Volume 22, Issue 22, Pages (November 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
High molecular weight hyaluronic acid regulates osteoclast formation by inhibiting receptor activator of NF-κB ligand through Rho kinase  W. Ariyoshi,
Advertisements

Volume 21, Issue 16, Pages (August 2011)
Plk1 Controls the Nek2A-PP1γ Antagonism in Centrosome Disjunction
Federico Dajas-Bailador, Emma V. Jones, Alan J. Whitmarsh 
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
Volume 15, Issue 19, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 23, Issue 14, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Richard C. Centore, Stephanie A. Yazinski, Alice Tse, Lee Zou 
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
J. Zhu, N. Sun, L. Aoudjit, H. Li, H. Kawachi, S. Lemay, T. Takano 
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Integrin α5β1 Activates the NLRP3 Inflammasome by Direct Interaction with a Bacterial Surface Protein  Hye-Kyoung Jun, Sung-Hoon Lee, Hae-Ri Lee, Bong-Kyu.
Feng Zhang, Jiazhong Shi, Chunjing Bian, Xiaochun Yu  Cell Reports 
Volume 18, Issue 19, Pages (October 2008)
m6A Facilitates eIF4F-Independent mRNA Translation
Kif15 Cooperates with Eg5 to Promote Bipolar Spindle Assembly
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
ARAP3 Is a PI3K- and Rap-Regulated GAP for RhoA
Boyd Butler, John A. Cooper  Current Biology 
Plk1 Controls the Nek2A-PP1γ Antagonism in Centrosome Disjunction
Basal Keratinocytes from Uninvolved Psoriatic Skin Exhibit Accelerated Spreading and Focal Adhesion Kinase Responsiveness to Fibronectin  Guofen Chen,
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
The Formin FMNL3 Controls Early Apical Specification in Endothelial Cells by Regulating the Polarized Trafficking of Podocalyxin  Mark Richards, Clare.
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (February 2008)
ERK Activation Propagates in Epithelial Cell Sheets and Regulates Their Migration during Wound Healing  Yutaka Matsubayashi, Miki Ebisuya, Sakiko Honjoh,
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Contribution of Src-FAK signaling to the induction of connective tissue growth factor in renal fibroblasts  A. Graness, I. Cicha, M. Goppelt-Struebe 
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 97, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 16, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 22, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages (May 2001)
Septins Regulate Actin Organization and Cell-Cycle Arrest through Nuclear Accumulation of NCK Mediated by SOCS7  Brandon E. Kremer, Laura A. Adang, Ian.
The Actin-Bundling Protein Palladin Is an Akt1-Specific Substrate that Regulates Breast Cancer Cell Migration  Y. Rebecca Chin, Alex Toker  Molecular.
Inhibitor Mediated Protein Degradation
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 14, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Virus-Induced Abl and Fyn Kinase Signals Permit Coxsackievirus Entry through Epithelial Tight Junctions  Carolyn B. Coyne, Jeffrey M. Bergelson  Cell 
Rsk1 mediates a MEK–MAP kinase cell survival signal
Integrin-β4–TNS4–Focal Adhesion Kinase Signaling Mediates Keratinocyte Proliferation in Human Skin  Eun Young Seo, Seon-Pil Jin, Yeon Kyung Kim, Hanon.
STIM2 Is an Inhibitor of STIM1-Mediated Store-Operated Ca2+ Entry
Volume 27, Issue 14, Pages e5 (July 2017)
Sandrine Etienne-Manneville, Alan Hall  Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 17, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 22, Issue 19, Pages (October 2012)
Coxsackievirus Entry across Epithelial Tight Junctions Requires Occludin and the Small GTPases Rab34 and Rab5  Carolyn B. Coyne, Le Shen, Jerrold R. Turner,
Regulation of LKB1/STRAD Localization and Function by E-Cadherin
Livio Trusolino, Andrea Bertotti, Paolo M Comoglio  Cell 
Changes in integrin expression during adipocyte differentiation
Volume 15, Issue 14, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 11, Issue 13, Pages (July 2001)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 26, Issue 15, Pages (August 2016)
Emmanuel Vial, Erik Sahai, Christopher J. Marshall  Cancer Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 22, Issue 22, Pages 2087-2094 (November 2012) Localized Tensional Forces on PECAM-1 Elicit a Global Mechanotransduction Response via the Integrin-RhoA Pathway  Caitlin Collins, Christophe Guilluy, Christopher Welch, E. Timothy O’Brien, Klaus Hahn, Richard Superfine, Keith Burridge, Ellie Tzima  Current Biology  Volume 22, Issue 22, Pages 2087-2094 (November 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.051 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Tensional Forces on PECAM-1 Result in Adaptive Cellular Stiffening and PI3-Kinase Activation (A) Schematic of experimental design. Two-second pulses of force (∼100 pN) separated by 10 s intervals over a 2 min time course. Representative example of bead displacement in response to the pulsatile force regimen is shown. Stiffening is indicated by decreased displacement during latter pulses. (B) ECs expressing GFP-PH were incubated with anti-PECAM-1-coated magnetic beads and subjected to force with a permanent ceramic magnet for the indicated times. Cells were fixed and scored for GFP-PH recruitment around the bead (box). Location of the bead is highlighted by the yellow circle (n > 50 cells/condition from three independent experiments; scale bar represents 10 μm). (C) Average relative anti-PECAM-1 bead displacements induced by the pulsatile force regimen. In some experiments, cells were pretreated with LY294002 (30 μM for 20 min) or Cytochalasin D (10 μM for 30 min) prior to incubation with magnetic beads. Average displacements were calculated relative to the first pulse of force (n > 15 beads/condition from three independent experiments). Error bars represent SEM, ∗p < 0.05. (See also Figure S1.) Current Biology 2012 22, 2087-2094DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.051) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 PECAM-1-Mediated Adaptive Cellular Stiffening, but Not PI3K Activation, Is Integrin Dependent (A) ECs were incubated with 20 μg/ml of FN blocking (16G3) or nonblocking (11E5) antibody for 20 min prior to force application. Average displacements were calculated relative to the first pulse of force to anti-PECAM-1-coated beads (n > 15 beads/condition from three independent experiments). (B) ECs expressing GFP-PH were incubated with 16G3 or 11E5 (20 μg/ml, 20 min) antibodies prior to being subjected to force with a permanent ceramic magnet. Cells were fixed and scored for GFP-PH recruitment around the bead (n > 50 cells/condition from three independent experiments; scale bar represents 10 μm). Error bars represent SEM, ∗p < 0.05. Current Biology 2012 22, 2087-2094DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.051) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Tensional Forces on PECAM-1 Activate the RhoA Pathway (A) Adherent ECs were incubated with anti-PECAM-1-coated magnetic beads and subjected to pulsatile tensional forces. For some conditions, cells were pretreated with C3 (2.0 μg/ml, 2 hr) or Y27632 (5 μM, 10 min) prior to force application. Average displacements were calculated relative to the first pulse of force (n > 15 cells/condition from three independent experiments). Error bars represent SEM, ∗p < 0.05. (B and C) ECs were incubated with anti-PECAM-1-coated beads and subjected to force with a permanent ceramic magnet for the indicted times (B). Active RhoA (RhoA-GTP) was isolated with GST-RBD and analyzed by western blot (n = 5). ECs were incubated with 20 μg/ml of FN blocking (16G3) or nonblocking (11E5) antibody for 20 min prior to force application (C). Active RhoA (RhoA-GTP) was isolated with GST-RBD