Ruggli M.1), Stebler D.1), Besancon L.1), Vaucher F.1)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Fecal Calprotectin and Immunochemical Occult Blood Tests for Diagnosis of Organic Bowel Disease in Primary Care: The.
Advertisements

Spotlight on Colorectal Cancer Screening 1 1. Home Screening for Colon Cancer
The Feasibility and Effectiveness of the Provision of Alcohol Screening and Brief Advice in Pharmacies for Women Accessing Emergency Contraception (EHOC)
Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal-Cancer Screening NEJM April 3, 2014 Vol 3 Imperiale, T.F. et al Presented by Melissa Spera, MD.
Sex Differences in the Prevalence and Correlates of Colorectal Cancer Testing: Health Information National Trends Survey Sally W. Vernon 1, Amy.
Colorectal cancer: How do we approach health disparities? Marta L. Davila, MD, FASGE University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Cervical cancer screening in Estonia: present situation Piret Veerus Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics National Institute for Health Development.
Colorectal Cancer Screening John Pelzel MD Sleepy Eye Medical Center.
Integrated Cancer Screening Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Update on Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests Source: Levin Bernard et al. Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous.
Bowel Screening in Scotland – Current Challenges and Possible Solutions Prof. Bob Steele Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee.
Mobilizing Newcomers and Immigrants to Cancer Screening Programs funded by Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) The views expressed herein do not necessarily.
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Our Vision – Healthy Kansans Living in Safe and Sustainable Environments.
Health Care Reform Through the Cancer Lens State and Private Sector Reforms for Hispanic Healthcare Edward E. Partridge, MD National Board President American.
Results and cost of a population-based biennial faecal occult blood colorectal cancer screening program Bernard DENIS, Philippe PERRIN, Jean François VIES,
COMPARING YIELD AND COST OF FOBT AND FS IN AN AVERAGE RISK POPULATION: RESULTS AFTER 2 SCREENING ROUNDS N.Segnan MD, Ms Epi Center for Cancer Prevention.
June 11, IOM, Reducing Suicide, 2002 Statement of Task w Assess the science base w Evaluate the status of prevention w Consider strategies for studying.
Colorectal cancer screening with the addition of flexible sigmoidoscopy to guaiac-based fecal occult blood testing: a population-based controlled trial.
Hypertension: Blood Pressure Measurement and the new NICE guideline Prof Richard McManus BHS Annual Meeting Cambridge 2011 NICE clinical guideline 127.
Colorectal Cancer Screening Colorectal Cancer Screening VT SGNA Conference VT SGNA Conference October 24, 2015 October 24, 2015 Lynn Butterly, MD Lynn.
Looking toward the future: Consumer preferences for blood-based screening for colorectal cancer PRESENTER: Dr Ian Zajac AUTHORS: Ian Zajac, Amy Duncan,
Colorectal Cancer Screening Implementation of a public health programme An Expert Group on Colorectal Cancer Screening Cancer Society of Finland, Finnish.
First results of a pilot population-based faecal occult blood colorectal cancer screening program B. DENIS, P. PERRIN, J.F. EBELIN, P. WEBER, E. KALTENBACH,
Presented by: Liz M. Baker, CHES NC Comprehensive Cancer Program 1.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 28 – Consumer and Health Protection.
PUTTING PREVENTION FIRST Vascular Checks Dr Bill Kirkup Associate NHS Medical Director.
NHS Cambridgeshire (formerly Cambridgeshire PCT) Visit our web site: EVALUATION OF NHS HEALTH CHECKS.
A Pharmacy Based Bowel Cancer Screening Program. Did You Know? Bowel cancer kills more Australians each year than breast or prostate cancer (AIHW 2012.
FIT Programme (Faecal Immunohistochemical Test)
Cancer prevention and early detection
Type 2 Diabetes campaign
Proctor’s Implementation Outcomes
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines
What you need to know about the Fecal Occult Blood Test
The Burden of Colorectal Cancer in Arkansas
Hypertension November 2016
Chlamydia Screening in Tower Hamlets
More Ontarians need to be screened for colorectal cancer (Sept. 2012)
NHS Cervical Screening Programme, England, : Graphs
Bowel cancer screening update GP education event 28 Nov 2017
Evidence of a Program's Effectiveness in Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in Federally Qualified Health Centers Robert L. Stephens, PhD, MPH1;
Purposes of the Convention
Increasing Access to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural East Texas
Cancer screening PROF .MAZIN AL-HAWAZ.
