ACSF C tests Prepared by JAPAN 15 November, 2017

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan September / 2012 Informal document GRRF (73rd GRRF, September 2012,
Advertisements

Sensors used in ABS (Anti-Lock Braking System)
Proposal to Modify Homologation Brake Test Procedure to Improve Safety on Proving Ground 18/09/2013 Mr. Klaus Vosteen ATP Executive Director Mr. Fran Martínez.
ACSF Informal Group Industry proposals 1 st Meeting of ACSF informal group April 29 and 30, 2015 in Bonn 1 Informal Document ACSF
Motor Vehicle Level 3 Electronics and Electronic Components Resource 1.
1 Vehicle Stability Function ● Directional Control ● Roll-over Control A functional overview with regard to commercial vehicles AMEVSC-03-04e August 2010.
3rd ACSF meeting Munich, September 2-3 Industry proposals for ACSF status definition and HMI Informal Document: ACSF Submitted by the experts from.
Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.
Movement on Noise Regulation – Alignment with R 51.03
Difference for "Automatically commanded steering function", "Corrective steering function" and " Autonomous Steering System " Informal Document: ACSF
1 ACSF Test Procedure Draft proposal – For discussion OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF
Concept of the exclusion of the blind area In Japan, it is predicted that, among accidents recorded during 8 years in the 1990s, five fatal accidents occurred.
Identification of regulatory needs for ACSF Oliver Kloeckner 16-17th June nd meeting of the IG ASCF Tokyo – Jasic Office Informal Document.
Protective Braking for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
Minimum Risk Manoeuvres (MRM)
Active Steering Project Andrew Odhams Richard Roebuck David Cebon 2 nd April 2009.
Safety Distances and Object Classifications for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
Results of the Study on ACSF Transition Time Informal Document: ACSF National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory, Japan 4th Meeting of ACSF.
5 th ACSF meeting French views Bonn January 2016 Informal Document - ACSF Submitted by the expert of France.
CLEPA Position Special GRRF Session on Automatic Emergency Braking and Lane Departure Warning Systems Brainstorming Meeting 9 Dec UN Palais des.
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
Hand-off Warning Time of LKA
Informal Document: ACSF-06-16
Lane Change Test for ACSF
7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016
OBJECTIVES Discuss the need for electronic stability control (ESC).
Presentation of ACSF C tests
Informal Working Group on ACSF
Industry proposal Driver availability recognition system
Submitted by UNECE Document No. ITS/AD-07-07
Informal Document: ACSF Rev.1
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Lane change driver reaction times
Timing to be activated the hazard lights
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Proposal for UN Regulation on AEBS for M1/N1
Dr. Patrick Seiniger, Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt)
Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C
ACSF Category B1 (LKAS) Concern with “Default-on” strategy
Submitted by the Expert of Sweden
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Informal document GRSG
Signalling of information and warnings
Quintessences Proposal for Category C of Germany and Japan
Safety Distance to the front
ACSF B1+C functional description
Reason for performance difference between LVW and GVW
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C
Hands-off detection warning time for B1-systems
Interpretation of 06 series of amendments to Regulation No. 48
Informal Document: ACSF-10-08
Definition of aysmax Interpretation 1
Submitted by the Secretary
Maximum allowable Override Force
ACSF - Category C1 Definition of Sensor range and safety distances
ACSF B1+C functional description
Emergency Steering Function
Status of discussion about “Reversing Motion” in VRU-Proxi
ACSF B2 and C2 Industry expectations from ACSF IG Tokyo meeting
False reaction test Car to Car
Electronic Stability Control Systems
Hands-off detection versus Start of Lane Change Manoeuvre
6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Regulation ECE R79-03 ACSF C 2-Step HMI
Deactivation of the ALKS system: Different cases
Automated Lane Keeping Systems
Presentation transcript:

ACSF C tests Prepared by JAPAN 15 November, 2017 Submitted by the experts of Japan Informal Document: ACSF-15-11 ACSF C tests Modified on Informal Document: ACSF-14-06 Prepared by JAPAN 15 November, 2017

