Transitioning from FIRST To The Systemic FFT Implementation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Principals Role in Systemic Change for Reading Commitment.
Advertisements

The Continuous Improvement Classroom Please sit by SIP goal area 1.) Find the SIP goal area that matches the Action Research area you work on.
The Continuous Improvement Classroom. What prevents students from succeeding and reaching their full potential? Discuss the characteristics or factors.
NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Instructional Learning Cycle
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
Integration: LDC/MDC Strategies & the Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) SREB August 26, 2013 KDE Effectiveness Coaches, Rebecca.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Understanding the Rubric Presenters: Rhonda Pitts and Bridgette Blue June 18, 2012.
Professional Performance Process OPD 863 – Using the Rubric Our Journey Continues! 21 st Century Supervision and Evaluation.
December 13, 2011 ICSD facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas & Cheryl Covell TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 4.
Resources and Beyond FfT Facilitator Training January 8, 2013.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research & Literature From Session 1 Homework Video Exercise Mid-Year Conferences.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Differentiated Supervision
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting February,
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Professional Performance Process Presented at March 2012 Articulation Meetings.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
EVALUATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Ohio TIF and OTES.
Peer Observation & Connecting to the Kentucky Framework for Teaching.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Teacher Leadership Specialist Standards and Evaluation Process Overview.
How to Effectively Communicate With Families A deeper understanding of component 4c: Communicating with Families.
Teacher Talk Based on what you know now about LDC... What would you expect to see if you walked into a classroom that was implementing LDC at what you.
Danielson Framework 3D – Using Assessment in Instruction.
July 11, 2013 DDM Technical Assistance and Networking Session.
1 Superintendent’s “Everybody Teaches” Academy Overview and Implementation Plan.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
ELA FELLOWS Convening #4. SWITCHING LENSES As a learner, how did I manage my learning? As a teacher, how have I helped my students make meaning? As a.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) Teacher Overview.
MOVING TO T-TESS Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System Copyright 2016.
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
The New York State Core Body of KNowledge
ABE Instructional Strategies: Getting Teachers Off to the Right Start
Teacher Evaluation Process
The Year of Core Instruction
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
Personal Growth and Professional Development
State Board of Education Progress Update
Teacher Evaluation Process
Introductions Introduction
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Defining Effective and Identifying Observation Rubric Titles
Auxiliary Rubrics Module 6 Activity Overview
Preston & Wingham Primary Schools Federation
Introductions Introduction
CUTM 4012: Methods of Teaching English
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Teacher Evaluator Student Growth Retraining Academy
Presentation transcript:

Transitioning from FIRST To The Systemic FFT Implementation The Office of Talent Development Presenter: Rhonda Pitts June 18, 2012

Outcomes Participants will learn what is expected in the transition from FIRST to the Systemic Roll-out of FFT Participants will share components of FIRST that they would like to continue/discontinue Participants will dig deeper in their understanding of the language of the 8 component areas of the FFT rubric Participants will define the language of the rubric as it applies to teachers and students levels of performance

Transitioning from FIRST Systemic FIRST No Platform Platform 8 Essential Components 12 Components (Choose 8) Goal Setting Conferences/ Goal Setting Conference/ Self Assessments Self Assessments Pre-Conference/Post Conference Pre-Conference/Post Conference FFT Observations (On-cycle) FFT Observations (Voluntary) OTD/FFT Facilitator/School Based FFT FIRST Teacher Liaisons Facilitators Emolument/Leadership Opportunities Leadership Projects Systemic Professional Development FIRST Professional Development (Program implementation/Danielson) Hard to Staff (No stipend) Hard to Staff (Stipend) Mid/Year and End of Year Evaluations Mid/Year and End of Year Evaluations No Financial Awards Financial Awards

Warm-up Activity- Keepers and Leavers Think about the FIRST Program and all of its components List all of the components that you would like to keep/refine and or build upon in the coming year How will you unite your staff under the Systemic Umbrella of FFT? Talk with your teams. Share

What is a Rubric? Read “The Advantages of a Rubric” article, individually In your reading, find the following: One sentence One phrase One word that speaks to you about rubrics. Let’s share.

Analyzing the Expectations Each table has been assigned a component: Read the performance levels for your assigned component. Using Hand-out # 1, record your understanding of the performance of the teacher and student based on the level (Unsat, Basic, Proficient and Distinguished) Share your notes with your tablemates. Chart your responses for each level of performance at the component level. Be prepared to share out.

Think Abouts As we begin the next school year, what is important for teachers and administrators to communicate in regards to understanding the transition from a FIRST School to a Systemic Framework for Teaching School How do we communicate to administrators and teachers the language and differences of the Framework for Teaching Rubrics/Performance Levels so that everyone understands the expectations to reach the proficient and distinguished levels? How do we ensure that teachers achieve at the highest levels of performance consistently?

Closing Thought What role will the Framework for Teaching Play in uniting your school in a common mission? What can your team do to help get them there? Thank you !!!!!