AN EVALUATION OF LOCAL IMAGE FEATURES FOR OBJECT CLASS RECOGNITION

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Advertisements

Recognising Panoramas M. Brown and D. Lowe, University of British Columbia.
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints David Lowe.
Presented by Xinyu Chang
Evaluating Color Descriptors for Object and Scene Recognition Koen E.A. van de Sande, Student Member, IEEE, Theo Gevers, Member, IEEE, and Cees G.M. Snoek,
The Pyramid Match Kernel: Discriminative Classification with Sets of Image Features Kristen Grauman Trevor Darrell MIT.
Computer Vision for Human-Computer InteractionResearch Group, Universität Karlsruhe (TH) cv:hci Dr. Edgar Seemann 1 Computer Vision: Histograms of Oriented.
Lecture 31: Modern object recognition
Instructor: Mircea Nicolescu Lecture 15 CS 485 / 685 Computer Vision.
IBBT – Ugent – Telin – IPI Dimitri Van Cauwelaert A study of the 2D - SIFT algorithm Dimitri Van Cauwelaert.
Object Recognition with Invariant Features n Definition: Identify objects or scenes and determine their pose and model parameters n Applications l Industrial.
Fast High-Dimensional Feature Matching for Object Recognition David Lowe Computer Science Department University of British Columbia.
SURF: Speeded-Up Robust Features
Recognition using Regions CVPR Outline Introduction Overview of the Approach Experimental Results Conclusion.
Feature extraction: Corners 9300 Harris Corners Pkwy, Charlotte, NC.
1 Interest Operators Find “interesting” pieces of the image –e.g. corners, salient regions –Focus attention of algorithms –Speed up computation Many possible.
A Study of Approaches for Object Recognition
Object Recognition with Invariant Features n Definition: Identify objects or scenes and determine their pose and model parameters n Applications l Industrial.
1 Interest Operator Lectures lecture topics –Interest points 1 (Linda) interest points, descriptors, Harris corners, correlation matching –Interest points.
Feature matching and tracking Class 5 Read Section 4.1 of course notes Read Shi and Tomasi’s paper on.
Scale Invariant Feature Transform
Object Recognition Using Distinctive Image Feature From Scale-Invariant Key point D. Lowe, IJCV 2004 Presenting – Anat Kaspi.
Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT)
Automatic Matching of Multi-View Images
1 Invariant Local Feature for Object Recognition Presented by Wyman 2/05/2006.
(Fri) Young Ki Baik Computer Vision Lab.
Matthew Brown University of British Columbia (prev.) Microsoft Research [ Collaborators: † Simon Winder, *Gang Hua, † Rick Szeliski † =MS Research, *=MS.
Overview Introduction to local features
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints By David G. Lowe, University of British Columbia Presented by: Tim Havinga, Joël van Neerbos.
Final Exam Review CS485/685 Computer Vision Prof. Bebis.
EADS DS / SDC LTIS Page 1 7 th CNES/DLR Workshop on Information Extraction and Scene Understanding for Meter Resolution Image – 29/03/07 - Oberpfaffenhofen.
Recognition and Matching based on local invariant features Cordelia Schmid INRIA, Grenoble David Lowe Univ. of British Columbia.
Hurieh Khalajzadeh Mohammad Mansouri Mohammad Teshnehlab
Overview Harris interest points Comparing interest points (SSD, ZNCC, SIFT) Scale & affine invariant interest points Evaluation and comparison of different.
Local invariant features Cordelia Schmid INRIA, Grenoble.
Lecture 31: Modern recognition CS4670 / 5670: Computer Vision Noah Snavely.
Representations for object class recognition David Lowe Department of Computer Science University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada Sept. 21, 2006.
Evaluation of interest points and descriptors. Introduction Quantitative evaluation of interest point detectors –points / regions at the same relative.
In Defense of Nearest-Neighbor Based Image Classification Oren Boiman The Weizmann Institute of Science Rehovot, ISRAEL Eli Shechtman Adobe Systems Inc.
MSRI workshop, January 2005 Object Recognition Collected databases of objects on uniform background (no occlusions, no clutter) Mostly focus on viewpoint.
Feature extraction: Corners 9300 Harris Corners Pkwy, Charlotte, NC.
Lecture 7: Features Part 2 CS4670/5670: Computer Vision Noah Snavely.
Local invariant features Cordelia Schmid INRIA, Grenoble.
Local invariant features Cordelia Schmid INRIA, Grenoble.
Week 10 Presentation Wesna LaLanne - REU Student Mahdi M. Kalayeh - Mentor.
Overview Introduction to local features Harris interest points + SSD, ZNCC, SIFT Scale & affine invariant interest point detectors Evaluation and comparison.
Features, Feature descriptors, Matching Jana Kosecka George Mason University.
CSE 185 Introduction to Computer Vision Feature Matching.
+ Speed Up Texture Classification in Clothing Retrieval System 電機三 吳瑋凌.
Presented by David Lee 3/20/2006
Goggle Gist on the Google Phone A Content-based image retrieval system for the Google phone Manu Viswanathan Chin-Kai Chang Ji Hyun Moon.
More sliding window detection: Discriminative part-based models
3D Face Recognition Using Range Images Literature Survey Joonsoo Lee 3/10/05.
Finding Clusters within a Class to Improve Classification Accuracy Literature Survey Yong Jae Lee 3/6/08.
Recognizing specific objects Matching with SIFT Original suggestion Lowe, 1999,2004.
Does one size really fit all? Evaluating classifiers in a Bag-of-Visual-Words classification Christian Hentschel, Harald Sack Hasso Plattner Institute.
SIFT.
Course Project Lists for ITCS6157 Jianping Fan. Project Implementation Lists Automatic Image Clustering You can download 1,000,000 images from You can.
SIFT Scale-Invariant Feature Transform David Lowe
Presented by David Lee 3/20/2006
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Efficient Image Classification on Vertically Decomposed Data
Project Implementation for ITCS4122
Cheng-Ming Huang, Wen-Hung Liao Department of Computer Science
Finding Clusters within a Class to Improve Classification Accuracy
CSE 455 – Guest Lectures 3 lectures Contact Interest points 1
Aim of the project Take your image Submit it to the search engine
SIFT.
CSE 185 Introduction to Computer Vision
Recognition and Matching based on local invariant features
Presentation transcript:

