Histone deacetylase 3 associates with and represses the transcription factor GATA-2 by Yukiyasu Ozawa, Masayuki Towatari, Shinobu Tsuzuki, Fumihiko Hayakawa,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fig. 7 Localization of the element(s) responsible for the transcriptional suppression by PPAR-γ. A, Rat VSMCs were transfected with either −1969/+104-luc,
Advertisements

Figure 1. DNMT3A interacts with the histone deiminase PADI4
Implications of somatic mutations in the AML1 gene in radiation-associated and therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia by Hironori.
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
by Toshibumi Shimokawa, and Chisei Ra
The Role of Transcription Factor PU
by Hong Hao, Huiling Qi, and Manohar Ratnam
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
A TPR Motif Cofactor Contributes to p300 Activity in the p53 Response
Large Hepatitis Delta Antigen Modulates Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling Cascades: Implication of Hepatitis Delta Virus–Induced Liver Fibrosis 
DHEA(S) and Allo activated transcription factors NF-κB and CREB in serum-deprived PC12 cells. DHEA(S) and Allo activated transcription factors NF-κB and.
by Chong-Shan Shi, Joseph Tuscano, and John H. Kehrl
FOG-1 represses GATA-1-dependent FcϵRI β-chain transcription: transcriptional mechanism of mast-cell-specific gene expression in mice by Keiko Maeda, Chiharu.
MafB negatively regulates RANKL-mediated osteoclast differentiation
Tax ubiquitylation and sumoylation control critical cytoplasmic and nuclear steps of NF-κB activation by Rihab Nasr, Estelle Chiari, Marwan El-Sabban,
by Katriina J. Peltola, Kirsi Paukku, Teija L. T
DOCK2 associates with CrkL and regulates Rac1 in human leukemia cell lines by Hiroshi Nishihara, Masae Maeda, Atsushi Oda, Masumi Tsuda, Hirofumi Sawa,
Phosphorylation of NF-κB p65 by PKA Stimulates Transcriptional Activity by Promoting a Novel Bivalent Interaction with the Coactivator CBP/p300  Haihong.
Lipopolysaccharide activation of the MEK-ERK1/2 pathway in human monocytic cells mediates tissue factor and tumor necrosis factor α expression by inducing.
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
IFN-γ Upregulates Expression of the Mouse Complement C1rA Gene in Keratinocytes via IFN-Regulatory Factor-1  Sung June Byun, Ik-Soo Jeon, Hyangkyu Lee,
The interferon regulatory factor ICSBP/IRF-8 in combination with PU
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Rose-Anne Romano, Barbara Birkaya, Satrajit Sinha 
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
NRF2 Is a Major Target of ARF in p53-Independent Tumor Suppression
Eun-Joo Kim, Jeong-Hoon Kho, Moo-Rim Kang, Soo-Jong Um  Molecular Cell 
Yongli Bai, Chun Yang, Kathrin Hu, Chris Elly, Yun-Cai Liu 
Volume 89, Issue 3, Pages (May 1997)
HDAC Activity Is Required for p65/RelA-Dependent Repression of PPARδ-Mediated Transactivation in Human Keratinocytes  Lene Aarenstrup, Esben Noerregaard.
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Ras Induces Mediator Complex Exchange on C/EBPβ
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
SYCE2 directly binds to the chromoshadow domain of HP1α.
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Yuming Wang, Jennifer A. Fairley, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Current Biology 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
A Dynamic Molecular Link between the Telomere Length Regulator TRF1 and the Chromosome End Protector TRF2  Benjamin R. Houghtaling, Leanora Cuttonaro,
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages (March 1999)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
SUMO-1 Modification Represses Sp3 Transcriptional Activation and Modulates Its Subnuclear Localization  Sarah Ross, Jennifer L Best, Leonard I Zon, Grace.
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (October 2000)
Hua Gao, Yue Sun, Yalan Wu, Bing Luan, Yaya Wang, Bin Qu, Gang Pei 
Volume 10, Issue 19, Pages (October 2000)
Livio Trusolino, Andrea Bertotti, Paolo M Comoglio  Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
Naoko Kanda, Shinichi Watanabe  Journal of Investigative Dermatology 
In Vitro Analysis of Huntingtin-Mediated Transcriptional Repression Reveals Multiple Transcription Factor Targets  Weiguo Zhai, Hyunkyung Jeong, Libin.
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
SARA, a FYVE Domain Protein that Recruits Smad2 to the TGFβ Receptor
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Mapping the Pirh2 and p73 interaction sites.
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
A Smad Transcriptional Corepressor
Volume 13, Issue 14, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 112, Issue 6, Pages (March 2003)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Gα12 and Gα13 Interact with Ser/Thr Protein Phosphatase Type 5 and Stimulate Its Phosphatase Activity  Yoshiaki Yamaguchi, Hironori Katoh, Kazutoshi Mori,
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

