Figure 2 Imaging of atherosclerotic plaque burden

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reversing Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid Lowering Reversing Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid Lowering Presented at American Heart Association.
Advertisements

Surrogate Measures of Atherosclerosis and Implications for Evaluating Cardiovascular Risk Nathan D. Wong, Ph.D., F.A.C.C. Associate Professor and Director.
ASTEROID A Study To evaluate the Effect of Rosuvastatin On Intravascular ultrasound- Derived coronary atheroma burden.
Lindsay and Choudhury, Nature Reviews: Drug Discovery 2008, 7: Imaging the vessel wall in atherosclerosis.
VBWG BRAVER Trial BRachial Artery Vascular Endothelium Reactivity Study A substudy of PROVE IT-TIMI 22.
Aortic and Carotid Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) Imaging
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Prospective Application of Pre-Defined Intravascular.
Date of download: 5/30/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography as a Screening.
Date of download: 7/8/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Impact of Dual Lipid-Lowering Strategy With Ezetimibe.
Date of download: 7/8/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: The Year in Atherothrombosis J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(10):
From: Prospective serial evaluation of myocardial perfusion and lipids during the first six months of pravastatin therapy: Coronary artery disease regression.
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Copyright © 2006 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Oxford Niacin Trial.
FATS- Familial Atherosclerosis Treatment Study
Figure 2 Response after initial increase in total tumour burden
Figure 10 Assessment of myocardial fibrosis
Figure 2 Different manifestations of myocardial ischaemia
Figure 4 Pharmacodynamic comparison of crushed versus integral
Figure 1 Cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)
Figure 4 BMI and mortality in patients with heart failure
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Figure 2 Pathological specimens showing the most common reasons for bioprosthetic valve failure Figure 2 | Pathological specimens showing the most common.
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Figure 1 Anatomy of the femoral artery
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Figure 3 Management of acute coronary syndrome with intact fibrous cap
Figure 2 Three-year survival rates on the basis of body composition
Figure 3 3D printing of aortic and mitral valves
Figure 4 Imaging in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome
Diagnosis of Atherosclerosis by Imaging
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Figure 6 Pharmacodynamic profile of switching between clopidogrel and ticagrelor therapy: results from the RESPOND study Figure 6| Pharmacodynamic profile.
Figure 10 Lipomatous hypertrophy of the atrial septum
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Figure 3 Ultrasound-guided femoral artery access
Figure 1 Health-care system today
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Figure 4 Treatment plans using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)
Figure 4 TAVI for bicuspid aortic valve disease
Figure 2 Global cost of HF per capita in 2012
Figure 1 Manual thrombus aspiration
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Figure 2 Apical hypertrophy missed by echocardiography
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Figure 5 Bioresorbable vascular scaffold apposition and strut coverage
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Figure 6 The neurogenic components of angina
Double-lumen carotid plaque: A morbid configuration
SMART-STRATEGY Trial design: Patients with a bifurcation coronary lesion were randomized to a conservative strategy (n = 128) vs. an aggressive strategy.
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Figure 3 Imaging of adverse plaque characteristics
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Cardiovascular calcification in patients with chronic renal failure: Are we on target with this risk factor?  Peter A. Mccullough, Sandeep Soman  Kidney.
Alan Rozanski et al. JIMG 2017;10:
Baseline characteristics of study population
Figure 1 Imaging assessments of luminal stenosis, haemodynamic
Expression of CD40L and CD40 in human vascular atherosclerotic lesions in situ. Expression of CD40L and CD40 in human vascular atherosclerotic lesions.
Presentation transcript:

Figure 2 Imaging of atherosclerotic plaque burden Figure 2 | Imaging of atherosclerotic plaque burden. a | CT calcium scoring demonstrating macroscopic coronary calcification. b | Intravascular ultrasonography of coronary plaque demonstrating the outline of the vascular lumen (red) and plaque (orange). Cross-sectional magnetic resonance image of the same patient c | at baseline, and d | after 24 months of statin treatment, showing plaque regression at the level of the right carotid artery bifurcation. ICA, internal carotid artery; IJV, internal jugular vein. Panels c and d reprinted from Corti, R. et al. Effects of aggressive versus conventional lipid-lowering therapy by simvastatin on human atherosclerotic lesions: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 46 (1), 106–112 © (2005), with permission from Elsevier. Panels c and d reprinted from Corti, R. et al. Effects of aggressive versus conventional lipid-lowering therapy by simvastatin on human atherosclerotic lesions: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 46 (1), 106–112 © (2005), with permission from Elsevier Dweck, M. R. et al. (2016) Imaging of coronary atherosclerosis — evolution towards new treatment strategies Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2016.79