Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages e4 (March 2018)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Advertisements

Membrane-Induced Structural Rearrangement and Identification of a Novel Membrane Anchor in Talin F2F3  Mark J. Arcario, Emad Tajkhorshid  Biophysical.
Conformational Change in an MFS Protein: MD Simulations of LacY
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Daniel M. Freed, Peter S. Horanyi, Michael C. Wiener, David S. Cafiso 
Transmembrane Signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA Receptor
The BCL-2 Family Reunion
R. Elliot Murphy, Alexandra B. Samal, Jiri Vlach, Jamil S. Saad 
Sonya M. Hanson, Simon Newstead, Kenton J. Swartz, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Interactions of Pleckstrin Homology Domains with Membranes: Adding Back the Bilayer via High-Throughput Molecular Dynamics  Eiji Yamamoto, Antreas C.
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
The Mechanism of the Translocation Step in DNA Replication by DNA Polymerase I: A Computer Simulation Analysis  Andrei A. Golosov, Joshua J. Warren, Lorena.
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2018)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Monika Sharma, Alexander V. Predeus, Nicholas Kovacs, Michael Feig 
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
How Does a Voltage Sensor Interact with a Lipid Bilayer
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
Mechanism of the αβ Conformational Change in F1-ATPase after ATP Hydrolysis: Free- Energy Simulations  Yuko Ito, Mitsunori Ikeguchi  Biophysical Journal 
Brittny C. Davis, Jodian A. Brown, Ian F. Thorpe  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e5 (January 2019)
Joe G. Greener, Ioannis Filippis, Michael J.E. Sternberg  Structure 
Andrew E. Blanchard, Mark J. Arcario, Klaus Schulten, Emad Tajkhorshid 
Volume 111, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Raf-1 Cysteine-Rich Domain Increases the Affinity of K-Ras/Raf at the Membrane, Promoting MAPK Signaling  Shuai Li, Hyunbum Jang, Jian Zhang, Ruth Nussinov 
A Gating Mechanism of the Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Ligand Binding to the Voltage-Gated Kv1
Structural Basis of Prion Inhibition by Phenothiazine Compounds
Li Sun, Jeffrey K. Noel, Herbert Levine, José N. Onuchic 
Computational Modeling Reveals that Signaling Lipids Modulate the Orientation of K- Ras4A at the Membrane Reflecting Protein Topology  Zhen-Lu Li, Matthias.
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 110, Issue 12, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages e5 (December 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2018)
Surface-Induced Dissociation of Homotetramers with D2 Symmetry Yields their Assembly Pathways and Characterizes the Effect of Ligand Binding  Royston S.
Zara A. Sands, Alessandro Grottesi, Mark S.P. Sansom 
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
Thomas H. Schmidt, Yahya Homsi, Thorsten Lang  Biophysical Journal 
A Self-Sequestered Calmodulin-like Ca2+ Sensor of Mitochondrial SCaMC Carrier and Its Implication to Ca2+-Dependent ATP-Mg/Pi Transport  Qin Yang, Sven.
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Crystallographic Identification of Lipid as an Integral Component of the Epitope of HIV Broadly Neutralizing Antibody 4E10  Adriana Irimia, Anita Sarkar,
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Allosteric Control of Syntaxin 1a by Munc18-1: Characterization of the Open and Closed Conformations of Syntaxin  Damian Dawidowski, David S. Cafiso 
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Crystal Structures of the Thi-Box Riboswitch Bound to Thiamine Pyrophosphate Analogs Reveal Adaptive RNA-Small Molecule Recognition  Thomas E. Edwards,
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 6, Issue 9, Pages (September 1998)
The Structure of JNK3 in Complex with Small Molecule Inhibitors
Damian Dawidowski, David S. Cafiso  Structure 
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
SV40 Large T Antigen Hexamer Structure
Matthieu Chavent, Elena Seiradake, E. Yvonne Jones, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
Y. Zenmei Ohkubo, Emad Tajkhorshid  Structure 
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Jochen Zimmer, Declan A. Doyle, J. Günter Grossmann 