University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Evaluation of a Spiritually-based Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Knowledge and Screening Among Church-attending African Americans and Whites.
Dr James Carlton, Medical Adviser
NHS Cervical Screening Programme, England : Graphs
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL ENGAGEMENT PROGRAMME:
Prevention and Early Diagnosis of Cancer Ongar Health Centre Patient Forum 7th March 2018 Sue White Cancer Research UK Facilitator.
The Bowel Screening Programme in Wales
Daniela B. Friedman, University of South Carolina
SAMPLE – Preliminary Results
Kathleen England Neville Calleja 20th October 2017
Impact of a public education program on promoting rational use of medicines:
Colorectal Natural History Model
Bowel Screening in Wales
INVITED ABSTRACTS Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Colorectal Cancer: National and International Perspective on the Burden of Disease and Public Health Impact  Ziad F. Gellad, Dawn Provenzale  Gastroenterology 
Standard 3.1 Patient Navigation Process
Citation: Cancer Care Ontario
Hypertension November 2016
BOWEL CANCER SCREENING IN LEWISHAM
BeTheChange The Problem BeTheChange Results of the scheme Conclusion
ESTIMATING THE EFFICIENCY OF THREE NATIONAL CANCER SCREENING PROGRAMMES USING THE POPULATION-BASED CANCER REGISTRY DATA IN SLOVENIA Vesna ZADNIK MD,
Cancer prevention policy in the EU:
Faecal Immunochemistry Test - qFIT
Presentation transcript:

Ruggli M.1), Stebler D.1), Besancon L.1), Vaucher F.1) Colorectal cancer screening in pharmacy: a campaign in the Swiss pharmacies Ruggli M.1), Stebler D.1), Besancon L.1), Vaucher F.1) 1) pharmaSuisse, Swiss Association of Pharmacists, Bern-Liebefeld, Switzerland Contact: international@pharmasuisse.org AIMS OF THE CAMPAIGN: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths.[1] In Switzerland, the incidence of colorectal cancer ranks third in males and second in females, with about 4,100 patients newly diagnosed every year, resulting in 1,600 deaths yearly, a third being among patients younger than 70 years of age.[2] Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is an accepted strategy for colorectal cancer screening in the average-risk population. Although FIT is less effective than colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy for neoplastic detection, evidence suggests that it may be better accepted and this higher acceptance may offset its lower detection capacity. Even if the Swiss authorities support colorectal cancer screening, the participation in colorectal cancer screening in Switzerland is very low and presently not offered systematically. To respond to this situation, pharmaSuisse (the Swiss association of pharmacists) launched in 2016 a preventive service in community pharmacies through a 6 week campaign to offer the Swiss people a low threshold screening opportunity. This campaign was associated with a study to evaluate its impact in terms of effectiveness, appropriateness, and cost/benefit ratio. METHOD: 771 community pharmacies from all over Switzerland took part in the 2016 campaign. The campaign targeted men and women between 50 and 75 years of age, who had not had a colonoscopy over the last 10 years. Through a questionnaire, pharmacists evaluated the risk factors and delivered a stool-based test, faecal immunochemical test (FIT) when appropriate (i.e. to individuals without elevated and additional risk factors). pharmaSuisse selected as a stool test OC Sensor Test, a well evaluated and widely used FIT without particular restrictions on diet or medication use. The patient collected a stool sample at home and sent it in a prepaid envelope to the laboratory contracted for the whole Switzerland. Through a dedicated online platform, the lab shared the results with the pharmacist, who could then inform the patient. If the test results were positive, the patient was referred to a GP or gastroenterologist for a colonoscopy. In case of negative result, the pharmacist gave lifestyle advice and offered the opportunity to be invited for a new screening in two years. This service was usually charged 30 CHF (25€); this fee included the FIT and lab analysis and was usually paid out-of-the pocket by the customer, as only one major health insurance scheme covered this service. In order to be able to offer the service, participating pharmacists had to complete an online training on the colon cancer, the stool test, the screening service and the campaign. RESULTS: Within 6 weeks, 23,024 individuals were screened in pharmacies using the questionnaire. 97% of them were in the focussed age group, 61% were women. In comparison with the general Swiss population, the screened population was slightly healthier (figure 1). 52% of participants stated they had been informed about the opportunity of colorectal cancer screening in community pharmacy through the media coverage or through the campaign organised by pharmaSuisse. 47% of them reported that if it wasn’t for the implemented campaign, they would probably not have taken a screening. Targeted population for the screening Patients between 50 and 75 years of age, without colonoscopy over the last 10 years Risk assessment N= 23,024 Samples analysed N = 21,071 Positive tests, visit to a medical doctor recommended N = 1,510 Elevated risks N=760 Referral to GP: N=632 (83%) Referral to specialist N=128 (17%) Provision of FITs N= 22,264 3% 97% 7% Negative tests N=20,191 93% Samples not sent by patients N=563 Figure 1: Comparison of study population with the average Swiss population Figure 2: Campaign results As shown on figure 2, 760 patients (3%) were found with elevated risk factors through the pre-test questionnaire and were referred directly to a physician. All other patients (22,264 ; 97%) received a FIT, out of which 21,701 (97%) collected a sample and sent it back to the laboratory. Of all tests analysed, 20,191 (93%) were negative. 1,510 patients with a positive result were referred to a physician or a gastroenterologist for a colonoscopy. Based on the literature,[3]-[4] we estimate that 5% (3-11) of patients with the positive stool tests effectively had colorectal cancer and 31% [24-38] suffered from advanced adenoma. In total, 2,270 persons (10%) were referred to a medical doctor: 760 for additional investigations in relation with their elevated and additional risk factors (determined through the questionnaire), and 1,510 because of the positive stool test. If we assume that 2/3 patients followed this recommendation and had eventually a colonoscopy, we can estimate that thanks to the campaign, 58 [33-114] cases of colon cancer were diagnosed and 364 [283-429] advanced adenoma were detected. Our evaluation also shows that colorectal screening in Swiss pharmacies is very likely to be cost-saving. CONCLUSIONS: The 2016 campaign results have demonstrated the feasibility and high acceptance of patients for this service. Currently this service is only covered by one health insurance scheme but the evidence was relevant to engage with public health authorities and helped position pharmacies as partners in health promotion and prevention. At national level, the Swiss national cancer strategy recognised the important role of pharmacists in preventing colon cancer.[2] At local level, health authorities from Cantons are developing their local prevention programmes on colon cancer, and so far all of them have integrated pharmacists in their programmes. Based on these positive results, it was decided to sustain the provision of this screening service: 500 Swiss pharmacies offer this service all year long, while 350 community pharmacies offer this service only during the campaign organised every two years. pharmaSuisse organised the 2018 campaign from 1st March to 14th April and Swiss patients were able to access this screening service in 850 pharmacies (out of 1770 Swiss community pharmacies; 50%). REFERENCES: 1 Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M et al. GLOBOCAN 2012v1.0 Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC Cancerbase No 11. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2013. [2] Kramis K, Ruckstuhl B, Wyler M. Nationale Strategie Gegen Krebs 2014–2017 [National Cancer Strategy 2014-2017]. Bern: Dialog Nationale Gesundheitspolitik [National Health Policy Dialog], 2013. [3] Quintero E, Castells A, Bujanda L, Cubiella J, Salas D, Lanas Á et al. Colonoscopy versus Fecal Immunochemical Testing in Colorectal-Cancer Screening. New England Journal of Medicine 2012: 366(8), 697–706. [4] de Wijkerslooth T, Stoop E, Bossuyt P, Meijer G, van Ballegooijen M, van Roon A et al. (2012). Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Testing Is Equally Sensitive for Proximal and Distal Advanced Neoplasia. American Journal of Gastroenterology 2012 Oct; 107(10): 1570-78.