Cosmic evolution of AGN in several X-ray bands

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
X-ray spectral variability of seven LINER nuclei with XMM-Newton and Chandra data Author: Hernandez-Garcia, L; Gonzalez-Martin, O; Marquez, I; Masegosa.
Advertisements

Radio and X-ray emission in radio-quiet quasars Katrien C. Steenbrugge, Katherine M. Blundell and Zdenka Kuncic Instituto de Astronomía, UCN Department.
Statistical analysis of the X-ray emission properties of type-1 AGN in the XMM-2dF Wide Angle Survey Silvia Mateos Leicester University (UK) Leicester.
Yoshihiro Ueda (ISAS) Co-Is on construction of the HXLF:
Swift/BAT Hard X-ray Survey Preliminary results in Markwardt et al ' energy coded color.
The multiwavelength surveys of the ELAIS-S1 and GOODS fields Fabrizio Fiore & M. Brusa, A. Comastri, C. Feruglio, A. Fontana, A. Grazian, F. La Franca,
Everything you wanted to know about the X-ray background … Andrea Comastri (INAF-OABologna-Italy) Andrea Comastri (INAF-OABologna-Italy) Gilli R., Comastri.
Luminosity Density of Star- Forming Galaxies Giavalisco et al Presented by Brandon Patel.
Probing the X-ray Universe: Analysis of faint sources with XMM-Newton G. Hasinger, X. Barcons, J. Bergeron, H. Brunner, A. C. Fabian, A. Finoguenov, H.
Growth of Structure Measurement from a Large Cluster Survey using Chandra and XMM-Newton John R. Peterson (Purdue), J. Garrett Jernigan (SSL, Berkeley),
The Sources of the CDF-N --- Classification Schemes, Absorption Estimates and Broadband SEDs Stephan Frank Patrick Osmer, Smita Mathur Extragalactic Surveys.
Boston, November 2006 Extragalactic X-ray surveys Paolo Tozzi Spectral analysis of X-ray sources in the CDFS.
Early Results from SWIFT's BAT AGN Survey: XMM Follow-up Observations for 22 BAT AGNs Lisa Winter Lisa Winter (Grad Student at UMD) Richard Mushotzky (GSFC),
Gamma-Ray Luminosity Function of Blazars and the Cosmic Gamma-Ray Background: Evidence for the Luminosity-Dependent Density Evolution Takuro Narumoto (Department.
The XMM-Newton hard band wide angle Survey Nicoletta Carangelo and Silvano Molendi (IASF-MI(CNR)) Epic Consortium Meeting Palazzo Steri, Palermo,
Obscured AGN and the synthesis of the cosmic X-ray background
Demography how many AGN in the sky? - number counts of normal galaxies radio sources optically selected AGN X-ray selected AGN how many AGN per cubic Mpc?
1 The Fundamental Plane Relationship of Astrophysical Black Holes Ran Wang Supervisor: Xuebing Wu Peking University Ran Wang Supervisor: Xuebing Wu Peking.
The variable X-ray spectrum of PDS456 and High-Velocity Outflows Shai Kaspi Technion – Haifa; Tel-Aviv University Israel & Ehud Behar, James Reeves “ The.
Obscured AGN and XRB models Andrea Comastri (INAF-OABologna-Italy) Roberto Gilli (INAF-OABologna-Italy) F. Fiore (INAF-OARoma-Italy) G. Hasinger (MPE-Garching-
Spectral Energy Distributions of 2XMM-selected AGN & VO-tools Rodrigo Gil-Merino Instituto de Física de Cantabria (CSIC-UC) Santander, Spain MAVO workshop,
The nature of X-ray selected Broad Absorption Line Quasars Alex Blustin With Tom Dwelly (Southampton), Mat Page (UCL-MSSL)‏ UCL-MSSL and IoA, Cambridge.
Properties of the point-like sources in the XMM-LSS field Olga Melnyk and XMM-LSS collaboration N. Clerc, L. Chiappetti, A. Elyiv, P.Gandhi, E.Gosset,
On behalf of the XMM-Newton Survey Science Centre Roberto Della Ceca INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera,Milan The Cosmological properties of AGN.
Is the dependence of spectral index on luminosity real in high-z QSO samples? Answer: No! Su-Min Tang, Shuang-Nan Zhang Tsinghua Center for Astrophysics.
The Accretion History of SMBHs in Massive Galaxies Kate Brand STScI Collaborators: M. Brown, A. Dey, B. Jannuzi, and the XBootes and Bootes MIPS teams.