Histone deacetylase 3 associates with and represses the transcription factor GATA-2 by Yukiyasu Ozawa, Masayuki Towatari, Shinobu Tsuzuki, Fumihiko Hayakawa, Takahiro Maeda, Yasuhiko Miyata, Mitsune Tanimoto, and Hidehiko Saito Blood Volume 98(7):2116-2123 October 1, 2001 ©2001 by American Society of Hematology

GATA-2 interacts with HDAC3 in vivo GATA-2 interacts with HDAC3 in vivo.(A) Flag–GATA-2 (5 μg) was cotransfected with Myc-HDAC1 (5 μg) or Myc-HDAC3 (5 μg) into COS cells. GATA-2 interacts with HDAC3 in vivo.(A) Flag–GATA-2 (5 μg) was cotransfected with Myc-HDAC1 (5 μg) or Myc-HDAC3 (5 μg) into COS cells. Whole cell lysates were prepared and immunoprecipitated with anti–Flag M2 beads. Immunoprecipitates were subjected to immunoblot analysis with anti-Myc antibody (upper panel). The blot was reprobed with anti-Flag antibody to confirm that GATA-2 was successfully immunoprecipitated (lower panel). Input represents 5% of whole cell lysates used for each immunoprecipitation applied to confirm whether each HDAC or GATA-2 was highly expressed. (B) The same lysates described above were immunoprecipitated with anti-Myc antibody followed by immunoblot analysis with anti-Flag antibody (upper panel). Successful immunoprecipitation was confirmed by reprobing with anti-Myc antibody. Yukiyasu Ozawa et al. Blood 2001;98:2116-2123 ©2001 by American Society of Hematology

GATA-2 interacts with HDAC3 in vitro GATA-2 interacts with HDAC3 in vitro.(A) [35S]-methionine-labeled HDAC1 or HDAC3 translated in vitro was incubated with GST–GATA-2 fusion protein or GST protein alone and pulled down with GST-agarose beads. GATA-2 interacts with HDAC3 in vitro.(A) [35S]-methionine-labeled HDAC1 or HDAC3 translated in vitro was incubated with GST–GATA-2 fusion protein or GST protein alone and pulled down with GST-agarose beads. After 4 washes, the precipitates were dissolved by SDS-PAGE and visualized by autoradiography. Input represents 4% of in vitro–translated HDAC proteins used for the pull-down assay. (B) [35S]-labeled full-length HDAC3 was incubated with GST fusion proteins containing the various portions of GATA-2 as indicated in the upper panel. The precipitates were visualized by autoradiography following SDS-PAGE. Input represents 4% of in vitro–translated HDAC3 protein used for the pull-down assay. N-Zf indicates amino-terminal zinc finger; C-Zf, carboxyl-terminal zinc finger. (C) Various HDAC3 deletion constructs as indicated in the upper panel were produced by in vitro translation reaction and subjected to pull-down analysis by GST–GATA-2. Input represents 4% of each in vitro– translated HDAC3 protein used for the pull-down assay. (D) Various HDAC3 deletion constructs were transfected in COS cells. Whole cell lysates were extracted and subjected to pull-down by GST–GATA-2. After 4 washes the precipitates were subjected to immunoblot analysis with anti–X-press antibody. Inputs represent 5% of whole cell lysates used for each pull-down assay applied to confirm whether each HDAC3 was highly expressed. Yukiyasu Ozawa et al. Blood 2001;98:2116-2123 ©2001 by American Society of Hematology

GATA-2 interacts with HDAC3 in hematopoietic cells GATA-2 interacts with HDAC3 in hematopoietic cells.Nuclear extracts from KG-1 cells were immunoprecipitated with either preimmune rabbit serum or anti–GATA-2 antibody (H116). GATA-2 interacts with HDAC3 in hematopoietic cells.Nuclear extracts from KG-1 cells were immunoprecipitated with either preimmune rabbit serum or anti–GATA-2 antibody (H116). Immunoprecipitates were subjected to immunoblot analysis with anti-HDAC3 antibody. Yukiyasu Ozawa et al. Blood 2001;98:2116-2123 ©2001 by American Society of Hematology

