Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (May 2007)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Visual Control of Altitude in Flying Drosophila
Advertisements

Thomas Andrillon, Sid Kouider, Trevor Agus, Daniel Pressnitzer 
Timing and Specificity of Feed-Forward Inhibition within the LGN
State-Dependent Sensory Gating in Olfactory Cortex
The Molecular and Cellular Basis of Bitter Taste in Drosophila
A Multisensory Network for Olfactory Processing
The Molecular Basis of Odor Coding in the Drosophila Larva
Araceli Ramirez-Cardenas, Maria Moskaleva, Andreas Nieder 
Avoiding DEET through Insect Gustatory Receptors
Ji Dai, Daniel I. Brooks, David L. Sheinberg  Current Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Color Discrimination with Broadband Photoreceptors
Cortical Sensory Responses Are Enhanced by the Higher-Order Thalamus
Selective Attention in an Insect Visual Neuron
Starvation-Induced Depotentiation of Bitter Taste in Drosophila
Bennett Drew Ferris, Jonathan Green, Gaby Maimon  Current Biology 
Aleksander Sobczyk, Karel Svoboda  Neuron 
Vincent B. McGinty, Antonio Rangel, William T. Newsome  Neuron 
Differential Impact of Behavioral Relevance on Quantity Coding in Primate Frontal and Parietal Neurons  Pooja Viswanathan, Andreas Nieder  Current Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 24, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (March 2017)
A Role for the Superior Colliculus in Decision Criteria
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Visual Control of Altitude in Flying Drosophila
Saskia E.J. de Vries, Thomas R. Clandinin  Current Biology 
Rapid Innate Defensive Responses of Mice to Looming Visual Stimuli
Volume 18, Issue 15, Pages (August 2008)
Jianing Yu, David Ferster  Neuron 
Spike Timing-Dependent LTP/LTD Mediates Visual Experience-Dependent Plasticity in a Developing Retinotectal System  Yangling Mu, Mu-ming Poo  Neuron 
Single-Unit Responses Selective for Whole Faces in the Human Amygdala
Volume 17, Issue 18, Pages (September 2007)
Non-canonical Phototransduction Mediates Synchronization of the Drosophila melanogaster Circadian Clock and Retinal Light Responses  Maite Ogueta, Roger.
Katherine M. Armstrong, Jamie K. Fitzgerald, Tirin Moore  Neuron 
Heidi C. Meyer, David J. Bucci  Current Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
Uma R. Karmarkar, Dean V. Buonomano  Neuron 
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (May 2013)
Neuronal Response Gain Enhancement prior to Microsaccades
Plasticity of Burst Firing Induced by Synergistic Activation of Metabotropic Glutamate and Acetylcholine Receptors  Shannon J. Moore, Donald C. Cooper,
Abhishek Chatterjee, Shintaro Tanoue, Jerry H. Houl, Paul E. Hardin 
Ryan G. Natan, Winnie Rao, Maria N. Geffen  Cell Reports 
A Taste Receptor Required for the Caffeine Response In Vivo
The CRYPTOCHROME Photoreceptor Gates PDF Neuropeptide Signaling to Set Circadian Network Hierarchy in Drosophila  Luoying Zhang, Bridget C. Lear, Adam.
Optic flow induces spatial filtering in fruit flies
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 1996)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (May 2013)
Gilad A. Jacobson, Peter Rupprecht, Rainer W. Friedrich 
Drew Friedmann, Adam Hoagland, Shai Berlin, Ehud Y. Isacoff 
Clock and cycle Limit Starvation-Induced Sleep Loss in Drosophila
Bonnie Chu, Vincent Chui, Kevin Mann, Michael D. Gordon 
Tuning to Natural Stimulus Dynamics in Primary Auditory Cortex
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Bettina Schnell, Ivo G. Ros, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology 
Volume 22, Issue 19, Pages (October 2012)
Regulation of Response Properties and Operating Range of the AFD Thermosensory Neurons by cGMP Signaling  Sara M. Wasserman, Matthew Beverly, Harold W.
Kristy A. Sundberg, Jude F. Mitchell, John H. Reynolds  Neuron 
Humans Can Continuously Optimize Energetic Cost during Walking
John B Reppas, W.Martin Usrey, R.Clay Reid  Neuron 
Social Information Signaling by Neurons in Primate Striatum
Marie P. Suver, Akira Mamiya, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology 
Christoph Kayser, Nikos K. Logothetis, Stefano Panzeri  Current Biology 
Color Constancy for an Unseen Surface
Activation of Pheromone-Sensitive Neurons Is Mediated by Conformational Activation of Pheromone-Binding Protein  John D. Laughlin, Tal Soo Ha, David N.M.
