Structured Academic Controversy (SAC)

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Stages of Group Process

Advertisements

Horses, Guns, and Steel Jared Peet. Warm Up Without using your notes, answer the following questions: – What advantage did horses give Europeans against.

WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.

ACCOUNTABLE TALK PROMPTS

Access Strategy: Cooperative Learning Session 2. Follow up Did anyone try any of the CL activities (Four Corners, Galley Walk) in their classroom last.

Strategies for Engaging Students in Civil Discourse Seminars and Deliberations.

Welcome to Special Topics! Second Semester: Contemporary Issues –In this second half of the year, we will focus on current events/controversial topics.

February 21, 2013 Please turn in your homework clock assignment and your grade sheet. Objective: Students will investigate the Mission of Discovery in.

Structured Academic Controversy (SAC). What? Working in pairs, and then teams, you will explore an issue through opposing positions and try to reach a.

Structured Academic Controversy (SAC). What? Working in pairs, and then teams, you will explore an issue through opposing positions and try to reach a.

Using Math Talk To Promote Student Understanding and Problem-Solving Kim Oliver-Second Grade Melissa Hawley-Kindergarten

SIOP Kindergarten SIOP Lesson Ms. Stetz’s Class Snow School

Objectives: 1.Quiz 2.Group Work and Presentations on 2.1: Matter.

+ Reading Groups for Johnston’s Opening Minds BSWP 2012 Invitational Summer Institute, Days #1 and #2.

House Rules 1)To be on time is to be in your seat. 2)Come to class prepared! This counts as 10% of your grade. 3)Treat every one with respect at all times.

The Louisiana Purchase and Exploration Notebook pages 29 and 30 Text pages

1’s T HINK -P AIR -S HARE OR T IMED -P AIR -S HARE  Teacher announces a topic and states how long each student will have to share. OR states students.

Louisiana Purchase STATE STANDARD 8.US France  Louisiana Purchase was purchased from France and Napoleon Bonaparte.

Structured Academic Controversy: Does Andrew Jackson deserve to be on the 20 dollar bill?

Professional Development to Practice The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education to the Missouri.

US HISTORY SLIDES FROM 10/7!. U.S. History Wednesday, 10/7 How do we judge the past? Do Now!Agenda Which amendment do you value most? And why? (Get ready.

Developing Questions That Matter

Fast Food Debate Learning Target: I can work collaboratively with my group. I can establish norms with the opposition for debate. I can use factual research.

Structured Academic Controversy: Did 1.5 million African Americans move north from because of racism in the South?

Chapter 1: What is the topic of this unit?. Predictions Partner A: State your prediction about the upcoming unit. Partner B: Restate your partner’s.

Unit 2 Timeline Was Reconstruction Successful?. What to do about slavery?

Team Review. Norms O Equity of Voice O Active Listening O Respect for All Perspectives O Safety and Confidentiality O Respectful Use of Technology.

Texas: Prelude to Civil War Teresa Goodin. The Annexation of Texas  Why did Americans immigrate to Texas in the mid 1800s?  Why did Texas declare its.

Socratic Seminar: Imperialism. Purpose of Socratic Seminar ● Get ALL students thinking and talking! ● Get all students listening to different perspectives.

Hull House Definition: This is a famous example of a Settlement House, a place where immigrants took classes and received services like childcare, health.

Reflective Conversations. Steps to Implementation 1.Students are purposefully grouped in pairs. Person A asks Person B one Before-Reading question. They.

Topic Seven: Structured Academic Controversy Encouraging careful consideration of opposing viewpoints on a topic of historical and contemporary significance.

Academic Conversations

Improv: Let’s go on a picnic and take….

Academic Conversations

Academic Conversations

[Presentation 1: add Date]

Controversy Learning goals: cognitive goals social goals

The Shared Inquiry Model

Always negotiating, all the time

Structured Academic Controversy (SAC)

Team 1: 32 responses Team 2: 55 responses Team 3: 29 responses

What is Shared Inquiry? Shared Inquiry is a method of learning in which students actively search for answers to questions raised by a text. This search.

'The Flowers' by Alice Walker

Lewis and Clark Expedition

Developing 'Political Generosity' through Classroom Deliberation

Lewis and Clark Expedition

Practice Socratic Seminar: “The Necklace”

Welcome to Drama! Miss Hendon.

Unit 2: Westward Expansion

Unit 2: Westward Expansion

Claims enCompass Academy.

Teaching the E.S.L. student

Examples of Classroom Norms

Structured Academic Controversy (SAC)

Learnenglish.britishcouncil

Structured Academic Controversy (SAC)

Structured Academic Controversy (SAC)

Unit 2: Westward Expansion

Reflecting on Practice: Worthwhile Tasks

Unit 2: Westward Expansion

Warm-up Do you enjoy talking? Why or why not? Are you more talkative in a structured or unstructured environment? Why? What are some ways in which talking.

GRAPHING EQUATIONS OF LINES

What to include in your personal evaluation

Unit 3: Civil War

Structured Academic Controversy (SAC)

Engineering Design Process

How Do You Describe the Location of an Object?

Design Thinking in the Learning Commons Patricia Baker Ottawa Catholic

Presentation transcript:

Structured Academic Controversy (SAC)

What? Working in pairs and then teams, you will explore an issue through opposing positions and try to reach a consensus or, at least, clarify where your differences lie.

Central Historical Question Were Lewis and Clark respectful to the Native Americans they met on their journey?

Discussion Norms Active listening Challenge ideas, not persons Try your best to understand other position Share the floor: each person in pair MUST have the opportunity to speak No disagreeing until consensus-building

Sequence Form into teams (partner prep) Team A presentation Team A presents Restatement (by Pair B) Team B presentation Team B presents Restatement (by Pair A) Consensus-Building