Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cascina, January 25th, Coupling of the IMC length noise into the recombined ITF output Raffaele Flaminio EGO and CNRS/IN2P3 Summary - Recombined.
Advertisements

Cascina, January 24, 2005 Status of GEO600 Joshua Smith for the GEO600 team.
1 Virgo commissioning status M.Barsuglia LAL Orsay.
LIGO- G060XXX-00-R E2E meeting, September How to design feedback filters? E2E meeting September 27, 2006 Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech.
Virgo Control Noise Reduction
GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,
Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik Detector Characterization of GEO 600 during.
Joshua Smith December 2003 Detector Characterization of Dual-Recycled GEO600 Joshua Smith for the GEO600 team.
The GEO 600 Detector Andreas Freise for the GEO 600 Team Max-Planck-Institute for Gravitational Physics University of Hannover May 20, 2002.
Interferometer Control Matt Evans …talk mostly taken from…
Takanori Sekiguchi ALPS Report, Dec. 26th, 2013 Prototype Test of Type-B 1 Takanori Sekiguchi KAGRA F2F MEETING Feb
GEO‘s experience with Signal Recycling Harald Lück Perugia,
Virgo Commissioning update Gabriele Vajente for the Virgo Collaboration LSC/VIRGO Meeting – MIT 2007, July LIGO-G Z.
Amaldi conference, June Lock acquisition scheme for the Advanced LIGO optical configuration Amaldi conference June24, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech.
Summary of Suspension Configurations Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo March 18, 2015.
Status of VIRGO Francesco Fidecaro (after Lisa Barsotti) - University and INFN Pisa – on behalf of the VIRGO collaboration Aspen - January 19 th, 2005.
GEO600 Detector Status Harald Lück Max-Planck Institut für Gravitationsphysik Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik, Uni Hannover.
Displacement calibration techniques for the LIGO detectors Evan Goetz (University of Michigan)‏ for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration April 2008 APS meeting.
New iKAGRA Configuration Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo 11th KAGRA F2F (University of Tokyo) Feb 6, 2015.
Institute for Cosmic Ray Research Univ. of Tokyo Development of an RSE Interferometer Using the Third Harmonic Demodulation LIGO-G Z Osamu Miyakawa,
Caltech, February 12th1 Virgo central interferometer: commissioning and engineering runs Matteo Barsuglia Laboratoire de l’Accelerateur Lineaire, Orsay.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
1 Frequency Noise in Virgo by Matt Evans. 2 The Actors  Noise Sources  Input Mode Cleaner length noise  Sensing noise on IMC lock  Frequency Servo.
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016 Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo April 12, 2016JGW-T
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment Rainer Weiss, MIT On behalf of the proposing group Fermi Lab Proposal Review November 3, 2009.
IKAGRA 初期アラインメント手順 Initial Alignment Procedure for iKAGRA Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo July 5, 2016JGW-T
Main Interferometer Subsystem
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Apr 11-25, 2016 Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo May 9, 2016JGW-T
bKAGRA PSL Design Study
Peter Beyersdorf TAMA300 Results from the Stanford 10m all-reflective polarization Sagnac interferometer Peter Beyersdorf TAMA300.
Main Interferometer Subsystem
Daniel Sigg, Commissioning Meeting, 11/11/16
Main Interferometer Subsystem
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Apr 11-25, 2016
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
KAGRA Control Room Appearance (tentative)
Yoichi Aso on behalf of the LCGT ISC Group
Summary of the iKAGRA Run
Current Status of the 40m Detuned RSE Prototype
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
iKAGRA初期アラインメント手順 Initial Alignment Procedure for iKAGRA
40m Laboratory Upgrade Progress Report
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1 ( )
iKAGRA初期アラインメント手順 Initial Alignment Procedure for iKAGRA
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1 ( )
Summary of the iKAGRA Run
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1 ( )
iKAGRA初期アラインメント手順 Initial Alignment Procedure for iKAGRA
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
Status of KAGRA Yuta Michimura on behalf of the KAGRA Collaboration
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1
Status of KAGRA Yuta Michimura on behalf of the KAGRA Collaboration
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Beam Propagation for bKAGRA Phase 1 with flat ETMs
iKAGRA初期アラインメント手順 Initial Alignment Procedure for iKAGRA
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016
Intensity Stabilization Servo Plan
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1
Status at the Prague meeting
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
Presentation transcript:

Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016 JGW-T1605101 December 29, 2018 Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016 Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo

Quick Facts 3 km Michelson, mid-fringe lock input power to BS ~ 220 mW power at detection port (REFL) ~ 8 mW duration: Mar 25 9:00 JST - Mar 31 17:00 JST acquired data length: ??? hours duty cycle: ??? % longest lock: ??? hours (but typically ~ ??? minutes) strain sensitivity: ~3e-15 /rtHz @ 100 Hz (~1pc for NS-NS binary range)

Interferometer Configuration 3 km Michelson, mid-fringe lock, UGF ~8 Hz suspended mirrors DC alignment controlled with oplevs IMC round-trip length: 53.30253(5) m (klog #616) finesse: 540(70) (klog #618) mode matching ratio: 86.2 % (JGW-G1605019) (see klog # 991 for servo topology) ETMY PMC round-trip length: 0.4 m (IOO blog 20141209) finesse: 197 (IOO blog 20141209) mode matching ratio: 75 % (IOO blog 20150623) Michelson BS-ETMX length: 2991.6 m (designed) BS-ETMY length: 2988.3 m (designed) contrast: ~70 % at best (klog # 1169) beam radii at PR3 wx = 35.3(2) mm wy = 37.5(3) mm (klog # 907) MCe MCe loop ~30 Hz (cross over) 270 mW IFI transmissivity: 94 % (JGW-G1604999) PZT loop ~3 kHz 2 W NPRO PR2 MCi MCo Laser IFI ETMX BS PR3 RFM network temp loop ~300 mHz ETM loop ~8 Hz PZT loop ~30 kHz

Suspensions and Mirrors fused silica, room temperature MCi, MCo, MCe Type-C (double pendulum; x config magnets) 95.95 mm dia, 29.5 mm thick RoC = 37.33(9) m (klog #711) ETMY ETMX, ETMY (TAMA PRM) Type-C (double pendulum; + config magnets) (wire dia 100 um for X, 50 um for Y) 100 mm dia, 60 mm thick RoC = 9 km reflectivity: 50 % for X, 90 % for Y (probably) PR3 Type-Bp’ (double pendulum) φ 250 mm, 100 mm thick RoC = 24.92 m TM stage was fixed IM stage has 6 OSEMs MCe BS (CLIO BS) Type-C (double pendulum; x config magnets) 150 mm dia, 40 mm thick (no wedge) RoC = flat PR2 fixed 2-inch mirror RoC = -3.0 +/- 0.2 m PR2 MCi MCo Laser IFI ETMX BS PR3

Vacuum central part and both ends were at air (PR2-BS was not connected, but covered; klog #1078) EYA air pressure ETMY Yarm 68 Pa Oct 28: last fastening IMC 200 Pa (klog #1020) GVs close to IXA/IYA were closed MCe IYC+IYA 1.5 Pa Mar 19: pumping IFI-BS area air pressure EXA air pressure PR2 MCi MCo Laser IFI ETMX BS PR3 Xarm 1.6 Pa one year sealed off IXC+IXA 4.0 Pa Mar 19: pumping slide based on 160330_Alignment.ppt by Y. Saito

Calibration calibration of error signal (optical gain) 2.3e10 counts/m (klog #1169) calibration of feedback signal (actuator efficiency) 1.8e-14 m/counts @ 80 Hz (klog #1169) calibration lines at 80 Hz and 135 Hz to monitor loop gain roughly calibrated in strain K1:LSC-MICH_ERR_CAL_OUT_DQ rough calib Michelson differential displacement [m] error signal K1:LSC-REFL_PDA1_DC_OUT_DQ Michelson optical gain 2.3e10 counts/m feedback signal K1:LSC-MICH_OUT_DQ calibration lines (80 Hz, 135 Hz) Actuator (klog #1340) ETMX: 2.6e-10 m/counts at DC, f0=0.94 Hz, Q= 5.1 ETMY: 0.94e-10 m/counts at DC, f0=0.92 Hz, Q = 4.6 combined: 1.7e-10 m/counts at DC (sign was wrong) Filter zero at 7 Hz pole at 200,200 Hz DC gain 10 demodulated signal K1:LSC-LKIN_CAL1/2_B_REAL/IMAG_OUT_DQ (1 for 80 Hz, 2 for 135 Hz) demodulated signal K1:LSC-LKIN_CAL1/2_A_REAL/IMAG_OUT_DQ (1 for 80 Hz, 2 for 135 Hz)

Detector Characterization SOME PLOTS BY HAYAMA-SAN, SASAKI-KUN duty cycle (for Michelson and IMC) lock duration (for Michelson and IMC) Michelson drift vs tidal effect open loop gain drift

Issues in March Test Run Michelson lock was lost every ~30 minutes Alignment was adjusted manually ~ once per day Calibration was done offline PMC was re-locked manually GVs close to IXA/IYA was closed PR2-BS duct was not connected Some unsafe issues left unaddressed

What’s New in April Test Run Michelson lock was lost every ~30 minutes -> improved to ????(x16 ?) new actuation efficiency (ETM differential): 2.6e-9 m/C at DC Alignment was adjusted manually ~ once per day Calibration was done offline PMC was re-locked manually remote control restored GVs close to IXA/IYA was closed opened PR2-BS duct was not connected connected Some unsafe issues left unaddressed partially addressed (klog #1340) (klog #1351) (klog #1338)

Calibration for April Test Run (TO BE UPDATED) calibration of error signal (optical gain) ???? counts/m calibration of feedback signal (actuator efficiency) 2.6(1)e-10 m/counts @ 80 Hz (klog #1340) calibration lines at 80 Hz and 135 Hz to monitor loop gain roughly calibrated in strain K1:LSC-MICH_ERR_CAL_OUT_DQ rough calib Michelson differential displacement [m] error signal K1:LSC-REFL_PDA1_DC_OUT_DQ Michelson optical gain ???? counts/m feedback signal K1:LSC-MICH_OUT_DQ calibration lines (80 Hz, 135 Hz) Actuator (klog #1340) ETMX: 1.6e-9 m/counts at DC, f0=0.94 Hz, Q= 5.1 ETMY: 1.0e-9 m/counts at DC, f0=0.92 Hz, Q = 4.6 combined: 2.6e-9 m/counts at DC Filter zero at 7 Hz pole at 200,200 Hz DC gain 10 demodulated signal K1:LSC-LKIN_CAL1/2_B_REAL/IMAG_OUT_DQ (1 for 80 Hz, 2 for 135 Hz) demodulated signal K1:LSC-LKIN_CAL1/2_A_REAL/IMAG_OUT_DQ (1 for 80 Hz, 2 for 135 Hz)

What To Do After April Test Run evacuate center area and both ends to open all GVs to investigate alignment change during evacuation PR3 height check oplev stability, noise measurements with fixed mirror investigate scattering noise from vibration of ducts what else?