Gaby Maimon, Andrew D. Straw, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology 
Volume 20, Issue 18, Pages (September 2010)
Shamik DasGupta, Scott Waddell  Current Biology 
A Temporal Channel for Information in Sparse Sensory Coding
Volume 15, Issue 24, Pages (December 2005)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages 905-908 (May 2007) Light Activation of an Innate Olfactory Avoidance Response in Drosophila  Greg S.B. Suh, Shlomo Ben-Tabou de Leon, Hiromu Tanimoto, André Fiala, Seymour Benzer, David J. Anderson  Current Biology  Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages 905-908 (May 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.04.046 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Electrophysiological Recordings from Single ab1 Sensilla of Flies Expressing ChR2 in CO2-Sensitive Neurons Flies were raised on food (see Supplemental Experimental Procedures for recipe) supplemented with (A, C, and D), or without (B) all-trans-retinal. (A) shows a representative trace illustrating spontaneous activity in the dark. The spikes of various sizes derive from four classes of ORNs in the ab1 sensillum: a, b, c, and d [10]. Representative spikes from ab1c neurons are indicated with red dots in (A)–(D′). The level of spontaneous spiking for ab1c neurons was 17 ± 3 spikes/s (see [E]). (B) shows that 470 nm light does not evoke responses in flies lacking all-trans-retinal. (C) shows response evoked by CO2 (∼2%). (D) shows that 470 nm light evokes spikes typical of ab1c neurons in the same fly as in (C). (D′) shows the expanded view of the boxed region in (D). (E) shows a summary of spiking responses in ab1c neurons. Spontaneous activity was subtracted from the activity in the three conditions presented. Three asterisks indicate a significant difference from light-retinal (p < 0.01) but not a significant difference from CO2. Current Biology 2007 17, 905-908DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.04.046) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Types of Electrophysiological Responses Observed in ab1c Neurons Expressing ChR2 (A and B) Raster plots summarizing the spiking frequency of ten individual ab1c neurons (upper traces) exposed either to CO2 (A) or to 470 nm light (B). Red dots in (B) indicate traces exhibiting fast-adapting responses (see also [E]). The lower traces show that the spiking of ab1a and ab1b neurons is enhanced neither by CO2 nor by blue light. Rather, they show some suppression of baseline spiking. (C–E) Peristimulus time histograms of spiking responses recorded before, during, and after stimulus onset, for CO2 (C) and blue-light (D and E) stimuli. The graphs were derived from the data in the raster plots and calculated as spikes per s in a moving window of 10 ms. The fast-adapting responses ([B], red dots) are plotted separately (E) against the same background trace as used in (D), for comparison purposes. (F) Quantification of types of spiking responses measured in ab1c neurons in response to CO2 or light (hν). Recordings of CO2 and light responses were made from 15 sensilla in four different flies raised in retinal-containing food, and nine sensilla in three control flies reared without retinal. In flies reared in food lacking retinal, in the few cases in which ab1c neurons exhibited responses to blue light (less than 10% of the sensilla tested), all of the responses were of the fast-adapting type (gray bars). Current Biology 2007 17, 905-908DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.04.046) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Blue-Light Activation of Gr21a+ Sensory Neurons Expressing ChR2 Elicits Avoidance in a T Maze (A–D) Apparatus used in T maze experiments. (A) shows the T maze with attached test tubes (t) and disconnected plexiglass-sleeve assembly (p) containing four aluminum plates (a) with attached diodes (d); (c) indicates water cooling tubing. An identical diode assembly is in place over the left test tube. (B) shows the T maze as in (A), with diodes illuminated (filled arrows). Lowercase labels within the panel are used as follows: i, water-cooling inflow; o, water-cooling outflow; c, water-cooling circulation between diodes; and e, entry-point for flies in T-maze. Dimensions of the T-maze are indicated in (C); diode assembly is in place on the right-hand tube and illuminated; the elevator is pushed down in the direction of the dashed arrow to deliver flies to the choice point (indicated by a long arrow). Dimensions of the plate-attached diode (d) are indicated in (D). The plate is normally held at the level of the choice point, behind the T maze, but is positioned above and in front for illustrative purposes. (E–G) Behavioral responses of flies expressing ChR2 in ab1c neurons. Error bars indicate the performance index (PI) of avoidance, calculated as the percentage of flies in the control arm subtracted by the percentage of flies in the test arm. “hν:+” represents choice tests with blue LEDs activated in one arm of the maze. The intensity of blue light at the choice point of the maze was ∼0.06 mW/mm2. “CO2” represents ∼1% CO2 in the test arm, without light (hν:−). (E) shows that flies expressing ChR2 in Gr21a+ neurons (Gr21a-Gal4;UAS-ChR2) avoid blue light (PI = 51.0), whereas control flies expressing either Gr21a-Gal4 alone or UAS-ChR2 alone (Gr21a-Gal4;+ or +;UAS-ChR2) do not. (F) shows that flies reared in food not supplemented with all-trans-retinal (“-retinal”) do not exhibit avoidance of blue light. (G) shows that blind norpA (no receptor potential A) mutant flies expressing ChR2 in Gr21a+ neurons (NorpA−;Gr21a-Gal4;UAS-ChR2) do avoid light (PI = 47.1), whereas norpA−;Or83b-Gal4;UAS-ChR2 flies do not. All control genotypes (Gr21a-Gal4;+, +;UAS-ChR2, Or83b-Gal4;+) raised in retinal-containing food, whether in the presence or absence of light, yielded PIs not statistically different from 0; some are omitted for clarity. Data represent the mean ± SEM of four independent experiments, each comprising three to four trials of 20–30 flies each. ∗∗∗p < 0.01 (ANOVA). Current Biology 2007 17, 905-908DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.04.046) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions