Hybrid Coordination Function (HCF) Frame Exchange and NAV Details

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /272a Submission June 2001 S. Choi, Philips Research Slide 1 Problems with IEEE (e) NAV Operation and ONAV Proposal Javier del.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /372r0 A New Approach to the NAV June, 2001 Matthew Sherman, AT&T Labs - ResearchSlide 1 A New Approach to the NAV Author: Matthew.
Doc.: IEEE /412r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 1 Aligning e HCF and h TPC Operations Amjad Soomro, Sunghyun.
Doc.: IEEE /630r1a Submission S. Choi, Philips Research November 2001 Slide 1 HC Recovery and Backoff Rules Sunghyun Choi and Javier del Prado.
Doc.: IEEE /630r4a Submission S. Choi, Philips Research January 2002 Slide 1 HC Recovery and Backoff Rules Sunghyun Choi and Javier del Prado.
Doc.: IEEE /605r3 Submission November 2001 S. Kandala, et. al. Slide 1 CFB Ending Rule under HCF Srinivas Kandala, Ken Nakashima, Yashihiro Ohtani.
1 Medium Access Control Enhancements for Quality of Service IEEE Std e TM November 2005.
802.11g & e Presenter : Milk. Outline g  Overview of g  g & b co-exist QoS Limitations of e  Overview of.
1 Medium Access Control Enhancements for Quality of Service IEEE Std e TM November 2005.
Submission doc.: IEEE /569r1 November 2001 M. Benveniste -- AT&T Labs, ResearchSlide 1 An Access Mechanism for Periodic Contention-Free Sessions.
Doc.: IEEE /336 Submission November 2000 Michael Fischer, Intersil Slide 1 The PIFS Ambiguity A tutorial on some practical limitations to the.
Doc.: IEEE /452 Submission December, 2000 Michael Fischer, Intersil Slide 1 A Hybrid Coordination Function for QoS Michael Fischer Intersil Corporation.
Doc.: IEEE /494r0 Submission July 2001 Michael Fischer, Intersil (TGe Editor)Slide 1 Provisional Tge Ballot Comment Resolutions from the May,
Doc.: IEEE /109r2 Submission March 2001 Michael Fischer, Intersil Slide 1 Hybrid Coordination Function (HCF) Frame Exchange and NAV Details Michael.
Doc.:IEEE /566r2 Submission November 2001 S. Choi, Philips & M.M. Wentink, Intersil Slide 1 Multiple Frame Exchanges during EDCF TXOP Sunghyun.
Doc.: IEEE /248r0 Submission Bobby JoseSlide 1 February 2002 Contention Free TXOP Request and Allocation Issues Bobby Jose,
EA C451 (Internetworking Technologies)
IEEE e Performance Evaluation
Calibration using NDP Vincenzo Scarpa
Lecture 27 WLAN Part II Dr. Ghalib A. Shah
An Access Mechanism for Periodic Contention-Free Sessions
IEEE : Wireless LANs ALOHA, Slotted ALOHA
QoS Tutorial Date: Authors: Nov 2008 Nov 2008
HCF medium access rules
Using Dynamic PCF to improve the capacity of VoIP traffic in IEEE 802
EDCF TXOP Bursting Simulation Results
NAV Protection Mathilde Benveniste Avaya Labs, Research July 2003
Power Management in IEEE
CC/RR Performance Evaluation - Revisited
Qos related issues in MAC and Baseline document #360
NAV Protection Mathilde Benveniste Avaya Labs, Research July 2003
HCF Duration Field Set Rules
Enhanced MAC proposal for high throughput.
Protocol Details John Bellardo UCSD.
Texas Instruments Incorporated
Burst Transmission and Acknowledgment
EDCF Issues and Suggestions
Terminology Corrections and Improvements for the TGe Draft
Uniform e Admissions Control Signaling for HCF and EDCF
Group Polling for DCF Based Reservation Request
Class-based Contention Periods (CCP) for the n MAC
HCF Channel Access And Inter-BSS Channel Sharing
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
Clarification on Some HCF Frame Exchange Rules
HCF medium access rules
QoS mechanisms in IEEE 802 Bin Zhen, Huan-band Li and Ryuji Kohno
Clarification on Some HCF Frame Exchange Rules
Suggested changes to Tge D3.3
HCF medium access rules
Student : Min-Hua Yang Advisor : Ho-Ting Wu Date :
Acknowledgement for Multicast Streams
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
Proposed ERTS & ECTS Mechanisms
Multiple Frame Exchanges during EDCF TXOP
Suggested changes to Tge D3.3
Introduction to the TGe Hybrid Coordination Function (HCF)
VTS Robust Multicast/Broadcast Protocol
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
HCF medium access rules
NAV Protection Mathilde Benveniste Avaya Labs, Research July 2003
HCCA TXOP handling difficulties
NAV Operation Rules under HCF
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
HCF Channel Access And Inter-BSS Channel Sharing
Cleaning Up MAC/PHY Interface Timing
Chapter 11 Comment Resolution for Letter Ballot 63
Signaling for Streaming in IEEE e
NAV Operation Rules under HCF
Enhancement for AV Transmission
Indicating NGV Capabilities in MAC Header
Presentation transcript:

Hybrid Coordination Function (HCF) Frame Exchange and NAV Details February 2001 Hybrid Coordination Function (HCF) Frame Exchange and NAV Details First version: 2000-02-07 Revision 1: 2000-02-26 Michael Fischer Intersil Corporation 4242-3 Medical Drive San Antonio, TX 78229 voice: +1-210-614-4096 fax: +1-210-614-8192 mfischer@choicemicro.com Michael Fischer, Intersil

Symbols for Frame Exchange Diagrams February 2001 Symbols for Frame Exchange Diagrams Frames are shown using 4- and 6-sided symbols, with enclosing round-cornered rectangle to show the scope of optional or repeatable subsets: (E)DCF contention and IFS periods are shown using 3- and 5-sided symbols: Michael Fischer, Intersil

Legacy Frame Exchange Sequences February 2001 Legacy Frame Exchange Sequences To the right are the frame exchanges defined in Table 21 of 802.11-1999 illustrated using this symbology. Note: The last CF-Sequence of each CFP includes 1 instance of CF-End followed by DIFS. All other CF-Sequences include 0 instances of CF-End. Michael Fischer, Intersil

HCF Frame Exchanges for CF-Bursts February 2001 HCF Frame Exchanges for CF-Bursts To the right are the frame exchanges required for HCF QoS Data transfers. Each CF-Burst comprises one or more TxOp. Note: Management frames can only be sent as the sole or final frame of a TxOp, since with no TCID field they default to NF=0. Michael Fischer, Intersil

February 2001 Start of TXOP Details There is one null and one non-null case for the start of a polled TXOP. There are three possible optimizations/deoptimizations of the non-null case. Michael Fischer, Intersil

February 2001 End of TXOP Details There are two cases for the end of a TXOP, based on whether the HC has additional traffic to transmit and/or additional ESTAs to poll. Michael Fischer, Intersil

February 2001 TXOP Requests QoS Null with TS=1 can be used to activate or deactivate periodic polling under an admitted Tspec. QoS Null with TS=0 can be used to request an immediate TXOP longer than the current EDCF TXOP limit. CC defines a controlled contention interval (CCI) when WSTAs that need more bandwidth may send RR frames. Michael Fischer, Intersil

Recovery from Non-Responses February 2001 Recovery from Non-Responses If the addressed ESTA does not respond to RTS or QoS Data at SIFS, the TXOP holder may resume transmission at PIFS unless PHY reports CCA(busy). If the TXOP holder does not resume transmission at PIFS, the TXOP terminates and the HC may resume transmission at DIFS or may allow the to CFB end. Michael Fischer, Intersil

February 2001 NAV Usage During TXOP This diagram shows the periods covered by the NAV, based on Duration field values in the various frames of a TXOP during which the polled ESTA initiates several QoS Data frame exchanges. Michael Fischer, Intersil

Multicast Delivery by HC February 2001 Multicast Delivery by HC Both HCF and PCF transmit queued broadcast and multicast frames directly following DTIM Beacons. The HC uses PIFS immediately after each broadcast/multicast frame, and terminates the CFP early if CCA(busy) is detected during any such PIFS. The HC typically sends CF-End immediately after the last queued broadcast/multicast frame, and provides reserved bandwidth and priority access for QoS traffic using controlled TXOPs during the CP. However, the HC may provide some TXOPs as CF-Sequences during the CFP. Michael Fischer, Intersil