University of North Carolina Institute for the Environment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Make Commitment Milestone 1 Inventory Emissions Milestone 2 Set Target/Goal Milestone 3 Establish Local Action Plan Milestone 5 Monitor/Evaluate Progress.
Advertisements

A Comprehensive Provincial Air Emissions Inventory to Support AEMERA, ESRD and the AER Richard Melick Emissions Inventory Scientist Air Policy.
Bob McConnell, EPA Region 1
1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
Transportation Conformity and Development of Emission Budgets.
Clean Air Corridor Section 309 Requirements Presentation to WRAP Board July 24, 2002.
2005 NEI - Changes. 2 A Call for Change Address external critiques –National Academy of Sciences report –Clean Air Act Advisory Committee report –NARSTO’s.
Talat Odman and Yongtao Hu, Georgia Tech Zac Adelman, Mohammad Omary and Uma Shankar, UNC James Boylan and Byeong-Uk Kim, Georgia DNR.
ADEQ Uses of ICF Modeling Analysis Tony Davis, Branch Manager – Air Planning Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Criteria Pollutant Modeling Analysis.
1 Current Issues And Problems Encountered For Projections In The United States And Canada Presented by Ms. Rebecca Lee Tooly USEPA Office of Air Quality.
1 WRAP Fire Tracking Systems Draft Intent of WRAP FTS Policy – Assist states/tribes to address emissions inventory and tracking associated with fire in.
1 WRAP Policy Fire Tracking Systems Draft December 9, 2002 FEJF Meeting December 10-11, 2002 Jackson, WY.
Developing a Workplan for Implementing the Strategic Plan for the WRAP Board October 1, 2008.
Improving Emission Inventories in North America NERAM V October 16, 2006 William T. Pennell NARSTO Management Coordinator.
Developing Alternate Anthropogenic Emission Scenarios for Investigating Future Air Quality William G. Benjey, Daniel H. Loughlin*, Christopher G. Nolte.
The Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) WRAP formed in 1997 as the successor organization to Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Commission (GCVTC) –
Modeling Studies of Air Quality in the Four Corners Region National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in.
1 Summary of LADCO’s Regional Modeling in the Eastern U.S.: Preliminary Results April 27, 2009 MWAQC TAC June 15, 2009.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
Emission Inventories and EI Data Sets Sarah Kelly, ITEP Les Benedict, St. Regis Mohawk Tribe.
1 Elements of EI Data Management Melinda Ronca-Battista ITEP.
October 6, 2015 Alison Eyth, Rich Mason (EPA OAQPS EIAG*) Alexis Zubrow (Volpe, DOT) * Emission Inventory and Analysis Group.
U.S. National Communication: Projections and Effects of Policies and Measures United States Delegation UNFCCC Workshop on National Communications from.
1 Conducting Reasonable Progress Determinations under the Regional Haze Rule Kathy Kaufman EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards January 11,
Overview of WRAP FEJF Work Products WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, and Dust May 23-24, 2006 Sacramento, CA Darla Potter (WDEQ) & Mark Fitch (USFS)
WRAP Regional Modeling Center, Attribution of Haze Meeting, Denver CO 7/22/04 Introduction to the the RMC Source Apportionment Modeling Effort Gail Tonnesen,
VISIBILITY SIPS The Regional Haze Rule Requirements for Fire The Role of the RPOs Opportunities for Participation US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Dennis Haddow.
The West is different August 14, 2013 OAQPS. Aerosols causing Worst Visibility Days – East vs. West 2.
WRAP SCC Temporal and Speciation Profile Improvement Project Status WRAP Regional Modeling Center Carolina Environmental Program November 4, 2003.
2018 Emission Reductions from the Base 18b Emission Inventory Lee Gribovicz Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting San Diego, California February 22-23, 2007.
Western Air Quality Study (WAQS) Intermountain Data Warehouse (IWDW) 2011b-based future year Emissions and 2020 D-J Basin O&G Emission Inventory University.
Western Regional Technical Air Quality Studies: support for Ozone and other Air Quality Planning in the West Tom Moore Air Quality Program Manager Western.
EMISSIONS INVENTORY UPDATE Briefing for OTC Committees and Stakeholder Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, DC Julie McDill & Susan Wierman 1.
Strategic Plan Development Status Technical Analysis Forum meeting October 11, 2007.
1 Elements of EI Data Management Melinda Ronca-Battista ITEP/TAMS Center.
Work Items for §309 SIPs WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 19, 2002 Tom Moore & Brian Finneran.
308 Outline (a) Purpose (b) When are 1st plans due (c) Options for regional planning (d) Core requirements (e) BART requirements (f) Comprehensive periodic.
Key Findings from May & July 2008 WRAP Technical Workshops September 30, 2008 Steve Arnold, Colorado DPHE & Bob Kotchenruther, EPA R10 (Co-Chairs, WRAP.
Reaching New Heights Tools and Data for air quality planning in the Intermountain West Intermountain West Data Warehouse Presenter: Agency: Contact Information:
Chapter 1: Roles and Opportunities for Information Technology in Meeting Sustainability Challenges Helynranta Viola Parkkila Vilma
Overview of WRAP Emissions Projections
Western Regional Technical Projects 2011 through 2013
Jeff Vukovich, USEPA/OAQPS/AQAD Emissions Inventory and Analysis Group
Social costs of fuel-vehicle pathways
Oil & Gas Growth Projections, Decline Curves, and Emissions Estimates
Western Ozone Issues WESTAR Fall Business Meeting Salt Lake City, UT
NSPS Rulemakings for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Elements of EI Data Management
A Collaborative Process to Develop a 2016 Emissions Modeling Platform
Innovations in projecting emissions for air quality modeling
Sector Growth Rates on NONROAD Emissions
Key Findings and Resource Strategy
Maryland's Air Quality: Nitrogen Reductions and the Healthy Air Act
EPA’s Power Sector Projections Use of 2016 Data
University of North Carolina Institute for the Environment
EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
The Role For State and Local Agencies
EGU Workgroup: 2016 beta Approach: Status: Next Steps / Milestones:
Upcoming projects* to support Regional Haze SIP/TIP planning
Patrick Cummins January 30, 2019.
WRAP Technical Planning Meeting Salt Lake City, UT December 5, 2018
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
Western Regional Haze Planning and
An integrated assessment model: the global CLEWS
Air Update, Georgia EPD Karen Hays Chief, Air Protection Branch
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
Oil and Gas Emission Inventories and Applications for Estimating Impacts to Health and Welfare Tom Moore, WESTAR-WRAP John Grant and Amnon Bar-Ilan, Ramboll.
Regional Modeling for Stationary Source Control Strategy Evaluation
Status of Preliminary Reasonable Progress Analysis
EPA’s Roadmap for the Second Planning Period
Presentation transcript:

