Modeling Service When Transport is restricted to Load-Driven

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Facility Location Decisions
Advertisements

WAREHOUSING MANAGEMENT
WAREHOUSING MANAGEMENT
Chapter 3 Network Planning.
Spring 02 Vande Vate 1 1 Modeling Service When Transport is restricted to Load-Driven Pool Points in Retail Distribution John Vande Vate Spring.
Logistic Management Warehousing
Vehicle Routing & Scheduling: Part 1
Vehicle Routing & Scheduling
INVENTORY AND WAREHOUSING PL201 FUNDAMENTAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT
Network Models II Shortest Path Cross Docking Enhance Modeling Skills Modeling with AMPL Spring 03 Vande Vate.
1 1 Summary of First Section: Deterministic Analysis John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2007.
1 1 Transportation & Supply Chain Costs John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2001.
1 1 1-to-Many Distribution Vehicle Routing John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2005.
1 1 Project #1 Optimization Model John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2001.
1 1 Revenue Management Dealing with Uncertainty John H. Vande Vate Spring 2006.
1 1 Managing Uncertainty with Inventory I John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2007.
1 1 Practice Final John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.
Inventory Management and Risk Pooling (1)
Performance Mean 65. Solutions to Exam 2 zWe have a single commodity in warehouses around the country and wish to ship it to our customers at minimum.
1 1 Location Problems John H. Vande Vate Spring 2006.
1 1 ISyE 6203 Modeling Multi-DC version of Pooling John H. Vande Vate Spring 2012.
1 1 Solutions to Exam #1 John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.
1 1 Exam I John H. Vande Vate Spring, Question 1 … centers to minimize its total transportation costs from its 2 plants to its 5 markets. We.
1 1 Modeling Flows John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2006.
Logistics Management LSM 730 Lecture 8 Dr. Khurrum S. Mughal.
1 1 Modeling Inventory (Deterministic View) John H. Vande Vate Spring 2007.
1 1 1-to-Many Distribution Vehicle Routing Part 2 John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2005.
Log Truck Scheduling Problem
Inventory and Models in Project 3 Load Driven Systems John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2001.
1 1 Review of Exam 1 John H. Vande Vate Fall 2009.
1 1 Review of Part I Preparation for Exam John H. Vande Vate Fall 2009.
Spring 02 Vande Vate 1 1 Modeling Service When Transport is restricted to Load-Driven Pool Points in Retail Distribution John Vande Vate Spring.
1 1 Exam 1 John H. Vande Vate Spring, Process 80+ exams to grade Certainly errors, misunderstanding, … Happy to re-grade BUT –Only respond to.
1 1 Practice Final John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2005.
1 1 Wrap Up John H. Vande Vate Spring, Review of Topics Variability Basics –The big idea Forecasting –The 5 Laws of Forecasting –Actual/Forecast.
1 1 Milk Runs and Variability John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.
Transportation and Distribution Planning Matthew J. Liberatore John F. Connelly Chair in Management Professor, Decision and Information Techologies.
1 1 1-to-Many Distribution with Transshipments John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2001.
1 1 Vehicle Routing Part 2 John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.
1 1 Practice Exam #1 John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.
Inventory Management Definition: STOCK:
Structuring a DC Network Ken Homa. Manufacturing Plants Distribution Centers Intermediaries End Users Customers.
1 1 Modeling Inventory (Deterministic View) John H. Vande Vate Spring 2008.
1 1 Frequency: Inventory vs Transportation John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2007.
Homework 1- Gateway.
Modeling Flows and Information
Managing Uncertainty with Inventory I
Distribution Strategies
John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2005
Frequency John H. Vande Vate Fall,
John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2001
What is Activity Profiling?
Many-to-Many Models Multicommodity Flows
Transportation Management
Location Case Study Shanghai GM Service Parts Part II
Exam 1 Review/Instructions
Sales Order Process.
Transportation & Supply Chain Costs: Answers to Questions
Location Problems John H. Vande Vate Fall,
John H. Vande Vate Spring 2005
Best Practices Consortium
A Computerized Planning Genius Reports & Functionality
Linear Programming Problem
Logistics Systems Analysis Mid-Term Review
Incorporating lot sizing into MRP
Project #1 Optimization Model
Last year’s Final John Vande Vate Fall, 2009.
Vehicle Routing John H. Vande Vate Fall,
Modeling Flows and Information
John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2005
Presentation transcript:

Modeling Service When Transport is restricted to Load-Driven Pool Points in Retail Distribution John Vande Vate Spring 2007 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 1

