CE 3500 Transportation Engineering Saturation flow and signal LOS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 14: Basic Freeway Segments and Multilane Highways
Advertisements

INTRODUCTION TO TRANSPORT Lecture 7 Introduction to Transport Lecture 7: Signal Coordination.
CE 2710: Transportation Engineering Traffic Signals April 3, 2009 Nicholas Lownes, Ph.D.
Redwood Road & 35th Avenue Traffic Study. Problems Observed: High collision rate along the corridor was found at McArthur Boulevard intersection, with.
Continuous Flow Intersection March, Why are we here? Discuss Continuous Flow Intersection compared to Standard Intersection Update permit status.
Transportation Engineering
INTRODUCTION TO TRANSPORT Lecture 3 Introduction to Transport Lecture 4: Traffic Signal.
City of Little Rock Public Works – Traffic Engineering Division City of Little Rock City of Little Rock Dallas Phasing Implementation Rodney Parham Road.
ECGD 4121 – Transportation Engineering I
Capacity Analysis CE 453 Lecture #14.
REVISION. Sample Question The sample questions for this year. Describe briefly the classic transport model, explaining the four stages of the model. [10]
INTRODUCTION TO TRANSPORT Lecture 4 Introduction to Transport Lecture 4: Signal Timing.
CTC-340 Signals - Basics. Terms & Definitions (review) Cycle - Cycle Length - Interval -. change interval - clearance interval- change + clearance = Yi.
Lecture #6 Chapter 16: Principles of Intersection Signalization.
N TELEGRAPH RD Vehicle Position vs. Signal Timing for the Intersection of Telegraph Road and Maple Road Position 1: Vehicle entering intersection 0.1 seconds.
Lec 15, Ch.8, pp : Signal Timing (Objective)
Introduction to Transport
PASSER II SOFTWARE.
Signals. Laneage Coding Examples.
Lec 19, Ch.17, pp : Sample simple timing problems (Objectives) Master the steps of simple signal timing through 4 sample problems in the textbook.
INTRODUCTION TO TRANSPORT Lecture 7 Introduction to Transport Lecture 7: Signal Coordination.
CE 7670: Advanced Traffic Signal Systems
Highway Capacity Software (HCS) – Part II
Highway Capacity Software Based on the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Special Report 209 Transportation Research Board (TRB), National Research Council.
Signal Timing Design Example Problems. Intersection of Michigan Avenue and Hewitt Road.
CEE – Spring 2005 Lectures 10 to 11 (Chapters 21, 22) Analysis of Signalized Intersections.
Signalized Intersections
Transportation Engineering
Transportation Engineering
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Course Logistics HW7 due today (9 total) Midterm next Friday (Wednesday review) Signalized Intersections (Chapter 7 of text) Last material.
Alternative Solution ONE Changes Phases from 4 to 6 based on the traffic demand of different movements; Optimizes Timing accordingly to minimize the overall.
Freeway Capacity Analysis
Roosevelt Road: State to Columbus Public Meeting September 22, 2015.
Desktop RSA Activity Desktop RSA Activity 4-53 Step 1: Identify project or existing road to be reviewed. Step 2: Select an independent, multi-disciplinary.
Signal Warrants. Slide 2 Signal Warrants  r2/part4/part4c.htm r2/part4/part4c.htm.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
Introduction to Transport
Traffic Signal Timing Design Part I. Slide 2 Steps in Designing a Traffic Signal Timing Plan (1/2) 1. Determine lane configurations and lane volumes 2.
Traffic Signal Timing Design Part II. Slide 2 What to do?  Distribute volume among lanes to Identify lane utilization Determine need for lane adjustment.
Problem 4: Okeechobee Road Stopped Control Analysis.
Problem 4: Clifton Country Rd/Route 146 Intersection Base Case Phasing and Volumes Analysis Plans Description of Analyses Overarching Issues 4a: AM peak.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Fairfax County Parkway Corridor Study Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee December 1,
Slower vehicle speeds (under 30 mph) means less severe crashes 90% reduction in fatalities, 76% reduction in injury crashes 75% fewer vehicle conflict.
Thinking Inside the Box
JUAN DE FUCA PEDESTRIAN CROSSING Transportation and Public Infrastructure Committee Colwood, BC 1 October 2012.
MOVA Traffic Signal Control Trial
Multilane Highway Capacity Analysis
Left-Turn Operation When Opposed by Multiple Lanes
BELLE TERRE BLVD/PKWY CORRIDOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Lane Volume Allocation
2a. Fully actuated signal - Improved T intersection
Signalized Intersections
Signalized Intersections
Problem 2: Moe Rd/Route 146 Intersection
Freeway Capacity and Level of Service
FM 518 By-pass Traffic Review
Highway capacity and Level of Service Analysis
Transportation Engineering LOS on other roadway types March 4, 2011
Signal Timing: Putting it All Together
Problem 5: Interstate 87 Interchange
Problem 3: Shenendehowa Campus
Case Study 1 Problem 4 Styner/Lauder Intersection Moscow, Idaho
CE 3500 Transportation Engineering Elements of Traffic Signals
Transportation Engineering Fancy intersections March 7, 2011
HIGHWAY CAPACITY & LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS)
Case Study 1 Problem 2 Styner/Lauder Intersection Moscow, Idaho
Highway Engineering CE 431
Intersection Sight Distance (ISD) – AASHTO Method
Transportation Engineering Calculating Signal Delay February 23, 2011
Signal Design CTC-340.
Presentation transcript:

CE 3500 Transportation Engineering Saturation flow and signal LOS February 28, 2011

REVIEW

General procedure for signal design: Establish phases Identify lane groups and volumes Identify design lane group for each phase Calculate clearance intervals Calculate total cycle length Allocate green time to phases

Overall procedure for calculating delay: Divide into lane groups Find capacity, degree of saturation, and delay for each lane group Calculate approach delay from lane group delay Calculate total intersection delay from approach delay

Today’s lecture: Calculating saturation flow Mapping delay to level of service (LOS)

HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL

SATURATION FLOW

Previously, we said saturation flow was 1900 pcphpl Previously, we said saturation flow was 1900 pcphpl. Now we want to calculate a more accurate figure to account for factors such as: Lane width Heavy vehicles Grade Bus stops Left turns Right turns

Lane width Heavy vehicles Grade Bus stops Left turns Right turns We calculate an adjustment factor for each of these, and multiply by the “base” rate of 1900 per lane.

Lane width adjustment W is lane width in feet. What is the “base” lane width?

Heavy vehicle adjustment pHV is proportion of flow which is “heavy vehicles.”

Grade adjustment %G is the percent grade. Does positive %G mean uphill or downhill?

Bus stop adjustment N is the number of lanes in the lane group NB is the number of buses stopping per hour

Left turn adjustment Exclusive lane: Shared lane: pLT is the proportion of left-turning traffic in this lane group

Right turn adjustment Exclusive lane: Shared lane: pRT is the proportion of right-turning traffic in this lane group

Follow-along example from last time: 100 354 48 588 86 60 96 75 120 700 160 550 50 100

Follow-along example:

Additional assumptions: Northbound and southbound lanes are 11 ft wide; eastbound and westbound are 12 ft wide. Heavy vehicles form 5% of traffic for all movements. North/south road has a 3% grade uphill to the north. 6 buses per hour stop on the east/west road.

Yielding left turns already multiplied by 1.6 Lane group volumes 454 86 636 120 96 160 600 800 Yielding left turns already multiplied by 1.6

Lane group base saturation flows 3800 1900 3800 1900 1900 1900 3800 3800

Lane width adjustment: N/S: 1+(11-12)/30 =0.97 3800 1837 3673 1900 1900 1837 3673 3800 E/W: 1+(12-12)/30 =1

Heavy vehicle adjustment: 1/(1+0.05)=0.95 3619 1749 3498 1809 1809 1749 3498 3619

Grade adjustment: NB: 1-3/200= 0.985 SB: 1+3/200= 1.015 3619 1775 3550 1809 1809 1723 3446 3619 SB: 1+3/200= 1.015

Left-turn adjustment: 3619 1686 3550 1719 1719 1637 3446 3619

Right-turn adjustment: SB: 1-0.15* (48/636) =0.989 WB: 1-0.15* (100/454) =0.967 3499 1686 3509 1719 1719 1637 3402 3551 EB: 1-0.15* (100/800) =0.981 NB: 1-0.15* (50/600) =0.988

Bus adjustment: EB/WB: (2-14.4*6/3600)/2 =0.988 3457 1686 3509 1719 1637 3402 3508 EB/WB: (2-14.4*6/3600)/2 =0.988

These are the saturation flows we should be using to design the signal and calculate delay. 3457 1686 3509 1719 1719 1637 3402 3508

LEVEL OF SERVICE

Remember how we calculated delay: Divide into lane groups and calculate saturation flow. Find capacity, degree of saturation, and delay for each lane group Calculate approach delay from lane group delay Calculate total intersection delay from approach delay

LOS Average delay (s) A <10 B 10-20 C 20-35 D 35-55 E 55-80 F The total intersection delay is used to define a level of service (LOS) LOS Average delay (s) A <10 B 10-20 C 20-35 D 35-55 E 55-80 F >80