Plans for checking hadronic energy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.
Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
CSC Note Jet 8 Meeting – April 11 '07 Status and plan for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Particle Identification in the NA48 Experiment Using Neural Networks L. Litov University of Sofia.
Daniele Benedetti CMS and University of Perugia Chicago 07/02/2004 High Level Trigger for the ttH channel in fully hadronic decay at LHC with the CMS detector.
1 N. Davidson E/p minimum bias update with Athena Analysis Meeting 12 th June 2007.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.
Analysis Meeting – April 17 '07 Status and plan update for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson.
Energy Flow Studies Steve Kuhlmann Argonne National Laboratory for Steve Magill, U.S. LC Calorimeter Group.
1 N. Davidson Calibration with low energy single pions Tau Working Group Meeting 23 rd July 2007.
My work PAST WORKS: 1) (Madrid) Data Analysis in L3, LEP: - Measurement of the Mass, Width and Cross Section of the W boson production at LEP, Study.
Track Extrapolation/Shower Reconstruction in a Digital HCAL – ANL Approach Steve Magill ANL 1 st step - Track extrapolation thru Cal – substitute for Cal.
Energy Flow Technique and *where I am Lily Have been looking at the technique developed by Mark Hodgkinson, Rob Duxfield of Sheffield. Here is a summary.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Jet Studies at CMS and ATLAS 1 Konstantinos Kousouris Fermilab Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions Wednesday, 18 March 2009 (on behalf of the CMS.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for electrons Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration of the.
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
CaloTopoCluster Based Energy Flow and the Local Hadron Calibration Mark Hodgkinson June 2009 Hadronic Calibration Workshop.
Positional and Angular Resolution of the CALICE Pre-Prototype ECAL Hakan Yilmaz.
Results from particle beam tests of the ATLAS liquid argon endcap calorimeters Beam test setup Signal reconstruction Response to electrons  Electromagnetic.
Interactions of hadrons in the SiW ECAL Towards paper Naomi van der Kolk.
PFAs – A Critical Look Where Does (my) SiD PFA go Wrong? S. R. Magill ANL ALCPG 10/04/07.
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
DIS Conference, Madison WI, 28 th April 2005Jeff Standage, York University Theoretical Motivations DIS Cross Sections and pQCD The Breit Frame Physics.
Software offline tutorial, CERN, Dec 7 th Electrons and photons in ATHENA Frédéric DERUE – LPNHE Paris ATLAS offline software tutorial Detectors.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector Seminar talk by Eduardo Garcia-Valdecasas Tenreiro.
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
24/08/2009 LOMONOSOV09, MSU, Moscow 1 Study of jet transverse structure with CMS experiment at 10 TeV Natalia Ilina (ITEP, Moscow) for the CMS collaboration.
David Berge – CAT Physics Meeting – 9 May Summary Hadronic Calibration Workshop 3 day workshop 14 to 16 March 2008 in Tucson, Arizona
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for hadrons and jets Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration.
7/13/2005The 8th ACFA Daegu, Korea 1 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP), M-C.Chang(Tohoku), K.Fujii (KEK), T.Fujikawa (Tohoku), A.Miyamoto (KEK), S.Yamashita.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
First Measurement of Jets and Missing Transverse Energy with the ATLAS Calorimeter at and David W. Miller on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 13 May 2010.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
V. Pozdnyakov Direct photon and photon-jet measurement capability of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC Valery Pozdnyakov (JINR, Dubna) on behalf of the HI.
Krisztian PetersPrecision Calibration of the DØ HCAL in Run II1 Krisztian Peters University of Manchester For the DØ Calorimeter Algorithm Group June.
DE/dx in ATLAS TILECAL Els Koffeman Atlas/Nikhef Sources: PDG DRDC (1995) report RD34 collaboration CERN-PPE
1 Dead material correction status. Alexei Maslennikov, Guennadi Pospelov. Bratislava/Kosice/MPI Calorimeter Meeting. 8-December Problems with DM.
Jet Energy and Resolution at the Tevatron Andrew Mehta YETI meeting, 7/1/2008.
XLIX International Winter Meeting on Nuclear Physics January 2011 Bormio, Italy G. Cattani, on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of.
1 Jet Reconstruction and Energy Scale Determination in ATLAS Ariel Schwartzman 3 rd Top Workshop: from the Tevatron to ATLAS Grenoble, 23-Oct-2008.
Lecture 18 - Detectors Detector systems
Jet Energy Scale and Calibration Framework
Introduction to hands-on Exercise
Predrag Krstonosic - ILC Valencia
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
CALICE scintillator HCAL
Interactions of hadrons in the Si-W ECAL
Charged Current Cross Sections with polarised lepton beam at ZEUS
Missing Transverse Energy Calibration in W/Z(+jets) Events
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
by M. Della Negra, P. Jenni, and T. S. Virdee
Event Shape Analysis in minimum bias pp collisions in ALICE.
Missing Energy and Tau-Lepton Reconstruction in ATLAS
Searches at LHC for Physics Beyond the Standard Model
Detector Optimization using Particle Flow Algorithm
Reports for highly granular hadron calorimeter using software compensation techniques Bing Liu SJTU February 25, 2019.
Michele Faucci Giannelli
Charged Current Cross Sections with polarised lepton beam at ZEUS
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Installation, Commissioning and Startup of ATLAS & CMS Experiments
Sheraton Waikiki Hotel
Presentation transcript:

Plans for checking hadronic energy depositions in the ATLAS calorimeters N. Davidson (The University of Melbourne) On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Abstract The first data from the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is due to be collected later this year. This first phase will play a vital role in understanding the detector and its response, in-situ. Jet reconstruction is important for identifying new physics as well as making precision measurements of standard model physics. The fine granularity of the ATLAS calorimeters can be used to gain information about a jet's shape and the classification of energy deposits, which allows a better estimate of the jet energy to be made and in particular correction for the non-compensating nature of the calorimeter using so-called calibration weights. The classification algorithm and weights are presently calculated using simulation. In this poster we describe an important step in the validation of ATLAS's jet calibration using charged tracks reconstructed in the inner detector and their inter-calibration with the clusters reconstructed in the calorimeters. Selecting isolated pions in minimum bias events Minimum bias events are inelastic proton collisions which generally produce only soft or low pT particles. As most events at the LHC will be of this nature, the collection of statistics is only limited by the rate of the trigger and data acquisition system. Minimum bias event have been allocated 10Hz3. The feasibility of using minimum bias events as a source of tracks for E/p measurements was studied4. Monte-Carlo equivalent to approx. 1 week of data at a luminosity of L=1032cm-2s-1 were used to check the sensitivity of the method, since data was not available. Isolated hadrons were identified by the following criteria: Track were isolated from other tracks Track were required to have larger momentum than other tracks in the event The pion shower was isolated in the hadronic calorimeter Transverse momentum reach of tracks in minimum bias (solid curve) scaled to 1μb-1. Good quality tracks were selected (dashed curve) with a fit of χ2/ndof < 1.5 ,no more than 1 missing hit and a hit in the first layer of the Inner detector. This removed fake tracks and pions with strong interactions in the Inner Detectors. E/p method The ATLAS track momentum scale and resolution should be known to within much less than 1%1,2 at energies below approximately 100 GeV allowing an inter-calibration between the inner tracker and calorimeters in-situ. E/p distributions of isolated charged hadrons will be compared to the Monte-Carlo used to derive the hadronic calibration in ATLAS. This will allow validation of, for example, the hadronic shower simulation. Background The energy deposited by selected hadrons was contaminated by energy from neutral particles accompanying the selected charged hadron. A data-driven background estimate procedure was employed: Hadrons were classified as either early showering or late showering based on the energy deposition in the hadronic calorimeter compared to the electromagnetic calorimeter (in the green core region). The contaminating energy was measured in the electromagnetic calorimeter (blue) region for late shower pions. The contaminating energy distribution was unfolded from the distribution for all pions (late and early showering) Calorimeters Energy (E) is taken as the sum of cells or clusters within a cone volume centred around the track position when extrapolated to the calorimeter. Inner Detector Momentum (p) is taken from track of charged hadron Range: |η|< 2.5 pT=0.8-1.2 GeV pT=1.6-2.4 GeV pT=4-6 GeV E/p distributions for selected pions in minimum bias Monte-Carlo (black solid curve), all tracks in minimum bias Monte-Carlo (black dashed curve) and isolated pions without background (red dashed curve). All samples were weighted to have the same distribution in η. Results All values of the mean E/p were found to be statistically consistent with the isolated pion sample without background. Systematic effects were studied such as hadron species (pion, kaon or proton) and the limitations of the background estimation technique. The estimated systematic effects were statistically dominated, but always below 10% Early Showering hadrons There was overlap between hadron showers and showers of other particles Late showering hadrons There was little overlap between hadron Showers and showers of other particles pT=0.8-1.2 GeV pT=1.6-2.4 GeV pT=4-6 GeV Hadron shower Had. Cal. EM Cal. Hadron shower Had. Cal. core cone The final E/p distribution obtained for pions from minimum bias Monte-Carlo (black solid curve) and isolated pions without background (red dashed curve) . The energy was calculated as the sum of topologically clustered cells, calibrated to the hadronic energy scale. The E/p here is below 1 because energy is lost in cells outside the cluster, and these looses are significant at these low energies. Showers from other particles Region where background was measured Showers from other particles EM Cal. 1. ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS Performance and Physics Technical Design Report, ATLAS TDR 15, CERN/LHCC/99-15 (25 May 1999). 2. ATLAS Collaboration, “Tracking” in Expected Performance of the ATLAS Experiment: Detector, Trigger and Physics, CERN (2008) 2. ATLAS Collaboration, “Trigger” in Expected Performance of the ATLAS Experiment: Detector, Trigger and Physics, CERN (2008) 3. ATLAS Collaboration, “Jets and Missing Transverse Energy ” in Expected Performance of the ATLAS Experiment: Detector, Trigger and Physics, CERN (2008)