Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mus81 and Yen1 Promote Reciprocal Exchange during Mitotic Recombination to Maintain Genome Integrity in Budding Yeast  Chu Kwen Ho, Gerard Mazón, Alicia.
Advertisements

The Mre11 Complex Is Required for Repair of Hairpin-Capped Double-Strand Breaks and Prevention of Chromosome Rearrangements  Kirill S. Lobachev, Dmitry.
Strand Invasion Structures in the Inverted Repeat of Candida albicans Mitochondrial DNA Reveal a Role for Homologous Recombination in Replication  Joachim.
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Randy W. Hyppa, Gerald R. Smith  Cell 
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Mus81 and Yen1 Promote Reciprocal Exchange during Mitotic Recombination to Maintain Genome Integrity in Budding Yeast  Chu Kwen Ho, Gerard Mazón, Alicia.
Pei-Yun Jenny Wu, Paul Nurse  Molecular Cell 
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Top3-Rmi1 DNA Single-Strand Decatenase Is Integral to the Formation and Resolution of Meiotic Recombination Intermediates  Hardeep Kaur, Arnaud De Muyt,
Pervasive and Essential Roles of the Top3-Rmi1 Decatenase Orchestrate Recombination and Facilitate Chromosome Segregation in Meiosis  Shangming Tang,
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages (August 2010)
Chromosome-wide Rad51 Spreading and SUMO-H2A
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages (October 2004)
A Rad51 Presynaptic Filament Is Sufficient to Capture Nucleosomal Homology during Recombinational Repair of a DNA Double-Strand Break  Manisha Sinha,
Mus81/Mms4 Endonuclease and Sgs1 Helicase Collaborate to Ensure Proper Recombination Intermediate Metabolism during Meiosis  Lea Jessop, Michael Lichten 
The Single-End Invasion
TALEN-Induced Double-Strand Break Repair of CTG Trinucleotide Repeats
Hsin-Yen Wu, Hsuan-Chung Ho, Sean M. Burgess  Current Biology 
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Thorsten Allers, Michael Lichten  Cell 
Neal Sugawara, Xuan Wang, James E. Haber  Molecular Cell 
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages (April 2012)
Hideo Tsubouchi, G.Shirleen Roeder  Developmental Cell 
Volume 130, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Single Holliday Junctions Are Intermediates of Meiotic Recombination
Comprehensive, Fine-Scale Dissection of Homologous Recombination Outcomes at a Hot Spot in Mouse Meiosis  Francesca Cole, Scott Keeney, Maria Jasin  Molecular.
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (November 2005)
Regulation of Telomere Elongation by the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase CDK1
Volume 143, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
The DNA Damage Machinery and Homologous Recombination Pathway Act Consecutively to Protect Human Telomeres  Ramiro E. Verdun, Jan Karlseder  Cell  Volume.
Intermediates of Yeast Meiotic Recombination Contain Heteroduplex DNA
Meiosis-Specific DNA Double-Strand Breaks Are Catalyzed by Spo11, a Member of a Widely Conserved Protein Family  Scott Keeney, Craig N Giroux, Nancy Kleckner 
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (October 2008)
Brh2 Promotes a Template-Switching Reaction Enabling Recombinational Bypass of Lesions during DNA Synthesis  Nayef Mazloum, William K. Holloman  Molecular.
Jill E. Falk, Andrew Chi-ho Chan, Eva Hoffmann, Andreas Hochwagen 
Distinct Pathways for snoRNA and mRNA Termination
Mnd1 Is Required for Meiotic Interhomolog Repair
Allyson M Holmes, James E Haber  Cell 
Targeted Stimulation of Meiotic Recombination
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Crossover Homeostasis in Yeast Meiosis
Homology Requirements and Competition between Gene Conversion and Break- Induced Replication during Double-Strand Break Repair  Anuja Mehta, Annette Beach,
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
The Meiosis-Specific Hop2 Protein of S
At Loose Ends: Resecting a Double-Strand Break
Alessandro Bianchi, Simona Negrini, David Shore  Molecular Cell 
Gradual Implementation of the Meiotic Recombination Program via Checkpoint Pathways Controlled by Global DSB Levels  Neeraj Joshi, M. Scott Brown, Douglas K.
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 125, Issue 7, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Generating Crossovers by Resolution of Nicked Holliday Junctions
Hsin-Yen Wu, Sean M. Burgess  Current Biology 
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages (August 2008)
Simon W.-L Chan, Elizabeth H Blackburn  Molecular Cell 
Multiple Rad5 Activities Mediate Sister Chromatid Recombination to Bypass DNA Damage at Stalled Replication Forks  Eugen C. Minca, David Kowalski  Molecular.
Zhu Zhu, Woo-Hyun Chung, Eun Yong Shim, Sang Eun Lee, Grzegorz Ira 
Huan Chen, Michael Lisby, Lorraine S. Symington  Molecular Cell 
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Meiotic DNA Breaks at the S. pombe Recombination Hot Spot M26
Xiaorong Wang, Peter Baumann  Molecular Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages 1001-1015 (December 2010) Temporally and Biochemically Distinct Activities of Exo1 during Meiosis: Double-Strand Break Resection and Resolution of Double Holliday Junctions  Kseniya Zakharyevich, Yunmei Ma, Shangming Tang, Patty Yi-Hwa Hwang, Serge Boiteux, Neil Hunter  Molecular Cell  Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages 1001-1015 (December 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.11.032 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Analysis of Meiotic DSB Resection (A) Structure of the HIS4LEU2 locus showing open reading frames and diagnostic XhoI restriction sites (circled Xs). The DSB fragments released by XhoI digestion and locations of probes for Southern analysis are shown below. (B) Diagram of DSB component-strands analysis showing the signals detected by Southern analysis of a native/denaturing two-dimensional gel hybridized with probes to both strands. The right-hand panels show Southern analysis of DSBs from wild-type cells, successively hybridized with probes to both strands and to individual strands. (C and D) Southern analysis of DSB resection over time in wild-type and exo1Δ meiotic time courses. (D) Quantification of the resection profiles of DSBs in wild-type and exo1Δ meiotic cultures sampled at 4 hr. (E) Quantification of the resection profiles of DSBs in wild-type and exo1Δ meiotic cultures sampled at 4 hr. (F) Quantification of the resection profiles of DSBs in pCLB2-SGS1 and pCLB2-SGS1 exo1Δ meiotic cultures sampled at 5 hr. (G) Southern images of DSB resection in pCLB2-SGS1 and pCLB2-SGS1 exo1Δ mutants. Molecular Cell 2010 40, 1001-1015DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.11.032) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Physical Analysis of Meiotic Recombination in Wild-Type and exo1Δ Cells (A) Map of the HIS4LEU2 locus showing diagnostic XhoI restriction sites (circled Xs) and the position of the probe. DNA species detected with Probe 4 are shown below. (B) Southern images of 1D gels hybridized with Probe 4 showing DNA species detailed in (A). (C) Quantitative analysis of DSBs, crossovers, and meiotic divisions (MI ± MII). Percent DNA is percent of total hybridizing DNA. Error bars show the standard error of three independent experiments. MI ± MII is cells that have completed either the first or second meiotic divisions as detected by the number of DAPI-staining bodies. (D) Graphs representing DSBs and crossovers normalized to the internal maximum. Molecular Cell 2010 40, 1001-1015DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.11.032) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Analysis of Joint Molecule Formation in Wild-Type and exo1Δ Cells (A) Map of HIS4LEU2 locus showing diagnostic restriction sites and the position of the probe. JM species detected with Probe 4 are shown below. Presumed structures of SEIs and dHJs are shown in the left-hand panel. SEI, single-end invasion; IH-dHJ, interhomolog double Holliday junction; IS-JM, intersister-joint molecule; mcJM, multichromatid joint molecule. mcJMs comprise either three or four interconnected chromatids; chromatid composition of mcJMs are shown in parentheses, e.g., MDD = 1 Mom + 2 Dad chromatids. (B) Southern blot of native/native two-dimensional gel showing JMs detailed in (A). (C) Two-dimensional analysis of JMs in wild-type and exo1Δ cells. JM regions are magnified in the right-hand panels. (D) Two-dimensional analysis of JMs in ndt80Δ and ndt80 exo1Δ cells. (E) Quantification of JMs in wild-type and exo1Δ cells. Percent DNA is percent of total hybridization signal. (F) Quantification of JMs in ndt80Δ and ndt80Δ exo1Δ cells. Molecular Cell 2010 40, 1001-1015DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.11.032) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Analysis of DSB Resection and Meiotic Recombination in exo1-D173A Cells (A) Domains of the Exo1 polypeptide showing conserved N (N-terminal) and I (internal) nuclease domains, and position of the D173A allele (asterisk). (B) Comparison of DSB resection profiles in exo1Δ and exo1-D173A cells. The right-hand panels show representative images of two-dimensional native/denaturing gels hybridized with the 5′ bottom probe. (C) Genetic analysis of crossing over in wild-type, exo1Δ, and exo1-D173A cells. Intervals analyzed by tetrad analysis, and graphs of map distances (±SE) and spore viability, are shown. Asterisks indicate significant differences between map distances p < 0.005 (see Table S1). cM, centiMorgans. (D) Physical analysis of recombination in wild-type, exo1Δ, and exo1-D173A cells. Images of one-dimensional Southern analysis, and quantitative analysis of DSBs, crossovers, and meiotic divisions (MI ± MII). (E) Final crossover levels in wild-type, exo1Δ, and exo1-D173A cells. Graphs show the averages of three independent time courses (means ± SE). Molecular Cell 2010 40, 1001-1015DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.11.032) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Crossing Over along Chromosome III in Wild-Type and exo1-D173A Cells (A) Genetic intervals on chromosome III analyzed by tetrad analysis. (B and C) Map distances (±SE) in wild-type and exo1-D173A cells. Asterisk indicates significantly different by G-test, p = 8 × 10−5 (see Table S2). Molecular Cell 2010 40, 1001-1015DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.11.032) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 The Crossover Function of Exo1 Involves Interaction with Mlh1 (A) Domain structure of EXO1 and the four alleles analyzed. (B) Physical analysis of crossing over in exo1 mutant strains. (C) Quantitative analysis of crossing over in exo1 mutant strains. For each strain, at least three independent time course experiments were analyzed (bars show the mean value ± SE for the 13 hr time points, when crossover levels plateau). (D) Analysis of DSB resection in wild-type and exo1-FF477AA cells. (E) Space-filling model of Mlh1 showing the position of the S2 interaction site and E682 residue. The S1 site mediates heterodimerization with the other MutL homologs, Pms1, Mlh2, and Mlh3. (F) Physical analysis of crossing over in wild-type, mlh1-E682A, and mlh1Δ cells. (G) Quantitation of crossover levels in wild-type, mlh1-E682A, and mlh1Δ cells. Graphs show the averages of at least three independent time courses (means ± SE for the 13 hr time points. (H) Physical assay to detect unrepaired heteroduplex DNA. (I) Analysis of heteroduplex repair in wild-type, mlh1-E682A, and mlh1Δ cells. (J) Quantitation of heteroduplex levels in wild-type, mlh1-E682A, and mlh1Δ cells. Graphs show the averages of at least three independent time courses (means ± SE for the 13 hr time points). Molecular Cell 2010 40, 1001-1015DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.11.032) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Models of Exo1 Function during Meiotic Recombination (A) Three models for meiotic DSB resection (see text for details). (B) Nuclease-independent function of Exo1 in resolving dHJs into crossovers (see text for details). Molecular Cell 2010 40, 1001-1015DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.11.032) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions