New Approach to Teammate Evaluation Rationale #7 Week 11

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

CATEGORY Exemplary (3 points) Proficient (2 points) Partially Proficient (1 point) Incomplete (0 points) POINTS Focus on the task and participation Consistently.

Advertisements

Measures of Central Tendency

Peer Evaluations. Attendance- Does the team member attend group meetings? Is advance warning of non-attendance given? Is the member late to meetings?

Information Architecture Week 15. Information Architecture CALENDAR.

Test 1 & 2 information Econ 130 Spring Information about Test 1 Number of students taking test: 41 Points possible: 50 Highest score: 47 (2 students)

Team Leader Training How to manage a team or be on a team (and survive) 540f07tltrain5sep6 1.

Mean, Median, Mode, Range, Outlier

Frequency Table Frequency tables are an efficient method of displaying data The number of cases for each observed score are listed Scores that have 0 cases.

Redesign of Beginning and Intermediate Algebra using ALEKS Lessons Learned Cheryl J. McAllister Laurie W. Overmann Southeast Missouri State University.

MHR 423 Creating the Business Plan Spring 2006 Dr. Stan Abraham MHR Dept.

Math Converting Mixed Numbers to Improper Fractions Multiplying Fractions & Mixed Numbers.

September 15, 16, 17, 22, and 23,  Evaluation of Student Learning in the University Studies Program as a Whole  Evaluation of Student Learning.

WEEK25 PHYSICAL SCIENCE VOCABULARY. 1) DATA Information collected through observation and scientific research.

Competency Assessment Advisory Team (CAAT) QUANTITATIVE REASONING DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS REP – ROB NICHOLS 1.

Creating a new sport. Introduction Student are to create a new sport on their own. They will be divided into two groups, and be assigned to make rules.

Rubric Assessment On the path to Common Writing Assessments.

Seminar 6. Agenda Housekeeping  Mid-term check-in  Saving documents Relative vs. Absolute Cell References Fill Handle Functions  Auto SUM  AVERAGE.

Welcome to Snap! Below the Line Decal Facilitated By: Zachary McPherson and Bao Xie.

Lesson 5.2 Adding and Subtracting Mixed Numbers 11/30/09.

CS 575 Spring 2012 Lecture Bapa Rao.

Understanding Credit Cards Learning about the little piece of plastic with a big responsibility Comparecards.com.

PRG 420 Week 4 Learning Team Quality Control Review To purchase this material click below link Week-4-Learning-Team-Quality-Control-Review.

SYL Friday Discussion (put your title here)

IST256 : Applications Programming for Information Systems

Facilitators Task Managers Resource Manager Task Manager

Review - Adding and Subtracting Fractions with Like Denominators

Adding Mixed Numbers.

Adding Fractions.

Questions on homework before you turn it in?

How the notebook works.

CHAPTER 2 Modeling Distributions of Data

Making a Line Plot Collect data and put in chronological order

Algebra 1 Notes: Lesson 2-1 Rational Numbers on the Number Line

Adding and Subtracting Mixed Numbers

New Approach to Teammate Evaluation Rationale #8 Week 9

Mean, Median, Mode and Range

Soccer Team A: Soccer Team B:

Making a Line Plot Collect data and put in chronological order

6.4 Adding and Subtracting Mixed Numbers

Peer Evaluation of Teammates

6.4 Adding and Subtracting Mixed Numbers

מדינת ישראל הוועדה לאנרגיה אטומית

Adding Mixed Fractions

Team Project Showcase Presentation: 15 to 20 minutes Peer evaluation

Course Overview meeting February 8, 2018

Engaging Students in Construction Safety Research

MEAN ABSOLUTE DEVIATION *MAD*.

homework assignment due Feb 23

Senior Professional Project CIS 432

What is today’s learning objective?

Learning 5x Table.

Making a Useful Resource

Add and Subtract Mixed Numbers

A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5TH EDITION Chapter 8

<<Project Name>>

GitHub A Tool for software collaboration James Skon

Bellringer 9 16.

Presentation and project

Experiencing the Model for Improvement

L6-5 Notes: Adding/Subtracting Mixed Numbers

Planning and Estimation

Welcome to PHYS101 Physics for the Masses

Unit 1 Statistics Mean, Median and Mode.

Series of Paragraphs.

Daily and Weekly Planning

ENROLLMENT STARTS SOON!

Your Project Title (It is YOUR project, not the team's project, not CAM2) Your Name Date.

Cultural contribution scholarship

Presentation transcript:

New Approach to Teammate Evaluation Rationale #7 Week 11

Teammate Review Issue … Average teammate review score from the past 3 semesters Spring 2016 96.2% Fall 2015 97.9% Spring 2015 97.0% Corollary: When you learn something new, mix it up with something old. Corollary: Tests should all be cumulative.

Teammate Review Issue … And the median teammate review score? Avg. Median Spring 2016 96.2% 99.0% Fall 2015 97.9% 99.0% Spring 2015 97.0% 99.0% So … team contributions don’t count! Corollary: When you learn something new, mix it up with something old. Corollary: Tests should all be cumulative.

Ideas for new rubric More quantitative data Automatically collected data

New rubric Question Score Range How many times was this person late to meetings? (9~10) 0 to 5 (0~1) How many times did this person not show up? (9~10) 0 to 5 (0~1) How much did this person offer to do on this project? (20%-0%) 0 to 5 (100%-80%) What fraction of the work assigned to this person did (s)he do? (20%-0%) 0 to 5 (100%-80%) Did this person do assigned work on time? (never) 0 to 5 (always) How much initiative did this person take on this project? (total deadbeat) 0 to 5 (a whole lot) Did this person try to avoid doing any task that was necessary for completing the project? (absolutely) 0 to 5 (not at all) How many of the useful ideas for the project did this person provide? (Note: Contribution of all team members should not add up to more than 100%) (20%-0%) 0 to 5 (100%-80%)

New rubric, cont. Question Score Range What fraction of the coding did this person do compared for the project? (Note: Contribution of all team members should not add up to more than 100%) (20%-0%) 0 to 5 (100%-80%) What fraction of the documentation did this person write? (Note: Contribution of all team members should not add up to more than 100%) (20%-0%) 0 to 5 (100%-80%) How important is this person to the team? (redundant) 0 to 5 (indispensable)

What difference did it make? And the median teammate review score? Avg. Median Fall 2016 87.7% 89.0% Spring 2016 96.2% 99.0% Fall 2015 97.9% 99.0% Spring 2015 97.0% 99.0%

Github metrics We will look at Github metrics in assigning teammate review scores. We are not sure of the formula yet, and we will solicit advice on which metrics should be considered and why.