Dr. Vajira H. W. Dissanayake MBBS (Colombo), PhD (Nottingham) Senior Lecturer, Human Genetics Unit & Joint-secretary, Ethics review committee Faculty of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Respect for participants Dr Enoka Corea. maintaining the privacy of the participant by ensuring confidentiality ensuring that participants may withdraw.
Advertisements

Navigating the IRB & IRBNet at Lehman Tara M. Prairie Director of Responsible Research Practices Lehman College.
The Research Application Process Charles Morgan, Ph.D. Clinical Investigation Department (CID) Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, VA.
EXEMPT VS. EXPEDITED PROJECTS. EXEMPT PROJECTS  If an investigator is affiliated with UTHSC, you have to submit to UTHSC IRB in order for us to ascertain.
24 April Elements of Research Ethics Review II Social Value Malik Fernando M.B.,Ch.B. (Bristol)
Expedited Review Procedure Expedited Review Procedure Initial Review of Research.
Obtaining Informed Consent: 1. Elements Of Informed Consent 2. Essential Information For Prospective Participants 3. Obligation for investigators.
Pediatric Ethics Subcommittee of Pediatric Advisory Committee, September 10, 2004 Analysis of Research Protocols Involving Children: Combining Subparts.
Understanding the Various Levels of IRB Review:
CORE COMPETENCIES IN CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH: The Child Health Perspective I. Clinical & Translational Research Questions: Extract information.
Protecting Human Participants in Research syr
Ethics in Research The Ethical Standards of the American Psychological Association (2002 Ethics code, to be effective June 1,
Fair participant selection Dr Enoka Corea. Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria Where the study will be conducted How the participants will be recruited.
Human Investigation Committee  Is it research?  If yes, does it involve human subjects?  If yes, can it be exempt?  If no, will a Request for.
Determinations of Research, Human Subjects Research, Exemptions, and Expedited Review Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for.
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
Precursor Preference in Surfactant Synthesis of Newborns Sarah Frankel, PhD Human Studies Committee Washington University School of Medicine.
Institutional Review Board
Dana Evans 1 1 Exempt & Expedited Human Subjects Research.
International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.
Research Ethics: The Protection of Human Subjects The Regulations and the Roles of the Researcher and the IRB Presented by Sinclair Community College Institutional.
Regulatory Considerations for Investigational Assays: Planning for Success Elizabeth Mansfield, PhD OIVD/FDA “Next-Generation DNA Sequencing as a Tool.
Expedited vs Exempt by Richard R. Riker MD Vice-Chair, IRB Maine Medical Center.
What makes Clinical Research Ethical? Dr Enoka Corea Co-secretary, ERC Faculty of Medicine, Colombo.
Regulatory criteria for approval Bob Craig, July 2007.
The IRB Approval Process Michael Bingham, JD Assistant Director, University of Wisconsin-Madison Education IRB
Submitting IRB Applications (or “Do I have to do an IRB?”) Linda A. Detman, Ph.D. Research Associate Lawton & Rhea Chiles Center for Healthy Mothers and.
Expedited Procedures Bob Craig June Expedited problems Usually individual investigators (rather than trained coordinators) Individuals not “ active.
Planned Emergency Research Exception from Informed Consent Requirements September 2007.
Is Your Research Ethical? The application of Research Ethics Guidelines to Regional Health Authority Research Dr Alan Katz Need to Know: June 9, 2003.
1 IRB review and assessment of risks / benefits Bernard Lo, M.D. July 31, 2008.
West Virginia University Office of Research Integrity & Compliance Human Research Protections Program.
Stanley Estime, MSCI, CIP Senior QA/QI Specialist Lisa Gabel, CIP QA/QI Specialist IRB Determinations: What type of Review will your study receive?
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
Expedited Review – Retrospective studies: A New Path Stephanie Gentilin, MA, CCRAKatherine Bright Director SCTR SUCCESS Center, eIRB Team MemberIRB, Grants.
Andrew Thornton Chairman, HREC Royal Adelaide Hospital Low and Negligible Risk Research Update - Ethics.
A step-by-step guide to help you determine if your research protocol is required to be reviewed by the Lindenwood University IRB INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
Regulations 201: Thorny Issues What is Research? Exempt and Expedited Reviews.
 Epidemiology -- Research – or Not Research? Medical Research Summit March Tom Puglisi, PhD.
Regulatory requirements: children, assent, and consent waivers and waiver of documentation Bob Craig, 2007.
Joni Barnard IRB Information Session: EHE Workshop 10/13/2015.
EXPEDITED PROTOCOL REVIEW AN IRB INFOSHORT APRIL 2013.
Human Subjects Research at Mines Colorado School of Mines New Faculty Orientation November 20, 2015.
Human Specimen Repositories Requirements of 21 CFR Parts 50 & 56 PRIM & R May 5, 2004 Sally A. Hojvat, Ph.D. Director of Microbiology Devices Office of.
Levels of Review of Research and Quality Improvement Walter Kraft, MD Associate Director, Office of Human Subjects Protection Department of Pharmacology.
Exempt Unless otherwise required by Department or Agency heads, research activities in which the only involvement of human subjects will be in one or more.
Legal Responsibilities for Studies Conducted or Supported by HHS Michael A. Carome, M.D. Associate Director for Regulatory Affairs Office for Human Research.
Human Research Protection Program 101 March 20, 2007 Cincinnati, OH.
HUMAN SUBJECTS QUIZ! TRUE OR FALSE?
Created by Steve Martin, PA-C IRB Application Received Exempt Complete Yes No Mississippi College IRB Application Process Determine Review Category Expedited.
Investigator Initiated Research Best Practices for IRB: SBER Corey Zolondek, Ph.D. IRB Operations Manager Wayne State University.
The IRB and Human Subjects Research Protection Eric Felde, CIP Research Compliance Consultant Office of Research Compliance Indiana University.
Risk Determinations and Research with Children
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Ethical Principles of Research
Introduction to the Institutional Review Board
Lana Gevorkyan Corporate Director Human Research Protection Program
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations and Types of Review
Institutional Review Board
Institutional Review Board
Navigating the IRB & IDEATE at Lehman College
Greg Nezat CRNA, PhD CDR/NC/USN Chairman, IRB II
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. Associate Dean,
Ethics Review Morals: Rules that define what is right and wrong Ethics: process of examining moral standards and looking at how we should interpret and.
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations on Expedited Review
Ethical Considerations for Pediatric Clinical Investigations
What the IRB is looking for when reviewing your protocol
Human Participants Research
Presentation transcript:

