VIIRS Polar Winds Jeff Key, Jaime Daniels, Rico Allegrino, Wayne Bresky NOAA/NESDIS 608-263-2605, Jeff.Key@noaa.gov.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recent Advances in the Processing, Targeting and Data Assimilation Applications of Satellite-Derived Atmospheric Motion Vectors (AMVs) Howard Berger 1,
Advertisements

1 GOES-R Hurricane Intensity Estimation (HIE) Validation Tool Development Winds Application Team Tim Olander (CIMSS) Jaime Daniels (STAR)
Slide 1 October 2011 Verification for polar regions  Scores computed for polewards of 65°  NB proposed for CBS is polewards of 60°  Verification at.
Title: Applications of the AWG Cloud Height Algorithm (ACHA) Authors and AffiliationsAndrew Heidinger, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Steve Wanzong, UW/CIMSS Topics:
SNPP VIIRS green vegetation fraction products and application in numerical weather prediction Zhangyan Jiang 1,2, Weizhong Zheng 3,4, Junchang Ju 1,2,
Green Vegetation Fraction (GVF) derived from the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) sensor onboard the SNPP satellite Zhangyan Jiang 1,2,
Bureau of Meteorology GOES-9 AMVs Generation and Assimilation Bureau of Meteorology GOES-9 AMVs Generation and Assimilation.
A New Cloud Cover Layers Application Andrew Heidinger and Dan Lindsey NOAA/NESDIS Andi Walther, Steve Wanzong UW/CIMSS Steve Miller, YJ Noh, Curtis Seaman.
1 Validated Stage 1 Science Maturity Review for {JPSS Algorithm} Presented by Date.
1 GOES-R AWG Hydrology Algorithm Team: Rainfall Probability June 14, 2011 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
Assimilation of GOES Hourly and Meteosat winds in the NCEP Global Forecast System (GFS) Assimilation of GOES Hourly and Meteosat winds in the NCEP Global.
1 GOES-R AWG Hydrology Algorithm Team: Rainfall Potential June 14, 2011 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
Régis Borde Polar Winds EUMETRAIN Polar satellite week 2012 Régis Borde
Algorithm and Software Development of Atmospheric Motion Vector Products for the GOES-R ABI Jaime M. Daniels 1, Wayne Bresky 2, Chris Velden 3, Iliana.
Polar Winds from Satellite Imagers and Sounders MODIS Winds Group: Jeff Key 1, David Santek 2, Christopher Velden 2, Lars Peter Riishojgaard 3, Paul Menzel.
1 Validated Stage 1 Science Maturity Review for VIIRS Cloud Base, Nighttime Optical Properties and Cloud Cover Layers Products Andrew Heidinger September.
GOES to the Pole Lars Peter Riishojgaard/UMBC & Dennis Chesters/NASA Geostationary-class meteorological imager in a Molniya orbit Busted forecasts do occur.
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Derived Motion Winds Jaime Daniels (STAR) Wayne Bresky (IMSG, Inc) Steve Wanzong (CIMSS) Chris Velden.
Andrew Heidinger and Michael Pavolonis
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Satellite Wind Products Presented.
Status of improving the use of MODIS, AVHRR, and VIIRS polar winds in the GDAS/GFS David Santek, Brett Hoover, Sharon Nebuda, James Jung Cooperative Institute.
Hyperspectral Infrared Alone Cloudy Sounding Algorithm Development Objective and Summary To prepare for the synergistic use of data from the high-temporal.
January 7, 2015 Walter Wolf, Jaime Daniels, and Lihang Zhou NOAA/NESDIS, Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Shanna Sampson, Tom King,
MODIS Polar Winds in ECMWF’s Data Assimilation System: Long-term Performance and Recent Case Studies Lueder von Bremen, Niels Bormann and Jean-Noël Thépaut.
MODIS Winds Applications to NWP/Data Assimilation studies; Fairbanks, 10/08/2003 Lars Peter Riishojgaard Yan-Qiu Zhu Global Modeling and Assimilation Office.
AIRS, HIRS and CSBT Experiments Plus Other FY05/06 Results by James A. Jung Tom H. Zapotocny and John Le Marshall Cooperative Institute for Meteorological.
1 Developing Assimilation Techniques For Atmospheric Motion Vectors Derived via a New Nested Tracking Algorithm Derived for the GOES-R Advanced Baseline.
Real-time Generation of Winds and Sea Ice Motion from MODIS Jeff Key 1, Dave Santek 2, Chris Velden 2 1 Office of Research and Applications, NOAA/NESDIS,
Developing Assimilation Techniques for Atmospheric Motion Vectors Derived via a New Nested Tracking Algorithm Derived for the GOES-R Advanced Baseline.
Status of improving the use of MODIS and AVHRR polar winds in the GDAS/GFS David Santek, Brett Hoover, Sharon Nebuda, James Jung Cooperative Institute.
Polar Winds from Satellite Imagers and Sounders MODIS Winds Group: Paul Menzel 1, Jeffrey Key 1, David Santek 2, Christopher Velden 2, Lars Peter Riishojgaard.
AMVs Derived via a New Nested Tracking Algorithm Developed for the GOES-R ABI Jaime Daniels 1, Wayne Bresky 2, Steve Wanzong 3 and Chris Velden 3 NOAA/NESDIS,
1 Validated Stage 1 Science Maturity Review for Surface Reflectance Eric Vermote Sept 04, 2014.
MODIS Winds Assimilation Impact Study with the CMC Operational Forecast System Réal Sarrazin Data Assimilation and Quality Control Canadian Meteorological.
Towards Assimilation of GOES Hourly winds in the NCEP Global Forecast System (GFS) Xiujuan Su, Jaime Daniels, John Derber, Yangrong Lin, Andy Bailey, Wayne.
Xiujuan Su 1, John Derber 2, Jaime Daniel 3,Andrew Collard 1 1: IMSG, 2: EMC/NWS/NOAA, 3.NESDIS Assimilation of GOES hourly shortwave and visible AMVs.
Polar Winds from VIIRS Jeff Key*, Jaime Daniels #, Steve Wanzong +, Andrew Hongming Qi ^, Wayne Dave Santek +, Chris Velden +, Walter.
Patricia Pauley and Nancy Baker Naval Research Laboratory Monterey, California Superobbing Satellite-Derived Winds in the U.S. Navy Global Data Assimilation.
“CMORPH” is a method that creates spatially & temporally complete information using existing precipitation products that are derived from passive microwave.
1 MODIS winds assimilation experiments and impact studies to date at the Met Office Howard Berger, Mary Forsythe, Met Office, Bracknell/Exeter, UK UW-CIMSS.
Slide 1© ECMWF Extended climate reanalysis ERA-Interim replacement Coupled with ocean REPROCESSED AMVs FOR THE NEXT ECMWF GLOBAL REANALYSES C.Peubey, N.
CGMS-42-IWWG-WP-01 PPT, v1, 9 May 2014 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Status of Activities and Relevant Discussion Topics in Advance.
NOAA Report on Ocean Parameters - SST Presented to CGMS-43 Working Group 2 session, agenda item 9 Author: Sasha Ignatov.
Chairs: James Cotton and Niels Bormann
GOES-R AIT: Updating the Data Processing System with data from the Himawari-8 Geostationary Satellite Jonathan Wrotny1, A. Li1, A. Ken1, H. Xie1, M. Fan1,
SNPP Regional Retransmission Service: Plans and Status of Implementation Presented to CGMS-43 Working Group 1 session, agenda item 6.
Derived Motion Winds Scott Bachmeier, Scott Lindstrom
SNPP VIIRS Aerosol Product Latencies
Winds in the Polar Regions from MODIS: Atmospheric Considerations
Jennifer Boehnert Emily Riddle Tom Hopson
RECENT INNOVATIONS IN DERIVING ATMOSPHERIC MOTION VECTORS AT CIMSS
Hyperspectral Wind Retrievals Dave Santek Chris Velden CIMSS Madison, Wisconsin 5th Workshop on Hyperspectral Science 8 June 2005.
Reprocessing of Atmospheric Motion Vector for JRA-3Q at JMA/MSC
Use of satellite winds at Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)
Technical and scientific verifications of the EUMETSAT MTG-FCI AMV prototype Manuel Carranza Régis Borde.
Assimilation of GOES-R Atmospheric Motion Vectors
Stéphane Laroche Judy St-James Iriola Mati Réal Sarrazin
Naval Research Laboratory
UPDATE ON SATELLITE-DERIVED amv RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTS
David Santek and Chris Velden
James Cotton, Mary Forsythe IWW14, Jeju City, South Korea.
GOES-16 AMV data evaluation and algorithm assessment
Generation of Cloud Products from NOAA’s Operational Satellite Imagers
IWW14 Conclusions of Working Group 1 (AMV Extraction Methods)
For NOAA-20 VIIRS Polar Winds
The Polar Wind Product Suite
MODIS Polar Winds Forecast Impact (3DVAR) Northern Hemisphere
Satellite Wind Vectors from GOES Sounder Moisture Fields
Status of the Regional OSSE for Space-Based LIDAR Winds – Feb01
For Cryosphere Products – Sea Ice
Presentation transcript:

VIIRS Polar Winds Jeff Key, Jaime Daniels, Rico Allegrino, Wayne Bresky NOAA/NESDIS 608-263-2605, Jeff.Key@noaa.gov

VIIRS Polar Winds (VPW) in Brief VIIRS Polar Winds are derived by tracking clouds features in the VIIRS longwave infrared channel Wind speed, direction, and height are determined throughout the troposphere, poleward of approximately 65 degrees latitude, in cloudy areas only Wind information is generated in both the Arctic and Antarctic regions The algorithm utilizes the Enterprise cloud height, phase, and (soon) mask

NOAA-20 VIIRS Winds Examples Left: Arctic, 28 Jul 2018, 1942Z Right: Antarctic, 28 Jul 2018, 2033Z

VIIRS Polar Winds Team Name Organization Major Task Jeff Key STAR Project management, DB winds Jaime Daniels Project management, algorithm development and testing Wayne Bresky IMSG Algorithm development and testing Andrew Bailey Rico Allegrino Validation Dave Santek CIMSS Algorithm and product testing Rich Dworak Algorithm and analysis Steve Wanzong Hongming Qi OSPO Operations Walter Wolf and others STAR, AIT Implementation

Derived Motion Winds Test Plan – Offline Validation: Truth Data Radiosonde wind observations serve as a key validation data source for derived motion wind products Used by all operational satellite processing centers that generate satellite derived motion winds Aircraft wind observations GFS Model Analysis Wind Fields 5 5

Validation Statistics NPP VIIRS Winds vs. Radiosondes July 5-29, 2018 NOAA-20 VIIRS Winds vs. Radiosondes July 5-29, 2018 Observed Accuracy: 5.79-5.99 m/s Precision: 3.58-3.64 m/s Requirements: Accuracy: 7.5 m/s Precision: 4.2 m/s NOAA-20 VIIRS winds generated at STAR. Statistics include only VIIRS winds at 12Z. NOAA-20 VIIRS Winds/Raob co-location files being reprocessed for the month of July to include 00Z matchups NPP VIIRS winds generated at OSPO 6 6

Analysis/Validation Result Status Error Budget, S-NPP and NOAA-20: Attribute Analyzed L1RD Threshold Analysis/Validation Result Meets spec? Accuracy 7.5 m/s 5.7-7.0 m/s Y Precision 4.2 m/s 2.7-3.8 m/s Horizontal cell size 10 km 19 km (inherent to the algorithm) N; Change the requirement as it is an error Mapping uncertainty 0.4 km nadir; 1.5 km EOS 0.57 km The S-NPP VIIRS Polar Winds product has been operational since May 2014. NOAA-20 VIIRS Winds Validated Maturity review scheduled for October 2018 VPW is also generated at direct broadcast sites and delivered to NWP centers.

Users 13 NWP centers in 9 countries use polar winds (MODIS, AVHRR, VIIRS); some using VIIRS winds operationally. U.S. Users: NCEP (Dennis Keyser) NRL/FNMOC (Randy Pauley) GMAO/JCSDA Foreign Users: UK Met Office (Mary Forsythe) JMA (Masahiro Kazumori) ECMWF (Jean-Noel Thepaut) DWD (Alexandar Cress) Meteo-France (Bruno Lacroix) CMC (Real Sarrazin) BOM (John LeMarshall) EUMETSAT (Simon Elliott) Russian Hydrometcenter (Mikhail Tsyrulnikov) CMA (China)

User Feedback Over the last decade, model impact studies at >10 major NWP centers have demonstrated that model forecasts for the NH and SH extratropics are improved when the MODIS polar winds are assimilated. Forecasts can be extended 2-6 hrs, depending on the location. NWP users have reported similar results for the VIIRS Polar Winds, as reported at the most recent International Winds Workshop (2016, Monterey) and at other venues. Organization Use VPW operationally Currently monitoring Plan to use? NCEP Yes (SNPP) Yes (early 2019 for N20) DWD Yes Navy ECMWF Met Office CMC MeteoFrance Awaiting information from the other NWP centers.

Users, cont. Courtesy of Naval Research Lab

Thank you!

Requirements JPSS L1RD supplement (threshold) requirements versus observed Attribute Threshold Observed/validated Geographic coverage ~70o latitude to poles ~65o to poles Vertical Coverage Surface to tropopause same Vertical Cell Size At cloud tops Horizontal Cell Size 10 km (should be ~19 km, CCR Aug 2015) Mapping Uncertainty 0.4 km (nadir); 1.5km (edge of scan) 0.57 km Measurement Range Speed: 3 to 100 m s‑1; Direction: 0 to 360 degrees Measurement Accuracy Mean vector difference: 7.5 m/s 5.7-7.0 m/s (w/raobs) Measurement Precision Mean vector difference: 4.2 m/s (was 3.8 m/s) 2.7-3.8 m/s (w/raobs) Measurement Uncertainty Not specified Not applicable

AMV Performance Metrics AMVs (QI>60) are matched and compared against RAOBS or GFS model analysis winds. Metrics: where: WMO/CGMS definitions of quality metrics. Accuracy is Mean VD. Precision is Standard Deviation around MVD. Ui and Vi ---> AMV Ur and Vr ---> “Truth”