Retail Inventory Single “Product”, many SKUs Style Color Size Broad Offering attracts customers Depth in SKU avoids missed sales Stock enough in each SKU to cover replenishment time (OTD) 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 2

Service Requirement Keep OTD short Reduce depth without losing sales Increase breadth to attract more customers and expand market OTD requirements differ by store Manhattan, NY Manhattan, KS 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 3

What’s in OTD POS system records sale Transmitted to DC Orders batched for efficient picking Order picked Trailer filled (Load driven) Line Haul to Pool Point Delivery 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 4

Pool Points Asian Port Asian Factory Store US Port US DC Pool 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 5

Pools Influence Trailer Fill Line Haul Delivery The greater the volume to the pool the faster the trailer fills Line Haul Is determined by the distance from the DC to the Pool Delivery Messier 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 6

The Trade-offs Too Few Pools Too Many Pools High Delivery Costs More moving inventory Less waiting inventory Too Many Pools Low Delivery Costs Less moving inventory More waiting inventory 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 7

OTD Dissected POS system records sale Transmitted to DC Orders batched for efficient picking Order picked Trailer filled (Load driven) Line Haul Delivery Constant cost & time Cost & Time depend on Pool Assignment

Line Haul Time & Cost Depend on The Pool Assignment Which DC’s serve the Pool NY DC to Chicago Pool LA DC to Chicago Pool 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 9

Trailer Fill Time Depends on The Pool Assignments Which pool this store is assigned to What other stores are assigned to this pool Rate at which the Pool draws goods How the Pool is served The Rate at which the Pool draws goods from each DC 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 10

Drilling Down on Service Simple Model Cube only (trailers never reach weight limit) One DC only (don’t split volumes to Pool) Many DC’s Cube only Weight & Cube and Many DC’s Soft Constraints: Infeasible is not an acceptable answer 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 11

Toward a Simple Model Trailer Fill Time (for store) * Rate Trailer Fills = Cubic Capacity of the Trailer Rate Trailer Fills Translate annual demand at stores assigned to the pool into cubic feet per day Rate to pool is: sum{prd in PRODUCTS, s in STORES} CubicFt[prd]*(Demand[prd,s]/DaysPerYear)*Assign[s, pool] Reworded for clarity 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 12

= Cubic Capacity of the Trailer Make It Linear Trailer Fill Time * sum{prd in PRODUCTS, s in STORES} CubicFt[prd]*(Demand[prd,s]/DaysPerYear)*Assign[s, pool] = Cubic Capacity of the Trailer Trailer Fill Time * Assign What to do? Reworded for clarity 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 13

Can’t Know Trailer Fill Time Trailer Fill Time * Rate Trailer Fills = Cubic Capacity of the Trailer Max Time to Fill Trailer * Rate Trailer Fills ? Cubic Capacity of the Trailer  Why  Cubic Capacity of the Trailer? What does this accomplish? 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 14

What’s Wrong? Max Time to Fill Trailer to store * Rate Trailer Fills  Cubic Capacity of the Trailer Max Time to Fill Trailer* (sum{prd in PRODUCTS, s in STORES} CubicFt[prd]*(Demand[prd,s]/DaysPerYear)*Assign[s, pool])  Cubic Capacity of the Trailer What if the Store is not assigned to the Pool?! Max Time to Fill Trailer * Rate Trailer Fills  Cubic Capacity of the Trailer*Assign[store,pool]

>= Cubic Capacity of the Trailer*Assign[store, pool] Our Simple Model var Assign{STORES, POOLS} binary; Service Constraint for each store and pool: Max Time to Fill Trailer * sum{prd in PRODUCTS, s in STORES} CubicFt[prd]*(Demand[prd,s]/DaysPerYear)*Assign[s, pool] >= Cubic Capacity of the Trailer*Assign[store, pool] Reworded for clarity Max Time to Fill Trailer depends on the Store and the Pool: Store Service Requirement, e.g., 3 days Constant Order time, e.g., order processing, picking, etc. Line haul time from DC to Pool Delivery time from Pool to Store 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 16

Getting Practical There are scores of Pools and THOUSANDS of Stores That means hundreds of thousands of service constraints! Can we just impose them at the Pools? If the Pool is open… Ensure we get there in reasonable time (same time from there to all stores) May have to handle a few special stores separately 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 17