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 109, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 309-317.e4 (March 2018) Lipids Shape the Electron Acceptor-Binding Site of the Peripheral Membrane Protein Dihydroorotate Dehydrogenase  Joana Costeira-Paulo, Joseph Gault, Gergana Popova, Marcus J.G.W. Ladds, Ingeborg M.M. van Leeuwen, Médoune Sarr, Anders Olsson, David P. Lane, Sonia Laín, Erik G. Marklund, Michael Landreh  Cell Chemical Biology  Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 309-317.e4 (March 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.12.012 Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Chemical Biology 2018 25, 309-317. e4DOI: (10. 1016/j. chembiol Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Non-denaturing MS of DHODH Complexes (A) The nESI-MS spectrum of the full m/z range shows peaks corresponding to apo-DHODH with a broad charge state distribution. (B) Collisional activation and isolation of the region between m/z 2,700 and 3,300 (shown in gray in A) reveals two series of well-resolved protein signals corresponding to apo-DHODH as well as DHODH bound to the FMN co-factor. The deconvolved zero-charge spectrum is shown as an insert. (C) The MS strategy for integral membrane proteins facilitates the analysis of intact DHODH complexes. Release of the desolvated protein from detergent by collisional activation preserves interactions with the FMN co-factor as well as exogenous ligands. See also Figure S1. Cell Chemical Biology 2018 25, 309-317.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.12.012) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 DHODH Exhibits Limited Binding of Mitochondrial Phospholipids (A) Structures of the detergent LDAO and the three major phospholipid species in the human mitochondrial membrane. (B) nESI-MS shows that binding of PC, PE, and CDL, can be preserved in the gas phase. CDL exhibits the most stable association with DHODH, while PC interactions are not well retained. (C) Mass spectra of DHODH in the presence of increasing amounts of PE reveal a maximum number of lipid adducts for both apo- and holo-DHODH. Above a 20-fold excess (180 μM) of PE over DHODH, a maximum of three lipids are bound per protein. (D) The DHODH-lipid complexes are less sensitive to DMSO-induced dissociation than the DHODH-FMN complexes (indicated by blue arrows). Spectra recorded without and with DMSO are normalized to the 14+ charge state of holo- and apo-DHODH, respectively. See also Figure S2. Cell Chemical Biology 2018 25, 309-317.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.12.012) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Effects of Ligand Interactions on the Flexible Membrane-Binding Domain (A) nESI-MS of DHODH in the presence of brequinar shows a series of adduct peaks for holo-DHODH corresponding to one bound brequinar molecule, as well as one brequinar and one, two, or three LDAO molecules. The deconvolved zero-charge spectrum is shown above the corresponding mass spectrum. One and two asterisks indicate peaks corresponding to apo-DHODH with LDAO and brequinar, respectively. (B) The crystal structure of human DHODH with a brequinar analogue (PDB: 1D3G) shows binding of the inhibitor and an LDAO molecule in the hydrophobic channel leading to the FMN co-factor. (C) Comparison with ligand-free DHODH (PDB: 2PRM) and in complex with brequinar and LDAO (PDB: 1D3G) rendered according to the average B factor show that binding of brequinar and LDAO significantly reduces the conformational flexibility of the membrane-binding domain. (D) MD simulations of ligand-free truncated DHODH in solution confirm the conformational flexibility of the membrane-binding domain. The protein is rendered according to the RMSDs between the equilibrated starting structure and the end structure after 200 ns all-atom MD simulations. See also Figure S3. Cell Chemical Biology 2018 25, 309-317.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.12.012) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Membrane Interactions Shape the Q10 Binding Site (A) The N-terminal segment of truncated DHODH contains two amphipathic helices. Hydrophobic residues are shown in green, basic residues in contact with the membrane are labeled in blue. (B) All-atom MD of full-length DHODH on a PE bilayer shows association of charged residues with the lipid head groups, partially lifting the membrane-binding domain (blue) off the membrane surface. Here, a partial Q10 molecule has been modeled into the binding site. (C) The close clustering of the charged residues limits the number of simultaneously bound PE molecules. Phosphate head groups within 3 Å of the protein surface after 200 ns simulations are rendered as spheres and basic residues as sticks. (D) Membrane association reduces conformational fluctuations in the membrane-binding domain. The protein is rendered according to the RMSDs between the equilibrated starting structure and the end structure after 200 ns. (E) In the membrane-bound protein, the Q10 binding site forms a narrow reaction chamber that extends away from the membrane and is sealed by the hydrophobic tail (shown as sticks). The dashed line indicates the membrane surface. (F) In this model, Q10 is coordinated by the strictly conserved residues R136 and Y356. See also Figure S4. Cell Chemical Biology 2018 25, 309-317.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.12.012) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions