SIGNIFY Trial design: Participants with stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure and resting heart rate >70 bpm were randomized to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
patients, 51 countries, 1139 centers Fox K, Ford I, Steg PG, Tardif JC, Tendera M, Ferrari R. Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of.
Advertisements

Trial profile Fox K et al. Lancet 2008;372:
Results Fox K, Ford I, Steg PG, Tardif JC, Tendera M, Ferrari R. N Eng J Med August 31. DOI: /NEJMoa
BEAUTI f UL: morBidity-mortality EvAlUaTion of the I f inhibitor ivabradine in patients with coronary disease and left ventricULar dysfunction Purpose.
Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled trial.
WOSCOPS: West Of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Purpose To determine whether pravastatin reduces combined incidence of nonfatal MI and death due to.
BEST: Beta-blocker Evaluation Survival Trial Purpose To determine whether the β-blocker bucindolol reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced.
LIPID: Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease Purpose To determine whether pravastatin will reduce coronary mortality and morbidity.
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study Purpose To evaluate whether the long-acting ACE inhibitor ramipril and/or vitamin E reduce the incidence.
The effect of heart rate reduction with ivabradine on renal function in patients with chronic heart failure: an analysis from SHIFT Systolic Heart failure.
Background There are 12 different types of medications to lower blood sugar levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. It is widely agreed upon that metformin.
The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) 2 Investigators. N Engl J Med 2006; available at: End pointActive therapy PlaceboRelative.
Perindopril Remodeling in Elderly with Acute Myocardial Infarction PREAMIPREAMI Presented at The European Society of Cardiology Hot Line Session, September.
Charlotte Kragelund et al N Engl J Med 2005;352: Baseline Clinical Characteristics According to Quartiles of NT-pro-BNP.
New 2011 SHIFT quality of life substudy Quality of life ( QoL) in heart failure: where do we stand? Therapies that have survival benefits either have a.
European trial on reduction of cardiac events with perindopril in stable coronary artery disease Presented at European Society of Cardiology 2003 EUROPA.
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
(p for noninferiority = 0.01)
NORSTENT Trial design: Patients with obstructive coronary artery disease were randomized to a drug-eluting stent (DES) (n = 4,504) versus a bare-metal.
CORAL Trial design: Patients with renal artery stenosis and hypertension or chronic kidney disease were randomized to renal artery stenting (n = 467) vs.
APEX Trial design: Patients hospitalized with an acute medical illness were randomized to oral betrixaban for days (n = 3,759) versus subcutaneous.
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study
Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial Investigators
TNT: Baseline and final LDL cholesterol levels
RE-CIRCUIT Trial design: Patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation were randomized to uninterrupted dabigatran 150 mg twice daily.
(p < for group 1 or 2 vs. group 3)
IMPI Trial design: Participants with TB pericarditis and risk for HIV were randomized to prednisolone (n = 706) vs. placebo (n = 694) and to M. indicus.
BENEFIT Trial design: Patients with positive serologic tests for T. Cruzi and cardiomyopathy were randomized to benznidazole 300 mg daily for days.
DANISH Trial design: Patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy were randomized to ICD implantation (n = 556) versus usual care (n = 560). Results (p = 0.28)
EUCLID Trial design: Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) were randomized to ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily (n = 6,930) vs. clopidogrel 75 mg.
ATLANTIC Trial design: Participants with STEMI being transported for primary PCI were randomized in the ambulance to ticagrelor 180 mg (n = 909) vs. placebo.
Systolic Heart failure treatment with the If inhibitor ivabradine Trial The effect of heart rate reduction with ivabradine on renal function in patients.
LEVO-CTS Trial design: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass were randomized to infusion of levosimendan 0.2 µg/kg/min.
Baseline characteristics of patients
EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial design: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) at high risk for CV events were randomized to receive in a 1:1:1 fashion either.
EVITA Trial design: Smokers admitted with an acute coronary syndrome were randomized to varenicline 1 mg twice daily (n = 151) vs. placebo (n = 151). Study.
INOVATE-HF Trial design: Patients with heart failure (HF) were randomized to device implant for vagus nerve stimulation (n = 436) versus optimal medical.
Compare-Acute Trial design: STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI were randomized to fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided complete revascularization (n.
PARADIGM-HF Trial design: Participants with NYHA class II-IV and LVEF ≤40% were randomized to LCZ mg twice daily (n = 4,187) vs. enalapril 10 mg.
