AMERICAN BOARD OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SPECIALTIES: ENHANCING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH NEW MODEL OF MAINTENANCE OF SPECIALIST CERTIFICATION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators
Advertisements

The Road To CPA Licensure Presented by: Tennessee State Board of Accountancy.
NEW MEXICO Three-Tiered Teacher Licensure EDUCATOR QUALITY DIVISION New Mexico Public Education Department September, 2005.
February 2014 What is a CNL ® ? The Clinical Nurse Leader SM (CNL) is a fast emerging nursing role developed by the American Association of Colleges.
CPC Program Update I am happy to be able to be here to talk about the CPC program. In spite of all these communications to date, we recognize that there.
Idaho Tiered Teacher Licensure May 13, Vision for Tiered Teacher Licensure Attract and retain great teachers in Idaho Identify struggling teachers.
Quality Improvement/ Quality Assurance Amelia Broussard, PhD, RN, MPH Christopher Gibbs, JD, MPH.
Writing an Effective Proposal for Innovations in Teaching Grant
KidStrong Conference 2013 Office of Professional Preparation.
Massachusetts Department of Education EDUCATOR DATABASE Informational Sessions Overview: September 2005 Web:
How to Submit an ADED Conference Proposal. Objectives Identify the necessary steps for submitting a conference proposal Identify information required.
The Prevention Specialist Certification Board of Washington.
CBAP and BABOK Presented to the Albany Capital District Chapter of the IIBA February 3, 2009.
Certifying Teaching Excellence The Louisiana Initiative.
Sustainability of CICMC – June 30, 2010 Develop and Implement a strategy for the sustainability of CICMC: Business Development Needs Brenda Pope, CMC.
Choosing Excellence: National Board Certification You’re at the head of your class. Now go to the top of your profession.
BUMP UP YOUR CAREER POTENTIAL WITH PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION!
Prevention Specialist Certification Board of Washington (PSCBW)
National Board Certification: What is the Same, Different, and New? North Carolina District Coordinators Meeting September 12, 2014 Prepared by: Amber.
“Putting the pieces together – as a community” December, 2014.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
SPECIAL PURPOSES EXAMINATION FOR CHIROPRACTIC A post-licensure exam for licensed or previously licensed practitioners from the from the NBCE.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Bilingual Coordinators’ Network Meeting September 25, 2008.
CCMEP A Certification Program for CME Professionals Serving the Public - Advancing the Profession.
Welcome to todays session!  Please take a moment to check your connection and audio settings.  If this is your first time using LYNC please see the resources.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
The Clinical Nurse Leader SM (CNL) is a fast emerging nursing role developed by the American Association of Colleges of Nursing. The CNL is a master’s.
Earning IPDP Points Annual Review of Responsibilities and Procedures.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT: PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction.
Choosing Excellence: National Board Certification Now go to the top of your profession.
Standards of Achievement for Professional Advancement District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander & Michael Clawson.
APRN Faculty Toolkit: ANCC Certification Overview © 2010 American Nurses Credentialing Center.
1 Expanded ADEPT Support and Evaluation System Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty.
AHIMA’s Commission on Certification for Health Informatics and Information Management (CCHIIM) Test Development Process Jo Santos, RHIA Senior Manager,
National Board Process
  NEW JERSEY ALTERNATE ROUTE CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION CERTIFICATE OF ELIGIBILITY   EDUCATOR  PREPARATION PROGRAM (CTE-CE EPP)
What it means for New Teachers
Preceptor Orientation For the Nurse Practitioner Program
Certification of Prevention Professionals
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
Child Welfare Certification Process
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Dissemination Training
National Board Certification: What is the Same, Different, and New?
The ABAM Certification and Recertification Examination
Maintenance of Certification
The National Data Guardian review & Government response
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Special Education Teachers and Highly Qualified Requirements
Certification of Prevention Professionals
AMERICAN BOARD OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SPECIALITIES: Enhancing Professional Development through Certification Introductions of Specialty Council members.
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
The School Mentor 9/19/2018.
Session 104: AAHAM Certification Review
Welcome RN to BSN Track II Information Session
The Institute of Certified Managers (ICRM)
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
NP CERTIFICATION AND LICENSURE
Assigning Courses to Disciplines: Finding the Right Map
Certification.
CST Program Description and Test Preparation
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Resident Educator Program
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
The Program Evaluation Committee and the Annual Program Evaluation
MASTER TEACHER PROGRAM
The National Data Guardian review & Government response
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
What’s Happening with DCS?
Presentation transcript:

AMERICAN BOARD OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SPECIALTIES: ENHANCING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH NEW MODEL OF MAINTENANCE OF SPECIALIST CERTIFICATION

Presentation Objectives Discuss the history and development of the ABPTS Maintenance of Specialist Certification (MOSC) program. Describe the purpose for transitioning from the current recertification process to a maintenance program. Provide an overview and describe the process for the new MOSC program. Detail implications for not meeting MOSC cycle requirements. Review the implementation timeline and new system launch. Emeritus designation option.

