Senior Project Presentation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mechanics Aerostructures (Aircraft Structures) An important course in the Aerospace Option Content is typical of advanced mechanics of materials Exposure.
Advertisements

ENGR 214 Chapter 16 Plane Motion of Rigid Bodies:
Design of Slabs-on-Grade
8.6 Frictional Forces on Collar Bearings, Pivot Bearings and Disks
LRFD Design of Shallow Foundations
The bucket of the excavator at a construction site is subjected to 1200-lb and 700lb digging forces at its tip. Determine the magnitude and direction.
Problem lb A couple of magnitude 30 lb
RETAINING EARTH STRUCTURE Session 11 – 16
FLORENCE & HUTCHESON LEE SEWELL, PE, SE.  SIGNAL AND LIGHTING STRUCTURAL ANAYLSIS (SALSA)  ANALYZES WIRE SPAN, MAST ARM AND HIGH MAST STRUCTURES.
Presentation outline Product development process: =>Design for Six Sigma =>Advanced modelling tools Practical examples => SKF quiet running bearing.
Design of Cantilevered Retaining Walls
Foundation System Design for Al Nimmer Commercial Building
E-furniture Leonardo da Vinci Transfer of inovation project Project number CZ1-Leo Agreement number CZ/10/LLP-LdV/T01/
Common Problems Freeboard Anchors and U-bars Sag System hardware.
Deep excavation softwareGeotechnical and foundation engineering Advanced Engineering Services Corso Paratie, Milano 30 settembre 2009 Tutorial 1: Introduction.
Slide Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.
Shawn Kenny, Ph.D., P.Eng. Assistant Professor Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science Memorial University of Newfoundland ENGI.
Shear - Tensile - Compression Stresses Slip Ted 126 Spring 2007.
IEOR 180 Senior Project Toni Geralde Mona Gohil Nicolas Gomez Lily Surya Patrick Tam Optimizing Electricity Procurement for the City of Palo Alto.
Lecture 24 ENGR-1100 Introduction to Engineering Analysis.
CM 197 Mechanics of Materials Chap 14: Stresses in Beams
1. By Dr. Attaullah Shah Swedish College of Engineering and Technology Wah Cantt. Reinforced Concrete Design-II Lec-3 Retaining walls.
Retaining Walls.
Retaining Wall Design SIL 211 MEKANIKA TANAH DR. IR. ERIZAL, MAGR
Lecture 11 Advance Design of RC Structure Retaining walls
EXTERNAL STABILITY The MSE wall system consists of three zones. They are: 1. The reinforced earth zone. 2. The backfill zone. 3. The foundation soil zone.
Problem y C 10 ft The 15-ft boom AB has a fixed 6 ft
FOOTINGS. FOOTINGS Introduction Footings are structural elements that transmit column or wall loads to the underlying soil below the structure. Footings.
Tutorial 6: Bin type walls with tierod Deep Excavation LLC DeepEX 2015 – Advanced course 1.
New Modeling Techniques for the Global Routing Problem Anthony Vannelli Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Waterloo Waterloo,
Friction  Friction results from relative motion between objects.  Frictional forces are forces that resist or oppose motion.
Session 15 – 16 SHEET PILE STRUCTURES
Don Bradfield Josh Brown Royce Kranz Shawn Mooney Ashlee Palm.
Lateral Earth Pressure
ENGR 1181 College of Engineering Engineering Education Innovation Center Excel Problem Solving.
8.2 Problems Involving Dry Friction
Retaining Walls I. *Introduction
Session 11 – 12 LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE
3.5 Graphing Functions. Slide Guidelines for studying and graphing a function:  (a) Define the domain.  (b)Are there Vertical asymptotes? Horizontal.
The previous cubic is entered in Excel in away that may be read easily Note the ‘ name box’ is used here to give the numerical content of the cell a name,
LUKHDHIRJI ENGINEERING COLLEGE MORBI SUBJECT :- “BOX SHEAR TEST” 1.Mepani Kiran ( ) 2.Pavasiya Jaydeep ( ) 3.Pindoriya Jenti( )
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 10 Revision
GLE/CEE 330: Soil Mechanics Earth Retaining Structures
Direct Shear Test.
Solver Feature Excel’s KY San Jose State University Engineering 10.
Prince Mohamed Bin Fahd University College of Engineering Department of Civil Engineering   Senior Design Project (ASSE III) Spring 2014 Management.
The Engineering of Foundations
DESIGN OF RETAINING WALLS
The Four-legged Water Walker
Solver Feature Excel’s KY San Jose State University Engineering 10.
Mohamed AL-Habib (ID: ) Omar G. Abdullah (ID: )
Design of Rockery Retaining Walls
Tilt N’ Store Design Analysis
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab. II
RETAINING WALL.
soil improvement using shredded rubber tires
Project Purpose & Description
Equivalent Systems.
Year 8 Assessment Comparing the giants!.
Particle F=ma (n-t): Example Problem 5
○ Hisashi Shimosaka (Doshisha University)
Tilt N’ Store Design Analysis
Title Layout Subtitle.
Engine Part ID Part 1.
Engine Part ID Part 2.
Engine Part ID Part 2.
Problem 4-d Rod AC is supported by a pin and
Graduation Project Bracing system for deep excavation.
Pipe-Line Anchor Block Optimization
© Infogroup Data Solutions Slide Title © Infogroup Data Solutions.
Presentation transcript:

Senior Project Presentation Zakariya Saleh Al-Helal ID# 212543

Outline Problem Description Objective Function Design Stage Design Constrains Excel Model Model Importance Results Concluded

Problem Description Project Title: Pipe-Line Anchor Block Optimization Anchor block! Why? restraints for pressurized pipes

Problem Description

Problem Description

Problem Description

Objective Function To optimize an anchor block for a given force How ? Minimize the volume A

Design Stage Normal forces analysis Frictional forces Moments

Design Stage Normal forces analysis In the horizontal direction

Design Stage Normal forces analysis Where k is ka for active soil kp for passive soil ka =

Design Stage Normal forces analysis

Design Stage Normal forces analysis

Design Stage Normal forces analysis

Design Stage Arms of actions: 2

Design Stage Arms of actions: For resultant force:

Design Stage Normal forces analysis

Design Stage Frictional forces

Design Constrains Factors of Safety Soil bearing capacity Against sliding ≥ 1.25 Against overturning ≥1.5 Soil bearing capacity ≤ 3 ksf ≥ 0

Design Constrains Factors of Safety Against sliding ≥ 1.25

Design Constrains Factors of Safety Against overturning ≥1.5

Design Constrains Soil bearing capacity ≤ 3 ksf ≥ 0

Design Constrains Soil bearing capacity ≤ 3 ksf ≥ 0

Excel Model Features: Easy to Handle Flexible Minimum Cost Time Saving

Verification & Comparison Excel Model Construction Optimization Verification & Comparison

Model Importance Material Saving: For a pipe force: Fp=1502 lb; Current Technique: V=30*16*16=7680 ft^3 Excel Model:minimzed to V=4288 ft^3

Model Importance Material Saving: For a pipe force: Fp=1502 lb; Typical Solution Obtained by Saudi Aramco Engineer: V=30*16*16=7680 ft^3 Excel Model:minimzed to V=4288 ft^3 % Saving: =45%

Results Concluded The dimensions for a given force can be obtained using: Model (Solver) Tables Charts Equations

Results Concluded Equations: with h1 = 3 ft For W=4H: H= 0.8039 x0.3736 B= 0.3968 x0.4072 W = 3.2154 x0.3736 d= 0.4661x0.3794 For W=8H: W = 4.3888 x0.3905 H= 0.5486 x0.3905, B= 0.4239 x0.3593 d= 0.2743x0.4162

Results Concluded Equations: For x=1000 For W=4H: H= 10.6 B= 6.6 W = 42.5 d= 6.4

Results Concluded Important Notice The dimensions are exponentially related to the pipe’s force magnitude Approximately Min 40% saving in material

THANKS