IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Report on the activities of the Digital Soil Mapping Working Group Endre Dobos.
Advertisements

Chemicals in the context of the Water Information System for Europe (WISE) Bo N Jacobsen EEA Chemicals and Water workshop 6-7 December 2010, EEA, Copenhagen.
Improving monitoring campaigns : A case study Dissemination Workshop on Evaluating Source Control Options for Reducing Emissions of Priority Pollutants.
Source control of priority substances in Europe EU-project within the sixth framework program John Munthe IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute.
The ScorePP Priority Pollutant Reduction Information System (PPRIS) ScorePP International Dissemination Workshop, Wednesday 03 February 2010.
Chemicals and Water A European Environment Agency (EEA) perspective Rob Collins Water Group EEA.
Overview of WFD key issues and research needs in Europe Activity leaders: NL and ES Marc de Rooy, RIZA, NL Jornadas sobre la Aplicación de la Directiva.
Final Conference June Maastricht, The Netherlands 1 Case Study: Kłodnica catchment, (Odra river basin) Poland Janusz Krupanek Institut for Ecology.
Compilation of emission inventories The situation in the Netherlands Special Session of the UNCEEA on Climate Change (New York, 25 June afternoon)
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
European Commission - DG Environment Unit D.2: Water & Marine 1 Pau-Plenary Session 14 may 2008 Pau-Plenary Session 14 may 2008 CMA developments and state.
Source control of priority substances in Europe EU-project within the sixth framework program John Munthe IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute.
Final Conference June Maastricht, The Netherlands 1 Case Study : River Vantaa Matti Verta,Tuomas Mattila, Jukka Mehtonen, Kimmo Silvo, Jaakko Mannio,
Developing PRTR Systems in Europe : EPER, E-PRTR and the PRTR Protocol Magda Tóth Nagy Public Participation Programme October 15, 2007.
COHIBA preliminary results for implementation HELCOM BSAP Ms. Eva Brorström-Lundén, IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute 32rd Meeting of the Helsinki.
Part-financed by the European Union. Control of hazardous substances in the Baltic Sea region - COHIBA Sept 2010 Frank Marscheider-Weidemann Slides prepared.
Rob Collins Water Group EEA Hazardous Substances in Europe’s fresh and marine waters – An overview Report for publication – 1 st half of 2011 Rob Collins.
Ecologic.de Public Participation- Key element of EU Water Policy Nicole Kranz Ecologic - Institute for International and European Environmental Policy.
Water.europa.eu Draft mandate WGE Chemical Status WG E Priority Substances 8-9 October 2009 Jorge Rodriguez Romero Madalina David DG Environment, European.
Source control of priority substances in Europe EU-project within the sixth framework program John Munthe IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute.
Health and Food Safety EU strategy for Pharmaceuticals in the Environment Patrizia Tosetti DG SANTE European Commission China/EU Pharmaceutical Industry.
SOCOPSE WP5 Brussels Case North Baltic Sea Region Vantaa River catchment.
SOCOPSE Final Conference Maastricht, June 2009 Prof.Dr.Damià Barceló, Paula Guerra, Dr. Ethel Eljarrat IDAEA-CSIC, Spain. WP5: Case Studies Ter and Llobregat.
Participation as a Pivotal Element R. Andreas Kraemer & Nicole Kranz
Environmental Intelligence Platform – Monitoring Nutrients Pollution with Earth Observation Data for Sustainable Agriculture and Clean Waters Blue.
The French National Agency on Water and Aquatic Environments
Principles and Key Issues
Project Briefing for WG/E Brussels 15/03/10
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Project Presentation Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator: BRGM (Fr)
4th Expert E-PRTR Group Meeting Brussels, 4 February 2011
Support in the implementation of the REFIT actions for ELD phase 2
Indepth assessment economic analysis progress report SCG meeting May 2008 Maria Brättemark, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European Commission.
In a circular economy, almost nothing is wasted
Diffuse Sources of Water Pollution
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
BRIDGE WP5 Socio-Economic Assessment of Groundwater Threshold Values
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
: a FP6 project SOCOPSE: Source control of priority substances in Europe Participating organisations: IVL Swedish Environmental Research.
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
Inventory preparation for priority substances
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
Antton Keto, Finland Working session December 21 of 2005
Preliminary feedback on analysis of Article V reports
Expert Advisory Forum on priority substances
CIS progress June-November 2011: main highlights
Diffuse Sources of Water Pollution
- Priority Substances - Strategic Coordination Group
Background document: How to build the Inventory of Emissions, Discharges and Losses: main elements and compilation of existing datasets (2007) DG on inventory.
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Summary of BRIDGE achievements Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator:
WFD, Common Implementation Strategy  Water Scarcity and Droughts Expert Group Madrid, February 17, 2010.
Control of hazardous substances in the Baltic Sea region - COHIBA
Overview of environmental monitoring at EU and regional level
Fitness Check EU Water Policy
Pilot River Basin Water Framework Directive.
Environmental objective document –
Part I.
WG E on Priority Substances
Preparation of the second RBMP in Romania
THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (WFD)
Water Science-Policy Interface (CIS-SPI) Progress report
State of the Environment reporting Agenda 5.
Draft CIS work programme
Introduction- Link with WG E activity CMEP PLENARY MEETING-GEEL
Benoît FRIBOURG-BLANC, IOW
NORMAN 6th FP - Proposal n°: Priority
Chemical Monitoring Activity Final Draft Guidance Document on Chemical Monitoring of Surface Water Peter Lepom.
Scientific Support to Policies
Research on Climate Change on Water, including Natural Hazards Contribution to SSG discussions and science-policy interfacing Philippe QUEVAUVILLER European.
Andrea Tilche Unit Head of the Water Key Action
Presentation transcript:

IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Source control of priority substances in Europe EU-project within the sixth framework program John Munthe IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute www.socopse.eu

Environmental Institute (EI), Slovakia University of Southampton, School of Civil Engineering & the Environment (SOTON), United Kingdom Kiwa N.V. Netherlands Vyskumny Ustav Vodneho Hospodarstva (WRI), Slovakia Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Finland Instityt Ekologii Terenow Uprzemyslowionych (IETU/Envitech), Poland Norsk institutt for luftforskning (NILU), Norway Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientifi cas (CSIC), Spain Institut National de l´Environment Industriel et des Risques (INERIS), France Nederlands Organisatie Voor Toegepast Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek (TNO), The Netherlands IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Ltd (IVL), Sweden

Project objective to provide guidelines and decision support system tools for the implementation of the WFD with regard to selected priority substances

Industry, application and release patterns Primary Producer A Secondary Producer B Secondary Producer C Application 1 Application 2 Application 3 Soil WWTP Conversion Adsorption Bio- accumulation Diffuse releases Production chain End use Aqueous Environment product wastewater air

Final evaluation and report Project organisation Coordination WP 1 WP 2 Material Flow Analyses WP 3 Management, Technologies WP 4 Decision Support System WP 5 Case Studies Final evaluation and report SAG WP 6 Dissemination and stakeholder interactions

Work flow Material flow analysis European scale Draft Decision Support System Substance reports Control technologies Case studies Final Decision Support System Final Report and Synthesis Web site DSS, synthesis

WP3: Management, control technologies A comprehensive inventory of technical emission reduction options, including process-oriented options, substitution, and end-of-pipe techniques. Provide basis for an emission reduction strategy Based on traditional literature studies as well as information gathered from surveys and interviews with key stakeholders. Three workshops with industry have been performed in different parts of Europe to further collect information and receive comments on the draft reports

WP 4: Decision support system (DSS) Objective: to develop a DSS including supporting tools for management of PS in order to asses the effectiveness of various measures or combinations of measures, and to make the right selection of measures The DSS will primarily be developed for authorities to make plans for the control of the PS at both European and national or river basin level

Decision support system (DSS) The SOCOPSE Decision support system (DSS) Current: Step by step guidelines (handbook) for implementation of WFD on PPs Planned: Web based DSS + information handling (databases and reports)

Step 1 Problem definition

Step by step guidelines for implementation of WFD on PPs

.........Step 6 Select solution/ management options

Decision support system handbook Draft version used in case studies Available on www.socopse.eu (comments are welcome)

WP2: Material Flow Analysis General: The main objective of WP2 is to describe the main flow-paths and releases of selected Priority Substances (PSs) to European waters The information on flow-paths and releases of PSs is crucial for the development of the Decision Support System (DSS), the main product of the SOCOPSE project because it describes current state of contamination of European waters by various PSs SOCOPSe-wp2.ppt

MFA diagram for Hg in Europe in 2000 (numbers in tonnes/year)

MFA diagram for Cd in Europe in 2000

MFA diagram for HCB in Europe in 2000

MFA diagram for Penta BDE in Europe in 2000

MFA diagram for Deca BDE in Europe in 2000

MFA diagram for TBT in Europe in 2000

MFA diagram for DEHP in Europe in 1997

MFA diagram for atrazine in Europe in 2000 Atrazine production Air Water Land Sewage effluents Field Application ? 1 109 6.1 401 Sediments

MFA diagram for isoproturon in Europe in 2000 Isoproturon production Air Water Land Sewage effluents Field Application ? 9 352 24 2 614 Sediments

MFA diagram for 5 PAHs in Europe Benzo(a)pyrene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene, Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene, Benzo(a)pyrene

Data sources The European Pollution Emission Register EPER (http://eper.eea.europa.eu/eper/) (e.g. TBT, PAH) 50 subst to 92 i PRTR (diffuse emissions, soils) EU technical guidance documents (TGD) EU risk assessment reports (http://ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/esis/) (e.g. PBDE, DEHP, NP)

Data sources Scientific papers Databases National products registers (e.g. Hg, HCB, PBDE) Databases "Air Database" (www.ivl.se) HSDB – Hazardous Substance Data Bank (http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/htmlgen?HSDB) (e.g. PBDE) National products registers e.g. Swedish Chemical Agency (www.kemi.se) (e.g. TBT)

WP 5: Case studies Leader: IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Objective: To evaluate the decision support tool by applying it to 5 case studies in different geographical regions and to integrate results and experiences to European scale

Case study areas The five case studies which represent different geographical regions of Europe as well as different scales The five cases have different characteristics in terms of pollution sources and degree of contamination of priority substances.

Case studies -substances Vantaa River, Finland: PBDE, Nonylphenol, DEHP, PAH, TBT (TPhT) Kłodnica River, Poland: Mercury, Cadmium, PAH Meuse, NL, Fr, Lu, Be, D: PBDE, Hg, Cd, PAH, Pesticides Ter and Llobregat Rivers, Spain: PBDE, Nonylphenol, Pesticides Danube river, Vah subcatchment: PAH, Hg, Cd, NP, DEHP, TBT

Plans for final year Complete case studies (early 2009) Based on results: - Update emissions database - Update reports on control options - Finalise DSS handbook Synthesis (first half of 2009). Aim to provide guidelines for implementation of the WFD on Water District and European scale Final conference/workshop: June 23-24, 2009

Final products of SOCOPSE Substance Flow Analysis (SFA). Report on main flowpaths and emissions of the selected substances in Europe. Draft version used in case studies to identify sources. Will be updated spring 2009. Database for identification on potential sources, emission factors (if available) Substance reports. Compilations of methods (efficiency, cost) to reduce releases of PS (including end of pipe, substitution etc). Emission reduction strategy report. Report where management options are ranked for different PPs and sources, based on efficiency and cost.

Final products of SOCOPSE Decision support system (DSS). Report (handbook) with stepwise procedures to fulfil WFD requirements for River Basin Management Plans. Brief report + appendices. Final draft available. Web based DSS. A web version of the DSS will be available towards the end of the project.

Final products of SOCOPSE Case study reports. 1 report for each case study with all steps taken in applying the DSS, evaluation of DSS, problems encountered and solutions found. Also how to use SFA, Substance reports etc.

Final products of SOCOPSE Synthesis report. Very short summary of results. Synthesis of experiences from case studies + implications for WFD and other policies on PPs. Aimed at several levels i.e. WFD managers and european policy-makers. Recommendations for future develelopment of the WFD, common topics for WFD, REACH, IPCC etc.

Synthesis report topics General lack of monitoring data to assess water quality: Combination of SFA and models can be used to identify potential sources, pathways, concentration ranges and suitable monitoring sites.

Synthesis report topics PS not always a priority, all data < EQS or lack of data (no awareness of problem?) Emerging substances will be a problem? The DSS can be used for emerging substances.

Synthesis report topics Diffuse sources important in many locations - Atmospheric deposition - Contaminated sites - Agriculture - Households and small industries: waste water (more or less treatment) For a long term view on PS and chemicals in general, a broad perspective is needed. Also links to other policies. Non technical measures, socio-economic perspective on use of chemicals in products, industry, households.

Synthesis topics Science-policy interface problem. Data, models, experience available but not used in RBMPs. Institutional structure – WFD is a new structure

Meetings, dissemination etc WG E meeting, March 18-19, Brussels. Presentation of results, preliminary synthesis SETAC conference Gothenburg June 1-4. Joint session with ScorePP SOCOPSE conference. Maastricht June 24-25. First announcement + draft agenda available.

Contacts: john.munthe@ivl.se www.socopse.eu