>= Cubic Capacity of the Trailer*Assign[store, pool] A Simpler Model var Assign{STORES, POOLS} binary; Service Constraint for each pool: Max Time to Fill Trailer * sum{prd in PRODUCTS, s in STORES} CubicFt[prd]*(Demand[prd,s]/DayPerYear)*Assign[s, pool] >= Cubic Capacity of the Trailer*Assign[store, pool] Moved var Open{POOLS} binary; Reworded for clarity Assign[store, pool] Open[pool] Max Time to Fill Trailer depends on the Store and the Pool: Store Service Requirement, e.g., 3 days Constant Order time, e.g., order processing, picking, etc. Line haul time from DC to Pool Delivery time from Pool to Store (depends on pool) 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 18

>= Cubic Capacity of the Trailer*Assign[store, pool] One DC Cube Only Model var Assign{STORES, POOLS} binary; Service Constraint for each pool: Max Time to Fill Trailer * sum{prd in PRODUCTS, s in STORES} CubicFt[prd]*(Demand[prd,s]/DaysPerYear)*Assign[s, pool] >= Cubic Capacity of the Trailer*Assign[store, pool] Moved var Open{POOLS} binary; Reworded for clarity Max Time to Fill Trailer depends on the Pool: Store Service Requirement, e.g., 3 days Constant Order time, e.g., order processing, picking, etc. Line haul time from DC to Pool Delivery time from Pool to Store (depends on pool) 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 19

>= Cubic Capacity of the Trailer*Open[pool] More than One DC Service Constraint for each pool: Max Time to Fill Trailer * sum{prd in PRODUCTS, s in STORES} CubicFt[prd]*(Demand[prd,s]/DaysPerYear)*Assign[s, pool] >= Cubic Capacity of the Trailer*Open[pool] What’s wrong with this? Reworded for clarity 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 20

The Problem If the pool is served by several DC’s, trailers fill more slowly The “rate” from each DC is less than the total rate of demand at the pool. 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 21

How to Get the Rates How fast does the trailer for pool fill at dc? Not the rate of demand at the pool The rate of shipments from the dc to the pool Translate shipments Ship[*, dc, pool] 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 22

What’s Wrong Now Service Constraint for each dc and pool: Max Time to Fill Trailer * sum{prd in PRODUCTS, s in STORES} CubicFt[prd]*(Ship[prd, dc, pool]/DaysPerYear) >= Cubic Capacity of the Trailer*Open[pool] Corrected Reworded for clarity 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 23

The Problem Does the DC serve the Pool? Service Constraint for each dc and pool: Max Time to Fill Trailer * sum{prd in PRODUCTS, s in STORES} CubicFt[prd]*Ship[prd, dc, pool]/DaysPerYear >= Cubic Capacity of the Trailer*Open[pool] Does the DC serve the Pool? These constraints insist the service is good from EVERY dc to EVERY open pool. Corrected Reworded for clarity 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 24

Fixing the Problem var UseEdge{DCS, POOLS} binary; Service Constraint for each dc and pool: Max Time to Fill Trailer * sum{prd in PRODUCTS, s in STORES} CubicFt[prd]*Ship[prd, dc, pool] /DaysPerYear >= Cubic Capacity of the Trailer*UseEdge[dc, pool] Define UseEdge for each prd, dc and pool: Ship[prd, dc, pool] <= sum{s in STORES (that can be assigned to the pool)} Demand[prd,s]* UseEdge[dc, pool] Corrected Reworded for clarity 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 25

Several DCs Cube Only var UseEdge{DCS, POOLS} binary; Service Constraint for each dc and pool: Max Time to Fill Trailer * sum{prd in PRODUCTS, s in STORES} CubicFt[prd]*Ship[prd, dc, pool]/DaysPerYear >= Cubic Capacity of the Trailer*UseEdge[dc, pool] Define UseEdge for each prd, dc and pool: Ship[prd, dc, pool] <= sum{s in STORES (that can be assigned to the pool)} Demand[prd,s]* UseEdge[dc, pool] Corrected Reworded for clarity 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 26

Weight & Cube var UseEdge{DCS, POOLS} binary; Cube Service Constraint for each dc and pool: Max Time to Fill Trailer * sum{prd in PRODUCTS, s in STORES} CubicFt[prd]*Ship[prd, dc, pool]/DaysPerYear >= Cubic Capacity of the Trailer*UseEdge[dc, pool] Weight Service Constraint for each dc and pool: Weight[prd]*Ship[prd, dc, pool]/DaysPerYear >= Weight Limit of the Trailer*UseEdge[dc, pool] Corrected Reworded for clarity Corrected Reworded for clarity 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 27

What’s Wrong Now? var UseEdge{DCS, POOLS} binary; Cube Service Constraint for each dc and pool: Max Time to Fill Trailer * sum{prd in PRODUCTS, s in STORES} CubicFt[prd]*Ship[prd, dc, pool]/DaysPerYear >= Cubic Capacity of the Trailer*UseEdge[dc, pool] Weight Service Constraint for each dc and pool: Weight[prd]*Ship[prd, dc, pool]/DaysPerYear >= Weight Limit of the Trailer*UseEdge[dc, pool] Corrected Reworded for clarity Corrected Reworded for clarity 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 28