Maintenance of Specialist Certification (MOSC) A model for credentialing that focuses on continued competence A necessary step of accountability to patients, health care organizations, and to the public

MOSC Program History: Many Years Devoted to Research, Discussion, and Debate In late 1990’s and early 2000’s: growing sense that PDP process did not capture essence of specialist practice. 2002-2003: ABPTS conducted study of multiple health care professions recredentialing process…..moving away from portfolio approach 2007: First proposed Model for Continued Competency in a Specialty Area 2008: Pilot study conducted to provide information and data to evaluate the case study process 2009: MOSC Work Group Established May 2012: Model for Maintenance of Specialist Certification Adopted by ABPTS May 2013: Implementation Plan adopted by ABPTS

MOSC: Purpose More effectively verify current competence as an advanced practitioner in the specialty area More effectively evaluate professional development and clinical experience Better encourage ongoing education and professional growth Keep pace with the rapidly expanding specialty knowledge base and scientific evidence that guides clinical decision-making Promote improved health outcomes related to physical therapy specialty services

Maintenance of Specialist Certification Licensure & Professional Standing Practice Performance & Clinical Care and Reasoning Cognitive Expertise Lifelong Learning & Professional Development Certification Cycle Year 3 MOSC 6 9 10

Minimum Eligibility Requirements of MOSC Evidence of Current Licensure as a physical therapist in the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands Direct Patient Care in the Specialty Area Evidence of 200 hours of direct patient care in the specialty practice within each three (3) year submission period Hours accrued in year 10 applied to the next three year submission period Direct patient care in the specialty area must include activities in each of the elements of patient/client management applicable to the specialty practice and included in the Description of Specialty Practice. Equivale

Minimum Eligibility Requirements of MOSC Commitment to Life Long Learning through Professional Development Mimics the information captured in the current PDP (professional services, continuing education coursework, publications, presentations, clinical supervision and consultation, research, clinical instruction, teaching) Minimum requirements for each three (3) submission period across three (3)designated activity areas Minimum of 10 MOSC credits, within 2 of the 3 designated activity categories, in years 3, 6, and 9. By year 9, a specialist must have accrued a minimum of 30 MOSC credits, and demonstrated professional development in each of the 3 designated activity categories. Credits accrued in year 10 applied to the next three year submission period A web-based submission/tracking system Recommendations: 1.      Demonstration of a certified specialist’s commitment to life-long learning should mimic the information captured in the current PDP. 2.      The PDP current point system should not be continued in the new model.   3.      Recommend increased flexibility and more direct examples of what would be acceptable while maintaining the current categories for research and practice. a.      Acceptable activities would need to go beyond simple attendance at continuing education workshops. Activities should include: continuing education coursework, publications, presentations, clinical instruction, or teaching. 4.      An individual must demonstrate how their participation in the various activities contributed in some way to the profession. 5.      Documentation of activities should be submitted on an annual basis, covering multiple activities. However, if special circumstances arise for candidates that prohibit an annual submission, it should be taken this into consideration and a extension or waiver for the year would be appropriately granted. 6.      Staff will put together a proposed schedule, including activity areas to be covered by certified specialists, based on the current activity listings in specialty PDP summary worksheets. 7.      Staff will continue to work with APTA’s IT Department to determine how best to secure a web-based system to track continuing competence in a specialty area.                                                   i.    The web-based system should provide an individual account tracking mechanism for each specialist to record professional development activities during years 1-7 of their certification cycle.                                                 ii.      System should be a component of APTA’s Learning Center. However, the development of this module within the Learning Center is currently on hold. Staff will continue to communicate with APTA’s Professional Development Committee to assure we are kept up-to-date on current timelines and developments. 8.      There is NOT an hour requirement in this area but the specialist must show evidence of professional development activities with, at minimum, annual documentation of professional development activities.  These activities include continuing education coursework, publications, presentations, clinical instruction, or teaching.

