More MCFocus Changes Matrix Elements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
XP New Perspectives on Microsoft Office Excel 2003, Second Edition- Tutorial 5 1 Microsoft Office Excel 2003 Tutorial 5 – Working With Excel Lists.
Advertisements

Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University NA48/2 Semileptonics Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February.
Word Processing. ► This is using a computer for:  Writing  EditingTEXT  Printing  Used to write letters, books, memos and produce posters etc.  A.
XP 1 Microsoft Office Excel 2003 Tutorial 3 – Working With Excel Lists.
Programmer Defined Functions Matthew Verleger. Windows It’s estimated that Window’s XP contains 45 million lines of code (and it’s over 10 years old).
Intro to By Debra Dimas Special thanks to David Fogliatti and Armand Amarento of Oceanside HS in San Diego.
XP Agenda Video Last Class Excel Tutorial 5: Working with Excel Lists Agenda for Next Class 1 New Perspectives on Microsoft Office Excel 2003 Tutorial.
Chapter 17 Creating a Database.
10/24/20151 Chapter 2 Review: MATLAB Environment Introduction to MATLAB 7 Engineering 161.
Access Chapter 1: Intro to Access Objectives Navigate among objects in Access database Difference between working in storage and memory Good database file.
XPages Example: Generating Dynamic Editable Fields from a Document Collection Author: John Mackey Groupware Solutions Inc.
Microsoft Office 2013 Try It! Chapter 4 Storing Data in Access.
Nyhoff, ADTs, Data Structures and Problem Solving with C++, Second Edition, © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved Recursion,
Emdeon Office Batch Management Services This document provides detailed information on Batch Import Services and other Batch features.
Core LIMS Training: Entering Experimental Data – Simple Data Entry.
Hashing (part 2) CSE 2011 Winter March 2018.
Lesson 8: Basic Monte Carlo integration
IST 220 – Intro to Databases
Programming in R Intro, data and programming structures
TEMS Parent Portal.
GO! with Microsoft Office 2016
Indexing Structures for Files and Physical Database Design
Updating SF-Tree Speaker: Ho Wai Shing.
Higher Order Tries Key = Social Security Number.
Practical Office 2007 Chapter 10
Confirmation and Feed Logs July 2017 Tips and Tricks
Creating a wiki phage for your lab notebook
Chauffeur Shade Alabsa.
Design-Space Exploration
Creating Functions with Parameters
Dynamic Hashing (Chapter 12)
QlikView Licensing.
Hashing - Hash Maps and Hash Functions
File System Structure How do I organize a disk into a file system?
Logan-Hocking Schools
GO! with Microsoft Access 2016
School of Computing Clemson University Fall, 2012
Microsoft Office Illustrated Fundamentals
Practical example of C programming
Arrays and files BIS1523 – Lecture 15.
Hashing Exercises.
Introduction to Computers
User Defined Functions
ECONOMETRICS ii – spring 2018
Subroutines Idea: useful code can be saved and re-used, with different data values Example: Our function to find the largest element of an array might.
Computer Science 2 Hashing
Fundamentals of Programming
Confirmation and Feed Logs July 2017 Tips and Tricks
Building Web Applications
Alberto A. Colavita, INFN, TS
Indexing and Hashing Basic Concepts Ordered Indices
Where did we stop? The Bayes decision rule guarantees an optimal classification… … But it requires the knowledge of P(ci|x) (or p(x|ci) and P(ci)) We.
Microsoft Official Academic Course, Access 2016
Lecture 3: Main Memory.
Multiway Trees Searching and B-Trees Advanced Tree Structures
Higher Order Tries Key = Social Security Number.
Lab 3 and HRP259 Lab and Combining (with SQL)
Database Design and Programming
○ Hisashi Shimosaka (Doshisha University)
Nuclear Decays Unstable nuclei can change N,Z.A to a nuclei at a lower energy (mass) If there is a mass difference such that energy is released, pretty.
Stata Basic Course Lab 2.
How to use hash tables to solve olympiad problems
File Organization.
LHCb Masterclass measurement of the Dº lifetime
M. Kezunovic (P.I.) S. S. Luo D. Ristanovic Texas A&M University
Bent Thomsen Institut for Datalogi Aalborg Universitet
17CS1102 DATA STRUCTURES © 2018 KLEF – The contents of this presentation are an intellectual and copyrighted property of KL University. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
UED KK-quark decays in pandora
Index Structures Chapter 13 of GUW September 16, 2019
Cayuse IRB Training Sharla Miles, M.Ed., CIP
Presentation transcript:

More MCFocus Changes Matrix Elements Maximum intensity searching Record max weights in a hash table Numerical problems when P2  m2 Evaluate ||2 in the parent particle’s rest frame Multiple specified decays provide unexpected benefits Gets results similar to c-cbar but much faster Can estimate equivalent number of c-cbar events for normalization Updating mcfedit New particle selection layout More MCFocus options Edit matrix elements and branching ratios Read new particle data file and identify & expand “final states” When will we finish and release it? What’s left to do? 12/31/2018

