An extension of IEEE e QoS for MESH Networks

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achieving Throughput Fairness in Wireless Mesh Network Based on IEEE Janghwan Lee and Ikjun Yeom Division of Computer Science KAIST
Advertisements

Extended Service Set (ESS) Mesh Network Daniela Maniezzo.
Priority Queuing Achieving Flow ‘Fairness’ in Wireless Networks Thomas Shen Prof. K.C. Wang SURE 2005.
Computer Networks Performance Metrics Advanced Computer Networks.
12/09/20041 Daniela Maniezzo, UCLA Gianluca Villa, Politecnico di Milano Mario Gerla, UCLA A “Smart” MAC-Routing Protocol for WLAN Mesh Networks.
Providing QoS in Ad Hoc Networks with Distributed Resource Reservation IEEE802.11e and extensions Ulf Körner and Ali Hamidian.
Enhancing TCP Fairness in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks using Neighborhood RED Kaixin Xu, Mario Gerla UCLA Computer Science Department
Load-Balancing Routing in Multichannel Hybrid Wireless Networks With Single Network Interface So, J.; Vaidya, N. H.; Vehicular Technology, IEEE Transactions.
Doc.: IEEE /1077r1 Submission Sep 2013 Slide 1 EDCA Enhancements for HEW Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddress Phone Hui
S Master’s thesis seminar 8th August 2006 QUALITY OF SERVICE AWARE ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN MOBILE AD HOC NETWORKS Thesis Author: Shan Gong Supervisor:Sven-Gustav.
Service differentiation mechanisms for IEEE based wireless networks § Srikant Kuppa & Ravi Prakash Distributed Systems Laboratory The University.
Qos support and adaptive video. QoS support in ad hoc networks MAC layer techniques: – e - alternation of contention based and contention free periods;
Fast and Reliable Route Discovery Protocol Considering Mobility in Multihop Cellular Networks Hyun-Ho Choi and Dong-Ho Cho Wireless Pervasive Computing,
Doc.: IEEE /0912r0 Submission 6/28/2006 Junping Zhang,HuaweiSlide 1 Traffic Aware Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE
November 4, 2003Applied Research Laboratory, Washington University in St. Louis APOC 2003 Wuhan, China Cost Efficient Routing in Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless.
Quality of Service Schemes for IEEE Wireless LANs-An Evaluation 主講人 : 黃政偉.
Doc.: IEEE r1 SubmissionAlexander Safonov, IITP RASSlide 1 Parameterized QoS for s mesh networks Date: March 2012 Authors:
1 Properties and Features of Virtual 1394 bus PHILIPS Research Subrata Banerjee PHILIPS Research Briarcliff, New York P WG Meeting, Huntington Beach,
Courtesy Piggybacking: Supporting Differentiated Services in Multihop Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Wei LiuXiang Chen Yuguang Fang WING Dept. of ECE University.
Ad Hoc Relay Mode for Mobile Coverage Extension and Peer-to-Peer Communications IEEE Presentation Submission Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-07/260r2.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0221r0 Feb 2013 BroadcomSlide QoS Queue Architecture and Possible 802.1bz Bridge Model Date: Authors:
MAC for Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC) in Intelligent Transport Systems IEEE Communications Magazine, December 2003 Cpre 592 – Wireless Networks.
Congestion Control in Data Networks and Internets
Mesh-Network VoIP Call Capacity
Daniela Maniezzo NRL – Network Research Lab UCLA
AST San Jose Lab: IEEE s Mesh Network
Congestion Control, Quality of Service, and Internetworking
Hyuk Lim, Chaegwon Lim, Jennifer C. Hou Department of Computer Science
Mobicom ‘99 Per Johansson, Tony Larsson, Nicklas Hedman
Managing the performance of multiple radio Multihop ESS Mesh Networks.
Mrinalini Sawhney CS-710 Presentation 2006/09/12
A “Smart” MAC-Routing Protocol for WLAN Mesh Networks
June 2005 doc.: IEEE /0593r0 July 2005 Summary Presentation Proposal L:19 Siemens Proposal for WLAN Mesh Networking Date: Authors:
Wireless Mesh Networks
September 2005 Performance Evaluation of the CCC MMAC Protocol for s Mesh Networks Date: Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared.
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Provision of Multimedia Services in based Networks
Speaker:Fu-Yuan Chuang Advisor:Ho-Ting Wu Date:
Submission Title: [Reliable Multicast for PAC]
Coexistence problem of s Congestion Control
Prioritized MAC Access Mechanism of Routing-related Frame for ESS Mesh
Mesh Media Access Coordination Ad Hoc Group Report Out
Coexistence problem of s Congestion Control
MAC Considerations for Mesh
Study of performance of regular TCP in MANETs (using simulator).
MAC improvement using random AIFSN
MAC improvement using random AIFSN
More on Performance Evaluation of ‘Express Forwarding’ for Mesh
Mesh Media Access Coordination Ad Hoc Group Report Out
Packet forwarding for non-routable devices in Multi-hop Wireless Mesh
EDCA Enhancements for HEW
Subject Name: Adhoc Networks Subject Code: 10CS841
Student : Min-Hua Yang Advisor : Ho-Ting Wu Date :
Network Research Center Tsinghua Univ. Beijing, P.R.China
November 2007 Effect of Contention Window Size on ‘Express Forwarding’ Performance for Single-Channel Mesh Date: Authors: Name Address Company.
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Performance Implications of DCF to ESS Mesh Networks
Performance Implications of DCF to ESS Mesh Networks
A Routing Protocol for WLAN Mesh
Prioritized MAC Access Mechanism of Routing-related Frame for ESS Mesh
Suggested comment resolution on MDA Access Fraction (MAF)
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
End-to-End QoS awareness for admission control
Performance Implications of DCF to ESS Mesh Networks
Infocom 2004 Speaker : Bo-Chun Wang
TGs MAC Enhancement Proposal
MAC Considerations for Mesh
Wireless MAC Multimedia Extensions Albert Banchs, Witold Pokorski
‘Express’ Forwarding in a Multi-hop Wireless Network
Presentation transcript:

