Improvement-Driven Fees

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Concurrency Management. What is Concurrency? Chapter , F.S. requires Comprehensive Plans to adopt a concurrency management system,
Advertisements

November 3, 2014 Planning Commission. 2 Capital Facilities Element (CFE)
Fiscal Neutrality Methodology Development Public Information | January 16 th, 2015 Sarasota 2050 Resource Management Area (RMA) Policy.
Lecture(1) Instructor : Dr. Abdelmajid Nassar Civil Engineering Dept. Master Program Civil Engineering Dept. Master Program
The Effects of Different Land Uses in Missouri on Local Fiscal Conditions – Cost of Community Services Project Update – 4/12/02.
PUBLIC HEARING: Development (Impact) Fees - Land Use Assumptions & Infrastructure Improvement Plan Reports June 30, 2014.
Development (Impact) Fee Program Changes to Comply with State Law Mayor and Council Study Session June 3, 2014.
PROPOSAL FOR PORT ST LUCIE RAILWAY STATION SERVING FT PIERCE AND JENSEN BEACH LOCATED AT WALTON ROAD. ACCESS TO CROSSTOWN PARKWAY AND SE GREEN RIVER PARKWAY.
Statewide Water Needs and future estimated costs September 20, 2011.
FISCAL IMPACTANALYSIS. TOPICS What is a FIA FIA methodologies FIA Shortcomings Rethinking FIA FIA and economic development policy.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council 6 th Plan Conservation Resource Supply Curve Workshop on Data & Assumption Overview of Council Resource Analysis.
Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. National Impact Fee Roundtable Public Safety Impact Fees and Alternatives – Fire Flow Methodology Robert P. Wallace,
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study Update Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing January 15, 2013.
UW Cooperative Extension Land Use Education Programs Comprehensive Planning Overview March 15th Osceola WI Polk County UWEX-Cooperative Extension.
The Link Between Land-Use and Transportation Planning
Sustainable Energy Society of Southern Africa Creating a Sustainable Solar Water Heating Industry in SA.
Current Trends In Impact Fees National Impact Fee Roundtable October 21, 2004 Robert D. Spencer.
Avalon Park Retail Market Analysis Fishkind and Associates, Inc Corporate Blvd. Orlando, FL December 12, 2008.
Short and Long Range Water Supply Planning and Aquifer Performance Test (APT)
Property Exchange ORANGE COUNTY Real Estate Management February 19, 2008.
Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendments Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act December 18, 2007 Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendments Wekiva Parkway and Protection.
Water Connection Fee Analysis Elk Grove Water District Finance Committee January 30, 2013.
Improvement-Driven Fees National Impact Fee Roundtable Arlington, VA October 5, 2006.
Michigan’s Nonpoint Source Program Pass Through Grant Funding Past, Present, and Future Outlook Bob Sweet Past Aquatic Biologist, Present Administrative.
Is the Mid-Atlantic Region Water Rich? Presentation to 5 th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable November 7, 2008 Joseph Hoffman, Executive Director.
It’s All About Fairness National Impact Fee Roundtable Denver – October 2005 Dr. Arthur C. Nelson, FAICP Professor & Director Urban Affairs & Planning.
Presented By Public Resources Management Group, Inc. RECREATION IMPACT FEE STUDY Prepared on October 10 th, 2013.
Fiscal Impact Analysis – City of Norwalk, Connecticut October 5, 2006 Prepared by:RKG Associates, Inc. Economic, Planning and Real Estate Consultants 277.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA FINANCIAL FORECAST AND CAPITAL FACILITIES FEES ANALYSIS Prepared in Conjunction With the Utility System Revenue.
4701 Sangamore Road S240 | Bethesda, MD | (800) Ext
Meadowbrook Property Fiscal Impact Analysis October 6, 2009.
Orange County Government Adoption Public Hearing May 10, 2016 Board of County Commissioners School Impact Fee Update.
Residential Impact Fee - Nexus Study Update City of Pasadena Conclusions & Findings Prepared by Brion & Associates In association with Nilsson Consulting.
OAK RIDGE NORTH IMPACT FEES. Overview 1.Introduction 2.Schedule/Process 3.Land Use Assumption 4.Capital Improvement Plan Water Wastewater 5.Impact Fees.
2014 Mobility Fee Update Study Adoption Reading 1 October 21, 2014.
Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District DRAFT Water Resource Management Plan Review
Lecture (11): Water Distribution Systems
Water Booster Station Improvement Study
The Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Tool (TADAT)
The Evolving M&A: From Affiliations to Acquisitions
Funding reforms and special provision One LA’s response
Budget Study Session – May 22, 2012
Water & Wastewater Capacity Charge Work Shop
Sewerage and Sanitation Policies in Indonesia
Planning Commission Impact fees Planning Commission
Information Systems and Technology in Organization
Pay and Classification Report Carolina Beach, North Carolina
WRCOG Fee Comparison Study – Lessons Learned
Management of Waiting Lines
Understanding Development Fees + A Regional Perspective Presentation to Mountain Housing Council Fee Roundtable November 30, 2017.
Presented by: Deborah Early Icenogle Seaver Pogue, P.C.
System Development Fees
Florida and Reclaimed Water
Determining and Scaling Habitat Services
Chapter 24 Taxes and Spending Chapter 24 Norton Media Library
Water & Sewer Rate Study Presented by: Chris Gonzalez, Project Manager
Fire Protection Impact Fee
Activity-Based Costing Systems
Alternative Road Impact Fee Methodologies
LDZ System Charges – Structure Methodology 26 July 2010
Presentation and Discussion of the Draft Transportation Land Use Assumptions and Infrastructure Improvement Plan Report (Impact Fee Report) Town Council.
2019 TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING
Slide Deck: My Municipal Government
Monthly Financial Reports
Mentoring.
АВЛИГАТАЙ ТЭМЦЭХ ҮНДЭСНИЙ ХӨТӨЛБӨР /танилцуулга/
Capital Facilities Study Session
Retail Rate Design & Administration
Change Order Number One Purchase Order for Ferric Chloride Use
Surrey County Council – Development of the Asset and Place Strategy
Presentation transcript:

Improvement-Driven Fees National Impact Fee Roundtable Arlington, Virginia October 5, 2006 Joe Colgan Colgan Consulting Corporation

Newtonian World View Plan-Based = Improvements-Driven Capacity-Based = Demand Driven = Consumption-Driven Standard-Based = Incremental Expansion (Similar to Capacity-Based) Buy-In or Recoupment Approach Combines with Other Methods Joe Colgan/Colgan Consulting Corporation Slide 2

Plan-Based Fees Typically Used for Facilities That Must Be Designed to a Plan Requires Both a Development Plan AND a Matching Facility Master Plan Plan Changes May Invalidate Fees Cost of Unused Capacity May Be Covered by the Fees Joe Colgan/Colgan Consulting Corporation Slide 3

Capacity-Based Fees Development Plan Not Required Need Facility Capacity and Cost Cost of Unused Capacity Not Covered by the Fees Traditionally Used for Water and Wastewater Facilities – Often Used for Traffic Impact Fees Joe Colgan/Colgan Consulting Corporation Slide 4

Standard-Based Fees Development Plan Not Required Standard Translates Directly to Fee, e.g. Park Acres per Capita & Cost per Acre Potential Benefit Nexus Issues Appropriate for Parks, Libraries, Police, Administrative Facilities that Can be Expanded Incrementally As Required to Serve New Development Joe Colgan/Colgan Consulting Corporation Slide 5

Why Do We Need More Than One Method Anyway? Relationship Between Development & Facility Needs Varies by Facility Type Need to Fit Different Circumstances Need to Work with Available Information Finding Most Conservative Result Finding Least Conservative Result Joe Colgan/Colgan Consulting Corporation Slide 6

Toward Relativity Do We Really Need More Than One Method? Within Limits, Different Methods Can Be Warped Into One Another Should the Newtonian View of Impact Fee Methodology Become Obsolete? Is There an Equivalent of the Space-Time Continuum for Impact Fees? Joe Colgan/Colgan Consulting Corporation Slide 7

Random Musings It’s All About Determining Growth’s Share of Cost Capacity vs. Consumption: Randy’s Example Orange County (CA) Fire Authority Example Indirect Impacts and Cost Shifting Joe Colgan/Colgan Consulting Corporation Slide 8