University of North Carolina Institute for the Environment Projecting Base Year Emissions to the 2028 Milestone Year for Regional Haze Planning Zac Adelman University of North Carolina Institute for the Environment Tom Moore Western States Air Resources Council and Western Regional Air Partnership Remind about emissions being regional, not a single source or single group of sources

High-level trends: What have we seen? Economic Growth with Cleaner Air (https://gispub.epa.gov/air/trendsreport/2017/#growth_w_cleaner_air) Between 1970 and 2016, the combined emissions of the six common pollutants (PM2.5 and PM10, SO2, NOx, VOCs, CO and Pb) dropped by 73 percent. This progress occurred while the U.S. economy continued to grow, Americans drove more miles and population and energy use increased.

Emissions Projections: What and Why? What are Emissions Projections? Projections are predictions/forecasts of future emissions Projections = activity changes (growth/contraction) + controls (reduction technologies/strategies) Why do we need to Forecast Emissions? SIP attainment demonstrations require future year modeling Regional haze planning requires demonstration of reasonable progress toward natural conditions

How are Emissions Forecasts Done? (1) Historic, simplest approach: Planning forecasts estimate changes in activity (i.e., number of emitting units) and the application of controls (i.e., emissions control devices or technology turnover) Timing, location, chemical makeup of the emissions are not forecast for planning Based on assumptions that: a large amount of anthropogenic emissions are available to control, control technology costs and effectiveness are available, and can be evaluated and effectively implemented by the regulatory agency. Activity Temporal Spatial Chemical Emissions Factor Controls Components of the emissions forecast Red boxes highlight the parts of the emissions equation that are used in the simplest forecast method.

How are Emissions Forecasts Done? (2) Second level of activity complexity to consider: What if sources within a sector are changing, beyond closings and if any new sources are being built, are they identical to existing sources? EGUs – how is electricity being generated? Oil & Gas production – formations accessed, techniques, etc. For mobile, how are electricity and gas supplies changing fleets? Begins to affect settings in blue boxes as well Activity Temporal Spatial Chemical Emissions Factor Controls Components of the emissions forecast Both red and blue boxes would need to be addressed in a second level forecast.