Weight AND Cube Trailer departs when Don’t have to fill BOTH Weight Limit is reached OR Cubic Capacity is reached Don’t have to fill BOTH 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 29

How to Fix It? The Cubic Capacity Constraint Applies If We use the edge from the dc to the pool: UseEdge[dc, pool] = 1 AND We Cube Out that trailer first: New Variable CubeOut[dc,pool] = 1 How to capture this? (UseEdge[dc,pool] + CubeOut[dc,pool] -1) 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 30

How to Fix It? The Weight Limit Constraint Applies If We use the edge from the dc to the pool: UseEdge[dc, pool] = 1 AND We DO NOT Cube Out that trailer first: CubeOut[dc,pool] = 0 How to capture this? (UseEdge[dc,pool] - CubeOut[dc,pool]) 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 31

A Full Model var UseEdge{DCS, POOLS} binary; var CubeOut{DCS, POOLS} binary; Cube Service Constraint for each dc and pool: Max Time to Fill Trailer * sum{prd in PRODUCTS, s in STORES} CubicFt[prd]*Ship[prd, dc, pool]/DaysPerYear >= Cubic Capacity of the Trailer*(UseEdge[dc, pool]+ CubeOut[dc,pool]-1) Weight Service Constraint for each dc and pool: Weight[prd]*Ship[prd, dc, pool]/DaysPerYear >= Weight Limit of the Trailer*(UseEdge[dc, pool]- CubeOut[dc,pool])

Added Detail The rest of the model var Assign{STORES, POOLS} binary; Meet Demand at each pool for each prd: Sum{dc in DCS}Ship[prd, dc, pool] >= Sum{s in STORES} Demand[prd,s]*Assign[s, pool] Define UseEdge for each prd, dc and pool: Ship[prd, dc, pool] <= sum{s in STORES (that can be assigned to the pool)} Demand[prd,s]* UseEdge[dc, pool] 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 33

Cube or Weight How do we know which constraint should apply? ….. >= Cubic Capacity of the Trailer*(UseEdge[dc, pool]+ CubeOut[dc,pool]-1) or …. >= Weight Limit of the Trailer*(UseEdge[dc, pool]- CubeOut[dc,pool])

What if it’s not feasible Infeasible is not a very helpful answer Want an answer that is “as close as possible” Sequential Optimization: Minimize Service Failures Minimize Cost subject to Best Achievable Service 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 35

Service Failures Can’t express them in terms of time Express them in terms of Capacity How much of the trailer is left unfilled at the end of the available time? 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 36

Unfilled Capacity Max Time to Fill Trailer * Rate Trailer Fills  Cubic Capacity of the Trailer*Binary Switch Scale this: Max Time to Fill Trailer * Rate Trailer Fills Cubic Capacity of Trailer  Binary Switch (0 or 1) - Service Failure (fraction of trailer unfilled)

Sequential Optimization First Objective: Minimize the sum of the Service Failures Could weight Service Failures Second Objective: Minimize Cost s.t. Service Failures <= Best Possible 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 38

The Whole Story var UseEdge{DCS, POOLS} binary; var CubeOut{DCS, POOLS} binary; var ServFail{POOLS} >= 0; Cube Service Constraint for each dc and pool: Max Time to Fill Trailer * sum{prd in PRODUCTS, s in STORES} CubicFt[prd]/DaysPerYear*Ship[prd, dc, pool] >= Cubic Capacity of the Trailer*(UseEdge[dc, pool]+ CubeOut[dc,pool]-1) - Cubic Capacity of the Trailer*ServFail[pool]; Weight Service Constraint for each dc and pool: Weight[prd]/DaysPerYear*Ship[prd, dc, pool] >= Weight Limit of the Trailer*(UseEdge[dc, pool]- CubeOut[dc,pool]) - Weight Limit of the Trailer*ServFail[pool]

Added Detail The rest of the model var Assign{STORES, POOLS} binary; Meet Demand at each pool for each prd: Sum{dc in DCS}Ship[prd, dc, pool] >= Sum{s in STORES} Demand[prd,s]*Assign[s, pool] Define UseEdge for each prd, dc and pool: Ship[prd, dc, pool] <= sum{s in STORES (that can be assigned to the pool)} Demand[prd,s]* UseEdge[dc, pool] 15.057 Spring 02 Vande Vate 40