Minimum Eligibility Requirements of MOSC Commitment to Life Long Learning through Professional Development Recommendations: 1.      Demonstration of a certified specialist’s commitment to life-long learning should mimic the information captured in the current PDP. 2.      The PDP current point system should not be continued in the new model.   3.      Recommend increased flexibility and more direct examples of what would be acceptable while maintaining the current categories for research and practice. a.      Acceptable activities would need to go beyond simple attendance at continuing education workshops. Activities should include: continuing education coursework, publications, presentations, clinical instruction, or teaching. 4.      An individual must demonstrate how their participation in the various activities contributed in some way to the profession. 5.      Documentation of activities should be submitted on an annual basis, covering multiple activities. However, if special circumstances arise for candidates that prohibit an annual submission, it should be taken this into consideration and a extension or waiver for the year would be appropriately granted. 6.      Staff will put together a proposed schedule, including activity areas to be covered by certified specialists, based on the current activity listings in specialty PDP summary worksheets. 7.      Staff will continue to work with APTA’s IT Department to determine how best to secure a web-based system to track continuing competence in a specialty area.                                                   i.    The web-based system should provide an individual account tracking mechanism for each specialist to record professional development activities during years 1-7 of their certification cycle.                                                 ii.      System should be a component of APTA’s Learning Center. However, the development of this module within the Learning Center is currently on hold. Staff will continue to communicate with APTA’s Professional Development Committee to assure we are kept up-to-date on current timelines and developments. 8.      There is NOT an hour requirement in this area but the specialist must show evidence of professional development activities with, at minimum, annual documentation of professional development activities.  These activities include continuing education coursework, publications, presentations, clinical instruction, or teaching.

Minimum Eligibility Requirements of MOSC Commitment to Life Long Learning through Professional Development Recommendations: 1.      Demonstration of a certified specialist’s commitment to life-long learning should mimic the information captured in the current PDP. 2.      The PDP current point system should not be continued in the new model.   3.      Recommend increased flexibility and more direct examples of what would be acceptable while maintaining the current categories for research and practice. a.      Acceptable activities would need to go beyond simple attendance at continuing education workshops. Activities should include: continuing education coursework, publications, presentations, clinical instruction, or teaching. 4.      An individual must demonstrate how their participation in the various activities contributed in some way to the profession. 5.      Documentation of activities should be submitted on an annual basis, covering multiple activities. However, if special circumstances arise for candidates that prohibit an annual submission, it should be taken this into consideration and a extension or waiver for the year would be appropriately granted. 6.      Staff will put together a proposed schedule, including activity areas to be covered by certified specialists, based on the current activity listings in specialty PDP summary worksheets. 7.      Staff will continue to work with APTA’s IT Department to determine how best to secure a web-based system to track continuing competence in a specialty area.                                                   i.    The web-based system should provide an individual account tracking mechanism for each specialist to record professional development activities during years 1-7 of their certification cycle.                                                 ii.      System should be a component of APTA’s Learning Center. However, the development of this module within the Learning Center is currently on hold. Staff will continue to communicate with APTA’s Professional Development Committee to assure we are kept up-to-date on current timelines and developments. 8.      There is NOT an hour requirement in this area but the specialist must show evidence of professional development activities with, at minimum, annual documentation of professional development activities.  These activities include continuing education coursework, publications, presentations, clinical instruction, or teaching.

Minimum Eligibility Requirements of MOSC Recommendations: 1.      Demonstration of a certified specialist’s commitment to life-long learning should mimic the information captured in the current PDP. 2.      The PDP current point system should not be continued in the new model.   3.      Recommend increased flexibility and more direct examples of what would be acceptable while maintaining the current categories for research and practice. a.      Acceptable activities would need to go beyond simple attendance at continuing education workshops. Activities should include: continuing education coursework, publications, presentations, clinical instruction, or teaching. 4.      An individual must demonstrate how their participation in the various activities contributed in some way to the profession. 5.      Documentation of activities should be submitted on an annual basis, covering multiple activities. However, if special circumstances arise for candidates that prohibit an annual submission, it should be taken this into consideration and a extension or waiver for the year would be appropriately granted. 6.      Staff will put together a proposed schedule, including activity areas to be covered by certified specialists, based on the current activity listings in specialty PDP summary worksheets. 7.      Staff will continue to work with APTA’s IT Department to determine how best to secure a web-based system to track continuing competence in a specialty area.                                                   i.    The web-based system should provide an individual account tracking mechanism for each specialist to record professional development activities during years 1-7 of their certification cycle.                                                 ii.      System should be a component of APTA’s Learning Center. However, the development of this module within the Learning Center is currently on hold. Staff will continue to communicate with APTA’s Professional Development Committee to assure we are kept up-to-date on current timelines and developments. 8.      There is NOT an hour requirement in this area but the specialist must show evidence of professional development activities with, at minimum, annual documentation of professional development activities.  These activities include continuing education coursework, publications, presentations, clinical instruction, or teaching.

