ATMOSPHERE Trial design: Patients with symptomatic heart failure were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to either aliskiren 300 mg once daily, enalapril 5.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CONSENSUS: Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study Purpose To determine whether the ACE inhibitor enalapril reduces mortality in patients.
Advertisements

Efficacy and safety of angiotensin receptor blockers: a meta-analysis of randomized trials Elgendy IY et al. Am J Hypertens. 2014; doi:10,1093/ajh/hpu209.
SOLVD (Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction)
COURAGE: Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation Purpose To compare the efficacy of optimal medical therapy (OMT)
ATLAS Clinical Trial Commentary Dr Eric Topol Chairman and Professor, Department of Cardiology Director of the Joseph J Jacobs Center for Thrombosis and.
CHARM-Alternative: Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity - Alternative Purpose To determine whether the angiotensin.
CHARM-Preserved: Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity - Preserved Purpose To determine whether the angiotensin.
Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled trial.
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
WOSCOPS: West Of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Purpose To determine whether pravastatin reduces combined incidence of nonfatal MI and death due to.
Study Design Scirica BM, Bhatt DL Braunwald et al, Sexagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med
BEST: Beta-blocker Evaluation Survival Trial Purpose To determine whether the β-blocker bucindolol reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced.
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study Purpose To evaluate whether the long-acting ACE inhibitor ramipril and/or vitamin E reduce the incidence.
The Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial ONTARGET.
Background There are 12 different types of medications to lower blood sugar levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. It is widely agreed upon that metformin.
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents FDA-Mandated CV Safety Trials 1.
NSTE Acute Coronary Syndromes
OVERTURE FDA Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting July 19, 2002 Milton Packer, M.D., FACC Columbia University College of Physicians.
Candesartan in Heart Failure Presented at European Society of Cardiology 2003 CHARM Trial.
COPERNICUS: Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival trial Purpose To assess the effect of carvedilol, a β 1 -, β 2 - and α 1 -receptor blocker,
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
(p for noninferiority = 0.01)
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
IRIS Trial design: Patients without diabetes with a history of stroke or TIA within 6 months, with objective evidence of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR value.
LEADER trial: Primary Outcome
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study
SOCRATES Trial design: Patients with acute ischemic stroke were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either ticagrelor 180 mg load + 90 mg BID or aspirin.
Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial Investigators
RE-CIRCUIT Trial design: Patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation were randomized to uninterrupted dabigatran 150 mg twice daily.
(p < for group 1 or 2 vs. group 3)
SAVE Trial design: Patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and known CV disease were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either CPAP.
GAUSS-3 Trial design: Patients with objective evidence of intolerance to statin agents were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to either evolocumab 420 mg subcutaneously.
BENEFIT Trial design: Patients with positive serologic tests for T. Cruzi and cardiomyopathy were randomized to benznidazole 300 mg daily for days.
EUCLID Trial design: Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) were randomized to ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily (n = 6,930) vs. clopidogrel 75 mg.
AARDVARK Trial design: Patients with small abdominal aortic aneuryms (AAAs) were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to either perindopril 10 mg once daily,
Angiography-guided PCI
BBK II Trial design: Patients undergoing a two-stent approach for a de novo bifurcation lesion were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either culotte stenting.
(pnoninferiority < )
EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial design: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) at high risk for CV events were randomized to receive in a 1:1:1 fashion either.
Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS I)
EXCEL Trial design: Patients with unprotected left main disease were randomized to either PCI with an Xience everolimus-eluting stent (EES) or CABG. They.
PARTNER 2A Trial design: Intermediate-risk patients with aortic stenosis (STS PROM score 4-8%) were randomized to undergo either TAVR or SAVR, stratified.
PARADIGM-HF Trial design: Participants with NYHA class II-IV and LVEF ≤40% were randomized to LCZ mg twice daily (n = 4,187) vs. enalapril 10 mg.
PRECISION Trial design: Patients with arthritis and increased cardiovascular risk were randomized to celecoxib 100 mg twice daily (n = 8,072) vs. ibuprofen.
ALPS Trial design: Patients with adult nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) and persistent or recurrent VT/VF after ≥1 shock were randomized.
SIGNIFY Trial design: Participants with stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure and resting heart rate >70 bpm were randomized to.
TUXEDO–India Trial design: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) and coronary artery disease undergoing PCI were randomized to receive Taxus Element.
Modified Rankin score 0-2
SUSTAIN-6 Trial design: Patients with DM2 at high risk for CV events were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 fashion to either semaglutide 0.5 mg, semaglutide 1 mg,
BAT for HFrEF Trial design: Patients with chronic systolic HF were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either baroreceptor activation therapy (BAT) or control.
Embargoed until 10:45 a.m. CT/11:45 a.m. ET Sunday, Nov. 11, 2018
RIDDLE-NSTEMI Trial design: Patients with NSTEMI were randomized to either immediate (within 2 hours) intervention or delayed (within 72 hours) intervention.
(p = 0.32 for noninferiority)
AMACING Trial design: Patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing intravascular iodinated contrast administration were randomized to prophylactic hydration.
BRAVO-3 Trial design: Patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to bivalirudin or UFH. They were followed for 30 days. Results.
Ezetimibe/simvastatin
OSLER Trial design: Patients from five phase 2 trials and seven phase 3 trials with evolocumab were invited to participate in the OSLER extension program,
(p for noninferiority < 0.001)
ACCELERATE Trial design: Patients at high vascular risk were randomized to either evacetrapib 130 mg daily or placebo. They were followed for 30 months.
CHAMPION Trial design: Patients with recent hospitalization for heart failure were implanted with a pulmonary artery pressure monitor and randomized so.
HOPE-3 Trial design: Patients without known cardiovascular disease, and with an intermediate risk of cardiovascular events, were randomized in a 2 x 2.
ITALIC Trial design: Patients with Xience V (everolimus-eluting stent) PCI were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive 6 or 24 months of dual antiplatelet.
TRUE-AHF Trial design: Patients with acute decompensated heart failure were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either early ularitide infusion (within 12 hours)
STOP-CHAGAS Trial design: Asymptomatic patients with serological evidence of T. cruzi were randomized to posaconazole 400 mg BID, benznidazole 200 mg BID,
DANAMI 3-DEFER Trial design: Patients presenting with STEMI and in whom the operators could establish TIMI 2-3 flow without stenting or those presenting.
Primary safety endpoint
MOMENTUM 3 Trial design: Patients with advanced heart failure were randomized to a centrifugal-flow pump (n = 152) vs. an axial-flow pump (n = 142). Results.
(p for noninferiority = 0.01)
EMPA-REG OUTCOME: Cumulative incidence of the primary outcome
CIRCUS Trial design: Patients with anterior STEMI were randomized to IV cyclosporine 2.5 mg/kg (n = 475) vs. placebo (n = 495) immediately before coronary.
Presentation transcript:

ATMOSPHERE Trial design: Patients with symptomatic heart failure were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to either aliskiren 300 mg once daily, enalapril 5 or 10 mg twice daily, or enalapril 5 or 10 mg twice daily + aliskiren 300 mg daily. They were followed for 36.6 months. (psuperiority = 0.17)* Results Primary outcome, CV death/CHF hospitalization for aliskiren + enalapril vs. enalapril: 32.9% vs. 34.6%, HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.85-1.03; p = 0.17 for superiority For aliskiren vs. enalapril: 33.8% vs. 34.6%, HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.90-1.10; p = 0.91 for superiority; p = 0.018 for noninferiority Hyperkalemia >6 mmol/L: 5.0% vs. 3.0% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.02 and 0.29, respectively 100 (psuperiority = 0.91)** 50 % 32.9 33.8 34.6 Conclusions Aliskiren is not superior to enalapril either as monotherapy or as combination therapy in patients with CHF; it also did not meet criteria for noninferiority There is a higher incidence of side effects with aliskiren including hypotension and hyperkalemia Primary endpoint Aliskiren + enalapril (n = 2,340) Aliskiren (n = 2,340) Enalapril (n = 2,336) * Aliskiren + enalapril vs. enalapril ** aliskiren vs. enalapril McMurray J, et al. N Engl J Med 2016;374:1521-32