Recent Results of Quarkonia Production at CMS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multi-Particle Azimuthal Correlations at RHIC !! Roy A. Lacey USB - Chem (SUNY Stony Brook ) What do they tell us about Possible Quenching?
Advertisements

Maki Kurosawa for the PHENIX Collaboration RIKEN Nishina Center 5/11/2015RHIC/AGS User's Meeting Maki Kurosawa 1 Recent Open Heavy Flavor Results from.
Open heavy-flavor and quarkonium measurements in heavy-ion collisions at the LHC E. Vercellin Università and INFN Torino, Italy Quark Confinement and the.
Quarkonia and vector mesons in d+Au collision at forward rapidity in PHENIX Kwangbok Lee Korea University for PHENIX collaboration 1 11 Dec. HIM 2010,
Heavy flavor production in sqrt(s NN )=200 GeV d+Au Collisions at PHENIX DNP 2013 Matthew Wysocki, Oak Ridge National Lab Newport News, Virginia, Oct 25,
Upsilon Production in Heavy Ions with STAR and CMS
Quarkonia Production in p+p, d+Au and A+A from PHENIX Melynda Brooks Los Alamos National Laboratory For the PHENIX Collaboration Melynda Brooks, LANL,
ICPAQGP, Kolkata, February 2-6, 2015 Itzhak Tserruya PHENIX highlights.
Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics, Heavy Ion Physics with CMS: Day-One Measurements Olga Barannikova for the CMS Collaboration.
Heavy Flavor Production at the Tevatron Jennifer Pursley The Johns Hopkins University on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty University.
Charmonia production at the SPS energies Marie-Pierre COMETS IPN Orsay, FRANCE SQM2006, UCLA, Los Angeles, USA, March 26-31, 2006.
1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.
J/Ψ Suppression in QGP Outline:
Cold nuclear matter effects on dilepton and photon production Zhong-Bo Kang Los Alamos National Laboratory Thermal Radiation Workshop RBRC, Brookhaven.
Sourav Tarafdar Banaras Hindu University For the PHENIX Collaboration Hard Probes 2012 Measurement of electrons from Heavy Quarks at PHENIX.
A SCENIC OVERVIEW OF J/  PRODUCTION IN HEAVY ION COLLISIONS AT PHENIX Matthew Wysocki, University of Colorado For the PHENIX Collaboration.
Quarkonia and heavy flavor: where do we stand ? What next? 1 E. Scomparin (INFN-Torino) Quarkonia Open heavy quarks Probe the opacity of QGP Sensitive.
Measurements of  Production and Nuclear Modification Factor at STAR Anthony Kesich University of California, Davis STAR Collaboration.
R CP Measurement with Hadron Decay Muons in Au+Au Collisions at √s NN =200 GeV WooJin Park Korea University For the PHENIX Collaboration.
 production in p+p and Au+Au collisions in STAR Debasish Das UC Davis (For the STAR Collaboration)‏
Kwangbok Lee, LANL for the PHENIX collaboration DIS 2011, Newport News, VA Heavy vector meson results at PHENIX 1.
☍ Studying bottmonium in hot/cold QGP medium. ☍ Triggering on ϒ production in STAR ☍ Baseline measurement: ϒ cross section in pp collisions. ☍ ϒ and CNM.
Heavy flavor production at RHIC Yonsei Univ. Y. Kwon.
The 6 th International Conference of Hard and Electromagnetic Probes of High-Energy Nuclear Collisions, Cape Town, South Africa, November 4-8, 2013 Nuclear.
Energy Scan of Hadron (  0 ) Suppression and Flow in Au+Au Collisions at PHENIX Norbert Novitzky for PHENIX collaboration University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Measurement of J/  -> e + e - and  C -> J/  +   in dAu collisions at PHENIX/RHIC A. Lebedev, ISU 1 Fall 2003 DNP Meeting Alexandre Lebedev, Iowa State.
Z, W bosons: well calibrated probe in pp LHC energies: access to Z, W in pA and AA Electroweak bosons in dilepton channel: No final state modification.
Recent Open Heavy Flavor Results from ATLAS and CMS Experiment at LHC
Chunhui Chen, University of Pennsylvania 1 Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the Tevatron Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the.
First measurements in Pb—Pb collisions at  s NN =2.76 TeV with ALICE at the LHC M. Nicassio (University and INFN Bari) for the ALICE Collaboration Rencontres.
 Production and Suppression in Heavy Ion Collisions at STAR Anthony Kesich University of California, Davis STAR Collaboration February 5, 2013.
OPEN HEAVY FLAVORS 1. Heavy Flavor 2 Heavy quarks produced in the early stages of the collisions (high Q2)  effective probe of the high-density medium.
Quarkonia Measurement Updates from PHENIX Cesar Luiz da Silva Los Alamos National Lab for the PHENIX Collaboration.
1 Guannan Xie Nuclear Modification Factor of D 0 Mesons in Au+Au Collisions at √s NN = 200 GeV Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University of Science.
News from ALICE Jan PLUTA Heavy Ion Reaction Group (HIRG) Warsaw University of Technology February 22, XIII GDRE Workshop, SUBATECH, Nantes.
PHENIX results on centrality dependence of yields and correlations in d+Au collisions at √s NN =200GeV Takao Sakaguchi Brookhaven National Laboratory for.
24 Nov 2006 Kentaro MIKI University of Tsukuba “electron / photon flow” Elliptic flow measurement of direct photon in √s NN =200GeV Au+Au collisions at.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
1 Cold and Hot nuclear matter effects on Charmonium production Kai Zhou (Tsinghua University,Beijing) In collaboration with: Baoyi Chen (Tsinghua University)
Jet Production in Au+Au Collisions at STAR Alexander Schmah for the STAR Collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Hard Probes 2015 in Montreal/Canada.
Heavy Flavor Measurements at RHIC&LHC W. Xie (Purdue University, West Lafayette) W. Xie (Purdue University, West Lafayette) Open Heavy Flavor Workshop.
PHENIX J/  Measurements at  s = 200A GeV Wei Xie UC. RiverSide For PHENIX Collaboration.
1 Joint meeting IPNO-LAL LUA9-AFTER Orsay, Novembre 2013 Roberta Arnaldi INFN Torino (Italy)
Non-Prompt J/ψ Measurements at STAR Zaochen Ye for the STAR Collaboration University of Illinois at Chicago The STAR Collaboration:
Design and performance of the ALICE Muon Spectrometer
Di-electron elliptic flow in
Outline Introduction LHC and ALICE Heavy-quark production in pp
Review of ALICE Experiments
Sedat Altınpınar for the ALICE Collaboration
Heavy-flavor particle correlations - From RHIC to LHC
Heavy-flavour production in heavy-ion collisions
W. Xie (Riken-BNL Research Center) for PHENIX Collaboration
Heavy-Flavour Physics in Heavy-Ion Collisions
ALICE and the Little Bang
Experimental Studies of Quark Gluon Plasma at RHIC
Quarkonium production in ALICE
First physics from the ALICE electromagnetic calorimeters
Open heavy flavor analysis with the ALICE experiment at LHC
Charm production at STAR
Heavy Ion Physics in RUN14-16
Motivation for Studying Heavy Quarks
STAR Spin alignment of vector mesons (K*0, φ) in Au+Au and p+p collisions at RHIC Jin Hui Chen Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics and UCLA For the STAR.
Charmed hadron signals of partonic medium
Open heavy-flavour results from ALICE
Charmonium dissociation and recombination at RHIC and LHC
Spares Giuseppe E. Bruno.
One PeV Collisions Very successful Heavy Ion run in 2015, with all new detectors in operation 16 GB/s readout/ 6GB/s on disk after HLT compression.
First Hints for Jet Quenching at RHIC
Heavy Quarkonium production in p-Pb collisions at LHCb
Presentation transcript:

