CRaTER-specific LRO Mission Duration Issues

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Automatic prediction of SEP events and the first hours of their proton fluxes with E > 10 MeV and E > 100 MeV Marlon Núñez Universidad de Málaga, Spain.
Advertisements

M.E. Wiedenbeck, JPL/Caltech Thanks to: the ACE/ULEIS &SIS Teams and the STEREO/LET, SIT, & SEPT Teams 9 June 20101ACE/SOHO/STEREO/Wind Workshop.
Solar System Science Flares and Solar Energetic Particles Terrestrial Gamma-Ray Flashes Cosmic-ray interactions with Earth, Sun, Moon, etc. Plans: Optimization.
GIOVE-A 3 rd Euro Space Weather Meeting, Nov 2006 ©SSTL/University of Surrey GIOVE-A Radiation Environment Study Regime and Instrument Description.
Minimum of Solar Cycle # 23 and beginning of Solar Cycle#24 Florian Nichitiu, UofT, may May 2008 At present,
Cosmic rays in solar system By: Tiva Sharifi. Cosmic ray The earth atmosphere is bombarded with the energetic particles originating from the outer space.
An analysis of the 23 rd Solar Cycle’s High Speed Solar Wind Streams activity: sources of radiation hazards in Geospace Space Weather Effects on Humans:
Effects of Solar Energetic Particle Events on the Martian Surface and Atmosphere F Leblanc, DA Brain, JG Luhmann, GT Delory, RA Mewaldt, CM Cohen 2004.
What are the Forms of Hazardous Radiation? Stanley B. Curtis Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, ret. & Dept. of Environmental Health University of.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology A New JPL Interplanetary Solar High- Energy.
GEANT-4, Spenvis Users Meeting, 6-9 Nov, 2006 Interplanetary Proton Cumulative Fluence Model Update A.Glover 1,2, A. Hilgers 1,3, L. Rosenqvist 1,4, H.
Constraints on Particle Acceleration from Interplanetary Observations R. P. Lin together with L. Wang, S. Krucker at UC Berkeley, G Mason at U. Maryland,
STEREO IMPACT Critical Design Review 2002 November 20,21,22 1 LET Performance Requirements Presenter: Richard Mewaldt
Analyses of Rainfall Hydrology and Water Resources RG744
March 2006TAAPT conference Long Term Analysis of 20 MHz Solar Radio Events P. Mason, M. Villarreal, Dr. C. Higgins MTSU Department of Physics and Astronomy.
Radiation conditions during the GAMMA-400 observations:
Ground Level Enhancement of May 17, 2012 Observed at South Pole SH21A-2183 Takao Kuwabara 1,3 ; John Bieber 1 ; John Clem 1,3 ; Paul Evenson 1,3 ; Tom.
System for Radiation Environment characterization (fluxes, doses, dose equivalents at Earth, Moon and Mars) on hourly thru yearly time frame Example: Snapshots.
Ultimate Spectrum of Solar/Stellar Cosmic Rays Alexei Struminsky Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia.
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDIZATION ORGANIZATION TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION Space Environment (Natural and Artificial) Probabilistic model of fluences and.
2001 Mars Odyssey GRS RDS 1 HEND Workshop 2002 May 20 th – 22 nd 2002 Mars Odyssey Gamma-Ray Spectrometer Richard Starr NASA/GSFC – Catholic University.
Monte-Carlo simulations of shock acceleration of solar energetic particles in self-generated turbulence Rami Vainio Dept of Physical Sciences, University.
GCR Primaries (See Wilson et al. poster for latest CRaTER proton albedo map) RELATIVE CONTRIBUTIONS OF GALACTIC COSMIC RAYS AND LUNAR PARTICLE ALBEDO TO.
Catia Grimani University of Urbino – INFN Florence Italy In collaboration with: M. Fabi, N. Finetti, M. Laurenza, M. Storini ECRS 2012 Moskow July 5th.
Yihua Zheng Solar Energetic Particles (SEPs) Goals: identify SEPs in data, connect to drivers, identify characteristics of SEPs June 2, 2015SW REDI Boot.
GOES fluence in Å and Å (1 min data) GOES fluence in Å and Å (1 min data) Areas in black correspond to times with the data missing.
M. Kim and F. Cucinotta Example Solar Proton Event Data NASA JSC August 30, 2006.
Long-term prediction of solar extreme events basing on the general regularities of energetic particle generation by the Sun by Rikho Nymmik Skobeltsyn.
Ground level enhancement of the solar cosmic rays on January 20, A.V. Belov (a), E.A. Eroshenko (a), H. Mavromichalaki (b), C. Plainaki(b), V.G.
ESP Solar Flare Model The Problem The ESP Model of Solar Protons 11 Year Average Proton Flux Tom Diehl 06/30/2004.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation (CRaTER): Science Overview Harlan E. Spence, Principal.
Florian Nichitiu a,*, James R. Drummond a, Jiansheng Zou a, Robert Deschambault b a) Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Canada,60 St. George.
ESP & Psychic Solar Flare Models
UPDATE OF THE ESP MODEL FOR SOLAR PROTON RISK ASSESSMENT* M.A. Xapsos 1, C. Stauffer 2, G.B. Gee 2, J.L. Barth 1, E.G. Stassinopoulos 1 and R.E. McGuire.
Probability. Hydrologic data series 1.Complete series Use all of the data. DateDepth (cm) 4/28/ /20/ /30/ /11/ /5/ /22/050.3.
RHESSI Observation of Atmospheric Gamma Rays from Impact of Solar Energetic Particles on 21 April 2002.
Athens University – Faculty of Physics Section of Nuclear and Particle Physics Athens Neutron Monitor Station Study of the ground level enhancement of.
Solar and Cosmic Ray Energetic Particle Models : Space Weather Aspects
CRaTER TIM April 2005 Proj. Sci. Justin Kasper (MIT) Galactic Cosmic Rays and Solar Flares Justin Kasper (MIT) CRaTER Project Scientist LRO/CRaTER TIM.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, April 2015 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS NOAA: Space Weather Overview Presented.
Probabilistic Solar Energetic Particle Models James H. Adams, Jr.1, William F. Dietrich 2 and Michael.A.Xapsos 3 1 NASA Marshall Space Flight Center 2.
Analyses of Rainfall Hydrology and Water Resources RG744 Institute of Space Technology October 09, 2015.
GOES Data Status Mutual Benefits of NASA THEMIS and NOAA GOES
Paul Evenson University of Delaware
Elemental Abundance variations of the Suprathermal Heavy Ion Population over solar cycle 23 M. Al Dayeh, J.R. Dwyer, H.K. Rassoul Florida Institute of.
GROUND-LEVEL EVENT (GLE)
- Feedback from ATV missions Ph. Yaya, L. Hecker
Paul Evenson University of Delaware
Mewaldt et al. (2001, 2007) fluence spectra from ACE data compiled for
Pradiphat (ฝุ่น) Muangha2 David J Ruffolo2
Marlon Núñez and David A. Núñez Universidad de Málaga
Early Alert of Solar Radiation Hazard
Development of a GLE Alarm System Based Upon Neutron Monitors
THEMIS and Space Weather
Energetic Particle Fluences from Solar Wind to Cosmic Ray Energies
Geomagnetic activity indicates large amplitude for sunspot cycle 24
Spacecraft Anomaly Analysis and Prediction System – SAAPS
Earth-Moon-Mars Radiation Environment Model
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter CRaTER Critical Design Review
Flood Frequency Analysis
N. P. Meredith1, R. B. Horne1, I. Sandberg2,3,
Ulysses COSPIN High Energy Telescope observations of cosmic ray and solar energetic particles intensities since its distant Jupiter flyby in 2004 R.B.
CRaTER Science Requirements
CRaTER Science Requirements
SMALL SEP EVENTS WITH METRIC TYPE II RADIO BURSTS
Detection of Solar Neutrons and Protons by the ground level detectors
Simulation of 14C production rates for the troposphere and stratosphere in weak geomagnetic intensity at 26,000 yr BP 1 Graduate School of Science and.
On the relative role of drift and convection-diffusion effects in the long-term CR variations on the basis of NM and satellite data Lev Dorman (1, 2) Israel.
Relating Mars Observations with Earth Observations Odyssey/GOES Energetic Particle Data Comparison ( ) Ron Turner, John Starcher, Matt Rudy.
Solar Energetic Particle Spectral Breaks
Presentation transcript:

CRaTER-specific LRO Mission Duration Issues CRaTER measures effect of galactic cosmic rays (GCR) and solar energetic protons (SEP) – prime CRaTER targets are infrequent, large SEP events GCR flux is low-level but continuous and has weak solar cycle dependence – longer mission linearly improves signal-to-noise ratio and hence LET spectrum, the prime CRaTER data product Intense SEPs (>10 MeV p+) are episodic and approximately follow the solar cycle – phasing of LRO launch during rising phase minimizes(!) chance of large SEPs; longer mission duration – or later launch – substantially increases probability of largest events

SEP event occurrence varies with the solar cycle in anti-phase with weaker galactic cosmic ray fluxes (plot courtesy R. Mewaldt, Cal Tech) SEP events At solar minimum: Min SEP occurrence Max GCR flux GCR Solar Minimum

LRO Launch: Currently Predicted for Rising Phase Of Cycle 24

Mapped to Previous Two Solar Cycles Cycle 24 Cycle 23 Cycle 22 LRO Mission Timeline: Mapped to Previous Two Solar Cycles Cycle 24 Cycle 23 Cycle 22 October 2008  June 1998  January 1988 October 2009  June 1999  January 1989 LRO Launch – rising phase of Cycle 24 Previous Solar Min Next Solar Min Δt Δt One year 2010 Hathaway, Wilson, and Reichmann J. Geophys. Res. 104, 22,375-22,388 (1999)] http://science.msfc.nasa.gov/ssl/pad/solar/predict.htm

Probability of Large SEP Events During LRO: Survey of Previous Two Solar Cycle’s Energetic Proton Events – 1987 to 2003 Event definition used: - Event onset: flux exceeds a threshold for 3 consecutive 5-min average points - Event end: flux remains below threshold for 6 hours Threshold Values: - 10 pfu (1/(cm2 s sr)) for >10 MeV protons 5 pfu for >50 MeV protons - 1 pfu for >100 MeV protons

Satellites used: - GOES 7: 1987 - 1995 GOES 8: 1995 – 2002 GOES 10: 1998 – 2003 GOES 11: 2003 Priority for satellites: GOES 8, GOES 11, GOES 10 Total number of events: >10 MeV: 153 >50 MeV: 56 >100 MeV: 53

>10 MeV Events With Flux Exceeding 10 pfu Annual Fluence (*) (cm2 sr)-1 ~5 – 7 “during” LRO Mission in Cycles 22 and 23 Number of Events (*) Caution: Units aren’t quite right!

>50 MeV Events With Flux Exceeding 5 pfu Annual Fluence (cm2 sr)-1 ~0 - 4“ during” LRO Mission in Cycles 22 and 23 Number of Events

>100 MeV Events With Flux Exceeding 1 pfu Annual Fluence (cm2 sr)-1 ~0 – 3 “during” LRO Mission in Cycles 22 and 23 Number of Events

Estimated Range of Number of Events as a Function of Mission Duration (assuming an October 2008 LRO launch; ranges based on Cycles 22/23) Mission Duration (months) >10 MeV Event Class >50 MeV >100 MeV 9 4-6 0-4 0-3 12 5-7 15 8-10 3-4 3 18 10-16 3-6 24 15-24 5-10 36 39-55 13-23 13-21 12-month mission may yield NO large events! 18-month mission provides higher confidence of seeing at least a few large events Multi-year mission extended into solar maximum assures excellent coverage of even large events