Dr. Vajira H. W. Dissanayake MBBS (Colombo), PhD (Nottingham) Senior Lecturer, Human Genetics Unit & Joint-secretary, Ethics review committee Faculty of medicine, university of Colombo Dr. Vajira H. W. Dissanayake MBBS (Colombo), PhD (Nottingham) Senior Lecturer, Human Genetics Unit & Joint-secretary, Ethics review committee Faculty of medicine, university of Colombo

1.Collaborative Partnership 2.Social Value 3.Scientific Validity 4.Fair Subject Selection 5.Favourable Risk Benefit Ratio 6.Independent Review 7.Informed Consent 8.Respect for Research Participants 1.Collaborative Partnership 2.Social Value 3.Scientific Validity 4.Fair Subject Selection 5.Favourable Risk Benefit Ratio 6.Independent Review 7.Informed Consent 8.Respect for Research Participants

Minimal Risk

2. Research involving greater than minimal risk, but presenting the prospect of direct benefit to the individual subjects. 2. Research involving greater than minimal risk, but presenting the prospect of direct benefit to the individual subjects. 1. Research involving no more than minimal risk. 3. Research involving greater than minimal risk and no prospect of direct benefit to individual subjects, but likely to yield generalizable knowledge about the subjects disorder or condition. 3. Research involving greater than minimal risk and no prospect of direct benefit to individual subjects, but likely to yield generalizable knowledge about the subjects disorder or condition. 4. Research not otherwise approvable which presents an opportunity to understand, prevent, or alleviate a serious problem affecting the health or welfare of the participants.

Minimal Risk ?

For research involving greater than minimal risk 1. the potential risks to individual subjects should be minimized, 2. the potential benefits to individual subjects should be enhanced, and 3. the potential benefits to individual subjects and society should be proportionate to or outweigh the risks.

For research involving greater than minimal risk 1. the potential risks to individual subjects should be minimized, 2. the potential benefits to individual subjects should be enhanced, and 3. the potential benefits to individual subjects and society should be proportionate to or outweigh the risks. For research involving greater than minimal risk 1. the potential risks to individual subjects should be minimized, 2. the potential benefits to individual subjects should be enhanced, and 3. the potential benefits to individual subjects and society should be proportionate to or outweigh the risks.

BenefitsBenefits

only benefits that accrue to participants from the interventions necessary to achieve the research objectives or those deriving from the knowledge to be gained by the research should be used to justify risks to participants only benefits that accrue to participants from the interventions necessary to achieve the research objectives or those deriving from the knowledge to be gained by the research should be used to justify risks to participants

Two benchmarks unique to developing countries. 1. the risk-benefit ratio for individuals must be favorable in the context in which they live. 2. the risk-benefit ratio for the community should be favorable (look at benefits from collaborative partnership, social value, respect for study population).

Minimal Risk Research

Minimal risk research Research involving materials (data, documents, records, or specimens) that have been collected, or will be collected solely for nonresearch purposes (such as medical treatment or diagnosis).

Minimal risk research Research on individual or group characteristics or behavior (including, but not limited to, research on perception, cognition, motivation, identity, language, communication, cultural beliefs or practices, and social behavior) or research employing survey, interview, oral history, focus group, program evaluation, human factors evaluation, or quality assurance methodologies.

Minimal risk research Collection of data from voice, video, digital, or image recordings made for research purposes.

Minimal risk research Clinical studies of drugs and medical devices only when condition a or b is met: a.Research on drugs for which an investigational new drug application is not required (exception: research on marketed drugs that significantly increases the risks or decreases the acceptability of the risks associated with the use of the product) b.Research on medical devices for which the medical device is cleared/approved for marketing and the medical device is being used in accordance with its cleared/approved labeling.

Minimal risk research Collection of blood samples by finger stick, heel stick, ear stick, or venipuncture as follows: a.from healthy, nonpregnant adults who weigh at least 110 pounds. For these participants, the amounts drawn may not exceed 550 ml in an 8 week period and collection may not occur more frequently than 2 times per week; or b.from other adults and children2, considering the age, weight, and health of the participants, the collection procedure, the amount of blood to be collected, and the frequency with which it will be collected. For these participants, the amount drawn may not exceed the lesser of 50 ml or 3 ml per kg in an 8 week period and collection may not occur more frequently than 2 times per week.

Minimal risk research Prospective collection of biological specimens for research purposes by noninvasive means. Examples: a.hair and nail clippings in a nondisfiguring manner; b.deciduous teeth at time of exfoliation or if routine patient care indicates a need for extraction; c.permanent teeth if routine patient care indicates a need for extraction; d.excreta and external secretions (including sweat); e.uncannulated saliva collected either in an unstimulated fashion or stimulated by chewing gumbase or wax or by applying a dilute citric solution to the tongue; f.placenta removed at delivery; g.amniotic fluid obtained at the time of rupture of the membrane prior to or during labor; h.supra- and subgingival dental plaque and calculus, provided the collection procedure is not more invasive than routine prophylactic scaling of the teeth and the process is accomplished in accordance with accepted prophylactic techniques; i.mucosal and skin cells collected by buccal scraping or swab, skin swab, or mouth washings; j.sputum collected after saline mist nebulization.

Minimal risk research Collection of data through noninvasive procedures (not involving general anesthesia or sedation) routinely employed in clinical practice, excluding procedures involving x-rays or microwaves. Where medical devices are employed, they must be cleared/approved for marketing. (Studies intended to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the medical device are not generally eligible for expedited review, including studies of cleared medical devices for new indications.) Examples: a.physical sensors that are applied either to the surface of the body or at a distance and do not involve input of significant amounts of energy into the participant or an invasion of the participants privacy; b.weighing or testing sensory acuity; c.magnetic resonance imaging; d.electrocardiography, electroencephalography, thermography, detection of naturally occurring radioactivity, electroretinography, ultrasound, diagnostic infrared imaging, doppler blood flow, and echocardiography; e.moderate exercise, muscular strength testing, body composition assessment, and flexibility testing where appropriate given the age, weight, and health of the individual.

??

Chairpersons Review