Faculty Course Alignment Workshop in Support of Developing Course Learning Outcomes 11/12/2018 Presented by: David Ha and Bob Sproule – School of Accounting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assisting Peers to Provide W orthwhile Feedback UC Merced SATAL Program.
Advertisements

Classroom Observation Training. Instructional Activities to be observed include but may not be limited to….. Classroom instruction Laboratory and clinical.
Online Course Observation. Objectives: 1.Articulate the steps of an online faculty observation 2.Explain the elements of the GRCC Online Course Observation.
Lesson Design Workshop Participants’ Expectations Lesson Plan Components:
Leading Group Discussions David M. Irby, PhD University of California San Francisco.
Engaging Students Taking Online Courses AURCO April 9, 2005 Joseph Cavanaugh.
1 Bob Sproule, University of Waterloo MERLOT August 9, 2007 Integrated Learning and Student Engagement Using ePortfolios.
Devising Assessment Tasks PGCE CS IT. Objectives To consider how to plan for assessment To consider progression To think about collaborative learning.
BUSINESS WITH CONFIDENCE icaew.com Discover how the new part-time BSc (Hons) Applied Accounting and Business can complement your ACA qualification.
Active Learning: Rethinking Our Teaching to Promote Deeper Learning
Leading Group Discussions
Existing Situation The course COMP 915 (Technical Communication in Computer Science, 1 hour) is currently a requirement for obtaining a PhD in computer.
Continuing professional development: Designing an interprofessional program for allied health placement educators My name is Kate Thomson. I’m from Sydney.
INSTRUCTOR: Whitney Rose DuBose
Active Learning: Rethinking Our Teaching to Promote Deeper Learning
Connecting to Distance Education Students
INSTEP: INternationalising Student Education in Physiotherapy
13thSeptember 2017 Learning Intention(s):   
TUTOR PROGRAMME, SELECTION AND TRAINING
Institute for Educators In Nursing and Health Professions
Assessment of English Learners
Faculty Development: Preparing Clinical Nursing Instructors
“Housekeeping” & What did the data say?
Margaret L. Stuber, MD Carole Warde, MD
CORNELL WAY Schoolwide
Folio Thinking: Making Learning Meaningful
Faculty Instructional Rubric
Tuesday, March 6, 2018 Convention Center, Terrace Ballroom 3 Area 1
EDU 695Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
EDU 695 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
COM 600 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
PREPARING STUDENTS FOR THE OCEAN SCIENCE WORKFORCE
EDU 695 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
DC CAS Anchor Paper Training Reading – Secondary Grades 7, 8 & 10
CTE: WHERE WE’VE BEEN HOW WE’RE GROWING
Pauline Walker Headteacher
League for Innovation in the Community College March 29, 2010
Find out more! Facilitating the IPE Skills Training Series – Join us!
Thursday overview Introduction
Agenda Setting One thing I want to get out of this session Activity:
FSSE-G RESULTS Faculty Survey of Student Engagement for Graduate Student Instructors.
Literacy Across Learning
TO ENGINEERING EDUCATION: 5. Adapting And Implementing
Journal #2 Career Planning Unit.
Identify Program and Map System
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Leanne Havis, Ph.D., Neumann University
Personal and Professional development for
Assignment Design Workshop
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Massachusetts College and Career Advising Professional Development
Bulloch Information Session
3 Training Presentation Mar 16
Core Competencies for Primary School Teachers in Crisis Contexts
Support for Program Review
We VALUE HIPs Utilizing VALUE Rubrics and HIP QA Tools in Course Revitalization Presented by Melynda Conner, TBR OSS HIP Specialist 2019.
Capacity Building – stimulating demand for evidence
Assessment & Tk20 November 12, 2015 Della.
Writing Measureable Learning Outcomes and Impact Statements
Session Chair Panelist 1 Panelist 2 Panelist 3 Panelist 4
Providing Effective Feedback to Students
CCL Early Leadership Program Logic Model
Presenter’s Institution
Engaging Students Taking Online Courses
Session Chair or Moderator Panelist 1 Panelist 2 Panelist 3 Panelist 4
Making it Easy: Health Literacy Outcomes to improve social care
Quality Matters How USFSP leads the way in online course excellence Nelson Poynter Library.
Engagement Planning - Communications
Presentation transcript:

Faculty Course Alignment Workshop in Support of Developing Course Learning Outcomes 11/12/2018 Presented by: David Ha and Bob Sproule – School of Accounting and Finance Scott Anderson – Centre for Teaching Excellence Scott – 1 min introduce us number of times offered, number of participants started/completed

Outline Why a faculty Course Alignment workshop Outcome of today’s presentation Issues in offering a Course Alignment workshop in your institution/program Our approach/experience with this type of workshop Reflecting on this presentation Scott run thru the outline

Why a faculty Course Alignment workshop Address quality assurance/enhancement in post-secondary institutions Revision in SAF program level outcomes Align with professional competencies Bob – 1 min The bridge-in, getting attendees excited

Outcome for today’s presentation Identify the considerations/issues in offering a Course Alignment workshop in your institution/program Scott – 1 min attendees outcome

Issues in offering this type of workshop in your institution/program What are they? Bob – 2 min Ask for attendees thoughts while Scott scribes them on board/flipchart

Our approach/experience with this workshop Starting with a top-down versus bottom-up approach Strategic focus with our workshops – Biggs, J. “Constructive alignment in university teaching”, HERDSA Review of Higher Education, Vol. 1, pp. 5 – 22 Workshop structure Day 1 – Key topics Day 2 – Key topics Day 3 – Key topics Total time – 8 min Bob – 1 – 1 min in the SAF we started with identifying PLLO being mindful of our profession’s competencies wanting all faculty to take, offering 2 – 3 hr sessions over 3 days in every term, on-line set-up/support Scott - 2 – 1 min 2 or 3 key points from the Biggs article Scott – 3 – 2 min for each of Day 1 and 2 (using V 4 of the workshop) brief description of focus for the day including key topics Bob – 3 – 2 min for Day 3 brief description (using V4 of the workshop)

Our approach/experience with this workshop Successes and challenges Feedback from participants Reflection from facilitators Course Alignment Survey – Elements and results Re-visit your issues Total time – 7 min David – 6 – 5 min progressing thru each of the 4 offerings referring to instructor feedback and our reflections Bob – 7 – 2 min reviewing survey questions and responses and responses to written questions

Reflecting on this presentation Revisit your considerations/issues What is/are your takeaways? Bob – 5 min go back to the points identified earlier and speaking to the one’s dealt with/not dealt with in our workshop give them 1 min on their own and then asking if anyone wants to share, including questions

Scott – 1 min ask for feedback/suggestions, offer our support Contact Information: Scott anderson – scott.anderson@uwaterloo.ca David ha – David.Ha@uwaterloo.ca Bob sproule – bsproule@uwaterloo.ca