NOAA Assessment of the Oceansat-2 Scatterometer Seubson (Golf) Soisuvarn, Zorana Jelenak and Paul S. Chang NOAA/NESDIS/StAR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VIIRS Data Evaluation Over Thailand and Japan February 13, 2012 Chair, Chris Elvidge NOAA-NGDC 1.
Advertisements

1 Contact details Colin Gray Room S16 (occasionally) address: Telephone: (27) 2233 Dont hesitate to get in touch.
(Very) Preliminary Quality Assessment of Stratospheric AMSU Channels (Channels 9 – 14) Carl Mears Remote Sensing Systems.
Stratospheric Measurements: Microwave Sounders I. Current Methods – MSU4/AMSU9 Diurnal Adjustment Merging II. Problems and Limitations III. Other AMSU.
OUTLINE Motivation Modeling Simulation Experiments Conclusions.
Level 2 Status February 25, 2003 syl 1 Level 2 Status Sung-Yung Lee and Edward Olsen Chris Barnet and John Blaisdell February 25, 2003.
Calibration Method of Microwave Tb for Retrieving Accurate SST Akira Shibata JAXA / EORC Advances of Satellite Oceanography at Vladivostok, Oct. 3-6, 2007.
1 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 Galactic noise model adjustment Jean-Luc Vergely (ACRI-ST) Jacqueline Boutin (LOCEAN) Xiaobin Yin (LOCEAN)
UPDATE ON BIAS TRENDS, DIRECT SUN CORRECTION, AND ROUGHNESS CORRECTION Joe Tenerelli May 10, 2011.
UPDATE ON SMOS LONG-TERM BIASES OVER THE OCEAN AND ROUGH SURFACE SCATTERING OF CELESTIAL SKY NOISE Joe Tenerelli SMOS L2OS Progress Meeting Arles, France,
REVIEW OF OBSERVED BIAS TRENDS OVER THE OCEAN AND POTENTIAL IMPACT OF PROCESSOR EVOLUTION Joe & Nicolas IFREMER/CLS ESL Quality Working Group #5 May 30-31,
Right Triangle Trigonometry
Long RAnge Navigation version C
Atelier Moment Cinetique Paris 26 Novembre 2012 Les Vents de Surface Diffusiométriques ERS-1 ERS-2 ADEOS-1 QuikSCAT.
COPC Meeting at NCEP, October 2009 NOAA/NESDIS support of ESA’s ADM/Aeolus mission Lars Peter Riishojgaard Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation.
The Aquarius Salinity Retrieval Algorithm Frank J. Wentz and Thomas Meissner, Remote Sensing Systems Gary S. Lagerloef, Earth and Space Research David.
End of Semester Meeting Conically Scanning Active/Passive Sensor Simulation Tool (CAPS) Pete Laupattarakasem Liang Hong.
Unit 2 GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT & SPACE SEGMENT
Using Scatterometers and Radiometers to Estimate Ocean Wind Speeds and Latent Heat Flux Presented by: Brad Matichak April 30, 2008 Based on an article.
Aquarius/SAC-D Mission Mission Simulators - Gary Lagerloef 6 th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010.
OSVW-VC Update Co-leads: Paul Chang (NOAA), Julia Figa-Saldaña (EUMETSAT), BS Gohil (ISRO) CEOS SIT-29 Meeting CNES, Toulouse, France 9 th -10 th April.
Offline Assessment of NESDIS OSCAT data Li Bi 1 Sid Boukabara 2 1 RTI/STAR/JCSDA 2 STAR/JCSDA American Meteorological Society 94 th Annual Meeting 02/06/2014.
Scatterometer winds Manager NWP SAF at KNMI Manager OSI SAF at KNMI PI European OSCAT Cal/Val project Leader KNMI Satellite Winds.
Recent activities on utilization of microwave imager data in the JMA NWP system - Preparation for AMSR2 data assimilation - Masahiro Kazumori Japan Meteorological.
Initial Results on the Cross- Calibration of QuikSCAT and Oceansat-2 Scatterometers David G. Long Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Brigham.
SVY 207: Lecture 4 GPS Description and Signal Structure
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology QuikScat Retrieving Ocean Surface Wind Speeds from the Nonspinning QuikSCAT Scatterometer.
WMO/ITU Seminar Use of Radio Spectrum for Meteorology Earth Exploration-Satellite Service (EESS)- Active Spaceborne Remote Sensing and Operations Bryan.
International Ocean Vector Winds Science Team Meeting, Annapolis, May 2011 ASCAT backscatter processing status Julia Figa-Saldaña, Craig Anderson, Hans.
Evaluation of Microwave Scatterometers and Radiometers as Satellite Anemometers Frank J. Wentz, Thomas Meissner, and Deborah Smith Presented at: NOAA/NASA.
Satellite Communications
ESTIMATION OF OCEAN CURRENT VELOCITY IN COASTAL AREA USING RADARSAT-1 SAR IMAGES AND HF-RADAR DATA Moon-Kyung Kang 1, Hoonyol Lee 2, Chan-Su Yang 3, Wang-Jung.
Applications of Satellite Derived
1 NOAA Programmatic Perspectives Stan Wilson NOAA Satellite & Information Service IOVW Science Team Meeting, Annapolis, 9-11 May 2011.
R. A. Brown 2003 U. Concepci Ó n Nov 9 ‘96 18Z Gulf of Alaska rab.
The New Geophysical Model Function for QuikSCAT: Implementation and Validation Outline: GMF methodology GMF methodology New QSCAT wind speed and direction.
1 Airborne Measurements of Ocean Backscatter Work In Progress by D. Esteban, Z. Jelenak, T. Mavor, P. Chang, NOAA/NESDIS/ORA D. Esteban, Z. Jelenak, T.
2007 IHC – New Orleans 5 – 9 March 2007 JHT Project: Operational SFMR- NAWIPS Airborne Processing and Data Distribution Products OUTLINE 2006 Hurricane.
IOVWST Meeting May 2011 Maryland Calibration and Validation of Multi-Satellite scatterometer winds Topics  Estimation of homogeneous long time.
Ocean Vector Wind Workshops and the Role of Cal/Val in Preparing for Future Satellite Wind Sensors Dudley Chelton Cooperative Institute for Oceanographic.
Level 2 Scatterometer Processing Alex Fore Julian Chaubell Adam Freedman Simon Yueh.
MODIS Preprocessing (before L1B) Changes over the Last Year (and looking forward) Chris Moeller and others CIMSS; Univ. Wisconsin July 13, 2004 Thanks.
SMOS Science Meeting September 2011 Arles, FR Simulating Aquarius by Resampling SMOS Gary Lagerloef, Yann Kerr & Eric Anterrieu and Initial Results.
Seubson Soisuvarn Khalil Ahmad Zorana Jelenak Joseph Sienkiewicz Paul S. Chang 9-11 May 2011IOVWST Meeting, Annapolis, MD, USA1.
9 Feb 2005, Miami 1 An Introduction to SeaWinds Near-Real Time Data Ross Hoffman Mark Leidner Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc. Lexington, MA.
NOAA/NESDIS support of ESA’s ADM/Aeolus mission Lars Peter Riishojgaard Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation.
Satellite Derived Ocean Surface Vector Winds Joe Sienkiewicz, NOAA/NWS Ocean Prediction Center Zorana Jelenak, UCAR/NOAA NESDIS.
Scatterometer Ocean Surface Vector Wind Products at NOAA Paul Chang, Zorana Jelenak, Joseph Sienkiewicz – NOAA and CEOS OSVW Virtual Constellation Update.
NOAA Near Real-Time AIRS Processing and Distribution System Walter Wolf Mitch Goldberg Lihang Zhou NESDIS/ORA/CRAD.
Altimeter and scatterometer seminar SMHI, March 2012 Altimetry data products Julia Figa Saldaña.
NOAA use of Scatterometry Products Presented to CGMS-43 Working Group 2 session, agenda item 10 Author: Paul Chang.
Look Angle Determination
HSAF Soil Moisture Training
SNPP Regional Retransmission Service: Plans and Status of Implementation Presented to CGMS-43 Working Group 1 session, agenda item 6.
Retrieving Extreme wind speeds using C-band instruments
OSVW-VC Update Co-leads: Julia Figa Saldaña - EUMETSAT
Calibration Activities of GCOM-W/AMSR2
Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University
Comparisons of Two Preliminary Windsat Vector Wind Data Sets with
OceanSat-2 Scatterometer Calibration and Validation
David E. Weissman Hofstra University Hempstead, New York 11549
Assessment of the CFOSAT scatterometer backscatter and wind quality
Satellite Communications
Calibration, Validation and Status of OSI SAF ScatSat-1 products
Evaluation of ASCAT Winds by Assessing their Self-consistency
OC Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Ocean - Summer 2001
Lunar Observation Data for GIRO Landsat–8 Operational Land Imager
Recent activities of the OSVW-VC
Recent activities of the OSVW-VC
Proposed best practices for Simultaneous Nadir Overpass (A Discussion)
Presentation transcript:

NOAA Assessment of the Oceansat-2 Scatterometer Seubson (Golf) Soisuvarn, Zorana Jelenak and Paul S. Chang NOAA/NESDIS/StAR

OceanSat-2 Scatterometer- OSCAT OSCAT is a Ku-band rotating pencil beam scatterometer with similarities to QuikSCAT –Developed by ISRO –Launched Oct 2009 on board of OceanSat-2 satelliteParameterQuikSCAT(NASA/JPL)OSCAT(ISRO) Operational Frequency GHz GHz Polarization (Inner/Outer)HH/VV Antenna Diameter1 m Altitude at Equator803 km720 km Orbit Near Repeat Cycle4 days2 days Local time at asc/desc node6:00 a.m. at asc nodenoon at desc node HH 3dB footprint (Az x El)24 x 31 km26.8 x 45.1 km VV 3 dB footprint (Az x El)26 x 36 km29.7 x 68.5 km Incidence Angle (Inner)46 deg49 deg Incidence Angle (Outer)54 deg57 deg Swath Diameter (Inner)1400 km Swath Diameter (Outer)1800 km1836 km Pointing Accuracy+/ deg+/ deg Elevation Pointing (w/ attitude error)+/ deg+/ deg

NRT OSCAT Data via ISRO and EumetSat 3

OSCAT Data NOAA NOAA has been receiving delayed (~24 hours) OSCAT data via ISRO FTP server since September 2010 Timely OSCAT data flow from ISRO to EUMETSAT commenced in February –Since then EUMETSAT has been receiving approximately orbits per day in a timely fashion –In March 2011 timely OSCAT data flow began at NOAA via EUMETSAT dedicated FTP server –ISRO currently working on providing all orbits in a timely fashion and working out procedures to operationally support the data flow NOAA is currently receiving all three levels of OSCAT data: L1B, L2A and L2B L2A and L2B 50 km WVC) 180min 150min Courtesy of T. Heinemann EumetSat

NRT L2B data coverage for all received orbits in May High coverage indicated by red and yellow colors, low by blue and violet colors NRT OSCAT North Atlantic Data Gaps Data gap in North Atlantic observed in ascending nodes This data gap problem is a result of the definition of data-orbits from North Pole to North Pole. The reception stations in Svalbard and Tromsø are not at the North Pole and due to technical constraints at the Oceansat-2 satellite, the satellite dump needs to be cut-off before the transmission starts. Therefore, the measurements between the reception stations and the North Pole are missing when the satellite reaches the reception station from the Atlantic side of the globe. ISRO and EUMETSAT try to find a solution for this problem. Courtesy of T. Heinemann EumetSat

Ongoing Efforts (In collaboration with JPL, KNMI and ISRO) Understand and characterize the L1B performance Develop and implement sigma0 corrections as appropriate Develop and implement NOAA unique L2 products to meet NOAA user requirements

