RIA Case Study from the United States FMVSS No

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Driver Inservice Child Safety Restraint Systems on School Buses.
Advertisements

SAFELY TRANSPORTING HEAD START CHILDREN Passenger Safety Texas AgriLife Extension Service in cooperation with Texas Department of Transportation Educational.
Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop Michael S. Griffith, Director FMCSA Office of Research and Analysis TRB Transportation Safety Planning Working Group.
Three Point Seat Belts on Coaches - The First Decade in Australia Michael Griffiths Road Safety Solutions Sydney Michael Paine Renae Moore.
Federal Role & Safety Standards Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004.
Why Wear Seat Belts? Why wear seatbelts?.
Connecticut Department of Public Health National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System (CODES) Grand Rounds.
United States of America Roof Crush Proposed Rulemaking FMVSS 216 December 8, 2005 Transmitted by the Informal document No. GRSP United States of.
New Proposed Seatbelt Rule for Motorcoaches September 15, 2010 American Bus Association Webinar Series.
Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004
Employee Transportation Defining and reducing the risks.
Fleet Safety. Introduction: Why Address Fleet Accidents Frequency of Fleet Accidents (NSC) 22% of workplace fatalities were highway accidents 80-90% were.
Survey on the actual situation for infant-carrying vehicles Results * Background We distributed questionnaires to countries in Europe and North America.
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Child Passenger Safety in Other Vehicles Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004.
A National Perspective on Child Passenger Safety Thursday, April 27, 2006.
ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL NHTSA’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Briefing for WP.29 November, 2006 Informal document No. WP (140th WP.29,
Part Five, Issue 13 Motor Vehicles and the Environment II: Global Trends.
Chapter 13: Child Passenger Safety in Other Vehicles/Modes of Transportation.
Prepared for Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety and Security Office of Grants and Research, Highway Safety Division Traffic Safety Forum Presented.
Safety Belts NAME Prosecuting Attorney. Safety Belts Common Traffic Issues Intoxicated Driving Intoxicated Driving Over The Limit, Under Arrest Over The.
Safety Recommendation A “Revise 14 CFR Part 91, 135, and 121 to require that all occupants be restrained during takeoff, landing, and turbulent conditions,
Road Wise Passenger Safety Texas Cooperative Extension in cooperation with Texas Department of Transportation Occupant Protection.
APEC Automotive Dialogue Road Safety Summit Robert C. Lange General Motors Executive Director Vehicle Structure & Safety Integration September 5, 2006.
Utah Driver Education and Training Strategies for Managing Risk with Vehicle and Highway Designs Part I Source: FHWA.
Survival Issues Luggage rack failure Luggage rack design Motorcoach occupant protection.
NHTSA Seat Belts on School Buses Public Meeting Deborah A. P. Hersman Member July 11, 2007.
Office of Research and Information Technology 2013 Large Truck and Bus Crash Overview Office of Analysis, Research, and Technology June 2015.
Federal Acquisition Service U.S. General Services Administration 1 GSA Automotive Changing the Way We Drive our Future An Alternative: Low Speed Vehicles.
Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Safety Inspections A Decentralized Approach 1.
The US Vehicle Safety Regulatory Process Martin Koubek Office of International Policy and Harmonization National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
INTRO TO UNINTENTIONAL INJURIES. Target: I will be able to describe rules and laws intended to prevent injuries Pg. 15 Unintentional Injury: injuries.
SAFETY & VEHICLE DESIGN Copyright © 2016 STC, UK.
Why I Bleed Yellow Alexandra Robinson, M.Ed., CDPT President-Elect/NAPT
The Power of Your Seatbelt
PROPANE SCHOOL BUSES MAKE SENSE.
Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC) 5th Edition
Overview of U.S. Crashes & Weather Environment
Graphic showing EGPWS Activation
The Florida Energy and Climate Commission (FECC)
Interpretation of Alabama’s Safety Belt and Child Restraint Laws
Two New NHTSA Data Efforts: EDT and vPIC
Analysis of Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries/Fatality Analysis Reporting System matched data: New insights on work-related motor vehicle crashes.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.
The Business of Transportation
Traffic Safety Programs and Safety Culture
USING IVMS AS A MANAGEMENT TOOL
FACT SHEET Recreational Vehicles (RV’s) and Child Occupants
NASDPTS Executive Director’s Report
The Business of Transportation
Opening General Session
Establishing Safe and Realistic Speed Limits
MPO/RPO Safety Performance Measures
The national problem Importance of data
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.
CASTO Annual Conference Anaheim, CA April 15, 2019
Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004
North Dakota Driver Risk Prevention Curriculum Guide
Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004
National Standardized CPS Certification Training April 2007 – R1010
National Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program May 2004
National Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program May 2004
Road Wise Occupant Protection Passenger Safety
Seating and Safety.
National Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program May 2004
Securing of children in buses and coaches
Real World Side Impacts Involving Rear Pediatric Occupants
16 Things We Have in Common
National Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program May 2004
Presentation transcript:

RIA Case Study from the United States FMVSS No RIA Case Study from the United States FMVSS No. 208: Lap/Shoulder Belts for Over-The-Road Buses

The Problem Millions of people ride commercial buses every year National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) had investigated several serious commercial bus crashes Each crash had at least three fatalities and six people with serious injuries NTSB determined that the risk of passenger fatalities or injuries would have been reduced if passengers wore a lap/shoulder safety belt Lap/shoulder belts may reduce the risk of fatal injuries in crashes where the bus rolls over crashes by 77 percent

Regulatory Environment Prior to the rule, there were no federal requirements for seat belts to be installed at the passenger positions for these buses The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) required NHTSA to issue the rule The requires lap/shoulder belts at all passenger seating positions on New over-the-road buses (except school buses) New buses, other than over-the-road buses, with a gross vehicle weight rating greater than 11,793 kilograms (26,000 pounds) Final rule published November 2013

Research: Scientific Basis for the Rule (Simplified) Full scale crash test with twenty-two test dummies The dummies with lap/shoulder belts generally stayed in their seats and had lowest injury during the crash test.

Data Foundations Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) All police-reported fatal motor vehicle crashes within the U.S. State data recoded into a uniform national data set Fatalities w/in 30 days of crash 20.9 annual fatalities in the vehicles of interest National Automotive Sampling System/General Estimate System (NASS/GES) Nationally representative sample of police reported motor vehicle crashes Trained data entry personnel interpret and code data Approximately 90 data elements in a common format 7,934 annual injuries in the vehicles of interest

Benefits: What the Rule Would Accomplish Effectiveness: the safety belts will not prevent 100 percent of all injuries/fatalities in a bus crash Belt Usage Rate: Not everyone will use the safety belts even if installed (about 15 percent to 83 percent projected to actually use the belts) In light of <100 percent effectiveness/usage, the rule was estimate to prevent (annually) 1.7 to 9.2 fatalities 89 to 536 minor injuries 57 to 322 moderate to critical injuries

Costs: The Rule’s “Price” Installation costs on new buses Weight impacts: adding the safety belts increases the bus weight and reduces fuel economy; bus operators will experience some increase in fuel costs Estimated Costs: $2,895 to $3,178 per vehicle

Alternatives to Lap/Shoulder Belts Alternatives analyzed Lap belts only Alternative anchorage strength requirements Retrofitting existing, old buses The alternatives were rejected in favor of the rule The lap belts only option and lower anchor strengths decreased costs only very modestly (or not at all), but would not increase the number of fatalities/injuries avoided significantly Requiring retrofitting not reasonable because it would be very expensive (particularly for small businesses) and yield little in terms of benefits

Summary: Net Benefits of the Rule Annualized Costs and Benefits of Requiring Lap/Shoulder Belts for Over-The-Road Buses (millions of $2008) Costs Benefits Net Benefits 3% Discount Rate $7.0 $28.5 – 158.6 $21.5 to 151.6 % Discount Rate $6.4 $21.8 – 121.1 $15.4 to 114.7