AN EVALUATION OF LOCAL IMAGE FEATURES FOR OBJECT CLASS RECOGNITION Presented by: Centre for Computational Intelligence School of Computer Engineering AN EVALUATION OF LOCAL IMAGE FEATURES FOR OBJECT CLASS RECOGNITION The use of local image features (LIF) for object class recognition is becoming increasingly popular. To better understand the suitability and power of existing LIFs for object class recognition, a simple but useful method is proposed in evaluation of such features. We have compared the performance of eight frequently used LIFs by the proposed method on two popular databases. We have used F-measure criterion for this evaluation. It is found that the individual performance of SURF and SIFT features are better than that of the global features on ETH-80 database with considerably lower number of training objects. However, it may not be good enough for more challenging object class recognition problem (e.g. Caltech-101). The evaluation of LIFs suggests the requirement for further investigation of more complementary LIFs. Acronym Name Dimension SIFT Scale Invariant Feature Trans 128 SURF Speed-Up Robust Features 64 GLOH Grad Location Orientation Hist GM Gradient Moment 20 SF Steerable Filters 14 CMI Color Moment Invariant 18 RMI Revised Moment Invariant 15 Approximation of Bayesian Classification Training Extract all features (d) of each class One k-d tree for each class. NN classification dj, c compute NN of dj in C: NNC(dj) List of features: Invariant to affine geometric and photometric transformations Method: An approximation of Bayesian optimal classifier (Boiman et al. 08) SIFT SURF GLOH GM SF CMI RMI Apple 0.95 0.99 0.89 0.84 0.10 0.70 0.04 Car 1.00 0.96 0.62 0.15 Cow 0.98 0.94 0.83 0.46 0.24 Cup 0.67 0.05 Dog 0.90 0.61 0.79 0.21 Horse 0.97 0.91 0.86 0.66 0.17 Pear 0.41 0.09 Tomato 0.23 Avg 0.984 0.43 0.12 Results: Wide baseline matching (previously seen objects with viewpoint change) Databases: ETH-80 and Caltech-101 Results: Recognition rate of previously unseen objects. (different number of training images were used) Centre for Computational Intelligence, N4 #B1a-02, Nanyang Avenue, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798., http://www.c2i.ntu.edu.sg