Data Analysis Overview The two latest L1B data were used in this analysis –February 2011 processing (OLD) Implemented in current NRT processor –July 2011 processing (NEW) There is currently no overlap period between the two data sets –Two different days were used in analysis, but approximately equal amount of data Day 094, 2011 (OLD) – 14 orbits Day 030, 2010 (NEW) – 15 orbits –All L1B QC flags were used except bit:4 (in order to show all slices) and bit:9 negative sigma0 flag L1B latest known Discrepancy –L1B was matched up with NCEP model winds and NSCAT2 GMF was used to compute modeled sigma0 –Noise Subtraction Algorithm Calculate Signal power and Noise power –Scan Angle Dependence –Ascending Descending Dependence

Noise Subtraction Noise subtraction inconsistent among slices for pre-July ISRO OSCAT processing version Power after noise subtraction Noise power zero line NEW = July 2011 delivery OLD – Pre July 2011

INNER BEAMOUTER BEAM OLD NEW Signal Power

Noise Subtraction – 2 Signal-to-noise ratio are improved at low wind speeds In both versions signal power appear to saturate at ~ 3-4 m/s NEW Ps Pn OLD Ps Pn

Negative Sigma0 Low value of sigma0 anomalies with wind speed is now gone. OLDNEW

INNER BEAM OUTER BEAM OLD – Pre July 2011 NEW Sigma0 bias vs Scan Angle Large biases between ascending & descending are still observed: ~ 1 dB for inner beam (H-pol) and ~ 0.5 dB for outer beam (V-pol) Biases with respect to NSCAT-2 model function operating on GDAS winds.

INNER BEAM OUTER BEAM Xfactor vs Scan Angle OLD – Pre July 2011

INNER BEAM OUTER BEAM Noise Power vs Scan Angle OLD – Pre July 2011

ISRO L2B Data Analysis (Pre July 2011 Data Set )

ISRO OSCAT L2B Selected Wind Vectors Wind Speeds Wind Directions 4ws<24m/s ECMWF rms 2.08m/s GDAS rms 2.64m/s 4ws<24m/s ECMWF rms 18.24º GDAS rms m/s 20.42º 6<ws<24m/s ECMWF rms 1.76m/s GDAS rms 1.89m/s 6<ws<24m/s ECMWF rms 18.04º GDAS rms m/s 19.84º

Average zonal winds bias vs ECMWF for March-July 2011 ISRO OceanSAT-II Near Real Time Winds. Pattern likely due to cross track biases. Courtesy of Svetla Hristova-Veleva JPL

NOAA OSCAT Wind Data Processor Process OSCAT data from Level 1B Grid 25 km WVC (L2A) MLE based wind retrieval Median filter based ambiguity removal

ISRO derived WVC index (i,j) from satellite position and velocity vectors (not currently available in routine L1B processing ) Derived WVC index (i,j) by approximation from orbital elements given in L1B attribute parameters, i.e. -Inclination = deg -Semi-major axis = km -Eccentricity = Equator crossing longitude (descending node) = varied orbit-by-orbit --New version of OSCAT L1B files contain state vectors NOAA orbit (25 km)ISRO orbit (50 km)

NOAA 25km OSCAT L2A Product σ 0 1 σ 0 2 σ 0 3 We calculate standard deviation of each Sigma0 from the following formulation

TC Bret 07/20/2011

TC Cindy 07/21/2011

Hurricane Dora 07/20/2011

Summary and Conclusions OSCAT data has been flowing to NOAA in near real-time via EUMETSAT since March 2011 (not all orbits yet) OSCAT L1B/L2A investigation shows: –High wind speed retrievals from OSCAT should definitely be possible –Sigma0 residual biases are significantly high at low wind speeds –Sigma0 are dependent on antenna scan angle –Sigma0 are also exhibit an Ascending & Descending pass dependence Development of enhanced L2A product from ISROs L1B –25 km WVC grid –L2A product will contain standard deviation of composite Sigma0 Is proving to be useful parameter in definition of objective function normalization during retrieval process OSCAT has the potential to provide a high utility product to largely mitigate the impacts due to the loss of QuikSCAT in NWS weather forecasting and warning products and services 24