and analyzed by western blot (n = 3). Blots (B and C) are representative of at least three independent experiments. (See also Figure S2.) Current Biology 2012 22, 2087-2094DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.051) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Tensional Forces on PECAM-1 Elicit RhoA Activation and Adaptive Cellular Stiffening via GEF-H1 and LARG (A–D) Tension was applied to anti-PECAM-1-coated beads using a permanent ceramic magnet for the indicated times. (A) Cells were lysed and active GEFs were precipitated with GST-(G17A)RhoA and analyzed by western blot (n = 3). (B) Cells were lysed, subjected to SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with indicated antibodies. Blots are indicative of three independent experiments. (C) Cells were lysed and active GEFs were precipitated with GST-(G17A)RhoA and analyzed by western blot (n = 3). For some conditions, cells were pretreated with FAK inhibitor 14 (5 μM, 30 min) or U0126 (5 μM, 30 min) to inhibit FAK and ERK, respectively (n = 3). (D) siRNA-transfected ECs were incubated with anti-PECAM-1-coated beads and subjected to force for the indicated times. Active RhoA was isolated with GST-RBD and analyzed by western blot (n = 3). All blots (A–D) are indicative of at least three independent experiments. (E) siRNA-transfected ECs on FN were incubated with anti-PECAM-1-coated beads and subjected to pulsatile forces. Average displacements were calculated relative to the first pulse of force (n > 15 beads/condition from three independent experiments, ∗p < 0.05). Current Biology 2012 22, 2087-2094DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.051) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Local Tensional Forces on PECAM-1 Elicit Global β1 Integrin Activation (A) ECs were incubated with anti-PECAM-1-coated beads (4.5 μm) and subjected to force with a permanent ceramic magnet for the indicated times. ECs were fixed and stained with HUTS-4, which recognizes ligated β1 integrin, and phalloidin to mark the actin cytoskeleton (n > 30 cells/condition from three independent experiments; scale bar represents 10 μm, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.02). (B) ECs were incubated with anti-PECAM-1-coated beads (4.5 μm) and subjected to force for the indicated times. ECs were fixed and stained for activated β1 integrins and the actin cytoskeleton. Cells were pretreated with LY294002 (30 μM, 20 min) to inhibit PI3K activation prior to force application (n > 25 cells/condition from three independent experiments; scale bar represents 10 μm, ∗p < 0.05). (C) ECs overexpressing GFP or GFP-PH were incubated with anti-PECAM-1-coated beads (4.5 μm) and force was applied. ECs were fixed and stained for activated β1 integrins (n > 25 cells/condition from three independent experiments, ∗p < 0.05). For all panels, integrin activation was quantified using thresholded images and ImageJ software. Values were normalized to the “no force” condition. Error bars represent SEM. (See also Figure S3.) Current Biology 2012 22, 2087-2094DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.051) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Local Tensional Forces on PECAM-1 Elicit Global RhoA Activation and Focal Adhesion Growth (A) ECs expressing the RhoA biosensor were incubated with poly-lysine or anti-PECAM-1-coated beads (4.5 μm) and subjected to force with a permanent ceramic magnet for the indicated times. Cells were fixed and analyzed for FRET. Whole-cell FRET ratios were calculated for each condition. Autofluorescent beads are highlighted in black dotted circles (n > 45 cells/condition from four independent experiments, ∗p < 0.05). (B) Adherent ECs on FN were incubated with anti-PECAM-1-coated magnetic beads and subjected to force for the indicated times. ECs were fixed stained with phalloidin and an anti-vinculin antibody to mark focal adhesions. Focal adhesion number and size were quantified using NIH ImageJ software. Values were normalized to the “no force” condition. Location of the beads are highlighted in yellow circles (n > 30 cells/condition from three independent experiments; ∗p < 0.05, scale bar represents 10 μm). (C) Model of PECAM-1-mediated mechanotransduction. Local tensional forces on PECAM-1 result in global mechanosignaling and changes in cytoskeletal architecture. (See also Figure S4.) Current Biology 2012 22, 2087-2094DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.051) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions