Black Box Software Testing 2004 Academic Edition

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Black Box Software Testing Copyright © Cem Kaner & James Bach 1 Black Box Software Testing Spring 2005 Part 4 -- QUALITY COST ANALYSIS by Cem Kaner,
Advertisements

Black Box Software Testing Copyright © 2003 Cem Kaner & James Bach 1 Black Box Software Testing Fall 2004 PART PAIRED EXPLORATORY TESTING by Cem.
Black Box Software Testing Copyright © 2003 Cem Kaner & James Bach 1 Black Box Software Testing Fall 2004 Part METRICS & MEASUREMENT THEORY by Cem.
Black Box Software Testing Copyright © 2003 Cem Kaner & James Bach 1 Black Box Software Testing Fall 2004 Part RECRUITING TESTERS by Cem Kaner, J.D.,
Copyright (c) Cem Kaner. All Rights Reserved. 1 Black Box Software Testing (Academic Course – Fall 2001) Cem Kaner, J.D., Ph.D. Professor of.
Black Box Software Testing Copyright © 2003 Cem Kaner & James Bach 1 Black Box Software Testing Fall 2004 Part Exercises by Cem Kaner, J.D., Ph.D.
Copyright (c) Cem Kaner. All Rights Reserved. 1 Black Box Software Testing (Professional Seminar) Cem Kaner, J.D., Ph.D. Professor of Computer.
Copyright (c) Cem Kaner. All Rights Reserved. 1 Black Box Software Testing (Professional Seminar) Cem Kaner, J.D., Ph.D. Professor of Computer.
Simulink SubSystems and Masking April 22, Copyright , Andy Packard. This work is licensed under the.
Black Box Software Testing Copyright © 2003 Cem Kaner & James Bach 1 Black Box Software Testing 2004 Academic Edition PART SCRIPTING: AN INDUSTRY.
Black Box Software Testing Copyright © Cem Kaner & James Bach 1 Black Box Software Testing Fall 2005 Overview—Part 2 (Mission of Testing) Cem Kaner,
Black Box Software Testing Copyright © 2003 Cem Kaner & James Bach 1 Black Box Software Testing Fall 2004 PART USER TESTING by Cem Kaner, J.D., Ph.D.
Black Box Software Testing Copyright © 2003 Cem Kaner & James Bach 1 Black Box Software Testing Spring 2005 PART 7 -- FUNCTION TESTING by Cem Kaner, J.D.,
Black Box Software Testing Copyright © Cem Kaner & James Bach 1 Black Box Software Testing Fall 2005 Overview for Students Cem Kaner, J.D., Ph.D.
Computer Aided Design By Brian Nettleton This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No Any opinions,
Black Box Software Testing Copyright © Cem Kaner & James Bach 1 Black Box Software Testing Fall 2005 Overview—Part 3 (Test oracles) Cem Kaner,
Black Box Software Testing Copyright © 2003 Cem Kaner & James Bach 1 Black Box Software Testing Fall 2004 PART 7 -- TEST DESIGN by Cem Kaner, J.D., Ph.D.
Black Box Software Testing Copyright © 2003 Cem Kaner & James Bach 1 Black Box Software Testing Fall 2004 PART 6 -- SCENARIO TESTING by Cem Kaner, J.D.,
Script Files UC Berkeley Fall 2004, E77 Copyright 2005, Andy Packard. This work is licensed under the Creative.
Black Box Software Testing Copyright © 2003 Cem Kaner & James Bach 1 Black Box Software Testing Fall 2004 PART STOCHASTIC TESTING by Cem Kaner, J.D.,
Black Box Software Testing Copyright © 2003 Cem Kaner & James Bach 1 Black Box Software Testing 2004 Academic Edition Part EDITING BUGS by Cem Kaner,
Session # Rational User Conference 2002 Author Note: To edit Session # go to: View/Master/Title Master ©1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 Rational Software.
Copyright (c) Cem Kaner. All Rights Reserved. 1 Black Box Software Testing (Professional Seminar) Cem Kaner, J.D., Ph.D. Professor of Computer.
Copyright (c) Cem Kaner. All Rights Reserved. 1 Black Box Software Testing (Professional Seminar) Cem Kaner, J.D., Ph.D. Professor of Computer.
Copyright (c) Cem Kaner Black Box Software Testing (Academic Course - Fall 2001) Cem Kaner, J.D., Ph.D. Florida Institute of Technology Section:
Black Box Software Testing Copyright © 2003 Cem Kaner & James Bach 1 Black Box Software Testing Fall 2004 PART REGRESSION TESTING by Cem Kaner, J.D.,
Leader Interviews Name, PhD Title, Organization University This project is funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under award numbers ANT
Copyright (c) Cem Kaner. All Rights Reserved. 1 Black Box Software Testing (Professional Seminar) Cem Kaner, J.D., Ph.D. Professor of Computer.
 Wind Power TEAK – Traveling Engineering Activity Kits Partial support for the TEAK Project was provided by the National Science Foundation's Course,
Copyright Crash Course Laura Rivera EDTC
Black Box Software Testing Copyright © 2003 Cem Kaner & James Bach 1 Black Box Software Testing Spring 2005 PART 8 -- TEST DESIGN by Cem Kaner, J.D., Ph.D.
Black Box Software Testing Copyright © Cem Kaner & James Bach 1 Black Box Software Testing Fall 2004 by Cem Kaner, J.D., Ph.D. Professor of Software.
Black Box Software Testing (Professional Seminar)
Black Box Software Testing Spring 2005
Black Box Software Testing Fall 2004
Black Box Software Testing 2004 Academic Edition
Copyright Notice This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. To view a copy of this license,
Black Box Software Testing Spring 2005
Black Box Software Testing Fall 2004
Black Box Software Testing (Academic Course - Fall 2001)
Welcome to course DT2350 Human Perception for Information Technology
For/Switch/While/Try UC Berkeley Fall 2004, E77 me
ME190L Nyquist Stability Criterion UC Berkeley Fall
Features Catalyst is the releng building tool It's used to build official releases Is being used to build weekly releases for > 2 years Supports many arches.
Discussion and Conclusion
Adaptive Lessons for Pre-Class Preparation for a Flipped Classroom
Class Info E177 January 22, me. berkeley
Written by: Jennifer Doherty, Cornelia Harris, Laurel Hartley
Critical - thinking Assessment Test (CAT)
Title of Poster Site Visit 2017 Introduction Results
Title of session For Event Plus Presenters 12/5/2018.
Black Box Software Testing Fall 2004
Black Box Software Testing Fall 2005 Overview – Part 1 of 3
Black Box Software Testing (Academic Course - Fall 2001)
Supporting Material for the Biodiversity Teaching Experiment
Black Box Software Testing (Academic Course - Fall 2001)
Class Intro/TDD Intro 8/23/2005
Adaptive Lessons for Pre-Class Preparation for a Flipped Classroom
What would improve the RAG status when amber or red
What would improve the RAG status when amber or red
Function Handles UC Berkeley Fall 2004, E Copyright 2005, Andy Packard
Black Box Software Testing (Professional Seminar)
Black Box Software Testing Fall 2005 Overview—Part 3 (Test oracles) Cem Kaner, J.D., Ph.D. Professor of Software Engineering Florida Institute of Technology.
Black Box Software Testing (Professional Seminar)
Title of Poster Site Visit 2018 Introduction Results
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant #XXXXXX. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations.
Project Title: I. Research Overview and Outcome
Exploring Exploratory Testing
Presentation transcript:

Black Box Software Testing 2004 Academic Edition Part 33 -- STATUS REPORTING by Cem Kaner, J.D., Ph.D. Professor of Software Engineering Florida Institute of Technology and James Bach Principal, Satisfice Inc. Copyright (c) Cem Kaner & James Bach, 2000-2004 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, California 94305, USA. These notes are partially based on research that was supported by NSF Grant EIA-0113539 ITR/SY+PE: "Improving the Education of Software Testers." Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Bug Statistics are Only One Part of Status. Project Status Bug Statistics are Only One Part of Status. Product status reporting is a long-term opportunity to communicate project information to a range of managers. Put the key issues that you want people to see on page 1. People will flip a page to get to your statistics.

Project Status My weekly status reports look like this: A. Key Issues Deliveries needed What promises are still open What documents are still needed What functions are still uncoded What tools are not yet working Decisions needed Bug fixes needed Unexpected problems

Project Status B. Progress Against Plan Milestones Weekly goals Percent complete C. Bug Numbers D. List of Bugs Not Fixed

Project Status I 3 weeks budgeted 1.5 weeks spent 60% complete II 10% III 2 weeks 1.5 weeks 75%

Project Status Bug Numbers I. Bug Curves (weekly progress) Total open New open New closed/fixed New closed/not-fixed II. Weekly Table Show this week and last week: New bugs this week New closed New resolved (not yet fixed) Total resolved

Project Status More Bug Numbers III. Another Weekly Table Show last week and this week Total open (x severity) Total closed fixed (x severity) Total closed not-fixed (x severity) New open (x severity) New closed fixed (x severity) New closed not-fixed (x severity)

Project Status Priority Severity Urgent Important Want to fix Can defer Awful Bad Pretty bad Needs improvement Minor This is an example of the type of chart that you might create. This one can be used to flag a serious mismatch of opinion between testers (who assign severity) and programmers (who assign priority).