Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How do we know what exists?
Advertisements

The Role of God in the Meditations (1) Context
Neo’s Escape: Plato’s Cave, Descartes’ Evil Genius, Berkeley & The Matrix
Jim Fahey Department of Cognitive Science 9/16/2010
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ rationalism
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism. Reason is the source of knowledge, not experience. All our ideas are innate. God fashioned us.
Meditations on First Philosophy
Views of Knowledge- Rationalism. Rationalism Rationalism- The belief that reason, without the aid of sensory perception, is capable of arriving at some.
Charting the Terrain of Knowledge-1
Lecture Three “The Problem of Knowledge” Think (pp. 32 – 48)  Review last lecture  Descartes’ Clear and Distinct Ideas  “The Trademark Argument”  The.
Descartes on Certainty (and Doubt)
The Rationalists: Descartes Certainty: Self and God
Sources of knowledge: –Sense experience (empiricism) –Reasoning alone (rationalism) We truly know only that of which we are certain (a priori). Since sense.
Knowledge empiricism Michael Lacewing
René Descartes The father of modern Western philosophy and the epistemological turn Methodological doubt, his dreaming argument and the evil.
How Claims of Knowledge Are Justified Foundationalism: knowledge claims are based on indubitable foundations –I can doubt whether there is a world, whether.
Rationalism: Knowledge Is Acquired through Reason, not the Senses We know only that of which we are certain. Sense experience cannot guarantee certainty,
Epistemology: the study of the nature, source, limits, & justification of knowledge Skepticism: doubt that knowledge is possible Taoism: the differentiation.
Epistemology: the study of the nature, source, limits, & justification of knowledge Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain. Since.
The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
Results from Meditation 2
Descartes’ Epistemology
Descartes’ First Meditation
© Michael Lacewing Reason and experience Michael Lacewing
Descartes & Rationalism
Philosophy of Mind Week 2: Descartes and Dualism
Rene Descartes 1596—1650. Some dates 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1633: Galileo.
Epistemology Section 1 What is knowledge?
Descartes Meditations. Knowledge needs a foundation Descartes knows he has false beliefs, but he does not know which ones are false So, we need a method.
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp )
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism.
Rationalist Epistemology Plato Descartes ( B.C.E. )( ) Plato Descartes ( B.C.E. )( )
Descartes' Evil Demon Hypothesis:
Varieties of Scepticism. Academic Scepticism Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy A return to the Socratic.
René Descartes, Meditations Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
“Cogito, ergo sum.” “I think, therefore I am.”.  chief architect of 17 th C intellectual revolution  laid foundations of ‘modern scientific age’
Descates Meditations II A starting point for reconstructing the world.
Rene Descartes ( ) The Father of Modern Philosophy
Argument From Dreaming. 1 This is the second sceptical argument – the second wave of doubt, after the argument from illusion – senses cannot be trusted.
COGITO ERGO SUM.
A posteriori Knowledge A priori knowledge A posteriori knowledge is based on experience. A posteriori knowledge is based on experience. A priori knowledge.
René Descartes Brandon Lee Block D.
Lauren Dobbs “Cogito ergo sum”. Bio  Descartes was a French born philosopher from the 1600’s.  He’s most famous for his “Meditations on First Philosophy”
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
WEEK 4: EPISTEMOLOGY Introduction to Rationalism.
Knowledge and Skepticism
Rationalism Focus: to be able to explain the claims of rationalism, looking in particular at Descartes To begin to evaluate whether Descartes establishes.
1. I exist, because I think. 2. I am a thinking thing 3
Meditation Three Of God: That He Exists.
Jim Fahey Department of Cognitive Science 9/16/2010
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Intuition and deduction thesis (rationalism)
Knowledge Empiricism 2.
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Skepticism.
Descartes’ proof of the external world
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
Rationalism.
Remember these terms? Analytic/ synthetic A priori/ a posteriori
March, 26, 2010 EPISTEMOLOGY.
On your whiteboard: What is empiricism? Arguments/evidence for it?
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
Rene Descartes Father of Modern Philosophy b. March in La Haye France wrote Meditations in 1641 d. February
Philosophy Sept 28th Objective Opener 10 minutes
March, 26, 2010 EPISTEMOLOGY.
Meditation 2: The Nature of the Mind, which is Better Known than the Body Descartes Meditation I.
Neo’s Escape: Plato’s Cave, Descartes’ Evil Genius, Berkeley & The Matrix
Meditation Three Of God: That He Exists.
Epistemology “Episteme” = knowledge “Logos” = words / study of
Presentation transcript:

Epistemology: the study of the nature, source, limits, & justification of knowledge Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain. Since sense experience cannot guarantee certainty, reason alone must be the means for getting knowledge Real knowledge about ourselves and the world is a priori (prior to and independent of experience). “Knowledge” gained from sense experience (a posteriori) is guaranteed only by appeal to reason

Rationalism: Sense Experience Does Not Provide Knowledge Shankara: we correct our experiences of self and world (e.g., hallucinations, sense perceptions) by knowing the oneness of ultimate reality (Brahman) (788-822) Descartes: sense experiences are often wrong; I might be wrong about whether I have a body or if there is a world apart from my imagination (it may be a dream), and even whether my reasoning abilities (e.g., 2+3=5) can be trusted (evil genie)

Objections to Descartes’ Method of Doubt Even if some sense experiences are mistaken, that is no reason to doubt (even hypothetically) all of them Limiting knowledge only to what we know with certainty is too restrictive: we often know things a posteriori (i.e., based on experience), not on indubitable foundations If we doubt everything, we must also doubt whether we are truly doubting—which requires us to assume the existence of a public world of language users

Descartes’ Escape from Doubt I cannot doubt that I am doubting (thinking). All other knowledge is based on the undoubtable foundation that I exist: I think, therefore I exist (cogito ergo sum) I know I exist imperfectly only by first knowing perfect existence (God); and as a perfect being, God would not deceive me or allow me to be deceived when I know something (e.g., wax) clearly and distinctly—that is, as an intelligible (e.g., mathematical) object

Innate Ideas: knowledge of ideas or principles is possible only if they are inborn Plato: our knowledge of certain propositions is based on remembering truths acquired before our birth Leibniz: our recognition of ideas and truths is based on innate dispositions of the mind Jainism: past unethical behavior blinds us to our innate knowledge of all things