Recent Results of Quarkonia Production at CMS Dong Ho Moon (Chonnam National University) HIM Winter 2014, Pusan 6th December, 2014

Quarkonia Suppression in Hot Medium One of striking signatures for Quark-Gluon-Plasma (QGP) formation Sequential melting : different binding energies  bound states are melt sequentially in hot medium Quenched heavy quarks (energy loss): A.Rothkopf, PRL 108(2012) 162001 Why we are interested in quarkonia measurment ? Because this is one of strking signatures for quark-gluon-plasma formation. Quarkonia is expected to be melt in the extreemly hot and densed qcd medium. if the debye screening radius is smaller than their binding radius. This plot is the debye screening radius as a function of temperature to critical temperature of the medium. As you can see, the screening radius is getting smaller increasing the temperature of medium. at the intersection of each quarkonia states they will be melt. They have different binding energy so, they will be melt sequentially from the lowest one to highest one. We call it sequential melting scenario. And the energy loss of heavy quarks is one of significant source of quarkonia production in heavy ion collisions according to this paper. So, quarkonia study is expected to give some hints to understand more about the hot and densed qcd medium The extra effect : CNM in initial state and recombination in final state Sequential melting  a QGP thermometer H. Satz, NPA 783 (2007) 249c. 2013 Heavy Flavor Measurements at RHIC and LHC (W. Xie)

Quarkonia Suppression in Hot Medium I would like to show J/psi v2 as the further study of charmonium side and bottominium in ppb CMS-PAS-HIN-12-014 PRL 109 (2012) 222301 Observed Significant suppression of J/ψ and ϒ (1S, 2S, 3S) at PbPb collisions Expected hierarchy in the suppression of the states with different binding energy

Quarkonia Study at CMS Today focus In PbPb collisions : Suppression of J/ψ again but dependence on new variable : reaction plane In pPb collisions : The pure suppression of quarkonia from the QGP : distinguish Cold Nuclear Matter (CNM) effect from QGP ϒ (1S, 2S, 3S) : published at JHEP (JHEP 04 (2014) 103) J/ψ : ongoing (KU group) I would like to show J/psi v2 as the further study of charmonium side and bottominium in ppb R 

(Silicon Strip & Pixel) CMS detector Muon Chamber (DT, RPC) Hadron Forward Calorimeter (HF) (CSC, RPC) Magnetic Field : 3.8 T Inner Tracker (Silicon Strip & Pixel)

Muon Reconstruction in CMS global muon Inner track standalone muon J/ψ in PbPb : reconstructed by global muon ϒ in pPb : reconstructed by tracker muon Muon Reconstruction Muon tracks in muon chamber (or segments) + tracks in inner tracker Excellent momentum resolution of tracking system. Overall resolution: 1~2 %

Muon Reconstruction in CMS global muon Inner track standalone muon Muon Reconstruction Muon tracks in muon chamber (or segments) + tracks in inner tracker Excellent momentum resolution of tracking system. Overall resolution: 1~2 %

Charmonium Measurements in PbPb

What is azimuthal anisotropy (v2) ? Quark Scaling

NPE v2 at RHIC and prediction of J/ψ v2 at LHC NPE (Non Photonic Electron) v2 Prediction of elliptic flow of J/ψ STAR arXiv:1210.5199 Nucl.Phys.A834 (2010) 317c NPE has significant elliptic flow (v2). It should be inherited to quarkonia, which indicates the existence non-zero v2 of quarkonia Significant elliptic flow (v2) may be expected at LHC energy due to the significant contribution of regenerated J/ψ

J/ψ Azimuthal Anisotropy at RHIC and LHC STAR and ALICE measured inclusive J/ψ v2 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 102301 (2013) STAR ALICE Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 052301 (2013) ALICE observed non-zero v2 in 2 - 4 GeV/c region. Data covers both of b-contribution models. STAR measured compatible zero v2 from 2 GeV/c in whole pT region. CMS challenge: 1) Prompt and non-prompt J/ψ separation 2) Extend high pT region

Prompt & Non-prompt J/ψ Separation Charm Beauty Reconstruct opposite sign muon vertex 2-D unbinned maximum likelihood fit of dimuon mass and pseudo-proper decay length (lJ/ψ) CMS-PAS-HIN-12-014

J/ψ Azimuthal Anisotropy in CMS  CMS-PAS-HIN-12-001 Event plane method Integrated v2 for Prompt J/ψ (pT > 6.5 GeV/c) 0.054 ± 0.013 (stat.) ± 0.006 (syst.) in |y| < 2.4, 10-60 % significant (3.8σ) v2 at high-pT prompt J/ψ

J/ψ Azimuthal Anisotropy in CMS CMS-PAS-HIN-12-001 No strong dependences of centrality, pT, rapidity Low pT (3-6.5 GeV/c) measured in forward (1.6<|y|<2.4)

J/ψ Azimuthal Anisotropy in CMS Systematic uncertainty

J/ψ Azimuthal Anisotropy Comparison CMS-PAS-HIN-12-001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 052301 (2013) Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 162301 (2013) Extended available measurement up to high pT region (6.5 – 30 GeV/c) and observed non-zero v2 No significant dependence of pT

J/ψ Azimuthal Anisotropy Comparison CMS-PAS-HIN-12-001 Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 022301 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 102301 (2013) Comparison to charged hadrons and D mesons 1) low pT light quark ≈ c+light quark > c+c quark 2) high pT light quark ≈ c+light quark ≈ c+c quark

Bottomonium Measurements in pPb

Dimuon spectrum in 2013 pPb Lint = 35 nb-1 pp √s = 2.76 TeV : 5.4 pb-1 ~20 times larger than 2010 (231 nb-1)

pPb Collisions at 2013 pPb PbPb pPb collisions: the bridge between pp and PbPb collisions, to understand CNM effect from QGP. pPb asymmetric collisions (~0.47 rapidity boost) analysis window |yCM| < 1.93 Centrality dependence Not easy to determine centrality in pPb collisions Ref. system Pb+p LAB -2.4 -0.47 1.5 Collision (CM) -1.9 0.00 1.9 pPb PbPb

pPb Collisions at 2013 pPb collisions: the bridge between pp and PbPb collisions, to understand CNM effect from QGP. pPb asymmetric collisions (~0.47 rapidity boost) analysis window |yCM| < 1.93 Binning in 2 event-activity variables: Corrected Ntracks (|η| < 2.4, pT > 400 MeV/c) Raw transverse energy measured in HF, ET (|η| > 4.0) Ref. system Pb+p LAB -2.4 -0.47 1.5 Collision (CM) -1.9 0.00 1.9

Invariant Mass Distributions Signal extractions Un-binned maximum log likelihood fit ➢ Signal : 3 Crystal-Ball function (Gaussian with low-side tail with power-law) ➢ Background : error function * exponential (all background parameters free) JHEP 04 (2014) 103

Double Ratio pPb vs PbPb: stronger final state effects in PbPb compared to pPb pPb vs pp: indication (significance < 3σ) of additional effects on the excited states in pPb JHEP 04 (2014) 103

Υ(nS)/Υ(1S) vs ET (|η| > 4) Weak dependence of excited to the ground state ratio with respect to the ET(|η|>4) JHEP 04 (2014) 103

Υ(nS)/Υ(1S) vs Ntracks (|η| < 2.4) Significant decrease of Υ(nS)/Υ(1S) with increasing multiplicity, in pPb and pp Possible ways to produce this dependence - Υ would affect the multiplicity or Multiplicity would affect the Υ JHEP 04 (2014) 103

Υ(2S)/Υ(1S) compare PbPb PbPb : no significant dependence on ET(|η|>4) and Ntracks, but large uncertainties PbPb points are below all the pPb data but large uncertainties to tell if already in most central pPb the level of suppression is the same as in PbPb peripheral JHEP 04 (2014) 103

Self-normalized Yields: Υ(nS)/<Υ(nS)> Υ(nS)/<Υ(nS)>: in the line at the whole ET(|η|>4) JHEP 04 (2014) 103

Self-normalized Yields: Υ(nS)/<Υ(nS)> Υ(nS)/<Υ(nS)> vs Ntracks Less consistent behavior (related to the Υ(nS)/Υ(1S) variations) JHEP 04 (2014) 103

Self-normalized Yields: Υ(nS)/<Υ(nS)> PLB 712 (2012) 165 Υ(nS)/<Υ(nS)> vs Ntracks Less consistent behavior (related to the Υ(nS)/Υ(1S) variations) JHEP 04 (2014) 103

Self-normalized Yields: Υ(nS)/<Υ(nS)> PLB 712 (2012) 165 Υ(nS)/<Υ(nS)> vs Ntracks Less consistent behavior (related to the Υ(nS)/Υ(1S) variations) Multi parton interaction : should be same in 1S, 2S and 3S but even pp with high multiplicity shows differences JHEP 04 (2014) 103

Summary Observed non-zero v2 of prompt J/ψ and even in high pT region (> 6.5 GeV/c) Find proper fit setting in low pT and forward region First time to measure v2 of non-prompt J/ψ ϒ results in pPb would give us some indications of initial state effect on the suppression in PbPb

Back up

ALICE Multiplicity dependence

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/PhysicsResultsHIN12014 RAA vs binding energy https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/PhysicsResultsHIN12014

Results from PbPb Collisions Double Ratio RAA CMS HIN-11-011 PRL 109 (2012) 222301 Υ(3S) are more suppressed than Υ(2S). Ordering: RAA(Υ(3S)) < RAA(Υ(2S)) < RAA(Υ(1S)) Υ(2S) and Υ(3S) are more suppressed than Υ(1S)

J/ψ Azimuthal Anisotropy in CMS

Muon Pair Acceptance

Υ(nS)/Υ(1S) vs ET (|η| > 4) Weak dependence of excited to the ground state ratio with respect to the ET(|η|>4) CMS-PAS-HIN-13-003 arXiv:1312.6300

J/ψ Azimuthal Anisotropy in CMS STAR and ALICE measured inclusive J/ψ’s v2 STAR measured compatible zero v2 from 2 GeV/c in whole pT region ALICE observed non-zero v2 in 2 - 4 GeV/c region Possible scenarios : regeneration of J/ψ or path-length dependence of suppression (less suppressed in-plane than out-plane) Prompt and non-prompt J/ψ separation is important: charmonium vs open bottom Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 102301 (2013) STAR Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 052301 (2013) R 

The life of Quarkonia in the Medium can be Complicated Observed J/y is a mixture of direct production+feeddown (R. Vogt: Phys. Rep. 310, 197 (1999)). All J/y ~ 0.6J/y(Direct) + ~0.3 cc + ~0.1y’ B meson feed down. Important to disentangle different component Suppression and enhancement in the “cold” nuclear medium Nuclear Absorption, Gluon shadowing, initial state energy loss, Cronin effect and gluon saturation (CGC) Study p+A collisions Hot/dense medium effect J/y,  dissociation, i.e. suppression Recombination, i.e. enhancement Study different species, e.g. J/psi,  Study at different energy, i.e. RHIC, LHC D+ c J/y

Summary Charmonium in PbPb Prompt J/ψ integrated v2 (10-60%, |y| < 2.4 and 6.5 < pT < 30 GeV/c) 0.054 ± 0.013 (stat.) ± 0.006 (syst.) (3.8σ) Bottomonia in pp & pPb Double ratios [Υ(nS)/Υ(1S)]pPb/[Υ(nS)/Υ(1S)]pp Higher than in PbPb: stronger final state effects in PbPb than in pPb Hint to the presence of additional effects (like CNM) in pPb than in pp Υ(nS)/Υ(1S): decrease with increase of particle multiplicity in both pp and pPb Reflect an influence of the ‘medium’ on the Υ Reflect a different multiplicity associated with the Υ states production Υ(nS)/<Υ(nS)>: increase with increasing event activity in pp, pPb and PbPb

<Ncoll>

Systematics 2018년 12월 31일

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA description 6th International Workshop on High-pT physics at LHC 2011 Lamia, B. “Observation of Z Boson Production in Heavy Ion Collisions at CMS” Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions, 2011 Dong Ho Moon, 7th Apr. 2018년 12월 31일

J/ψ v2 at ALICE

Single Muon Acceptance ✔ Acceptance definition: Range of pT and eta of reconstructable muon (RecoMu/GenMu ≥ 10%) CNU Colloquium, 25 September 2014, Dong Ho Moon

Reconstruction Efficiency

Acceptance PRL 109, 222301 (2012)

Correction (Acceptance) PYTHIA+EventGen+PHOTOS simulation at √s = 2.76 TeV Total acceptance : 0.296, 0.0 ≤ |y| < 2.4, 6.5 ≤ pT < 30.0 (GeV/c)

Υ(nS)/Υ(1S) vs ET (|η| > 4) Weak dependence of excited to the ground state ratio with respect to the ET(|η|>4) CMS-PAS-HIN-13-003 arXiv:1312.6300

Υ(nS)/Υ(1S) vs Ntracks (|η| < 2.4) Significant decrease of Υ(nS)/Υ(1S) with increasing multiplicity, in pPb and pp Possible ways to produce this dependence - Υ would affect the multiplicity or Multiplicity would affect the Υ CMS-PAS-HIN-13-003 arXiv:1312.6300

Υ(2S)/Υ(1S) compare PbPb PbPb : no significant dependence on ET(|η|>4) and Ntracks, but large uncertainties PbPb points are below all the pPb data but large uncertainties to tell if already in most central pPb the level of suppression is the same as in PbPb peripheral CMS-PAS-HIN-13-003 arXiv:1312.6300

Self-normalized Yields: Υ(nS)/<Υ(nS)> Υ(nS)/<Υ(nS)>: in the line at the whole ET(|η|>4) CMS-PAS-HIN-13-003 arXiv:1312.6300

Self-normalized Yields: Υ(nS)/<Υ(nS)> Υ(nS)/<Υ(nS)> vs Ntracks Less consistent behavior (related to the Υ(nS)/Υ(1S) variations) CMS-PAS-HIN-13-003 arXiv:1312.6300

Self-normalized Yields: Υ(nS)/<Υ(nS)> PLB 712 (2012) 165 Υ(nS)/<Υ(nS)> vs Ntracks Less consistent behavior (related to the Υ(nS)/Υ(1S) variations) CMS-PAS-HIN-13-003 arXiv:1312.6300

Self-normalized Yields: Υ(nS)/<Υ(nS)> PLB 712 (2012) 165 Υ(nS)/<Υ(nS)> vs Ntracks Less consistent behavior (related to the Υ(nS)/Υ(1S) variations) Multi parton interaction : should be same in 1S, 2S and 3S but even pp with high multiplicity shows differences CMS-PAS-HIN-13-003 arXiv:1312.6300

Self-normalized Yields: Υ(nS)/<Υ(nS)>

Contents Introduction Charmonium measurements Bottomonium measurements Prompt J/ψ azimuthal anisotropy in PbPb collisions Bottomonium measurements pp & pPb collisions Summary

pp DiMuon