How are Emissions Forecasts Done? (3) Third level complexity across forecast steps to consider: What if a source sector is already well-controlled in terms of emissions rates, control technology, and compliance? Accounting for state programs and strategies that are not in the SIP, but limit future emissions Are economic activity forecasts reliable or representative data to estimate changes in future activity and associated emissions? How are economic data related to the permitting and compliance programs of the agency(ies) implementing additional controls in individual programs? How are interrelated sources to be evaluated, such as natural gas production and EGUs, or control decisions vs. closure assumptions for coal EGUs, electric cars in the western grid, et cetera? Activity Temporal Spatial Chemical Emissions Factor Controls Components of the emissions forecast Simultaneous, robust evaluation of both red and blue boxes would need to be addressed in a third level forecast.

How are Emissions Forecasts Done? Models and data are / can be used as the basis to project activity (silo approach) IPM and ERTAC for electricity sector Travel demand for MOVES EIA for energy production/distribution U.S. Census for population and housing U.S. EPA oil and gas tool Applying emissions controls On-the-books and On-the-way control programs Control Strategy Tool (CoST) Database of technology controls and costs Natural emissions not typically forecasted

What Sources Can/Cannot Be Forecasted? Realities: Climate changing with many ancillary effects Increases in economic activity occur without emission increases (often decreases) Ecosystem and market responses, and costs, cause many changes, so emissions mgmt. reductions or increases are often the effect, not the driver. Availability of Information to use in Forecast (highly variable in completeness and detail) Emissions Estimate Technique None A Lot Counted Modeled EGU Non-EGU Point On-road Mobile Ag Biogenic Forest Fire Oil & Gas Off-road Mobile

Facts About Emissions Forecasts Uncertainty in a base year inventory carries forward to the forecast Certainty of a forecast decreases with time Tradeoff between need to forecast for planning and minimizing uncertainty in the forecast Base and future year inventories are coupled Forecasts always start from a base year inventory Air quality modeling forecasts should only show sensitivity to emissions projections, not differences resulting from base year assumptions Deterministic emissions forecasts will always be wrong

Forecast Optimization: CoST Control Strategy Tool (CoST) is software built on an EPA database of control measures Control measure: technology, costs to implement and maintain, and applicable sources/pollutants Control Strategy Development CoST includes algorithms for developing strategies to reduce emissions from stationary sources Least-Cost, Maximum Emissions Reduction, Multi-Pollutant Emissions Reduction, Least Cost Curve

Regional Haze Planning and Emissions Forecasts 1. Define what is Anthropogenic and Controllable SOURCE In-State Out-of-State International Anthropogenic Controllable not controllable Natural 2. Quantify all the emissions contributions on a daily basis for modelling Here is how to organize thinking before making a forecast. Planning to make a forecast

Examples of Emissions Forecast Plots Stacked bar chart shows changes in total magnitude and contribution by inventory sector

Examples of Emissions Forecast Plots 2025/2017 Annual total ratios compare two years of emissions data. Trends in the projections are highlighted. 2017/2011 2025/2011

Examples of Emissions Forecast Plots Percent difference plots show the relative changes between a base and future year. Highlights the sectors that changed between years, with no indication of the magnitude. Difference plots show the absolute changes between a base and future year. Highlights the sectors that have largest impact on the total emissions change.

S/L/T Roles in Emissions Forecasts Document and plan the inventory projection development process in a regional manner for haze analysis Assure transparency, completeness, documentation Gather information on S/L/T activities and emissions factors for the inventory projection year or general timeframe Engage with stakeholders and researchers in the state/region to collect the best-available data, e.g.: What and how many OOOO and JJJJ sources are in the state or basin, how fast are they turning over, etc. Representative chemical profiles, spatial allocations, operating times Develop an inventory database and reporting/tracking tool Databases are needed to report/track inventories, will feed into forecasting system (probably regional); if the jurisdiction that has the database they can do planning

Evaluation Steps for Regional Haze Emissions Forecasting Inventory active mandatory and voluntary control programs Determine and implement forecasting methodology and produce data for QA/QC Collate all, best-available inventory projection data for emissions modeling Track QA/QC of data through emissions modeling process Modeling studies to evaluate future year impacts Submit data to TSS for Regional Haze Planning Tracking for SIP referencing

S/L/T Roles in Emissions Forecasts Post regional database (TSS) submittal Review 2017 and newer state- and sector-level EIs as the Regional Haze planning process moves along toward SIP submittals in mid-2021 2017 is next triennial NEI year, significant work by S/L/Ts and EPA in 2018, and well into 2019 Review activity data used by EPA for federal sources, e.g.: Assumptions about the fleet turnover in MOVES correct Projection curves and methodologies used by EPA for federal sources Review federal/state rule implementation roll out and penetration rates