Simplified Cost Options

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Towards a National Quality Assurance Framework: the UN Statistical Commission Initiative CCSA Conference on Data Quality for International Organizations.
Advertisements

Financial Instruments under the European Structural and Investment (ESI) Funds MS expert meeting 17 June 2013.
Expert group on delegated and implementing acts of 3 October 2013 Models of Joint Action Plans (Art 95 CPR) 2 nd meeting.
1 Flat-rates for indirect costs Ex-ante assessment by DG Employment, Social affairs and Equal Opportunities and DG Regional Policy Myrto Zorbala- DG Regional.
European Union Cohesion Policy
Fiche No 11 – Delegated act on general rules on eligibility of expenditure for cooperation programmes 2 nd Expert Group Meeting, 4 July 2013.
Public Procurement ESF ECA DAS 2011 Case studies
© Shutterstock - olly Joint Action Plan: Towards a management more focused on results Annual meeting with the Managing Authorities of the European territorial.
© Shutterstock - olly Delegated Acts ESF Art 14.1 Expert Group on delegated and implementing acts 3 October 2013.
© Shutterstock - olly Simplification Cost Options Expert Group on delegated and implementing acts 3 July 2013.
Management and control systems Franck Sébert, DG Regional and Urban Policy, Head of Unit C1 SEVENTEENTH MEETING OF THE EXPERT GROUP ON.
European Commission Enterprise and Industry # European Standardisation: Proposal for a Regulation Presentation to IMCO – 5 October 2011 European Commission.
Research and Innovation Summary of MS questions on the Commission's proposal for DG Research & Innovation Research and Innovation Rules for Participation.
1 Making legislation work better for citizens and business The IMI NETWORK Bucharest, 23 rd June 2008 Presentation.
Funding Schemes. Legal and Financial Rules in the 7th Framework Programme PHOENIX Training Laulasmaa, 1 Sept 2007.
© Shutterstock - olly Simplification Cost Options Current use and perspectives June 2014.
Seminar on community-led local development Keeping it simple Brussels, 6 February
ESIF Business Process and Simplification Nic Suggit Department of Communities and Local Government 24 April 2014.
1 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Draft information note on the Annual.
Harmonised Implementation Tools - HIT Towards simplification and streamlining of programme implementation 23 October 2013 | Stockholm.
30 th meeting of the Expert Group on DA and IA for the ESI Funds Fiche No 37 based on Fiche No 21 Article 14(1) ESF Reg. Brussels, 18 May 2015.
1 Progress and Crisis ( and ) Closure & Reporting ( ) Systems and Simplification ( and post 2013) Monitoring & Evaluation.
1 Eligibility: Simplified costs Lump sums grants Mathieu LEFEBVRE, Laurent SENS, ESF Coordination Unit DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.
VAPRO Bucuresti 30 Octombrie 2009 Theo Seip Contact Romania: Irina Zugravu
Simplified Cost Options. Organizational structure National Development Agency Internal Audit Cabinet Legal Affairs Communication HR Vice-president for.
1 Progress and Crisis ( and ) Closure & Reporting ( ) Systems and Simplification ( and post 2013) Monitoring & Evaluation.
Outlook on effective management of EU structural funds from to Vilnius.
Louis Vervloet, General director, ESF Agency Flanders
1 Management verifications Examples of good practice José FERREIRA DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities European Union Cohesion Policy.
1 The simplified cost options: Flat rate for indirect costs, standard scale of unit costs and lump sums OPEN DAYS Workshop 06D06 – Simplification of Cohesion.
Joint Action Plans (Art CPR). …did we propose this new instrument? To focus more on outputs and results …do we believe it will work? Because focus.
Projects spanning over two programming periods Department for Programme and Project Preparation Beatrix Horváth, Deputy Head of Department Budapest, 5.
Delegated act: use of flat rates for indirect costs in other Union policies 1.
Joint Action Plans (Art CPR). 2 Purpose of the presentation Present the “Joint Action Plan”, a potential approach on a management more focused on.
Major projects and revenue generating operations 11 th meeting of the Expert Group on Delegated and Implementing Acts for the ESI Funds 25 June
Regional Policy FRAUD RISK ASSESSMENT AND ANTI-FRAUD MEASURES Article c) CPR ESIF Mr Leif HÖGNÄS, Fraud Prevention Officer DG Regional.
32 nd meeting of the Expert Group on DA and IA for the ESI Funds Fiche No 37B Article 14(1) ESF Reg. Brussels, 15 January 2016.
Simplified Cost Options Impatto della semplificazione sulle attività dei controlli Francisco MERCHÁN CANTOS Direttore Audit DG EMPL Firenze, 21 novembre.
© Shutterstock - olly Simplified Costs Options (SCOs) The audit point of view.
© Shutterstock - olly Simplified Costs Options (SCOs)
Interreg annual meeting 2016 Brussels | 6 June 2016 Simplified cost options in Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Luca Ferrarese | Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Joint Secretariat.
Best practices related to procurement within a project (for part of the expenditure) implemented by the beneficiary itself (art. 67, par. 4 of Regulation.
Joint Action Plans (Art CPR). 2 Purpose of the presentation Present the “Joint Action Plan”, a potential approach on a management more focused on.
Simplified Cost Options: DG EMPL audit approach
Experiences from programming period Simplified costs
Content of the presentation
Leader ECA audit findings and possible simplification
Proposed Organisation of Evaluation of the Romanian NSRF and Operational Programmes, Niall McCann, Technical Assistance Project for Programming,
Background Legal basis of the TA financing decision: Article 45 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions.
The simplified cost options: Flat rate for indirect costs, standard scale of unit costs and lump sums Mark SCHELFHOUT& Laurent SENS DG Employment, Social.
Simplification in ESI funds for
Mid-Term Review Package on the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF)
Activation of young people in the Podkarpacie region
ESF Technical Working Group Brussels, 10 October 2016
Thomas Bender Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities DG
ESF Technical Working Group Tallinn, 28 November 2017
Use of SCOs in the ESI funds: Survey of OPs 2017
ESF Technical Working Group Brussels, 5 October 2017
ESF Informal Technical Working Group
Simplified Cost Options in the Netherlands
Draft note on Joint Action Plans
Financial Instruments under the ESF State of Play & Implementation
Progress of the negotiations on the CPR and ESF regulations
COCOF 09/0025/00-EN The simplified cost options: Flat rate for indirect costs, standard scale of unit costs and lump sums Laurent SENS ESF coordination.
ESF INFORMAL TWG Prague, 2-3 April 2009 Lump sums grants
Model of Joint Action Plans
ESF launch Conference 6-7 February 2014
DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion
Simplified costs Interreg V-A Romania-Bulgaria Programme.
EURLs DIRECTORS MEETING
Presentation transcript:

