Search for gravitational waves from binary black hole mergers:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
S3/S4 BBH report Thomas Cokelaer LSC Meeting, Boston, 3-4 June 2006.
Advertisements

A walk through some statistic details of LSC results.
Current status of numerical relativity Gravitational waves from coalescing compact binaries Masaru Shibata (Yukawa Institute, Kyoto University)
GWDAW /12/16 - G Z1 Report on the First Search for BBH Inspiral Signals on the S2 LIGO Data Eirini Messaritaki University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Multiantenna-Assisted Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radio
Brennan Ireland Rochester Institute of Technology Astrophysical Sciences and Technology December 5, 2013 LIGO: Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave.
Systematic effects in gravitational-wave data analysis
The “probability event horizon” and probing the astrophysical GW background School of Physics University of Western Australia Research is funded by the.
Spinning Black Hole Binaries1 Search for Spinning Black Hole Binaries in Advanced LIGO: Parameter tuning of HACR Speaker: Gareth Jones Cardiff University.
Results from TOBAs Results from TOBAs Cross correlation analysis to search for a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background University of Tokyo Ayaka Shoda.
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
Acknowledgements The work presented in this poster was carried out within the LIGO Scientific Collaboration (LSC). The methods and results presented here.
Gravitational lensing effects on parameters estimation in gravitational wave detection with advanced detectors Zhoujian Cao Institute of Applied Mathematics,
Adapting matched filtering searches for compact binary inspirals in LSC detector data. Chad Hanna – For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
TAMA binary inspiral event search Hideyuki Tagoshi (Osaka Univ., Japan) 3rd TAMA symposium, ICRR, 2/6/2003.
Precession during merger R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM) J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech) Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago arXiv:
1SBPI 16/06/2009 Heterodyne detection with LISA for gravitational waves parameters estimation Nicolas Douillet.
The Analysis of Binary Inspiral Signals in LIGO Data Jun-Qi Guo Sept.25, 2007 Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Mississippi LIGO Scientific.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
Dec 16, 2005GWDAW-10, Brownsville Population Study of Gamma Ray Bursts S. D. Mohanty The University of Texas at Brownsville.
15 Dec 2005GWDAW 10 LIGO-G Z1 Overview of LIGO Scientific Collaboration Inspiral Searches Alexander Dietz Louisiana State University for the LIGO.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California CC & M. Vallisneri, PRD.
S.Klimenko, December 16, 2007, GWDAW12, Boston, LIGO-G Z Coherent burst searches for gravitational waves from compact binary objects S.Klimenko,
Manuela Campanelli, LSC Worshop 3/20/2002 The Lazarus Project: Modeling gravitational radiation from coalescing binary black holes MANUELA CAMPANELLI Department.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Searches for Compact Binary Coalescences in LIGO and Virgo data Gabriela González For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration APS.
1. Background A generic ‘chirp’ can be closely approximated by a connected set of multiscale chirplets with quadratically-evolving phase. The problem of.
1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.
S.Klimenko, August 2003, Hannover LIGO-G Z How optimal are wavelet TF methods? S.Klimenko l Introduction l Time-Frequency analysis l Comparison.
Applying Numerical Relativity and EOB to Black Hole Binary Observation Sean McWilliams NASA Goddard Space Flight Center University of Maryland Collaborators:
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
15-18 Dec 2004Spinning Black Hole Binaries1 Search for Spinning Black Hole Binaries in LIGO/GEO data: The First Steps Speaker: Gareth Jones LSC Inspiral.
Searching for Binary Black Holes with Spin Aligned with Orbital Angular Momentum 1 Deborah L. Hamm – Northern Arizona University LIGO SURF 2013 Mentors:
GWDAW10, UTB, Dec , Search for inspiraling neutron star binaries using TAMA300 data Hideyuki Tagoshi on behalf of the TAMA collaboration.
Stochastic Background Data Analysis Giancarlo Cella I.N.F.N. Pisa first ENTApP - GWA joint meeting Paris, January 23rd and 24th, 2006 Institute d'Astrophysique.
GWDAW91Thursday, December 16 First Comparison Between LIGO &Virgo Inspiral Search Pipelines F. Beauville on behalf of the LIGO-Virgo Joint Working Group.
LIGO-G v1 Searching for Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of High Mass Black Hole Binaries 2014 LIGO SURF Summer Seminar August 21 st, 2014.
The first AURIGA-TAMA joint analysis proposal BAGGIO Lucio ICRR, University of Tokyo A Memorandum of Understanding between the AURIGA experiment and the.
LIGO-G09xxxxx-v1 Form F v1 Numerical Simulations of Superkick Binary Black Holes Lydia Nevin Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute LIGO SURF 2014 Mentor:
Searching the LIGO data for coincidences with Gamma Ray Bursts Alexander Dietz Louisiana State University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
SEARCH FOR INSPIRALING BINARIES S. V. Dhurandhar IUCAA Pune, India.
Bose, APS-Denver, 2008/05/04 Estimating the parameters of coalescing black hole binaries (non-spinning) using ground-based detectors Sukanta Bose Washington.
1 8 th E. Amaldi Conference, New York City, June, 2009 Anand Sengupta California Institute of Technology on behalf of the LSC and Virgo Collaborations.
Search for gravitational waves from binary inspirals in S3 and S4 LIGO data. Thomas Cokelaer on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Search for compact binary systems in LIGO data Thomas Cokelaer On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. LIGO-G Z.
Search for compact binary systems in LIGO data Craig Robinson On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. LIGO-G
Thomas Cokelaer for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. APS April Meeting, Jacksonville, FL 16 April 2007, LIGO-G Z Search.
Data Analysis report November, 2009 Gianluca M Guidi
A 2 veto for Continuous Wave Searches
P.Astone, S.D’Antonio, S.Frasca, C.Palomba
Adam Zadrożny The Andrzej Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies
Bounding the strength of gravitational radiation from Sco-X1
Searching for gravitational-wave transients with Advanced detectors
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
GW150914: The first direct detection of gravitational waves
Detection of gravitational waves from binary black hole mergers
Bounding the strength of gravitational radiation from Sco-X1
On Behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and VIRGO
Results from TOBAs Cross correlation analysis to search for a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background University of Tokyo Ayaka Shoda M. Ando, K. Okada,
M.-A. Bizouard, F. Cavalier
Targeted Searches using Q Pipeline
LISA Data Analysis & Sources
OK Alexander Dietz Louisiana State University
Searching for GRB-GWB coincidence during LIGO science runs
Center for Gravitational Wave Physics Penn State University
K.Somiya Detection of blackhole ringdown signals
A Waveform Consistency Test for Binary Inspirals using LIGO data
J. Ellis, F. Jenet, & M. McLaughlin
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
Search for Ringdowns in LIGO S4 Data
Presentation transcript:

Search for gravitational waves from binary black hole mergers: parameter estimation and the Fisher matrix Hee-Suk Cho (KISTI, KOREA) 2nd LeCosPA International Symposium 2015.12.14-NTU

Outline Gravitational waveforms from binary black holes (BBHs) Search and parameter estimation (PE) overview Fisher matrix for PE uncertainty prediction Results and Summary

Inspiral-Merger-Ringdown stages

==> need a Hybrid model Constructing hybrid IMR waveform Theoretical model: fast but inaccurate in MR region NR simulation: accurate in IMR region but short Inspiral due to a long computational time ==> need a Hybrid model arXiv:0704.3764 Hybrid = Inspiral:PN + Merger - Ringdown:NR

Hybrid waveform samples arXiv:0710.2335

Defining IMR waveform model Hybrid waveform Fitting function Fitting function to the hybrid waveforms => Analytic IMR waveform model

Analytic IMR models for BBHs Binary System Function Domain PhenomA NoSpin Frequency PhenomB AlignedSpin PhenomC PhenomD PhenomP PrecessingSpin Frequency-domain models are much faster than time- domain models in generation time ==> fast data analysis (search and parameter estimation)

Search method: Matched filtering Matched filtering is the optimal filter for a signal of known shape in the stationary Gaussian noise 1) Known signal ? BBH waveforms are well modeled as IMR 2) Gaussian noise ? Average of real noises is roughly Gaussian. But, it often gives false alarms, various additional filters applied to reduce false alarm rate

Detector noise sensitivity (Sn) Matched filtering Detector output (d) Model waveform (T) Detector noise sensitivity (Sn) or ⊗ / template bank matched filters are done at once ==> need computing resources ==> no output ==> strong output

Parameter estimation Search pipeline just identifies the GW event. We want to know the physical parameters of the source. Once a detection is made, parameter estimation (PE) analysis is implemented. PE pipeline explores the whole parameter space. Number of parameters: 9 for NoSpinning, 12 for one spinning, 15 for two spinning.

⊗ / Overlap ==> 9~15 parameters Template bank-based analysis is not possible (search:2-3 parameters) Continuous overlaps varying all parameters until the process converges 10^6 ~ 10^9 iterations, very long computational time

PDFs for a PrecessingSpin binary (a2=0) PE result is given by probability density functions (PDFs) ==> Gaussian distribution

Parameter estimation limitation PE aims to find the parameters of the GW source quickly and accurately when a real GW is detected. PE performance test is done by using injection signals for various waveform models, various source parameters. Only one PE test even needs a long computational time Simple methods?

analytical derivatives Fisher matrix For known signal parameters with high Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) in Gaussian noise, the statistical errors can be calculated semi-analytically using the Fisher matrix (FM). PE performance test on errors can be easily done for various waveform models, various binary systems. PDF one numerical overlap analytical derivatives

But semi-analytic, easily applicable to various PE vs. FM PE: no assumptions Unknown signal, Real noises, explore whole parameter space, long time FM: with assumptions Known signal parameters, high SNR, Gaussian noise, only statistical errors But semi-analytic, easily applicable to various waveform models, detector models, binary models.

FM accuracy: NoSpin binary (10, 1.4) Msun waveform1 waveform2 PE noise1 noise2 noise3 noise4 90 % confidence region SNR=20 FM result agrees well with PE errors !!

Result I: NoSpin BBHs - PhenomA model Advanced LIGO detector sensitivity SNR=20

Result II: AlignedSpin BBHs - PhenomC model Strong correlation

Summary Merging BBH systems suffer Inspiral-Merger-Ringdown phases, various IMR models have been developed. In data analysis, search pipeline used matched filtering method, model waveforms are stored in the template bank. Parameter estimation analysis continuously computes overlaps varying all parameters, so needs a very long computational time. Fisher matrix is a simple semi-analytic method, used to predict the statistical error in parameter estimation for known source parameters of a song signal in Gaussian noise. PE errors for NoSpin BBHs (<30Msun) ~0.2% for , ~2% for , errors for are much larger for AlignedSpin BBHs due to strong correlation between the mass ratio and spin

Thanks !!