Revealing X-ray obscured Quasars in SWIRE sources with extreme MIR/O Giorgio Lanzuisi Fabrizio Fiore Enrico Piconcelli Chiara Feruglio Cristian Vignali.
X-ray emission properties of BLAGN in the XMM-2dF Wide Angle Survey S. Mateos, M.G. Watson, J. A. Tedds and the XMM-Newton Survey Science Centre Department.
NGC 3147: a 'true' type 2 Seyfert galaxy without the broad-line region THE X-RAY UNIVERSE Granada, May 28 th 2008 Stefano Bianchi A. Corral 1, F.
Compton-thick AGN in the CDFN I. Georgantopoulos NOA A. Akylas NOA A. Georgakakis NOA M. Rovilos MPE M. Rowan-Robinson Imperial College.
The NuSTAR Extragalactic Survey: A 1 st Look at the Distant High-Energy X-ray Background D.R. Ballantyne (Georgia Tech) on behalf of M. Ajello, D. Alexander,
Obscured and unobscured growth of Super-massive Black Holes from the XMM-Newton Medium Survey Francisco J. Carrera, X. Barcons, J. Bussons, J. Ebrero,
The epoch of star formation for th e most massive galaxies Sarah Brough (AAO)
Black hole accretion history of active galactic nuclei 曹新伍 中国科学院上海天文台.
The Lag-Luminosity Relation in the GRB Source Frame T. N. Ukwatta 1,2, K. S. Dhuga 1, M. Stamatikos 3, W. C. Parke 1, T. Sakamoto 2, S. D. Barthelmy 2,
The dependence on redshift of quasar black hole masses from the SLOAN survey R. Decarli Università dell’Insubria, Como, Italy A. Treves Università dell’Insubria,
The History of Black Hole Accretion from X-ray Stacking Ezequiel Treister (IfA, Hawaii) Collaborators: Meg Urry, Priya Natarajan, Kevin Schawinski (Yale),
The History of Active Galaxies A.Barger, P. Capak, L. Cowie, RFM, A. Steffen, and Y. Yang Active Galaxies (AKA quasars, Seyfert galaxies etc) are radiating.
A synthesis model for AGN evolution: unveiling SMBH growth with (past and future) X- ray surveys Ringberg Meeting, 2/2008 Andrea Merloni Max-Planck Institut.
Tools for computing the AGN feedback: radio-loudness and the kinetic luminosity function Gabriele Melini Fabio La Franca Fabrizio Fiore Active Galactic.
Why is the BAT survey for AGN Important? All previous AGN surveys were biased- –Most AGN are ‘obscured’ in the UV/optical –IR properties show wide scatter.
Seeking type 2 QSO amongst bright X-ray selected EXOs Agnese Del Moro University of Leicester, UK In collaboration with: M.G. Watson (UoL), S. Mateos (UoL),
Average Fe Kα emission from distant AGN
Discovery of the X-ray emission from the darkest TeV object HESS J
The Dichotomy of Seyfert Galaxies at Hardest X-rays
Catching Blazars in their ordinary life
Growth of SMBH studied through X-ray surveys
Florencia Jiménez Luján Trainee in 2004
The black hole fundamental plane: revisit with a larger sample of radio and X-ray emitting broad line AGNs Zhao-Yu Li Astronomy Department, Peking University.
The Growth of Supermassive Black Holes
The Space Density of Compton Thick AGN
The nature and density of Spitzer selected X-ray absorbed AGN:
The X-ray Evolution of Young Post-Merger
Andrea Comastri (INAF- Oss. Astr. Bologna)
Multi-epoch X-ray observations of Seyfert 1 galaxies
Tracing the Accretion History of the Universe by stacking X-rays from Red Galaxies in the NDWFS Kate Brand, NOAO, Tucson A. Dey, B. Jannuzi, M. Brown,
XMM-NEWTON reveals a dipping black-hole X-ray binary in NGC 55
Hard X-ray observations of Extremely Red Objects
Lecture 6: Gamma-Ray Bursts Light extinction: Infrared background.
Risolvere il Background X al suo picco
The Stellar Population of Metal−Poor Galaxies at z~1
LINERs: The X-ray Perspective John McNulty
The spectral properties of Galactic X-ray sources at faint fluxes
Black Holes in the Deepest Extragalactic X-ray Surveys
A.Malizia, L. Bassani , M. Molina
Yuan Liu and Shuang Nan Zhang
Black Hole Winds: the case of PDS 456
Shaji Vattakunnel - University of Trieste
Mentors: Marco Ajello & Masaaki Hayashida
Borislav Nedelchev et al. 2019
Presentation transcript:

Cosmic evolution of AGN in several X-ray bands Jacobo Ebrero Instituto de Física de Cantabria (CSIC-UC) X-ray Universe Symposium 2008 Granada, 27th May 2008

Outline Introduction X-ray samples The NH function of Ultrahard sources The X-ray luminosity function Results Summary X-ray Universe Symposium 2008 Granada, 27th May 2008

Introduction We have computed the luminosity function of a combination of nearly completely identified AGN surveys in 3 different energy bands (0.5-2 keV, 2-10 keV and 4.5-7.5 keV) up to z = 3. The backbone of this study is the XMS survey, a flux-limited highly complete survey at medium fluxes. It is 96% complete in the 0.5-2 keV band, and over 86% in the others. We have combined XMS with other highly complete shallower and deeper surveys in order to obtain a wider LX-z plane coverage. Detailed spectral information is available for most of the sources detected in the 4.5-7.5 keV band thus allowing us to study their absorption properties.

Samples Soft (0.5 – 2 keV): Survey NAGN Flux limit (cgs) XMS 178 1.5 x 10-14 CDF-S 226 5.5 x 10-17 RIXOS 222 3.0 x 10-14 RDS 39 5.5 x 10-15 RBS 310 2.5 x 10-12 Overall sky coverage XMS CDF-S RDS RIXOS RBS

Samples Hard (2 – 10 keV): Survey NAGN Flux limit (cgs) Overall sky coverage XMS CDF-S AMSS Hard (2 – 10 keV): Survey NAGN Flux limit (cgs) XMS 120 3.3 x 10-14 CDF-S 236 4.5 x 10-16 AMSS 79 3.0 x 10-13

Samples Ultrahard (4.5 – 7.5 keV): XMS 57 6.8 x 10-15 Overall sky coverage XMS HBS Ultrahard (4.5 – 7.5 keV): Survey NAGN Flux limit (cgs) XMS 57 6.8 x 10-15 HBS 62 7.0 X 10-14

The NH function of Ultrahard sources We have used the joint XMS/HBS sample in the 4.5-7.5 keV band (119 identified AGN). The NH function is a probability distribution for the absorption column density as a function of LX and redshift. 43 < log L4.5-7.5 < 43.75 Ebrero et al., 2008, in preparation

The X-ray luminosity function We first calculate the binned XLF using the 1/Va method: We perform a ML fit to an analytic model using all the available information in each source without binning. We use a Luminosity-dependent Density Evolution (LDDE) model: For the Ultrahard sources we use absorption-corrected data and we introduce the best-fit NH function when performing the fit.

XLF: Results Soft (0.5-2 keV)

Evolution in LX and redshift present. XLF: Results Soft (0.5-2 keV) Evolution in LX and redshift present.

XLF: Results Hard (2-10 keV)

Evolution in LX and redshift present. XLF: Results Hard (2-10 keV) Evolution in LX and redshift present.

XLF: Results Ultrahard (4.5-7.5 keV)

Evolution in LX and redshift present. XLF: Results Ultrahard (4.5-7.5 keV) Evolution in LX and redshift present.

XLF: Results ? Comoving density Hard Soft Ultrahard High-luminosity AGNs reach a maximum in density earlier than the less luminous AGN. Growth and formation more efficient for high-luminosity AGN. ?

Accretion rate density XLF: Results Accretion rate density Soft Hard Ultrahard The majority of the accretion rate density in the Universe is produced by low-luminosity AGN. High-luminosity AGN reach a maximum in the accretion rate density earlier than the less luminous AGN.

Summary We have used the XMS survey along with other highly complete shallower and deeper surveys to study the cosmic evolution of AGN in three energy bands: Soft (0.5-2 keV), Hard (2-10 keV) and Ultrahard (4.5-7.5 keV). The XLF has been computed by ML fitting to an analytic model (LDDE). We have modelled the intrinsic absorption of the Ultrahard sample (NH function). We found that the fraction of absorbed AGN depends on the X-ray luminosity but not on redshift. High-luminosity AGN grow and feed more efficiently in the early stages of the Universe than the less luminous AGN, and are fully formed at redshifts ~1.5-2. The evolution of AGN along cosmic time is therefore not caused by changes in the absorption environment but by intrinsic variations in the accretion rate at different epochs of the Universe.