3.5.1. Lane change functional test Country Vapp MAX Vtest Germany 130km/h Vsmin - 10km/h Vsmax + 10km/h 120km/h 110km/h Japan 100km/h Conditions are not met Vtest Lateral jerk and below max values All conditions are met B1 resumes Vtest Country Vapp MAX Vtest Germany 130km/h Vsmin + 10km/h 120km/h 110km/h Japan 100km/h Direction Indicator lamp flashing time≧ 3sec. Lane change manoeuvre ≦ 5sec. DI lamp off ≦ 0.5sec. Lane change procedure

A two-wheeled motor vehicle 3.5.2. Abort of lane change test Country Vapp Max Vtest Dtest Germany 130km/h Vsmin+10km/h Critical distance at Vego = Vtest & Vapp = Vtest 120km/h 110km/h Japan 100km/h A two-wheeled motor vehicle of category L3 Dtest Center of the lane ±20cm Vapp = Vtest Center of the lane ±20cm Vego = Vtest The driver shall initiate the lane change by the deliberate action. The lane change procedure does not start. or The lane change procedure is canceled no later than 5 seconds after the deliberate action of the driver, if the lane change procedure has started and the manoeuver is delayed. The driver is informed that the manoeuver is delayed. Is it needed?

firmly maintain the steering in the straight direction 3.5.3. Overriding force test Applicable Paragraph 5.6.5.3 Vsmax≧Vtest ≧ Vsmin firmly maintain the steering in the straight direction Procedure Initiate lane change Before the start of the lane change manoeuvre, the driver shall firmly maintain the steering in the straight direction. Measure the steering effort

Deactivate the direction indicator 3.5.4. Deactivation test Vsmax≧Vtest ≧ Vsmin Deactivation by the driver (5.6.5.6.8.) Deactivate the direction indicator flashing time < 3sec. Procedure Initiate lane change Before the start of the lane change manoeuvre, the driver shall deactivate the direction indicator.

A two-wheeled motor vehicle 3.5.5. Sensor performance test Rear sensor CAN CAN monitor ECUs A two-wheeled motor vehicle of category L3 Capture Trigger Vehicle system under test Vapp = vtest +10, 130 km/h ≦6m Vtest = Vsmin+10km/h ≦55m Measurement Capture the sensor data, distance and speed, at the timing the rear vehicle is detected Confirm the actual distance to the rear by using GPS data of both vehicles Confirm the actual speed of the rear vehicle Connection of CAN monitor system should be allowed.

3.5.6. Sensor blindness test Extra-test proposed by industry Vsmax≧Vtest ≧ Vsmin The rear sensor(s) is made blind. A lane change is commanded The lane change does not start

3.5.7.3. Engine start/run cycle test (Phase 1) Vsmax≧Vtest ≧ Vsmin Procedure A new engine start/run cycle Check ACSF C is default off.

3.5.7.3. Engine start/run cycle test (Phase 2) Vsmax≧Vtest ≧ Vsmin Procedure Perform phase 1 The driver switches on ACSF C The driver commands a lane change right after ACSF C switched on  No lane change

A high volume series production passenger car of category M1 AA saloon 3.5.7.3. Engine start/run cycle test (Phase 3) Rear sensor CAN CAN monitor ECUs A high volume series production passenger car of category M1 AA saloon Capture Trigger Vehicle system under test vtest + 10 km/h to VappMAX ≦6m Vsmax≧Vtest ≧ Vsmin Procedure Following the completion of the test phase 2 A vehicle approaches from the rear on the adjacent lane After the rear coming vehicle entirely passed the test vehicle, the driver commands a lane change. ≦[X]m Test is passed if: The lane change is performed and The distance between both vehicles at the time ACSF detects the rear coming vehicle is ≧ [X]m Measurement Capture the sensor data at the timing the rear vehicle is detected Confirm the actual distance to the rear by using GPS data of both vehicles Connection of CAN monitor system should be allowed.