Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Advertisements

Fuhrman Grade and Neutrophil-To-Lymphocyte Ratio Influence on Survival in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With First-Line Tyrosine.
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 66, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Response to Nivolumab in a Patient With Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and End-stage Renal Disease on Dialysis  Maria I. Carlo, Darren R.
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 70, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Renal Cell Carcinoma: Prognostic Factors and Patient Selection
Volume 69, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 69, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 69, Issue 1, Pages 4-6 (January 2016)
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 51, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 73, Issue 4, Pages e116-e118 (April 2018)
Treatment of Advanced and Metastatic Renal Cancer: A Revolution?
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 66, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 73, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 71, Issue 1, Pages 1-3 (January 2017)
Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages 5-7 (July 2015)
Volume 71, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Cost Effectiveness of Nivolumab in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
Volume 70, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma  Viktor Grünwald, Xun Lin, Daniel Kalanovic,
International Society of Urological Pathology Grading and Other Prognostic Factors for Renal Neoplasia  Brett Delahunt, John R. Srigley, Lars Egevad,
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages (September 2018)
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Robert A. Meguid, MD, MPH, Benjamin S. Brooke, MD, Bruce A
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Clinical Practice: Patient Selection
Benefit of immediate revascularization in women with critical limb ischemia in an intention-to-treat analysis  Jana Ortmann, MD, Eveline Nüesch, PhD,
Volume 73, Issue 4, Pages e116-e118 (April 2018)
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Survival benefits of revascularization in patients with critical limb ischemia and renal insufficiency  Jana Ortmann, MD, Brigitta Gahl, MD, Nicolas Diehm,
The 20-Yr Outcome in Patients with Well- or Moderately Differentiated Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Diagnosed in the Pre-PSA Era: The Prognostic.
Volume 70, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages (September 2018)
Volume 75, Issue 3, Pages (March 2019)
Sergio Bracarda  European Urology Supplements 
European Urology is “Your” Journal
Volume 68, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 74, Issue 6, Pages (December 2018)
European Urology Oncology
Volume 52, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Prognostic Impact of Immune Microenvironment in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma  Kyuichi Kadota, MD, PhD, Jun-ichi Nitadori, MD, PhD, Hideki Ujiie, MD, Daniel.
European Association of Urology Guidelines for Systemic Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: What is Recommended and Why?  Jean-Jacques Patard 
J.J. Keller, M.-C. Tsai, C.-C. Lin, Y.-C. Lin, H.-C. Lin 
Joaquim Bellmunt  European Urology Supplements 
European Urology Oncology
Volume 76, Issue 1, Pages (July 2019)
Jan Roigas  European Urology Supplements 
European Urology Oncology
Volume 51, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Figure 2. Forest plot of multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression illustrating the impact of chemoradiation ... Figure 2. Forest plot of multivariable.
Sequencing and Combination of Systemic Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma  Guillermo de Velasco, Axel Bex, Laurence Albiges, Thomas Powles, Brian.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages 358-364 (August 2016) Change in Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio in Response to Targeted Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma as a Prognosticator and Biomarker of Efficacy  Arnoud J. Templeton, Jennifer J. Knox, Xun Lin, Ronit Simantov, Wanling Xie, Nicola Lawrence, Reuben Broom, André P. Fay, Brian Rini, Frede Donskov, Georg A. Bjarnason, Martin Smoragiewicz, Christian Kollmannsberger, Ravindran Kanesvaran, Nimira Alimohamed, Thomas Hermanns, J. Connor Wells, Eitan Amir, Toni K. Choueiri, Daniel Y.C. Heng  European Urology  Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages 358-364 (August 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.033 Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Estimated 1-yr and 2-yr survival rate from univariate Cox regression based on the continuous neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR; on the natural logarithmic scale). (A) International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium cohort. (B) Validation cohort. European Urology 2016 70, 358-364DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.033) Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Impact of change in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at wk 6 (±2 wk) on (A) overall survival, (B) progression-free survival, and (C) response. Hazard ratios or odds ratios were estimated from multivariable Cox or logistic regression adjusted for baseline LN (NLR) values and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk factors. Overall survival and progression-free survival were calculated from wk 8; “no change” in NLR (defined as –25% to +25%) was used as the reference group in the comparison. Left panels: International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium cohort; right panels: validation cohort. CI=confidence interval; ORR=objective response rate; OS=overall survival; PFS=progression free survival. European Urology 2016 70, 358-364DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.033) Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions