Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon
Strength vs.Toughness Strength Resistance of a material to plastic flow Toughness Resistance of a material to the propagation of a crack Figure 8.1 Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon
Testing for Toughness Figure 8.2 This type of test provides a comparison of the toughness of materials – however, it does not provide a way to express toughness as a material property Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon
Remote stress applied to a cracked material: Figure 8.3 The local stress σlocal is proportional to the number of lines of force which rises steeply as the crack tip is approached c – crack length r – distance from crack tip σ – remote stress Y – geometric constant * valid when r << c Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon
Stress Intensity Factor For any value of r, the local stress scales with σ√πc Mode 1 stress intensity factor Mode 1 indicates tensile loading normal to the crack Typically, loading modes are designated by Roman numerals – K1 would be designated as KI – K1 is used throughout the book which goes against the universally accepted use of Roman numerals Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon
Fracture Toughness Cracks propagate when the stress intensity factor exceeds a critical value – the critical value is known as the fracture toughness K1c Figure 8.4 σ* - tensile stress at which the crack propagates * For this geometry, the value of Y is 1 if c << w Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon
Energy Release Rate G and Toughness Gc For a crack to grow, sufficient external work must be done which is in the form of released elastic energy Figure 8.5 γ – surface energy Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon
Process Zone A plastic zone forms at the crack tip where the stress Figure 8.6 A plastic zone forms at the crack tip where the stress would otherwise exceed the yield strength Size of process zone: Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon
A material transitions from yield to fracture Crack length necessary for fracture at a materials yield strength A material transitions from yield to fracture at a critical crack length Figure 8.7 Stress required for fracture for a given crack length Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon
Critical crack lengths are a measure of the damage tolerance of a material Table 8.1 Tough metals are able to contain large cracks but still yield in a predictable, ductile, manner Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon
Fracture Toughness – Modulus Chart Figure 8.8 Values range from 0.01 – 100 MPa√m Contours show the toughness, Gc Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon
Fracture Toughness – Strength Chart Figure 8.9 Transition crack length plotted on chart – values can range from near- atomic dimensions for ceramics to almost a meter for ductile metals Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon
Surface Energy When a new surface is created, atomic bonds are broken, requiring some fraction of the cohesive energy, Hc Figure 8.10 Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon
Brittle ‘Cleavage’ Fracture Figure 8.11 Characteristic of ceramics and glasses Local stress rises as 1/√r toward the crack tip – if it exceeds that required to break inter-atomic bonds they separate, giving a cleavage fracture Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon
Tough ‘Ductile’ Fracture Materials contain inclusion which act as stress concentrations when loaded – the inclusions separate from the matrix causing voids to n nucleate and grow, causing fracture Figure 8.12 Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon
Ductile Fracture of Cracked Sample Figure 8.13 If a material is ductile, a plastic zone forms at the crack tip Within the plastic zone, voids nucleate, join, and link to cause fracture The plasticity blunts the crack tip, reducing the severity of the stress concentration Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon
Ductile-to-Brittle Transition At low temperatures some metals and all polymers become brittle As temperatures decrease, yield strengths of most materials increase leading to a reduction in the plastic zone size Only metals with an FCC structure remain ductile at the lowest temperatures Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon
Embrittlement from Chemical Segregation Impurities in an alloy are normally found in grain boundaries – this leads to a network of low-toughness paths that can lead to brittle fracture Figure 8.14 Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon
The Strength-Toughness Trade-Off Figure 8.15 Increasing the yield strength of a metal decreasing the size of the plastic zone surrounding a crack – this leads to decreased toughness Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon
Manipulating Polymers Fillers, impact modifiers, and fiber reinforcement can significantly alter the fracture toughness of polymers Figure 8.16 Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon
Toughening by Fibers When a crack grows in a matrix, the fibers remain intact and bridge the crack Figure 8.17 Materials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon