PANEL: CI Leadership Assessing and Anticipating Researcher Needs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Strength in Numbers Technology Transfer Tactics November 18,
Advertisements

A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.
2009 M&S LEADERSHIP SUMMIT Successes and Challenges in Applying M&S beyond the research lab Dr. Carolina Cruz-Neira LITE Chief Scientist W. Hansen Hall.
VOLUNTEER MANAGEMENT INTERNAL KICKOFF DATE The Leadership Development and Strategic HR Practice Area is presented by American Express. This Service Grant.
1 Vision Area of Focus Success Metrics* * All success metrics to be completed by Spring ’08. Commitments to ActionStatus Provide access to quality and.
1 ETCTN phase 2 accrual goal vs minimum requirement in UM1 parent grant supplements  Total budget is $7.2M for supplements and maximum direct costs per.
1 Exploring NSF Funding Opportunities in DUE Tim Fossum Division of Undergraduate Education Vermont EPSCoR NSF Research Day May 6, 2008.
Scholarly Engagement Mission Pathway Partnership Pathway Epistemological Pathway Pedagogical Pathway Production of Knowledge Improvement of LearningConnection.
Technology Planning Little Creek Elementary School.
OCTOBER 4, 2012 Tenure and Promotion Workshop. Today’s Agenda Execution of Mission, Vision and Goals Criteria for Tenure and Promotion FAQ’s E-Faculty.
ACCJC SPECIAL REPORT DUE TO FINANCIAL REVIEW CONTACT: DR. VICTOR JAIME, ED.D DUE: APRIL 15, 2014.
The University of Texas at San Antonio June 19, 2013 Merit Policy.
Technology and the new Colby professor Get Help | Get Started.
Think Tank and University Relationships: Finding the Synergies Dr. Ifediora C. Amobi Executive Director African Heritage Institution Enugu, NIGERIA Wednesday,
Building Strong Geoscience Departments: Resources for the Community Heather Macdonald, College of William & Mary Cathryn Manduca, SERC at Carleton College.
KYTC RESEARCH AND INNOVATION PROGRAM: AASHTO RAC: JULY 23, 2014 Jason J. Siwula, P.E. Innovation Engineer, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet.
Assessment 101 Office of Planning and Assessment.
Jennifer Skolaski, Ph.D. Community & Nonprofit Leadership Consulting, LLC.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center 1 Putting Advocacy Plans into Practice.
Planning and SACS Stephen Riter Roy Mathew The University of Texas at El Paso.
Information Technology Assessment conducted by BerryDunn Consulting for the UA System March 9, 2015.
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
Upcoming Events. "Our Stories: Faculty Who Were First in Their Families to Attend College Share Their Stories" A panel of faculty who were the first in.
Mickey Slimp, Executive Director, Northeast Texas Consortium of Colleges & Universities Rich Gross, Executive Vice President, the Clements Group Ronda.
Tuition-Designated Fees University of Texas at San Antonio.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Faculty Members Need to Know the Answers to These 10 Questions Joseph T. DiPiro, PharmD University of Georgia College of Pharmacy and the Medical College.
Governance effectiveness... A model for development Les Walton Northern Education Trust.
Dallas County Community College District – The LeCroy Center Taking the Pulse of Online Learning: Using the Quality Score Card in the DCCCD ROOM X2005.
LSSU Assessment Timeline Phase I (Completed by December 2009) –Create Institutional Assessment Structure –Create Department Assessment Teams –Write College.
David J. Chard, Ph.D. Leon Simmons Dean Simmons School Update and Doctoral Program Development.
Bridge to College Courses Funded by College Spark Washington Washington Bridge to College Project: Setting a Context for Principals Dr. Kathe Taylor Assistant.
Broadband and other Technical Needs of Smaller Communities Presented by Brian Ormand Ed.D. Project Manager, NMSU June 10, 2016.
Transforming Good Ideas into Funded Research:
Faculty Mentoring Program for Students with Disabilities
Faculty Advancement, Success and Tenure (FAST)
The Integration of Quality Matters™
Faculty Advancement, Success and Tenure (FAST)
Professional Learning Communities
Individual Thinking Time
Project Management (x470)
Standard III Faculty.
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
Corine Farewell DVM, MBA
Promotions Process.
Conceptual Model of Integrated Planning
Assessing the Impact of Governors
FUTURE WATER ASSOCIATION
Michigan Guided Pathways 2.0 Institute I
STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES
Next Generation Student Systems
Guided Pathways: Connecting and Reconnecting with Students
Going to Conferences Why participate at a conference?
SACSCOC Reaffirmation 2016 Quality Enhancement Plan
Transforming Good Ideas into Funded Research:
Jenny Schanker, Ed.D. Director of Research and Institutional Practice
Linking Strategic Planning and Budgeting
Why Does Diversity Matter and How Can We Achieve It?
A Two-Phased Approach to Online Faculty Development
Institution Name.
Unlock Your Major Gifts Potential
2013 Nonprofit Information Session
Concept Proposal template for presentation by Dean to evaluation panel
Lorem Ipsum lorem ipsum
Curriculum and Programs
Curriculum and Programs
Extension Title Series
Civil Discourse: Engaging with Colleagues Who May Not Like You
Affordable Housing for
STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES & Assessment
Presentation transcript:

PANEL: CI Leadership Assessing and Anticipating Researcher Needs Hussein Al-Azzawi University of New Mexico 08.08.2018

Panelists: Patrick Clemins, U Vermont Randy Downer, Colby College Chris Simmons, U Texas Dallas Jason Simms, Lafayette College

What is the vision of your institute when it comes to supporting research? (small vs large, number of research faculty) Describe the process of assessing and anticipating researchers needs? (is it affected by funding availability) Your understanding of faculty on tenure track? (based on their incentive, needs, timeline)

What is the procedure for boarding new researchers and introducing them to the right resources for them? Do you evaluate the researcher’s expertise and does that play a role when you provide your solutions? What are the different service levels service does your institute provide?

Do you work/collaborate with researchers while in design phase of their upcoming grants? What do you do if your center cannot provide the needed resource? Do you guide them to other national or enterprise resource? Examples and success stories? Is there a way to read researcher’s minds?