ETG subgroup on New Entrants: Report to EU WG

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Challenges and opportunities of EU ETS Phase III Katowice, 18 Mai 2011 r. European Economic Congress Przemysław Sikora, KASHUE-KOBIZE Senior Policy analyst.
Advertisements

Getting More for Four Principles for Comprehensive Emissions Trading Jan Mazurek, Director Center for Innovation and the Environment 2002 Environmental.
1 EUROPEAN COMMISSION CLIMATE CHANGE UNIT Data consistency between National GHG inventories and reporting under the EU ETS Dr. Erasmia Kitou Climate Change,
Integrated Territorial Investments
The EU Emission Trading System (ETS) Henriëtte Bersee Henriëtte Bersee Environment Counselor Environment Counselor Royal Netherlands Embassy Royal Netherlands.
Center for Strategic and International Studies – CCS event 31 st March 2008 Rachel Crisp Deputy Director, Cleaner Fossil Fuels Unit, Energy Group.
IFIEC Energy Forum How to adjust the EU Climate and Energy Policies in light of the financial crisis? – An enhanced EU ETS 19 June 2012 Annette Loske Chairwoman.
Climate Action EU ETS #EU2030 Jos Delbeke DG CLIMATE ACTION Carbon Expo 2014 – Cologne 28 May 2014.
The EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) Rationale and Lessons learnt Artur Runge-Metzger Head of International Climate Negotiations, European Commission.
E3G - Third Generation Environmentalism 1 Decarbonising the European power sector: Is there a role for the EU ETS? European Parliament, 31 May, 2011 Sanjeev.
Ad Hoc Working Group on Article 3.9 of the Kyoto Protocol Battling global climate change - the EU’s perspective (Part II) Artur Runge-Metzger European.
The Sevilla process for supporting the implementation of the IPPC Directive Michael Parth Tallinn – Estonia 27 – 28 March 2008.
Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS)
Economic policy for low-carbon transition and the role of carbon leakage Tsinghua University Karsten Neuhoff Faculty of Economics Cambridge University.
GF I NVEST AG F INANCIAL S OLUTIONS 1 Introduction to the Emissions Market February 2008 Mélanie Stauffer GF I NVEST AG F INANCIAL S OLUTIONS.
IFIEC EUROPE – International Federation of Industrial Energy Consumers on behalf of Alliance of Energy Intensive Industries / CEFIC / IFIEC 1 ECCP Meeting,
Market Mechanisms to Curb Greenhouse Gases: Challenges and Future Directions Joe Kruger February 20, 2007 Joe Kruger February 20, 2007.
Carbon capture and storage - input to EUETS Directive review Penny Tomlinson.
The implementation status of specific mechanisms under Kyoto Protocol EU-ETS 13 May 2013 Geta Diaconu.
Energy Forum Compensation arrangements for indirect EU ETS cost effects Presented by Vianney Schyns Brussels 9 June
Towards an effective and efficient carbon price signal minimising leakage How to combat climate change while preserving Europe’s competitiveness European.
Climate change policy as today’s driver for energy policy IFIEC Europe’s suggestions for EU ETS post 2012 AEM XI. Autumn Conference, Prague 11 September.
Lessons from implementing the EU Emission Trading System DG Environment European Commission Side event 2009 Climate Change.
1 “Seeking Common Ground” Second consultation meeting on options for structural measures to strengthen the EU ETS on 19 April 2013 in Brussels Peter Botschek.
Avoiding the threat of competitiveness disadvantage through benchmarking Integer/EII Conference “Energy Intensive Industries & Climate Change” Brussels,
1 EU Emissions Trading Scheme – New System to allocate free Allowances from 2013 onwards IFIEC Energy Forum Brussels, 9 June 2011 Hans Bergman DG Climate.
Energy Forum Allocation rules for Industry in EU ETS 2013 presented by Mukund Bhagwat Brussels 9 June
10 th June 2008 Workshop on Clean Coal Technologies Regional Office of Silesia in Brussels.
EU Climate Change Policy Necessary Review of EU ETS Annette Loske IFIEC Energy Forum 23 February 2006 IFIEC EUROPE – International Federation of Industrial.
12 June 2007 Aviation Emissions ETG submission to DEFRA Presentation of Draft Submission WG5/6 – 12 June 2007.
RWE AG CA-AP En, SEITE 1 Mitigating effects of „phasing in“ the auctioning of CO 2 -emission allowances after 2012.
Center for Clean Air Policy September 1999 Verification of Early Reduction Credits Ned Helme, President Center for Clean Air Policy Pew Center Early Action.
IFIEC EUROPE – International Federation of Industrial Energy Consumers The way forward to a more efficient and effective EU-ETS IFIEC Europe‘s views Brussels,
ETS POST REVISION THE LIME SECTOR Ms. Eleni Despotou EuLA Secretray General.
WG 5/6 sub-group on Benchmarking ETG Draft Position Paper Benchmarking as an allocation methodology 14 May 2007 Jim Rushworth.
EAI Board The EU 2030 Climate and Energy Framework 11 th March 2014.
0 Allocation in phase 3 of EU ETS Case study: integrated pulp and paper mill.
ETS Post 2020 The view of Italian steel industry on carbon leakage Flavio Bregant Director General EPP ENVI/ITRE Hearing on ETS Post 2020 Bruxelles, 4.
1 Harmonised Allocation Rules in EU ETS as from 2013 General introduction and overview of NIM process DG CLIMA Unit B.2. European Commission Member State.
EUETS Allowance Auctioning Phase II EUETS Allowance Auctioning in the UK Lee Oliver Workshop on EU Emission Trading Scheme – Monitoring, Reporting and.
Climate Action Climate and Energy: EU perspective Madrid, Universidad Pontificia Comillas 18 May 2015 Jos DELBEKE Director General for Climate Action European.
EU ETS REFORM #EU2030 Yvon Slingenberg DG CLIMATE ACTION.
Risk and reality of carbon leakage
EU’s CO2 Emissions Trading Scheme – Benchmarks for Free Allocation from 2013 Onwards 9 September 2010 Hans Bergman DG Climate Action European Commission.
The EU Adaptation Strategy implementation and related activities of the European Commission Presented by Claus Kondrup, European Commission, DG Climate.
Energy for a changing world
Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS)
Recent Cap and Trade Programs: EU ETS and RGGI
Revising the ETS directive
Determine the difference between Internal and External Reporting
The revision of the EU Emissions Trading System for phase 4 and the implementation process Stakeholder Meeting on the Preliminary Carbon Leakage List for.
Coal – security of coal supply considerations of EURACOAL
Hearing on “Gender Budgeting: State of Play and Way Forward”
SCP in the 7th Environmental Action Programme
EU-ETS and Aviation N-ALM, , Norrköping.
State aid and EU funding - Are they compatible
CO2 Emission in the Power Generation Sector
Determined to reach the target: the EC’s progress
EU climate policies delivering
منصور شمس احمدی حسابدار رسمی
Assessing the ENVI report
Point 8: A revision policy for the UOE data collection History
Looking ahead to Paris, what role will non-state actors play
EPP hearing: ETS reform post 2020
Commission strategy to
CO2 Emission in the Industrial Sector
Harmonisation and Increased Predictability
Energy Efficiency in the EU Randall Bowie DG Energy and Transport
Gauteng Provincial Legislature Money Bills Act Discussion
Industrial Emissions Directive Targeted stakeholder survey
Presentation transcript:

ETG subgroup on New Entrants: Report to EU WG Bill Thompson EU WG Meeting Wednesday, 29 June 2015

New Entrants & NER in Phase 4 NER & new entrants in Phase 4 ignored so far in Commission’s proposal. Small number of New Entrants so far Phase 3 2013-16 New Entrants use 20% of total NER reserve. But NER key to industry investment in EU

Summary: Need for certainty on the date defining New Entrants Simplicity in Free Allocation NER must not run dry Accredit Member States to allocate from the NER – where deemed competent

1. Need for certainty on the date defining New Entrants Current date is 30 June 2011 No change proposed in Commission proposal But need for a date in Phase 3

2. Simplicity in Free Allocation Actual ex post allocation, not via estimated activity Free Allocation to equal ex post verified emissions, less any CSCF, less any sector carbon leakage factor Assumption is that a New Entrant is at sector benchmark level – no one builds inefficient new installations. No change to Power Generation Sector receiving zero allocation Where fallback approaches are used, allocation would be at heat / fuel / process emissions benchmark level Prevents coal/lignite fuelled installations receiving a full allocation Duration of ex post allocation? Depends on gap between installation activity and allocation Probably at least three years, could be for remaining phase.

3. NER must not run dry NER is 250m EUA + unused industry share Phase 3. It is the only source of allocation available to New Entrants and for significant extension. The fact it could run dry is a deterrent to new entrant investment Phase 4 ‘significant production increases’ will also be drawn from the NER. If needed, NER to be topped up from auctioning / MSR reserve / other source, to prevent rationing Irony of innovation funding sources available, but risk of no allocation for a new entrant!

4. Accredit Member States to allocation from the NER – where deemed competent Aim is to relieve Commission’s role as NER administrator where Member States are competent and accredited Allows Commission to concentrate on policy, audit and investigation matters Clear distinction between definitions of ‘new entrants’ , ‘significant extension’ and ‘significant production increases’ Definitions have different thresholds, thus risk of gaming