PRECISION Trial design: Patients with arthritis and increased cardiovascular risk were randomized to celecoxib 100 mg twice daily (n = 8,072) vs. ibuprofen.
VALUE Trial design: Hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk were randomized to valsartan (n = 7,649) vs. amlodipine (n = 7,596). Results (p =
ANTARCTIC Trial design: Patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing stenting were randomized to tailored antiplatelet therapy (n = 435) versus conventional.
FAMOUS-NSTEMI Trial design: Participants with NSTEMI were randomized to an FFR-guided strategy (n = 176) vs. a coronary angiography-guided strategy (n.
TUXEDO–India Trial design: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) and coronary artery disease undergoing PCI were randomized to receive Taxus Element.
ATMOSPHERE Trial design: Patients with symptomatic heart failure were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to either aliskiren 300 mg once daily, enalapril 5.
SUSTAIN-6 Trial design: Patients with DM2 at high risk for CV events were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 fashion to either semaglutide 0.5 mg, semaglutide 1 mg,
LATITUDE-TIMI 60 Trial design: Patients hospitalized with AMI on guideline-recommended therapy were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either losmapimod 7.5.
BASKET-PROVE II Trial design: Subjects with stable or unstable coronary artery disease undergoing stent implantation were randomized to a biodegradable-polymer.
MACE rate among CAD severity groups (total 0
ALBATROSS Trial design: Patients with MI without heart failure were randomized to an IV bolus of potassium canrenoate 200 mg as early as possible, then.
After Eighty Study Trial design: Elderly patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) were randomized to invasive therapy (n = 229)
TACTICS-HF Trial design: Patients with acute heart failure (reduced or preserved ejection fraction) were randomized to tolvaptan 30 mg at 0, 24, and 48.
FOURIER Trial design: Patients with established cardiovascular disease on statin therapy were randomized to evolocumab 140 mg subcutaneous every 2 weeks.
(p = 0.32 for noninferiority)
(p < for noninferiority)
OSLER Trial design: Patients from five phase 2 trials and seven phase 3 trials with evolocumab were invited to participate in the OSLER extension program,
(p for noninferiority < 0.001)
(p = for noninferiority)
POPE-2 Trial design: Patients with moderate to large pericardial effusion after cardiac surgery were randomized to colchicine 2 mg loading dose, then 1.
CHAMPION Trial design: Patients with recent hospitalization for heart failure were implanted with a pulmonary artery pressure monitor and randomized so.
A decade after the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial: Weaving firm clinical recommendations from lessons learned  Robert E.
Age-Standardized Rates of Death from Any Cause According to the Estimated GFR among 1,120,295 Ambulatory Adults Alan S.Go et al. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:
SOLID-TIMI 52 Trial design: Participants within 30 days of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were randomized to darapladib 160 mg daily (n = 6,504) versus.
IVUS-XPL Trial design: Patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation for long coronary lesions were randomized to IVUS-guided PCI (n = 700) vs. angiography-guided.
(p for noninferiority = 0.01)
MATRIX: Radial vs. Femoral
Risk for cardiovascular disease and all-cause death according to RHR: (A) as categorical variable (HR≥75 bpm vs HR
CIRCUS Trial design: Patients with anterior STEMI were randomized to IV cyclosporine 2.5 mg/kg (n = 475) vs. placebo (n = 495) immediately before coronary.
Left Ventricular Mass at MRI and Long-Term Risk of Cardiovascular Events: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Left ventricular hypertrophy.
Presentation transcript:

SIGNIFY Trial design: Participants with stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure and resting heart rate >70 bpm were randomized to ivabradine, up to 10 mg twice daily (n = 9,550) versus placebo (n = 9,552). Results CV death or MI: 6.8% of the ivabradine group vs. 6.4% of the placebo group (p = 0.20) Cardiovascular death: 3.4% vs. 3.2% (p = 0.25), respectively MI: 3.7% vs. 3.5% (p = 0.60), respectively Hospitalization for heart failure: 2.3% vs. 1.9% (p = 0.07), respectively (p = 0.20) % 6.8 6.4 Conclusions Among patients with stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure, the use of ivabradine, in addition to standard medical therapy, did not reduce adverse cardiovascular events compared with placebo Ivabradine Placebo Fox K, et al. N Engl J Med 2014;371:1091-9