1 NNSAs ICF Strategy Presented to Fusion Power Associates 34th Annual Meeting and Symposium Washington, DC December 11, 2013 Kirk Levedahl NNSA NATIONAL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

Presidents FY13 Federal Budget Crop Protection Funding Line Susan T. Ratcliffe Ph.D. Crop Protection Visioning Teleconference March 7,
2013 Key Issues Review: Enabling Sustained Deep Space Exploration with a Broad Vision Congressional Visits Day Preparatory Briefing Teleconferences February.
1 AIAA Delta Forum AIAA Public Policy A CRISIS IN AERONAUTICS The NASA Landscape Aerospace Sciences Meeting January 8, 2001 Carol A. Cash, Chair Aeronautics.
1 Practical Work and Experience With Performance Management ICAO Performance Management Symposium John Crichton, President and CEO NAV CANADA March 28,
1 Establishing Performance Indicators in Support of The Illinois Commitment Presented to the Illinois Board of Higher Education December 11, 2001.
Innovate Now: Overview and Next Steps February 2007.
Council for Education Policy, Research and Improvement CEPRI Projects Presentation to State Board of Education February 17, 2004.
Development Paths for IFE Mike Campbell General Atomics FPA 25 th Anniversary Meeting December 13,2004.
ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
Portfolio Management, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance, is the coordination of Federal geospatial.
Moving toward a Communications Plan for American Magnetic Fusion Fusion Power Associates Meeting December 5 – 6, 2012 Kitta MacPherson, Director of Communications.
Report of the Committee of Visitors Energy Frontier Research Centers and Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis Energy Innovation Hub Office of Basic.
Khammar Mrabit Director Office of Nuclear Security
SAI Performance Measurement Framework
Internal Control–Integrated Framework
Katonah-Lewisboro School District Annual Professional Performance Review Update 5/23/
Extension of IEA Implementing Agreement on Large Tokamak Facilities Presented to Committee on Energy Research Technologies October 18-19, 2005 Paris, France.
Portfolio Management at DOE/NNSA Kirby Brace Chief Operating Officer (240) (o) (954) (c)
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Perspectives on 10-Year Planning for the Fusion Energy Sciences Program Presented to Public Meeting of the 2014 FESAC Strategic Planning Subpanel Gaithersburg,
1 Ideas About the Future of HPC in Europe “The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of.
Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation,
High Energy Density Physics in the NNSA
Briefing to the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories (CRENEL) Joseph McBrearty, Deputy Director for Field Operations.
Office of Nuclear Energy 1May 20, 2013 Property Management Workshop Office of Nuclear Energy Program Perspective Delivering Nuclear Solutions for America's.
1 E.J. Synakowski Fusion Energy Sciences Office of Science December 3, 2009 FPA Meeting Washington, D.C. Perspectives on fusion energy research: towards.
N A T I O N A L N U C L E A R S E C U R I T Y A D M I N I S T R A T I O N O F F I C E O F D E F E N S E P R O G R A M S Fusion Ignition and Stockpile Stewardship.
Advances in Modeling and Simulation for US Nuclear Stockpile Stewardship February 2, 2009 James S. Peery Director Computers, Computation, Informatics and.
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Advanced Scientific Computing Research Program NERSC Users Group Meeting Department of Energy Update June 12,
FES International Collaboration Program: Vision and Budget Steve Eckstrand International Program Manager Office of Fusion Energy Sciences U.S. Department.
Recommendations Ward Plummer BESAC Subpanel Review of IPNS and LANSCE/Lujan Center Recommendations Ward Plummer Washington, D. C. December 11, 2000.
1 V&V: What to Expect When You’re Doing Science Karen Pao Division of Advanced Simulation and Computing (ASC) Office of R&D for National Security S&T National.
So Many Possibilities Dr. Vic MaconachyChris Inglis Capitol Technology University U. S. Naval Academy CAE Community Meeting, - Columbia, Maryland Accreditations.
Performance Appraisal System Update
1 WRF Development Test Center A NOAA Perspective WRF ExOB Meeting U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, D.C. 28 April 2006 Fred Toepfer NOAA Environmental.
Summary and Closing Remarks Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego Presentation to: ARIES Program Peer Review August 18, 2000 UC San Diego.
Page 1 of 14 Reflections on the energy mission and goals of a fusion test reactor ARIES Design Brainstorming Workshop April 2005 M. S. Tillack.
Office of Fusion Energy Sciences (OFES) Perspective Gene Nardella, Acting Associate Director of Science for Fusion Energy Sciences
Overview of Advanced Design White Paper Farrokh Najmabadi Virtual Laboratory for Technology Meeting June 23, 1998 OFES Headquarters, Germantown.
1 NNSA Perspective on Scientific Opportunities in High Energy Density Laboratory Plasma Physics Mike Donovan Acting Director, ICF Program August 25, 2008.
1 Ideas About the Future of HPC in Europe “The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of.
PRESENTATION OF AWARDS Stephen O. Dean, President Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting and Symposium December 16-17, 2014.
Senior Review Evaluations (1 of 5) Proposals due: 6 March 2015 Panel evaluations: Week of 22 April 2015 Performance factors to be evaluated will include.
Challenges of a Harmonized Global Safety Regime Jacques Repussard Director General IRSN IAEA 2007 Scientific Forum.
A Proposed Risk Management Regulatory Framework Commissioner George Apostolakis Presented at the Organization of Agreement States 2012 Annual Meeting Milwaukee,
Nuclear Science User Facilities (NSUF) DOE Headquarters Perspective Michael Worley Director, Office of Innovative Nuclear Research Office of Nuclear Energy.
Progress in Confinement & Heating Increasing laser energy nn Confinement Parameter & Temperature.
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Advanced Scientific Computing Research Program NERSC Users Group Meeting Department of Energy Update September.
Performance Assessment Assessment of Organizational Excellence NSF Advisory Committee for Business and Operations May 5-6, 2005.
Update on NNSA’s Inertial Confinement Fusion Program Presented to: Fusion Power Associates 32nd Annual Meeting and Symposium Washington, DC Presented by:
The Value of Data The Vital Importance of Accountability American Institutes for Research February 2005.
ASCAC-BERAC Joint Panel on Accelerating Progress Toward GTL Goals Some concerns that were expressed by ASCAC members.
PRESENTATION OF AWARDS Stephen O. Dean, President Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting and Symposium December 1-2, 2010.
1 1 by Dr. John Parmentola Senior Vice President Energy and Advanced Concepts Presented at the American Security Project Fusion Event June 5, 2012 The.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science 20 th Meeting of the IEA Large Tokamak ExCo, May th Meeting of the IEA Poloidal Divertor ExCo, May.
1 OFFICE OF ADVANCED SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING RESEARCH The NERSC Center --From A DOE Program Manager’s Perspective-- A Presentation to the NERSC Users Group.
N A T I O N A L N U C L E A R S E C U R I T Y A D M I N I S T R A T I O N O F F I C E O F D E F E N S E P R O G R A M S The National Academy of Sciences.
Future Direction of the U.S. Fusion Materials Program Dr. Pete Pappano US Department of Energy Fusion Energy Sciences Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting.
Developing Technology for Inertial Fusion Energy David H. Crandall Advisor to the Under Secretary for Science On National Security and Inertial Fusion.
Research in the Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation.
PRESENTED TO: ENERGY FACILITY CONTRACTORS GROUP SAFETY ANALYSIS WORKING GROUP SAFETY ANALYSIS WORKSHOP BY: CHRIS CHAVES NSR&D PROGRAM OFFICE OF NUCLEAR.
1 Defense Programs Predictive Science and Program Credibility: “Beyond M over U” July 2008 Njema Frazier, PhD Acting Deputy Director, Office of Advanced.
ATTRACT is a proposal for an EU-funded R&D programme for sensor, imaging and related computing devlopment Its purpose is to demonstrate the value of European.
Next Generation Nuclear Plant Licensing Strategy William D. Reckley NRC/NRO/ARP March 12, 2009.
PEER 2003 Meeting 03/08/031 Interdisciplinary Framework Major focus areas Structural Representation Fault Systems Earthquake Source Physics Ground Motions.
Strength Through Science
DOE Nuclear Safety Research and Development Program
The next decade of inertial fusion research at LLNL
Presentation transcript:

1 NNSAs ICF Strategy Presented to Fusion Power Associates 34th Annual Meeting and Symposium Washington, DC December 11, 2013 Kirk Levedahl NNSA NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS

2 ICF is vital to NNSAs stockpile stewardship and national security missions ICF is vital to NNSAs stockpile stewardship and national security missions Show relevance to Stockpile Stewardship through HED science. Equating [gain 1] ignition goal to fusion energy undercuts support for ICF out of the 050 account. Provides unique environments for model validation that include radiation hydrodynamics, transport models and TN burn. Recent 5x10 15 allows a credible program on TN burn without substantial further increases in yield HED science is exciting work that attracts and trains those whose judgment will be relied upon to maintain our nuclear deterrent. Ignition remains a goal to pursued deliberately (in a scientifically defensible and productive) fashion. But we are at 1/200 th of goal. Demonstrate scientific quality and credibility to national and international communities in areas relevant to our national security goals. Operate efficiently and effectively.

3 ICF Program has 5 principal elements Develop a burning plasma platform for stockpile stewardship and continue to pursue ignition and high yield in a deliberate fashion. Obtain fundamental physical properties of materials and plasmas in HED environments (in collaboration with Science Campaigns) Provide experimental basis for code and model validation in the HED regime (in collaboration with the Advanced Scientific Computing Campaign). Develop and advance capabilities in HED Science nationally and internationally. Strengthen the HED community and grow the next generation of stewards

4 NNSAs ICF program has transitioned from the NIC to a stockpile science program. Ended the National Ignition Campaign marked the end of construction and commissioning of major facilities. Completed the first year under the 2012 Path Forward Report to Congress Transitioning NIF and other ICF facilities to routine operations under governance models based upon peer review. Increased focus of the NNSA ICF program on its Stockpile Stewardship Mission. FY 2014 ICF Budget, Continuing Resolution and potential for Sequestration NAS report on Inertial Fusion Energy Basic science access to ICF facilities will continue.

5 Path Forward provides consensus view from the National ICF Program leadership May 2012 November 2012 ~120 scientists from around the world met to identify key missing understanding & path to resolve Consensus document submitted to Congress with proposed plan to resolve issues & achieve ignition

6 Under the 2012 plan the principal elements of the ignition plan are: 1.Continue a modified approach in pursuing the indirect drive approach to ignition (IDI) by: oExploring the physics revealed in experiments designed to evaluate integrated performance of the system. oAdding a significant experimental effort to explore single physics effects and improved models to develop an understanding of why the NIC ignition effort failed and most likely paths for improvement. oExploring alternative indirect drive approaches. 2.Explore the underlying physics and develop a path forward for Polar Drive Ignition (PDI) or symmetric direct drive approaches, principally using the capabilities of Omega while performing higher energy PDI experiments on NIF. 3.Explore magnetically driven implosions (MDI) on Z. 4.Continuously update diagnostics capability 5.Provide targets and advance capabilities in the most efficient manner (including appropriate partnerships with industry).

7 The NRC 2013 Report on Inertial Fusion Energy is consistent with the NNSA program The appropriate time for the establishment of a national, coordinated, broad-based inertial fusion energy program within DOE is when ignition is achieved. [Conclusion 4-13] The Target subcommittee report: [t]he national program to achieve ignition using indirect laser drive has several physics issues that must be resolved if it is to achieve ignition. [Conclusion 4-1] Based on its analysis of the gaps in current understanding of target physics and the remaining disparities between simulations and experimental results, the panel assesses that ignition using laser indirect drive is not likely in the next several years. [Conclusion 4-2]

8 Recent High Foot design is showing promising results

9 Further requested reports from Congress 120-day study – a plan to increase the shot rate at NIF over the next 3 years with a budget of $329,000,000 over the next 3 years. –Working groups formed by LLNL to review operations and recommend improvements –Results will be reviewed by panel established by NNSA 60-day study - 3-year plan that lays out significant milestones NIF plans to achieve on the path to ignition and critical experiments needed to support the stockpile stewardship program –HED council is planning the weapons physics program –ICF council established for ignition.

10 We will continue to operate NIF, Omega / EP and Z as our key facilities. 60% of the ICF Program budget is applied to facility operations at NIF, Z, and Omega Research on magnetically-driven ICF Dynamic material properties – including Pu Radiation effects Radiation hydrodynamics Radiation transport Research on indirect drive ignition Laser plasma instabilities Hydrodynamic instabilities Radiation hydrodynamics Materials at extreme conditions Research on polar drive ignition Diagnostics development Open science platform Focused experiments on scientific issues for ICF Platform development for NIF experiments

11 ICF FY 2014 PBR by MTE Total = $484,635

12 Summary Developing a burning plasma platform to achieve ignition is a principal goal of the ICF Program for stockpile stewardship and ignition remains and important goal Alternate concepts to the mainline indirect drive approach are advancing HED facilities are operating well and are oversubscribed (by a lot) Vibrant HED community is recognized to be critical to the success of SSP ICF is an exciting grand challenge endeavor and remains a leading attractor for talent and the next generation of stewards