I - General and Financial Rules II - Applicant Eligibility

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to apply for a Grant EIDHR / NSA CBSS How do you apply for an EU Grant? You apply by sending: A Concept Note in response to one of the two Calls.
Advertisements

INTERREG and Tacis budgets Main differences: No breakdown of the Tacis budget between the partners is required; No strict limits for the project management.
1 Financial Procedures in FP7 Projects Reporting and Audits Karolina Lis Research Assistant DCU, Finance Office
1 Emerging communities for collective innovation: ICT Operational tool and supporting methodologies for SME Associations 2010 January,
The Project Overall Objective To assist in resolving the problems of refugees and IDPs in the Republic of Serbia through the provision of adequate support.
“MED P ROGRAMME ” Z ERO C O (2) Z ERO EMISSION CO MMUNITIES F INANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM K ICK O FF M EETING J UNE 17° 18° 2010.
Support and Inclusion of students with disabilities at higher education institutions in Montenegro – Procedure for collecting valid documentations.
Contractors’ Day, June 2008 to the Framework Partnership Agreement & the Specific Grant Agreement Financial Guidelines for co-ordinators and co-partners.
EuropeAid/ SMILING Call for Proposals. The SMILING Programme Capacity building by PRIP Trust (€ 2.4 million) 3 Calls for Proposals Cluster-wise.
Sustainable Energy Systems Overview of contractual obligations, procedures and practical matters KICK-OFF MEETING.
EuropeAid How can a private entity benefit from EC Service Contracts ? Jean-Louis VILLE Head of Unit « Finances, Contracts and Audit » Neighbourhood.
Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café Brussels, 8 September 2010 How to apply: Legal Framework - Application Form ( How to ensure that your proposal is.
Culture Programme - Selection procedure Katharina Riediger Infoday Praha 10/06/2010.
AFKAR II PROGRAMME Constitutes a continuation and development of AFKAR I. Aims at the strengthening of the action of the Lebanese civil society in favor.
LINKED Administrative & Finance overview18/03/2010 LINKED Leveraging Innovation for a Network of Knowledge on Education LIFE LONG LEARNING PROGRAMME LLP.
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE-II Anna Cook Dita Mocova Reporting procedures & Financial Guidelines.
APPLICATION FORM OF ROBINWOOD SUBPROJECT SECOND STEP 1. The short listed Local Beneficiaries work together to create international partnerships and prepare.
25-26/11/2010 ESSnet training Budapest ESSnet Training Part 3 – Financial Issues P. Jacques.
Financial Management MW-Sonet 16 th – 19 th of March 2011, Turkey.
Tacis Contracting Procedure Documents to be submitted together with the application:  Original Declaration by the Financial Lead Partner for Tacis  Partnership.
EuropeAid How to benefit from EC grants? ‘Calls for Proposals’ Thematic Operations EuropeAid Cooperation Office.
EuropeAid How can an NGO benefit from EC grants? ‘Calls for Proposals’ Thematic Operations EuropeAid Cooperation Office Athens, 25 September 2008.
SELECTION PROCEDURE Clivio CASALI, Project Officer EM ECW Erasmus Mundus and External Cooperation Call for Proposals for mobility activities starting in.
Science, research and development European Commission IDARI Project Meeting Tartu, June 2005 Martin Greimel Scientific Officer Directorate-E ‘Biotechnology,
Technical Assistance Office SOCRATES / Lingua 1 and 2 Information seminar for co-ordinators of successful pre-proposals Carla Donda 28 January 2005.
Participation and dissemination Rules and Contracts FP6.
Grant contract and annexes Training for Auditors Estonia/Latvia/Russia ENPI CBC Programme Riga, Tartu, April 2012.
Reporting requirements - contractual and financial issues NGO Kick-off meeting Lorenzina Bruno, Senior Financial Officer Manuel Montero Ramírez, Project.
Technical Assistance Office 1 Contract, Reports and errors to avoid! GRANT AGREEMENT 2005 Comenius coordinators’ meeting, 17/10/2005 Maryline Fiaschi,
1. TEMPUS PROGRAMME PROJECT REPRESENTATIVES’ MEETING Brussels, March 2010 Management of the Grant Agreement.
2014 ANNUAL PROGRAMME: MEETING WITH LEAD INSTITUTIONS & END BENEFICIARIES March 2016 CFCU.
Concept Note Preparation CYPRIOT CIVIL SOCIETY IN ACTION IV.
INFORMATION SESSION CSO-LA Actions in GHANA AGENDA : 08H30 – 09H15Registration of participants 09H15 – 09H30Opening Remarks by Head of Local Government.
This project is funded by the European Union Call for Proposals EuropeAid/131662/L/ACTU/UA European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) Country-based.
Advancing Indonesia’s Civil Society in Trade & Investment (ACTIVE) Programme Ref. EuropeAid/130989/L/ACT/ID Info Session – Full Application Delegation.
1 How to apply? Info session February 2016 Civil Society Organisations and Local Authorities Development in Lao PDR RESTRICTED Call for Proposals EuropeAid/151225/DD/ACT/LA.
Ministry of Finance Financial management and control of the Operational Programmes, co- financed under the Structural funds and the Cohesion fund of EU.
NON STATE ACTORS INFORMATION SESSION ON THE 2012 CALL FOR PROPOSALS Ref. EUROPEAID/132436L/ACT/KE Nairobi, 14 February 2012.
DRUG PREVENTION 4 YOUTH IN LEBANON Call for Proposals reference: EuropeAid/ /DD/ACT/LB I.Overview of the call for proposals II.Type of actors III.Submission.
EuropeAid/152087/DD/ACT/LB Cultural activities 2016 Information Session 13 th June 2016.
- Special Education Needs (SEN) Network Administrative and Financial Aspects.
EU - China 11 Guidelines for Applicants rules for applications European Union Delegation to China & Mongolia Beijing Information Session 14 th November.
Management of the Grant Agreement By Philippe Ruffio & Nathalie Hoste-Luxen Tempus project representatives’ meeting Brussels December 2011.
The LIFE Programme: the EU funding tool for the Environment and Climate Action Lorenzina Bruno, Senior Financial Officer EASME – C.1.6 LIFE NGO Kick-off.
Kolarctic ENPI CBC Programme Project implementation training session under the 1st Call for Proposals FINANCIAL ISSUES Joint Managing Authority.
WP8 Project management Milan Gocić University of Niš
Local call for proposals: Civil Society Organisations and Local Authorities (CSOLA) Europe Aid/ /DD/ACT/GY-SR Information session Brian Sukhai.
Financial Support to Third Parties
Participation and dissemination Rules
Preparation of a tender and tender documents
Chisinau, Republic of Moldova 2017
Content of Tender Dossier - Instructions to Tenderers - Tenders
Evaluation Grids Evaluation Grids.
What is a grant? A direct financial contribution – donation – from EU budget An action - contributing to EU policy achievement Functioning of a body acting.
PRAG PRACTICAL GUIDE TO CONTRACT PROCEDURES FOR EXTERNAL ACTIONS
GREECE-ALBANIA IPA CROSS BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME
4.4 Procurement by grant beneficiaries
Drafting the Guidelines for applicants
International Open Procedure (1) – PRAG 4.3
ESSnet Training Part 3 – Financial Issues M. Prigent
European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR)
Eurostat Task force on victimisation surveys,
01/01/2019 Development Education and Awareness Raising - Call for Proposals 2018 EuropeAid/160048/DH/ACT/MULTI Information session Brussels, 12 July 2018.
Information Session Brussels, 7 November 2018.
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
27/02/2019 Development Education and Awareness Raising - Call for Proposals 2018 EuropeAid/160048/DH/ACT/MULTI Information session Brussels, 12 July 2018.
DEAR Call 2018 Briefing on European Commission ‘DEAR call’: Raising public awareness of development issues and promoting development education in European.
COGAIN Kick-Off 5-6 September, 2004 FINANCIAL GUIDELINES
Background and objectives of the programme Eligibility criteria
Financial and Administrative presentation on PARTICULATES project
Presentation transcript:

I - General and Financial Rules II - Applicant Eligibility Strengthening the role of civil society in promoting human rights and democratic reform 2010 - 2011 I - General and Financial Rules II - Applicant Eligibility III – Budget and eligibility costs IV – Submission of the proposals V - Evaluation of the proposals This presentation has an information purpose only. The rules for this call for proposals are set in the Guidelines for Applicants and its annexes. Applies to both Budget & EDF The procedure for evaluation call for proposals has been reversed. Until the new PRAG 2006, we started with the administrative & eligibility check. As you know, this requires a lot of resources and can be quite time-consuming. And the result is often that many proposals are rejected because they have not submitted all the documents required and no one looks further at the technical proposals. With a view to increase effectiveness (ie get better results) and efficiency (ie focusing on evaluating technical quality first rather than administrative matters) we have introduced the following changes: Eligibility check after evaluation Concept notes In both the open calls for proposals and in restricted calls for proposals, applicants will have to fill in a concept note in order to give an executive summary of the project, and to answer to questions related to the relevance of the proposal, its methodology and sustainability and the operational capacity and expertise of the applicant and his partners. This concept note is part of the application form in open calls, and replaces the former preliminary proposal for the restricted calls. Redrafting of application forms The aim is to make them clearer and better specifying administrative requirements to reduce the risks of errors by applicants Grants of low amount ( less or equal EUR 10 000) Publication Only international calls. Publication of the Guidelines. No publication of the notice of calls for proposals. Standardised reporting Publication of a template for narrative and financial reporting by grant beneficiaries This new template allows for standardised reporting for all contracts, replacing the sometimes conflicting requirements of Delegations. It is foreseen to provide that this template may also be used by grant beneficiaries under ongoing contracts, to the effect that the Commission should not reject a report on the sole ground that it conforms to this template rather than to any other currently applicable requirement. Expenditure verification Publication of standard terms of reference for “expenditure verification” by auditors: The audit certificates have been questioned by auditors, services and NGOs. The new template details the “agreed upon procedure” which auditors have to follow to verify expenditures incurred.

I - General and Financial Rules Strengthening the role of civil society in promoting human rights and democratic reform 2010 - 2011 I - General and Financial Rules Deadline for submission of proposals: Monday 16.09.2011 at 16:00 Hours Total amount of the grants: 1,200,000 € Min amount of each EC contribution: 50,000 € Max amount of each EC contribution: 250,000 € Applies to both Budget & EDF The procedure for evaluation call for proposals has been reversed. Until the new PRAG 2006, we started with the administrative & eligibility check. As you know, this requires a lot of resources and can be quite time-consuming. And the result is often that many proposals are rejected because they have not submitted all the documents required and no one looks further at the technical proposals. With a view to increase effectiveness (ie get better results) and efficiency (ie focusing on evaluating technical quality first rather than administrative matters) we have introduced the following changes: Eligibility check after evaluation Concept notes In both the open calls for proposals and in restricted calls for proposals, applicants will have to fill in a concept note in order to give an executive summary of the project, and to answer to questions related to the relevance of the proposal, its methodology and sustainability and the operational capacity and expertise of the applicant and his partners. This concept note is part of the application form in open calls, and replaces the former preliminary proposal for the restricted calls. Redrafting of application forms The aim is to make them clearer and better specifying administrative requirements to reduce the risks of errors by applicants Grants of low amount ( less or equal EUR 10 000) Publication Only international calls. Publication of the Guidelines. No publication of the notice of calls for proposals. Standardised reporting Publication of a template for narrative and financial reporting by grant beneficiaries This new template allows for standardised reporting for all contracts, replacing the sometimes conflicting requirements of Delegations. It is foreseen to provide that this template may also be used by grant beneficiaries under ongoing contracts, to the effect that the Commission should not reject a report on the sole ground that it conforms to this template rather than to any other currently applicable requirement. Expenditure verification Publication of standard terms of reference for “expenditure verification” by auditors: The audit certificates have been questioned by auditors, services and NGOs. The new template details the “agreed upon procedure” which auditors have to follow to verify expenditures incurred.

I - General and Financial Rules Strengthening the role of civil society in promoting human rights and democratic reform 2010 - 2011 I - General and Financial Rules Maximum EC contribution: 80 % of eligible costs Minimum duration of the contract: 12 months Maximum duration of the contract: 36 months Implementation of the action: Lebanon Applies to both Budget & EDF The procedure for evaluation call for proposals has been reversed. Until the new PRAG 2006, we started with the administrative & eligibility check. As you know, this requires a lot of resources and can be quite time-consuming. And the result is often that many proposals are rejected because they have not submitted all the documents required and no one looks further at the technical proposals. With a view to increase effectiveness (ie get better results) and efficiency (ie focusing on evaluating technical quality first rather than administrative matters) we have introduced the following changes: Eligibility check after evaluation Concept notes In both the open calls for proposals and in restricted calls for proposals, applicants will have to fill in a concept note in order to give an executive summary of the project, and to answer to questions related to the relevance of the proposal, its methodology and sustainability and the operational capacity and expertise of the applicant and his partners. This concept note is part of the application form in open calls, and replaces the former preliminary proposal for the restricted calls. Redrafting of application forms The aim is to make them clearer and better specifying administrative requirements to reduce the risks of errors by applicants Grants of low amount ( less or equal EUR 10 000) Publication Only international calls. Publication of the Guidelines. No publication of the notice of calls for proposals. Standardised reporting Publication of a template for narrative and financial reporting by grant beneficiaries This new template allows for standardised reporting for all contracts, replacing the sometimes conflicting requirements of Delegations. It is foreseen to provide that this template may also be used by grant beneficiaries under ongoing contracts, to the effect that the Commission should not reject a report on the sole ground that it conforms to this template rather than to any other currently applicable requirement. Expenditure verification Publication of standard terms of reference for “expenditure verification” by auditors: The audit certificates have been questioned by auditors, services and NGOs. The new template details the “agreed upon procedure” which auditors have to follow to verify expenditures incurred.

II - Applicant eligibility Strengthening the role of civil society in promoting human rights and democratic reform 2010 - 2011 II - Applicant eligibility be legal persons and be non profit making be nationals of EU Member States, Accession or official candidate country, European Economic Area, or of the developing countries as specified in OECD/DAC (Lebanon included). be a civil society organization (NGO, independent political foundation, community based organization, private sector non profit agent) , public sector operator, international organization. Either the applicant or one of its partners has its headquarters in Lebanon. be responsible of the implementation of the action Applies to both Budget & EDF The procedure for evaluation call for proposals has been reversed. Until the new PRAG 2006, we started with the administrative & eligibility check. As you know, this requires a lot of resources and can be quite time-consuming. And the result is often that many proposals are rejected because they have not submitted all the documents required and no one looks further at the technical proposals. With a view to increase effectiveness (ie get better results) and efficiency (ie focusing on evaluating technical quality first rather than administrative matters) we have introduced the following changes: Eligibility check after evaluation Concept notes In both the open calls for proposals and in restricted calls for proposals, applicants will have to fill in a concept note in order to give an executive summary of the project, and to answer to questions related to the relevance of the proposal, its methodology and sustainability and the operational capacity and expertise of the applicant and his partners. This concept note is part of the application form in open calls, and replaces the former preliminary proposal for the restricted calls. Redrafting of application forms The aim is to make them clearer and better specifying administrative requirements to reduce the risks of errors by applicants Grants of low amount ( less or equal EUR 10 000) Publication Only international calls. Publication of the Guidelines. No publication of the notice of calls for proposals. Standardised reporting Publication of a template for narrative and financial reporting by grant beneficiaries This new template allows for standardised reporting for all contracts, replacing the sometimes conflicting requirements of Delegations. It is foreseen to provide that this template may also be used by grant beneficiaries under ongoing contracts, to the effect that the Commission should not reject a report on the sole ground that it conforms to this template rather than to any other currently applicable requirement. Expenditure verification Publication of standard terms of reference for “expenditure verification” by auditors: The audit certificates have been questioned by auditors, services and NGOs. The new template details the “agreed upon procedure” which auditors have to follow to verify expenditures incurred.

II - Applicant eligibility Strengthening the role of civil society in promoting human rights and democratic reform 2010-2011 II - Applicant eligibility An applicant can submit only one proposal. An Applicant may not be awarded more than one grant under this call for proposals. An applicant may at the same time be partner in another application. Partners may take part in more than one application. Applies to both Budget & EDF The procedure for evaluation call for proposals has been reversed. Until the new PRAG 2006, we started with the administrative & eligibility check. As you know, this requires a lot of resources and can be quite time-consuming. And the result is often that many proposals are rejected because they have not submitted all the documents required and no one looks further at the technical proposals. With a view to increase effectiveness (ie get better results) and efficiency (ie focusing on evaluating technical quality first rather than administrative matters) we have introduced the following changes: Eligibility check after evaluation Concept notes In both the open calls for proposals and in restricted calls for proposals, applicants will have to fill in a concept note in order to give an executive summary of the project, and to answer to questions related to the relevance of the proposal, its methodology and sustainability and the operational capacity and expertise of the applicant and his partners. This concept note is part of the application form in open calls, and replaces the former preliminary proposal for the restricted calls. Redrafting of application forms The aim is to make them clearer and better specifying administrative requirements to reduce the risks of errors by applicants Grants of low amount ( less or equal EUR 10 000) Publication Only international calls. Publication of the Guidelines. No publication of the notice of calls for proposals. Standardised reporting Publication of a template for narrative and financial reporting by grant beneficiaries This new template allows for standardised reporting for all contracts, replacing the sometimes conflicting requirements of Delegations. It is foreseen to provide that this template may also be used by grant beneficiaries under ongoing contracts, to the effect that the Commission should not reject a report on the sole ground that it conforms to this template rather than to any other currently applicable requirement. Expenditure verification Publication of standard terms of reference for “expenditure verification” by auditors: The audit certificates have been questioned by auditors, services and NGOs. The new template details the “agreed upon procedure” which auditors have to follow to verify expenditures incurred.

Associate eligibility Strengthening the role of civil society in promoting human rights and democratic reform 2010 - 2011 Partner Eligibility same eligibility criteria as applicants. participate in designing and implementing the action must sign the partnership statement Associate eligibility No eligibility criteria as they do not receive funds from EC (except from perdiem and travel costs) Applies to both Budget & EDF The procedure for evaluation call for proposals has been reversed. Until the new PRAG 2006, we started with the administrative & eligibility check. As you know, this requires a lot of resources and can be quite time-consuming. And the result is often that many proposals are rejected because they have not submitted all the documents required and no one looks further at the technical proposals. With a view to increase effectiveness (ie get better results) and efficiency (ie focusing on evaluating technical quality first rather than administrative matters) we have introduced the following changes: Eligibility check after evaluation Concept notes In both the open calls for proposals and in restricted calls for proposals, applicants will have to fill in a concept note in order to give an executive summary of the project, and to answer to questions related to the relevance of the proposal, its methodology and sustainability and the operational capacity and expertise of the applicant and his partners. This concept note is part of the application form in open calls, and replaces the former preliminary proposal for the restricted calls. Redrafting of application forms The aim is to make them clearer and better specifying administrative requirements to reduce the risks of errors by applicants Grants of low amount ( less or equal EUR 10 000) Publication Only international calls. Publication of the Guidelines. No publication of the notice of calls for proposals. Standardised reporting Publication of a template for narrative and financial reporting by grant beneficiaries This new template allows for standardised reporting for all contracts, replacing the sometimes conflicting requirements of Delegations. It is foreseen to provide that this template may also be used by grant beneficiaries under ongoing contracts, to the effect that the Commission should not reject a report on the sole ground that it conforms to this template rather than to any other currently applicable requirement. Expenditure verification Publication of standard terms of reference for “expenditure verification” by auditors: The audit certificates have been questioned by auditors, services and NGOs. The new template details the “agreed upon procedure” which auditors have to follow to verify expenditures incurred.

Contractors eligibility Strengthening the role of civil society in promoting human rights and democratic reform 2010-2011 Contractors eligibility Are subject to the procurement rules set out in Annex IV of the grant contract III – Budget of the action Has to respect the format provided in the call for proposal Subheadings may be created but no new headings Must be submitted in Euros Applies to both Budget & EDF The procedure for evaluation call for proposals has been reversed. Until the new PRAG 2006, we started with the administrative & eligibility check. As you know, this requires a lot of resources and can be quite time-consuming. And the result is often that many proposals are rejected because they have not submitted all the documents required and no one looks further at the technical proposals. With a view to increase effectiveness (ie get better results) and efficiency (ie focusing on evaluating technical quality first rather than administrative matters) we have introduced the following changes: Eligibility check after evaluation Concept notes In both the open calls for proposals and in restricted calls for proposals, applicants will have to fill in a concept note in order to give an executive summary of the project, and to answer to questions related to the relevance of the proposal, its methodology and sustainability and the operational capacity and expertise of the applicant and his partners. This concept note is part of the application form in open calls, and replaces the former preliminary proposal for the restricted calls. Redrafting of application forms The aim is to make them clearer and better specifying administrative requirements to reduce the risks of errors by applicants Grants of low amount ( less or equal EUR 10 000) Publication Only international calls. Publication of the Guidelines. No publication of the notice of calls for proposals. Standardised reporting Publication of a template for narrative and financial reporting by grant beneficiaries This new template allows for standardised reporting for all contracts, replacing the sometimes conflicting requirements of Delegations. It is foreseen to provide that this template may also be used by grant beneficiaries under ongoing contracts, to the effect that the Commission should not reject a report on the sole ground that it conforms to this template rather than to any other currently applicable requirement. Expenditure verification Publication of standard terms of reference for “expenditure verification” by auditors: The audit certificates have been questioned by auditors, services and NGOs. The new template details the “agreed upon procedure” which auditors have to follow to verify expenditures incurred. Will become annex III of the contract

III - Eligibility of the costs Strengthening the role of civil society in promoting human rights and democratic reform 2010-2011 III - Eligibility of the costs direct costs Incurred during the implementation of the action. Must be indicated in the budget of the action. Must be necessary for the implementation of the action. Must be identifiable and verifiable Cost of staff assigned to the Action Travel and subsistence costs Purchase or rental costs for equipment and supplies Applies to both Budget & EDF The procedure for evaluation call for proposals has been reversed. Until the new PRAG 2006, we started with the administrative & eligibility check. As you know, this requires a lot of resources and can be quite time-consuming. And the result is often that many proposals are rejected because they have not submitted all the documents required and no one looks further at the technical proposals. With a view to increase effectiveness (ie get better results) and efficiency (ie focusing on evaluating technical quality first rather than administrative matters) we have introduced the following changes: Eligibility check after evaluation Concept notes In both the open calls for proposals and in restricted calls for proposals, applicants will have to fill in a concept note in order to give an executive summary of the project, and to answer to questions related to the relevance of the proposal, its methodology and sustainability and the operational capacity and expertise of the applicant and his partners. This concept note is part of the application form in open calls, and replaces the former preliminary proposal for the restricted calls. Redrafting of application forms The aim is to make them clearer and better specifying administrative requirements to reduce the risks of errors by applicants Grants of low amount ( less or equal EUR 10 000) Publication Only international calls. Publication of the Guidelines. No publication of the notice of calls for proposals. Standardised reporting Publication of a template for narrative and financial reporting by grant beneficiaries This new template allows for standardised reporting for all contracts, replacing the sometimes conflicting requirements of Delegations. It is foreseen to provide that this template may also be used by grant beneficiaries under ongoing contracts, to the effect that the Commission should not reject a report on the sole ground that it conforms to this template rather than to any other currently applicable requirement. Expenditure verification Publication of standard terms of reference for “expenditure verification” by auditors: The audit certificates have been questioned by auditors, services and NGOs. The new template details the “agreed upon procedure” which auditors have to follow to verify expenditures incurred.

III - Eligibility of the costs Strengthening the role of civil society in promoting human rights and democratic reform 2010 - 2011 III - Eligibility of the costs direct costs Costs of consumables Subcontracting expenditure Costs deriving directly from the requirements of the Contract (dissemination of information, evaluation specific to the Action, audits, translation, reproduction, insurance, etc.) Applies to both Budget & EDF The procedure for evaluation call for proposals has been reversed. Until the new PRAG 2006, we started with the administrative & eligibility check. As you know, this requires a lot of resources and can be quite time-consuming. And the result is often that many proposals are rejected because they have not submitted all the documents required and no one looks further at the technical proposals. With a view to increase effectiveness (ie get better results) and efficiency (ie focusing on evaluating technical quality first rather than administrative matters) we have introduced the following changes: Eligibility check after evaluation Concept notes In both the open calls for proposals and in restricted calls for proposals, applicants will have to fill in a concept note in order to give an executive summary of the project, and to answer to questions related to the relevance of the proposal, its methodology and sustainability and the operational capacity and expertise of the applicant and his partners. This concept note is part of the application form in open calls, and replaces the former preliminary proposal for the restricted calls. Redrafting of application forms The aim is to make them clearer and better specifying administrative requirements to reduce the risks of errors by applicants Grants of low amount ( less or equal EUR 10 000) Publication Only international calls. Publication of the Guidelines. No publication of the notice of calls for proposals. Standardised reporting Publication of a template for narrative and financial reporting by grant beneficiaries This new template allows for standardised reporting for all contracts, replacing the sometimes conflicting requirements of Delegations. It is foreseen to provide that this template may also be used by grant beneficiaries under ongoing contracts, to the effect that the Commission should not reject a report on the sole ground that it conforms to this template rather than to any other currently applicable requirement. Expenditure verification Publication of standard terms of reference for “expenditure verification” by auditors: The audit certificates have been questioned by auditors, services and NGOs. The new template details the “agreed upon procedure” which auditors have to follow to verify expenditures incurred.

III - Eligibility of the costs Strengthening the role of civil society in promoting human rights and democratic reform 2010-2011 III - Eligibility of the costs Contingencies - 5% of the direct costs - can be used only with the prior written authorisation of the EC Indirect costs Applies to both Budget & EDF The procedure for evaluation call for proposals has been reversed. Until the new PRAG 2006, we started with the administrative & eligibility check. As you know, this requires a lot of resources and can be quite time-consuming. And the result is often that many proposals are rejected because they have not submitted all the documents required and no one looks further at the technical proposals. With a view to increase effectiveness (ie get better results) and efficiency (ie focusing on evaluating technical quality first rather than administrative matters) we have introduced the following changes: Eligibility check after evaluation Concept notes In both the open calls for proposals and in restricted calls for proposals, applicants will have to fill in a concept note in order to give an executive summary of the project, and to answer to questions related to the relevance of the proposal, its methodology and sustainability and the operational capacity and expertise of the applicant and his partners. This concept note is part of the application form in open calls, and replaces the former preliminary proposal for the restricted calls. Redrafting of application forms The aim is to make them clearer and better specifying administrative requirements to reduce the risks of errors by applicants Grants of low amount ( less or equal EUR 10 000) Publication Only international calls. Publication of the Guidelines. No publication of the notice of calls for proposals. Standardised reporting Publication of a template for narrative and financial reporting by grant beneficiaries This new template allows for standardised reporting for all contracts, replacing the sometimes conflicting requirements of Delegations. It is foreseen to provide that this template may also be used by grant beneficiaries under ongoing contracts, to the effect that the Commission should not reject a report on the sole ground that it conforms to this template rather than to any other currently applicable requirement. Expenditure verification Publication of standard terms of reference for “expenditure verification” by auditors: The audit certificates have been questioned by auditors, services and NGOs. The new template details the “agreed upon procedure” which auditors have to follow to verify expenditures incurred. - Administrative costs = max 7% of direct costs

IV – Submission of the Proposals Strengthening the role of civil society in promoting human rights and democratic reform 2010-2011 IV – Submission of the Proposals Application form (in English or French): Concept note (max 5 pages) Description of the action Budget Other documents as mentioned in the guidelines The Checklist (Section 6 of part B the grant application form) Applies to both Budget & EDF The procedure for evaluation call for proposals has been reversed. Until the new PRAG 2006, we started with the administrative & eligibility check. As you know, this requires a lot of resources and can be quite time-consuming. And the result is often that many proposals are rejected because they have not submitted all the documents required and no one looks further at the technical proposals. With a view to increase effectiveness (ie get better results) and efficiency (ie focusing on evaluating technical quality first rather than administrative matters) we have introduced the following changes: Eligibility check after evaluation Concept notes In both the open calls for proposals and in restricted calls for proposals, applicants will have to fill in a concept note in order to give an executive summary of the project, and to answer to questions related to the relevance of the proposal, its methodology and sustainability and the operational capacity and expertise of the applicant and his partners. This concept note is part of the application form in open calls, and replaces the former preliminary proposal for the restricted calls. Redrafting of application forms The aim is to make them clearer and better specifying administrative requirements to reduce the risks of errors by applicants Grants of low amount ( less or equal EUR 10 000) Publication Only international calls. Publication of the Guidelines. No publication of the notice of calls for proposals. Standardised reporting Publication of a template for narrative and financial reporting by grant beneficiaries This new template allows for standardised reporting for all contracts, replacing the sometimes conflicting requirements of Delegations. It is foreseen to provide that this template may also be used by grant beneficiaries under ongoing contracts, to the effect that the Commission should not reject a report on the sole ground that it conforms to this template rather than to any other currently applicable requirement. Expenditure verification Publication of standard terms of reference for “expenditure verification” by auditors: The audit certificates have been questioned by auditors, services and NGOs. The new template details the “agreed upon procedure” which auditors have to follow to verify expenditures incurred.

must be stapled separately and enclosed in the envelope Strengthening the role of civil society in promoting human rights and democratic reform 2010-2011 IV – Submission of the proposals The Checklist (Section 7 of part B the grant application form) and The Declaration signed by the applicant (Section VI of part B of the grant application form) must be stapled separately and enclosed in the envelope To be submitted in 1 original and 3 copies + CD ROM Applies to both Budget & EDF The procedure for evaluation call for proposals has been reversed. Until the new PRAG 2006, we started with the administrative & eligibility check. As you know, this requires a lot of resources and can be quite time-consuming. And the result is often that many proposals are rejected because they have not submitted all the documents required and no one looks further at the technical proposals. With a view to increase effectiveness (ie get better results) and efficiency (ie focusing on evaluating technical quality first rather than administrative matters) we have introduced the following changes: Eligibility check after evaluation Concept notes In both the open calls for proposals and in restricted calls for proposals, applicants will have to fill in a concept note in order to give an executive summary of the project, and to answer to questions related to the relevance of the proposal, its methodology and sustainability and the operational capacity and expertise of the applicant and his partners. This concept note is part of the application form in open calls, and replaces the former preliminary proposal for the restricted calls. Redrafting of application forms The aim is to make them clearer and better specifying administrative requirements to reduce the risks of errors by applicants Grants of low amount ( less or equal EUR 10 000) Publication Only international calls. Publication of the Guidelines. No publication of the notice of calls for proposals. Standardised reporting Publication of a template for narrative and financial reporting by grant beneficiaries This new template allows for standardised reporting for all contracts, replacing the sometimes conflicting requirements of Delegations. It is foreseen to provide that this template may also be used by grant beneficiaries under ongoing contracts, to the effect that the Commission should not reject a report on the sole ground that it conforms to this template rather than to any other currently applicable requirement. Expenditure verification Publication of standard terms of reference for “expenditure verification” by auditors: The audit certificates have been questioned by auditors, services and NGOs. The new template details the “agreed upon procedure” which auditors have to follow to verify expenditures incurred.

EuropeAid/131-597/L/ACT/LB Strengthening the role of civil society in promoting human rights and democratic reform 2010-2011 IV – Submission of the proposals The outer envelope must bear : Reference of the call: EuropeAid/131-597/L/ACT/LB Title of the call: Strengthening the role of civil society in promoting human rights and democratic reform Name and address of the applicant The words : Not to be opened before the opening session and يمنع فتح هذا المغلف قبل جلسة فض العروض Applies to both Budget & EDF The procedure for evaluation call for proposals has been reversed. Until the new PRAG 2006, we started with the administrative & eligibility check. As you know, this requires a lot of resources and can be quite time-consuming. And the result is often that many proposals are rejected because they have not submitted all the documents required and no one looks further at the technical proposals. With a view to increase effectiveness (ie get better results) and efficiency (ie focusing on evaluating technical quality first rather than administrative matters) we have introduced the following changes: Eligibility check after evaluation Concept notes In both the open calls for proposals and in restricted calls for proposals, applicants will have to fill in a concept note in order to give an executive summary of the project, and to answer to questions related to the relevance of the proposal, its methodology and sustainability and the operational capacity and expertise of the applicant and his partners. This concept note is part of the application form in open calls, and replaces the former preliminary proposal for the restricted calls. Redrafting of application forms The aim is to make them clearer and better specifying administrative requirements to reduce the risks of errors by applicants Grants of low amount ( less or equal EUR 10 000) Publication Only international calls. Publication of the Guidelines. No publication of the notice of calls for proposals. Standardised reporting Publication of a template for narrative and financial reporting by grant beneficiaries This new template allows for standardised reporting for all contracts, replacing the sometimes conflicting requirements of Delegations. It is foreseen to provide that this template may also be used by grant beneficiaries under ongoing contracts, to the effect that the Commission should not reject a report on the sole ground that it conforms to this template rather than to any other currently applicable requirement. Expenditure verification Publication of standard terms of reference for “expenditure verification” by auditors: The audit certificates have been questioned by auditors, services and NGOs. The new template details the “agreed upon procedure” which auditors have to follow to verify expenditures incurred.

IV – Submission of the proposals Strengthening the role of civil society in promoting human rights and democratic reform 2010-2011 IV – Submission of the proposals Registration in PADOR PADOR: on-line database in which organisations register themselves and update regularly their data. These data concerns the organisation itself (Sectoral and Geographical experience, Financial Data etc.) Organisations obtain their EuropeAid ID after having completed the registration process. Where?: http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/work/onlineservices/pador/index_en.htm PADOR HELP-DESK: Europeaid-pador@ec.europa.eu Applies to both Budget & EDF The procedure for evaluation call for proposals has been reversed. Until the new PRAG 2006, we started with the administrative & eligibility check. As you know, this requires a lot of resources and can be quite time-consuming. And the result is often that many proposals are rejected because they have not submitted all the documents required and no one looks further at the technical proposals. With a view to increase effectiveness (ie get better results) and efficiency (ie focusing on evaluating technical quality first rather than administrative matters) we have introduced the following changes: Eligibility check after evaluation Concept notes In both the open calls for proposals and in restricted calls for proposals, applicants will have to fill in a concept note in order to give an executive summary of the project, and to answer to questions related to the relevance of the proposal, its methodology and sustainability and the operational capacity and expertise of the applicant and his partners. This concept note is part of the application form in open calls, and replaces the former preliminary proposal for the restricted calls. Redrafting of application forms The aim is to make them clearer and better specifying administrative requirements to reduce the risks of errors by applicants Grants of low amount ( less or equal EUR 10 000) Publication Only international calls. Publication of the Guidelines. No publication of the notice of calls for proposals. Standardised reporting Publication of a template for narrative and financial reporting by grant beneficiaries This new template allows for standardised reporting for all contracts, replacing the sometimes conflicting requirements of Delegations. It is foreseen to provide that this template may also be used by grant beneficiaries under ongoing contracts, to the effect that the Commission should not reject a report on the sole ground that it conforms to this template rather than to any other currently applicable requirement. Expenditure verification Publication of standard terms of reference for “expenditure verification” by auditors: The audit certificates have been questioned by auditors, services and NGOs. The new template details the “agreed upon procedure” which auditors have to follow to verify expenditures incurred.

V - Evaluation of the proposals Strengthening the role of civil society in promoting human rights and democratic reform 2010-2011 V - Evaluation of the proposals Step 1 : Opening and administrative check & concept note Friday, 30 September 2011 Step 2: Evaluation of the full application form Monday, 10 October 2011 Step 3: Notification of award Thursday 20 October 2011 Applies to both Budget & EDF The procedure for evaluation call for proposals has been reversed. Until the new PRAG 2006, we started with the administrative & eligibility check. As you know, this requires a lot of resources and can be quite time-consuming. And the result is often that many proposals are rejected because they have not submitted all the documents required and no one looks further at the technical proposals. With a view to increase effectiveness (ie get better results) and efficiency (ie focusing on evaluating technical quality first rather than administrative matters) we have introduced the following changes: Eligibility check after evaluation Concept notes In both the open calls for proposals and in restricted calls for proposals, applicants will have to fill in a concept note in order to give an executive summary of the project, and to answer to questions related to the relevance of the proposal, its methodology and sustainability and the operational capacity and expertise of the applicant and his partners. This concept note is part of the application form in open calls, and replaces the former preliminary proposal for the restricted calls. Redrafting of application forms The aim is to make them clearer and better specifying administrative requirements to reduce the risks of errors by applicants Grants of low amount ( less or equal EUR 10 000) Publication Only international calls. Publication of the Guidelines. No publication of the notice of calls for proposals. Standardised reporting Publication of a template for narrative and financial reporting by grant beneficiaries This new template allows for standardised reporting for all contracts, replacing the sometimes conflicting requirements of Delegations. It is foreseen to provide that this template may also be used by grant beneficiaries under ongoing contracts, to the effect that the Commission should not reject a report on the sole ground that it conforms to this template rather than to any other currently applicable requirement. Expenditure verification Publication of standard terms of reference for “expenditure verification” by auditors: The audit certificates have been questioned by auditors, services and NGOs. The new template details the “agreed upon procedure” which auditors have to follow to verify expenditures incurred.