HDAC3 does not alter DNA-binding activity of GATA-2 HDAC3 does not alter DNA-binding activity of GATA-2.Nuclear extracts from COS cells transfected with GATA-2 expression vector (Flag–GATA-2) in the presence or absence of HDAC3 expression vector (Myc-HDAC3) were used in EMSAs. A 32P-labeled double-stranded o... HDAC3 does not alter DNA-binding activity of GATA-2.Nuclear extracts from COS cells transfected with GATA-2 expression vector (Flag–GATA-2) in the presence or absence of HDAC3 expression vector (Myc-HDAC3) were used in EMSAs. A 32P-labeled double-stranded oligonucleotide containing a GATA consensus recognition site was used as a probe. The protein-DNA complex was revealed in lanes 2 and 4. Competitive experiments were performed using a 2000-fold excess of the unlabeled oligonucleotide (lane 3). Supershift experiments were performed by addition of α-Flag antibody, with the combination α-GATA-1 antibody serving as a control, as indicated. Specific GATA-2–DNA complexes and the supershifted complexes are indicated. The supershifted band by α-Flag antibody is denoted with an asterisk. Yukiyasu Ozawa et al. Blood 2001;98:2116-2123 ©2001 by American Society of Hematology

HDAC3 represses GATA-2–directed transcriptional activity HDAC3 represses GATA-2–directed transcriptional activity.(A) The 293T cells were transfected with a luciferase reporter containing GATA consensus motif (GATA-1/Luc, 0.5 μg), together with expression plasmid for human GATA-2 (Flag–GATA-2, 0.5 μg) and human H... HDAC3 represses GATA-2–directed transcriptional activity.(A) The 293T cells were transfected with a luciferase reporter containing GATA consensus motif (GATA-1/Luc, 0.5 μg), together with expression plasmid for human GATA-2 (Flag–GATA-2, 0.5 μg) and human HDAC1 and HDAC3, (pcDNA3.1-HDAC1 or pcDNA3.1-HDAC3, 0.2 μg or 0.5 μg, as indicated). Luciferase activity is standardized against β-galactosidase activity from cotransfected control vector (pCMV/β-gal). The relative luciferase activities presented reflect triplicate value from a representation of at least 3 independent experiments. (B) Experiments similar to those represented in panel A were conducted using a luciferase reporter containing 2 copies of back-to-back double GATA sites from the mouse CD34 promoter (CD34 × 2/Luc., 0.5 μg; solid bar) or its mutant in which GATA sites were disrupted (mutant CD34 × 2/Luc., 0.5 μg; open bar), together with GATA-2 (Flag–GATA-2, 0.5 μg) and human HDAC3, (pcDNA3.1-HDAC3, 0.2 μg or 0.5 μg, as indicated). Yukiyasu Ozawa et al. Blood 2001;98:2116-2123 ©2001 by American Society of Hematology

GATA-2 and HDAC3 colocalize in the nucleus GATA-2 and HDAC3 colocalize in the nucleus.KG-1 cells were cytospun onto glass slides and fixed in methanol and stained with anti–GATA-2 and anti-HDAC3 antibodies followed by FITC-conjugated and Alexa 568–conjugated secondary antibody. GATA-2 and HDAC3 colocalize in the nucleus.KG-1 cells were cytospun onto glass slides and fixed in methanol and stained with anti–GATA-2 and anti-HDAC3 antibodies followed by FITC-conjugated and Alexa 568–conjugated secondary antibody. Cells were analyzed by confocal microscopy. GATA-2 is immunostained in green and HDAC3 is immunostained in red. Yukiyasu Ozawa et al. Blood 2001;98:2116-2123 ©2001 by American Society of Hematology

GATA-2 interacts with HDAC5 in vivo and in vitro. (A) pcDNA3 GATA-2 interacts with HDAC5 in vivo and in vitro.(A) pcDNA3.1/His–GATA-2 (5 μg) was cotransfected with 5 μg of either Flag-HDAC4, Flag-HDAC5, or Flag-HDAC6 into COS cells. GATA-2 interacts with HDAC5 in vivo and in vitro.(A) pcDNA3.1/His–GATA-2 (5 μg) was cotransfected with 5 μg of either Flag-HDAC4, Flag-HDAC5, or Flag-HDAC6 into COS cells. Whole cell lysates were prepared and immunoprecipitated with anti–X-press antibody. Immunoprecipitates were subjected to immunoblot analysis with anti-Flag antibody (upper panel). The blot was reprobed with anti–X-press antibody to confirm that GATA-2 was successfully immunoprecipitated (lower panel). Input represents 5% of whole cell lysates used for each immunoprecipitation applied to confirm whether each class II HDAC was highly expressed. (B) GATA-2 interacts with HDAC3 and 5 in vitro. [35S]-methionine-labeled HDAC1, HDAC3, and HDAC5 translated in vitro were incubated with GST–GATA-2 fusion protein or GST protein alone and pulled down with GST-agarose beads. After 4 washes, the precipitates were dissolved by SDS-PAGE and visualized by autoradiography. Input represents 4% of in vitro–translated HDAC proteins used for the pull-down assay. Yukiyasu Ozawa et al. Blood 2001;98:2116-2123 ©2001 by American Society of Hematology