Fisher v. Texas: Implications for K-12 Integration Stephen Menendian Assistant Director, Haas Institute for a Fair and Inclusive Society February 22, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ALAMEDA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent Search.
Advertisements

1 Mid-Term Review of The Illinois Commitment Assessment of Achievements, Challenges, and Stakeholder Opinions Illinois Board of Higher Education April.
Title I Site Eligibility Ranking & Serving Schools NCLB Technical Assistance Audio March 28, :30 PM March 29, :30 AM Alaska Department of.
Fair: marked by impartiality and honesty; free from self-interest, prejudice, or favoritism; conforming with the established rules; consonant with merit.
Brown vs. Board of Education : Yesterday and Today Source:Rosen, Jeffrey,The Lost Promise of School Integration, The Sunday New York Times, The Week in.
February 16, Tonight’s Agenda  Review Assets and Challenges From Last Meeting  Review Necessary Assumptions  Look at Possible Considerations.
The Metro Schools Learning Community LB 641. Learning Community/Timeline 1.September 2007 – Commissioner of Education certifies Learning Community (LC)
1. 2 The San Jacinto Unified School District presents: Strategic Plan For
Legal Update: A Review of the Latest Cases Concerning Diversity Gerard D. St. Ours Associate General Counsel The Johns Hopkins University November 1, 2007.
Higher education In a study of admissions at the college level, Bok and Bowen (The Shape of the River) found that Admission rates for blacks were greater.
Distributing the Benefits and Burdens of Growth: Metropolitan Equity in the Portland Region.
Equity vs. Adequacy By: Jay Masterson. For 100 years…  School financing through local wealth and property taxes  Creates a situation if significant.
Public and Private School Choice in Greater Hartford: A Brief Overview and Computer Mapping Analysis Jack Dougherty and Naralys Estevez Trinity College,
Analyzing and Mapping Census and Student Data 2007 Innovations Conference New Orleans March 6, 2007.
Measuring socio-economic background and its influence on school education outcomes South Australian Institute for Education Research Spring Seminar Series.
UNTOUCHABLE CARROTS: MARKETING SCHOOL CHOICE AND REALITIES IN HARTFORD'S INTER-DISTRICT MAGNET PROGRAM Mira Debs, Yale University Trinity.
Are Magnet Schools Attracting All Families Equally ? Naralys Estevez ’06 Cities, Suburbs, and Schools research project at Trinity College, Hartford CT.
Magnet Schools and Peers: Effects on Student Achievement Dale Ballou Vanderbilt University November, 2007 Thanks to Steve Rivkin, Julie Berry Cullen, Adam.
Schools and Segregation For ELPS 200, Spring 2009.
Learning Together for Life. If your child was born between 1 September 2003 and 31 August 2004, they will transfer from primary to secondary school in.
SEATTLE DECISION: SCHOOL INTEGRATION SURVIVES WHAT’S NEXT? WHAT’S NEXT? John C. Brittain Chief Counsel, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.
Title 1 at J. Evans Middle School. Title 1 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 was created to ensure that all children have a fair,
DRAFT Building Our Future 2017 Fulton County Schools Strategic Plan Name of Meeting Date.
Chapter 43 Discrimination. Amendments Amendments ratified to make equality a reality: 13 th 13 th 14 th 14 th 15 th 15 th 19 th 19 th 24 th 24 th.
Quote of the Day: “We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable.
If you have your Parent Letter signed, please return the bottom portion. Scissors are on my desk. Please get out materials for notes.
Chapter 10 Recruiting Children ©2013 Cengage Learning.
Is There Housing Discrimination?. Homeownership Rates.
Fisher v. Texas: The Limits of Exhaustion and the Future of Race-Conscious University Admissions Professor john a. powell Director, Haas Institute for.
Analyzing and Mapping Census and Student Data 2006 PNAIRP Conference Welches, OR.
- 0 - Community Forums OUSD School Admissions and Attendance Boundary Policies Spring 2008.
Family awareness, access and action: the Partners in Literacy approach.
The Decade of Roma Inclusion: A Unifying Framework of Progress Measurement Martin Kahanec Central European University, Budapest Institute for the Study.
Racial Disparities in Criminal Sentencing and Incarceration: Twin Cities and Wichita.
Improving Security, Systems, and Statistics San Diego, CA June 4 th – 8 th, 2006 Developing a Community Health Information System NAPHSIS Conference –
Asian Americans and Affirmative Action. What is Affirmative Action? Institutional efforts to increase the number of underrepresented minorities in U.S.
Changes in the Educational Status of Minority Students in New Hanover County Public Schools since Brown vs. the Board of Education (May 17, 1954) By: George.
November 7, Report on the community feedback Inform the Board on our progress on the recommendations from Dr. Orfield’s report Review the timeline.
Accepting Justice Kennedy’s Dare: Jefferson County Public Schools and the Future of Integration Daniel Kiel The University of Memphis Cecil C. Humphreys.
1 Equip for Equality and the Special Education Clinic Presentation to Holland & Knight January 13, 2010.
The University of Michigan Cases: Unraveling the Confusion Maya R. Kobersy Assistant General Counsel The University of Michigan (March 24, 2006)
Planning for A Single Point of Access For Families One Stop Family Support and Resource Center Baltimore, Maryland.
The Need for Disaggregated and Cross-Tabulated Data in Higher Education Policymaking Robert T. Teranishi Associate Professor New York University National.
Chapter 21: Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law Section 2
Success is what counts. Increasing Student Success: Why Equity Matters.
Color-blind vs. Color-defined Educational Opportunity Laura McNeal, J.D., Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Georgia State University Laura McNeal, J.D., Ph.D.
Demographic Shifts: The Community College Experience Ileana P. Rodriguez, Ph.D. Vice President of Academic Affairs and Student Services Triton College.
Admission & Desegregation Re-examining the Role of Race in the Enrollment of America’s Public Schools By Tracy Hall & Tim Milledge.
Every student. every classroom. every day. Healthy Kids Healthy Oakland Opportunity Mapping Update Susan Lindell Radke OUSD GIS Analyst/Contract Demographer.
Education applications and potential use for liability and remedy.
Brown V. Board of Education (1954)
L-Edukazzjoni għall-Minuri u l-Adulti, iċ-Ċavetta kontra l-Faqar Carmel Borg L-Universit a` ta’ Malta.
THE UNFAIR TREATMENT OF MEMBERS OF MAJORITY GROUPS(WHITES) CAUSED FROM PREFERENTIAL POLICIES, AS IN COLLEGE ADMISSIONS OR EMPLOYMENT, PROPOSED TO HELP.
Utilization and Integration of Technology to Promote the Success of all Students Patricia Huertas.
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin Lorraine Jones Yu Sun.
POWER OF ONE COMMUNITY INITIATIVE SHARELIUS HOLMES EDU 635: COMMUNITY & YOUTH DEVELOPMENT DR. LECONTE MIDDLETON ASHFORD UNIVERSITY OCTOBER 25, 2015.
Challenge Your Mind…Build Your Faith A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the School of Education Liberty University Joseph F. Fontanella February.
Discrimination Chapter 43. What Is Discrimination? What Is Discrimination? Our legal traditions are rooted in part in a commitment to equality. Discrimination—
Post Desegregation Consent Decree Plan
School Segregation by Race & Socioeconomic Status
Build Your Own ESSA Explainer
Opportunity Index: Policy Presentation to School Committee
Lecture 42 Discrimination VI
Summary of Central Park School for Children’s Economic Diversity
Fisher v. Univ. of Texas (2013)
Process and Anticipated Schedule
Current conditions.
Assistant Director, Haas Institute for a Fair & Inclusive Society
A ROADMAP FROM DESEGRATION TO DIVERSITY IN AMERICA’S PUBLIC SCHOOLS
How to Measure and Monitor Outcomes in Opportunity Zones
Presentation transcript:

Fisher v. Texas: Implications for K-12 Integration Stephen Menendian Assistant Director, Haas Institute for a Fair and Inclusive Society February 22, 2014

K-12/Post-Fisher Environment The requirements of narrow tailoring/exhaustion and the burdens of this approach are already evident in K-12. K-12 educational environments are increasingly segregated by race and class. School districts with a commitment to equal opportunity and integration have developed increasingly administratively complex, sophisticated approaches to student assignment.

3 School boards may pursue the goal of bringing together students of diverse backgrounds and races through other means, including strategic site selection of new schools; drawing attendance zones with general recognition of the demographics of the neighborhoods; allocating resources for special programs; recruiting students and faculty in a targeted fashion; and tracking enrollments, performance, and other statistics by race. These mechanisms are race-conscious but do not lead to different treatment based on a classifications that tells each student he or she is to be defined by race. If school authorities are concerned that the student- body compositions of certain schools interfere with the objective of offering an equal educational opportunity to all of their students, they are free to devise race- conscious measures to address the problem in a general way without treating each student in a different fashion soley on the basis of systematic, individual typing by race.

Multi-Factor Modeling Multi-factor approaches may better capture particular forms of disadvantage, but they do a less effective job of producing raw numerical racial diversity than individual racial classifications do. To compensate for not being able to use race directly, more factors are needed to ensure greater precision in terms of desired outcomes. While approximating race, these approaches are far more complex and resource intensive than using a simple race criterion, and require outside expertise and consultants Such plans have been laboriously developed using available demographic data with the help of consultants and student assignment experts.

Multi-Factor Modeling Multi-factor approaches are compelling because they not only paint a more vivid portrait of the underlying structural conditions, but are also more narrowly tailored to particular forms of disadvantage. A single indicator cannot capture the myriad factors that influence an individuals life chances. The administrative expense of developing race-neutral plans goes far beyond the resources of most admissions committees, let alone school boards and administrative staff, compared to the use of racial classifications in either student assignment or admissions review.

DistrictIndicatorsStepsNotes Jefferson County/Louisvill e, KY 1)Median HH Income 2)Racial Composition of Neighborhood 3)Ed. Attain of Parents 1) Parental Choice within Resides Zone Two-Zone model Berkeley, CAL 1)Average Nbhd Income 2)Ed. Attain of Adults in Nbhd 3)Racial Composition of Nbhd 1)Sibling 2)Parental Choice within Zone assignment Controlled Choice, 3 Attendance Zones; Upheld by Cal. Ct. of Appeals Montclair, NJ 1)Median HH income 2)HH Poverty Rates 3)# of F/R Lunch Stds 4)Ed. Attain of Adults in Nbhd 5)Racial Composition of Nbhd 1)Special needs 2)ESL 3)Siblings 4)Parental Choice within Zone Assignment Magnets Plan, Freedom-of-Choice, 3-Zones, K students only Chicago, IL 1)Median family income 2)Adult Ed. Attainment 3)% of Single-Parent HH 4)% of Owner-Occupied Homes 5)% Of ESL students 1)Siblings 2)½ of remaining seats proximity lottery 3)Remaining Seats by SES census block zone 4 Census Block Zones

Berkeley Zones Source: Civil Rights Project at UCLA

Diversity Map Source: Civil Rights Project at UCLA

Cal. Ct. of Appeals We conclude that the particular policies challenged here – which aims to achieve social diversity by using neighborhood demographics when assigning students to schools – is not discriminatory. The challenged policy does not use racial classifications; in fact, it does not consider an individual students race at all when assigning the student to a school. - ACRF v. Berkeley Unified School Districts

Opportunity Mapping and Education 10 Since the racialized nature of opportunity isolation is a spatial phenomena, maps are naturally an effective way to represent it Since the racialized nature of opportunity isolation is a spatial phenomena, maps are naturally an effective way to represent it Maps allow us to understand volumes of data at a glance through layering Maps allow us to understand volumes of data at a glance through layering Mapping is a very powerful tool in looking at educational inequity & opportunity Mapping is a very powerful tool in looking at educational inequity & opportunity Multi-Factor Modeling: Opportunity Mapping

Opportunity Mapping For Schools 11 Mapping the geographic distribution of opportunity helps us to evaluate where these opportunity mismatches exist in a community and to design interventions to move people to opportunity Student assignment policies can be created using indicators, drawing attendance Zones, boundaries, or through controlled choice plans.

Modeled several educational zones for Montclair, based on five equally weighted factors. # of Free and Reduced Lunch Students Parental Education Levels Median Household Income Household Poverty Rates Race, by neighborhood Each of these factors was calculated at the neighborhood level, by census block group. Opportunity Zones in Montclair

Three Zone Integration Model: Montclair, NJ GOAL: Each school has diversity of students from each zone, within 5% point deviation of K class zone baseline. K and transfer students are assigned based on parental preference and zone balance.

*Step 3: From this database, a wait list system is utilized Montclair

Montclair

Montclair

Three Zone Integration Model: Montclair, NJ Under the plan, the township would be divided into three zones, labeled Zone A, Zone B and Zone C. Students would be assigned to zones based on individual census data, including household income and Title 1 status (eligibility for Free or Reduced Lunch). Students from all three zones would then be represented in each school.

Three Opportunity Zone Model Zone Model Without RaceWith Race

Four Opportunity Zone Model Without RaceWith Race

20 Justice Kennedys opinion is controlling as the fifth vote.

That the school districts consider these plans to be necessary should remind us that our highest aspirations are yet unfulfilled. School districts can seek to reach Browns objective of equal educational opportunity. But the solutions mandated by these school districts must themselves be lawful.

Conclusion Opportunity-enrollment model may well offer an ideal alternative or complementary admissions policy. Pursuit of policies such as these will illustrate for the courts the limits of a strict exhaustion requirement, and perhaps lead to the development and use of admissions processes that can better measure forms of advantage relative to discrete and insular minorities.