Simplified Cost Options Elsa Kmiecik, DG Employment, ESF coordination unit Elsa.Kmiecik@ec.europa.eu

Training on SCO-JAP 9-10/12 Second session "beginner level" (repetition of last October training session) Low level of registration: Problem of mailing? Problem of date? Not all stakeholders informed? Format not interesting? (need more advanced level, prefer seminars in MS …??) What should we do next?

EGESIF Guidance on SCOs Translation calendar: All COCOF languages delivered on 16/01 CS, ET, HR, MT and SK delivered on 30/01 Are there volunteers to provide support for the linguistic revision of the guidance?

Draft guidance on 14(1) ESF Only feedback received from 2 MS, what about the others? Please provide quickly your remarks (objective: ISC launched before Christmas)

Lessons learnt from already received applications for 14(1) ESF 4 applications received, 3 still ongoing Tool is not yet known by stakeholders despite high potential of application and simplification

Lessons learnt from already received applications for 14(1) ESF DON'T: Use something else than a fair, equitable and verifiable calculation method Forget to provide underlying justification for the figures used Be too "creative" when working with statistics Be vague

Lessons learnt from already received applications for 14(1) ESF AVOID: Sending your application only in your official language Designing a risky system Designing a system based on a formula and not a set value

Lessons learnt from already received applications for 14(1) ESF DO: Provide us with a translation in EN, even if "unofficial" Talk to us as soon as you start thinking about a 14(1) ESF application Use solid data source for your calculation

14(1) ESF assessment stages Preliminary assessment (internal) In-depth assessment (with external analysis of underlying data when there is no conflict of interest) Only when a proposal is deemed acceptable, the delegated act procedure can start

What's the point of 14(1) ESF? Approval from the Commission Possibility to benefit from SCOs even when not possible in the national legislation (SCO between COM and MA) Possibility to apply SCOs to publicly procured operations Audit scope even reduced compared to the "classical" SCOs

What are the different ways to use a standard scales of unit scale / lump sum approved by the delegated act? Expliquer que cela sera vu tout au long de la journée et qu'à la fin de la journée ils devraient en être convaincus. Faire un retour sur ce slide en fin de journée?

Reminder: "Classical" SCO (67 CPR)   SSUC (Article 67 CPR)  Commission  Managing authority EUR 700 x 50 students completing the training = EUR 35.000  Beneficiary Expliquer que cela sera vu tout au long de la journée et qu'à la fin de la journée ils devraient en être convaincus. Faire un retour sur ce slide en fin de journée?

Option1: operation applying only Article 14(1) ESF to define its eligible expenditure   SSUC Article 14(1) ESF Commission  Managing authority Delegated act : EUR 700 / student completing the training EUR 700 x 50 students completing the training = EUR 35.000  Beneficiary Option 1: 14.1 is applied to the beneficiary Option 2: real costs are applied to the beneficiary Option 3: another SCO system is applied EUR 36.000 Lump sum of EUR 35.500 if at least 45 students complete the training = EUR 35.500 Expliquer que cela sera vu tout au long de la journée et qu'à la fin de la journée ils devraient en être convaincus. Faire un retour sur ce slide en fin de journée?

SSUC agreed in the framework of Option2: operation combining a SSUC or LS agreed in the framework of Article 14(1) ESF to other SCOs and real costs to define its eligible expenditure Methodology to cover the different types of costs of one operation : SSUC agreed in the framework of Article 14(1) ESF Real costs Article 67(1) (a) CPR Flat rate financing Article 68(1) (b) CPR Expenditure of one operation = Delegated act : Staff costs = EUR 10/hour Direct costs other than staff costs Indirect costs 15% x direct staff costs Commission  Managing authority EUR 10 x 120 hours = EUR 1.200 EUR 800 15% x EUR 1.200 = EUR 180  Beneficiary Expliquer que cela sera vu tout au long de la journée et qu'à la fin de la journée ils devraient en être convaincus. Faire un retour sur ce slide en fin de journée?

Option3: operation using a formula approved within 14(1) ESF Example: 𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐥𝐲 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐟𝐟 𝐜𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐬= 𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐱 𝟏.𝟐 (𝐟𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐧 𝐰𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐜𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐬) 𝟏.𝟔𝟒𝟑 𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬 𝐱 𝐟𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬 (𝐢𝐟 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐯𝐚𝐧𝐭) Expliquer que cela sera vu tout au long de la journée et qu'à la fin de la journée ils devraient en être convaincus. Faire un retour sur ce slide en fin de journée? RISKY !!!!!!

Please provide asap: - your comments on 14(1) ESF - your wishes on SCOs/training - your willingness to help us on the linguistic revision of the EGESIF SCO guidance to elsa.kmiecik@ec.europa.eu Thank you ! Expliquer que cela sera vu tout au long de la journée et qu'à la fin de la journée ils devraient en être convaincus. Faire un retour sur ce slide en fin de journée?