An extension of IEEE 802.11e QoS for MESH Networks Daniela Maniezzo, UCLA

WLAN Mesh: how to guarantee the QoS?? In a ESS WLAN Mesh Net a Mesh Portal is a gateway with another networks IEEE 802.11e gives a strategy to assure differentiation among up to four access categories, on the basis of ad hoc AIFS (Arbitration Inter Frame Space) and backoff parameters, but it was projected for single-hop networks, i.e. for an infrastructured BSS built around the Access Point IEEE 802.11e, nevertheless, provides an efficient, easy and fully distributed way to introduce the concept of “service priority” in the IEEE 802.11 ’99 standard, so it’s natural to investigate the possibility of its extension to multihop ad hoc networks as the future IEEE 802.11s

RELAY and OUT_BSS flows MeshP1 MeshP3 MeshP2 STA6 STA3 STA2 STA1 STA5 STA4 A Mesh Point has to deal with both traffic originated by other Points (for which it is a relay) and its own traffic directed to out-of-its-BSS nodes

Related Work Jangeun Jun and Mihail L. Sichitiu, "Fairness and QoS in Multihop Wireless Networks", in Proc. of the IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC 2003), Orlando, FL, Oct. 6-9, 2003. G G Node2 Node1 2G D S1 S2 Fairness study of a two-node network forwarding packets to a destination D of the offered load G [...] “without a modified MAC or network layer, as the offered load increases, the node closest to the destination (node 1) will gradually but completely starve the node further away from the destination.”

RELAY and OUT_BSS flows (cont'd) Notice that granting the co-existance of these two different kinds of flows means that each Mesh Point must be able to assure a fair amount of bandwidth to both its outgoing data and the packets sent by its peers: STA Who shall I serve? MeshPi MeshPj MeshPk We need to distinguish between Relay and Out_BSS flows and to deal with them differently according to a proper service policy (QoS parameters)

Proposed Idea (1): Multiple Tx queues at the MeshP (1/3) Mesh Pi Mesh Pk Mesh Pj STA Relay Out_BSS ??? The amount of service given to each kind of queue depends on the status of the queues themselves and must be set adaptively!!

Multiple Tx queues at the Mesh Points (2/3) …how to be fair??? Relay Out_BSS In the following we will suppose to have a mechanism of distributed admission control that checks which resources are currently available in the network along the path between the source/destination pair and rejects the new Out_BSS flow or finds a different route in case of congestion. This mechanism may also indicate which is the maximum bandwidth share permitted to the new flow.

Multiple Tx queues at the Mesh Points (3/3) Relay and Out_BSS flows contain frames belonging to different access category (AC). Relay Out_BSS ??? AC0 AC1 AC2 AC3 In 802.11e the amount of service given to each AC is fixed statistically by != AIFSs and backoff window sizes. In the same way we propose to use up to 8 AIFSs and backoffs, set by the MeshAP in a fully distributed way

Mesh: multiple queues and QoS Relay Out_BSS ??? AC0 AC1 AC2 AC3 Our purpose: the scheduler sets the proper channel access parameters, mainly the AIFSs different amount of service between Relay and Out_BSS require != AIFSs the first AC who wins a TXOP is served by the Mesh Point BUT: how to grant the “quality of service”????

Mesh: multiple queues and QoS Relay Out_BSS AC0 AC1 AC2 AC3 AIFS0, AIFS1, AIFS2, AIFS3 BW0, BW1, BW2, BW3 BW = backoff window Find out metrics that can be used by the Mesh Point to set the AIFSs/BWs In each queue, order the packets on the basis of the number of hops traversed When an AC wins TXOP, it picks the Head Of Line

Proposed Ides (2):Traffic Destinations Most of traffic of a WLAN Mesh Network goes through the Mesh Portals that connect the ESS with other networks and Internet (office networks - Campus/Community/Public Access Net scenarios) During the Routing Procedure: Distinction between Mesh Points and Mesh Portals

Proposed Idea (2) Priority DIFS function of the distance from the Mesh Portal Portal Priority Portal

Any idea or other suggestions?