Minimum Eligibility Requirements of MOSC Commitment to Life Long Learning through Professional Development Recommendations: 1.      Demonstration of a certified specialist’s commitment to life-long learning should mimic the information captured in the current PDP. 2.      The PDP current point system should not be continued in the new model.   3.      Recommend increased flexibility and more direct examples of what would be acceptable while maintaining the current categories for research and practice. a.      Acceptable activities would need to go beyond simple attendance at continuing education workshops. Activities should include: continuing education coursework, publications, presentations, clinical instruction, or teaching. 4.      An individual must demonstrate how their participation in the various activities contributed in some way to the profession. 5.      Documentation of activities should be submitted on an annual basis, covering multiple activities. However, if special circumstances arise for candidates that prohibit an annual submission, it should be taken this into consideration and a extension or waiver for the year would be appropriately granted. 6.      Staff will put together a proposed schedule, including activity areas to be covered by certified specialists, based on the current activity listings in specialty PDP summary worksheets. 7.      Staff will continue to work with APTA’s IT Department to determine how best to secure a web-based system to track continuing competence in a specialty area.                                                   i.    The web-based system should provide an individual account tracking mechanism for each specialist to record professional development activities during years 1-7 of their certification cycle.                                                 ii.      System should be a component of APTA’s Learning Center. However, the development of this module within the Learning Center is currently on hold. Staff will continue to communicate with APTA’s Professional Development Committee to assure we are kept up-to-date on current timelines and developments. 8.      There is NOT an hour requirement in this area but the specialist must show evidence of professional development activities with, at minimum, annual documentation of professional development activities.  These activities include continuing education coursework, publications, presentations, clinical instruction, or teaching.

Minimum Eligibility Requirements of MOSC Practice Performance through Examples of Clinical Care and Clinical Reasoning Online submission of one (1) Reflective Portfolio for each three (3) year submission period Demonstrate the clinical care and reasoning utilized and reflect how a patient case(s) has impacted practice Not scored, but screened for completion of required information and reflection .      A case study/log format similar to ortho b.      Case reflection based on the Women’s Health initial certification case study requirement including an evidence-based component possibly a clinical bottom-line format.

Minimum Eligibility Requirements of MOSC Cognitive Expertise through a Test of Knowledge in the Profession Non proctored recertification examination Comprised of approximately 100 items in year ten Exam blueprint will mirror that of initial certification exam, but will reflect contemporary specialist practice and allow a specialist to demonstrate continued competency in general areas of the profession (professional roles, responsibilities, values) Successful completion of requirements 1-3 at each three (3) year submission period are prerequisites Permitted two attempts without loss of credential Demonstrate continued competency in general areas of the profession, such as knowledge areas, professional roles and responsibilities, coordination/communication/ documentation, and patient/client related instruction. 

MOSC Examination First 25 Questions 25 Questions 25 Questions March thru April January thru February First 25 Questions November thru December Review Cycle 4 applications Review Cycle 3 applications Cycle 3 Review July 1st to August 31 Cycle 4 Review July 1st to September 30 25 Questions May thru June

Cost and Implications for Not Meeting MOSC Cycle Requirements APTA member rate of $220 per submission cycle; examination fee in year 10 Regardless of compliance with MOSC cycle requirements, certification is still good for a 10-year period Specialists who do not meet MOSC requirements, or opt not to participate in MOSC process, will be required to apply for and sit for initial certification examination again. This includes meeting minimum eligibility requirements and associated fees.

MOSC: Timeline Recertification Model MOSC Model Transition Period prior to 2023 expiration Transition Period started 2013 MOSC Model Full implementation in 2016

MOSC Learning Plan Submission System System officially launched in October 2016 Development of Instructional Tutorials

Transition & Implementation Phase All individuals who have a certification expiration of 2023 or higher are subject to the new MOSC process. There is a waiver of the first 3-year requirements for board-certified specialists whose certifications expire in 2023, 2024, and 2025. will be required to fulfill the year 6 (second 3-year) requirements beginning in 2016, 2017, and 2018 respectively.  Individuals who have a certification expiration of 2026 or higher will be subject to the MOSC process, as described, in its entirety.

Emeritus Designation Option Board-certified specialists who have retired from direct patient/client care (as defined by ABPTS) may petition ABPTS in writing to be granted the designation “emeritus.” Must meet eligibility requirements and submit emeritus application and $100 application fee to spec-recert@apta.org while a current board-certified specialist. A therapist who does not participate in direct patient/client care but may perform occasional demonstrations or supervision of patient/client care of less than five hours per week, qualifies for “emeritus” status. Clinical specialists with two or more clinical specialties may apply for “emeritus” status only when they have retired from direct patient/client care. Once granted, ABPTS grants authorization to include the designation “emeritus” after specialist initials. May not represent yourself as a board certified if you resume direct patient/client care.

For more information contact: APTA Specialist Certification Program 1111 North Fairfax Street Alexandria, VA 22314 800/999-2782, ext 8520 www.abpts.org

Questions