Storing Max Weights Some ME’s have a simple (easy calculation) max. value Like Cos2q Others do not, and must be sampled many times first Like This sampling process takes time, so we ought to save the result Max weight depends on: Function (subroutine) Parameters Parent ID Daughter IDs Function + parameter set is one number Could have up to 7 daughters We could store max weights in a 9-dimensional array (sparsely populated) OR a hash table (much smaller, faster, etc) Easy to implement, clearly the correct solution 12/31/2018

How it Works RGPHASEME: max weight for OM3P::OMEGA->PI0,PI+,PI+ given as 1.000000 RGPHASEME: max weight not given. Guessing.. RGPHASEME: max weight of PLN_K::KL->PI+,MU-,NU measured to be 5.4862153E-02 RGPHASEME: max weight of PLN_K::KL->PI+,E-,NU measured to be 6.2835544E-02 RGPHASEME: max weight of PLN_K::K+->PI0,E-,NU measured to be 6.2505074E-02 RGPHASEME: max weight for PVPA::RHO+->PI+,PI0 given as 1.000000 RGPHASEME: max weight for PVPA::K*+->K0,PI+ given as 1.000000 RGPHASEME: max weight for PVPA::K*0->K+,PI+ given as 1.000000 RGPHASEME: max weight of PLN_DS::D0->K+,E-,NU measured to be 0.8992732 RGPHASEME: max weight for PVPA::K*+->K+,PI0 given as 1.000000 RGPHASEME: max weight of PLN_DS::D+->K0,MU-,NU measured to be 0.8878478 RGPHASEME: max weight for PVPA::PHI->KL,KS given as 1.000000 RGPHASEME: max weight of PLN_DS::DS+->ETA,MU-,NU measured to be 0.9688660 RGPHASEME: max weight for PVPA::PHI->K+,K+ given as 1.000000 RGPHASEME: max weight of PLN_K::K+->PI0,MU-,NU measured to be 5.3868037E-02 RGPHASEME: max weight of PLN_DS::D+->K0,E-,NU measured to be 0.9021877 RGPHASEME: max weight for VLN::DS+->PHI,MU-,NU given as 1.000000 RGPHASEME: max weight for VLN::D0->K*+,E-,NU given as 1.000000 RGPHASEME: max weight for VLN::D0->K*+,MU-,NU given as 1.000000 RGPHASEME: max weight for VLN::D+->K*0,MU-,NU given as 1.000000 ... 12/31/2018

Numerical Problems in Matrix Elements Problems when P2  m2 Double precision computation helps a bit, but doesn’t directly address the real problem. Need to go to another frame Cos2 should be  1 Precision problems can give arbitrarily large max value. 12/31/2018

The Solution Evaluate all matrix elements in rest frame of the parent particle Greatly simplifies certain ME’s Faster, especially for 2-body decays This requires a new phase space generator which does not boost all the way to the lab frame. Spin-off from phase, called phasecm While I was at it, I changed phase to take the parent mass as given from rgmass instead of re-computing from Sqrt(E2-P2). Also, double precision is used (overkill?) 12/31/2018

Multiple Specified Decays Original purpose was to simulate matrix elements in generic decays, and simplify simulating specific ones By-products from this, new particle data structure and ability to specify multiple decays, may be the real benefit K p black is ccbar in old MC K 2p K 3p red is select decays in new MC  K K p p K p K p (D*) red is about 3 times faster for the equivalent charm K 3p (D*) Ks 2K (D*) Ks K p (D*) 12/31/2018

c-cbar Common Currency The new algorithm allows a simple calculation of… Effective c-cbar Pythia events! Example log file beginning and end: Specified decay chain CHARM: D+ A.P. = 1.000000 BR TOT = 9.618392 8.088971 D+(K-,PI+,PI+) 1.529421 D+(K*0BAR(K-,PI+),PI+;PVP) LAMBDAC+ A.P. = 0.519837 BR TOT = 5.000000 3.045000 LAMBDAC+(PROTON,K-,PI+) 1.955000 LAMBDAC+(K*0BAR(K-,PI+),PROTON) CHARMBAR: CHARMBAR A.P. = 1.000000 . . . . . . . *************************************************************** Rogue Final ISEED: 324604806 c,cbar Events Pythia generated: 1046146 Scaled c,cbar Pythia events: 1.0876517E+07 NGEN: 434055 NACC: 200000 25  faster than c-cbar! 12/31/2018

Updating mcfedit mcfedit must track with MCFocus if it’s going to be useful Already finished: Choose matrix elements for vertices Choose branching ratios for decays read and write chat files matrix elements and branching ratios multi-line decay spec (2 or more) New options Match conjugate decay, do matrix elements, use counting rules, Q/diQ supression factor Better particle selection menus Read particle2.dat Still to come: new particle data browser window Distinguish final states from decay paths (important!) expand final states Macros such as “Do trigger. No, really, I mean it!” 12/31/2018

Screen Shots 12/31/2018

More Screen Shots 12/31/2018

When Can I Release? Want to add a couple more simple matrix elements for  -> p0 p+ p- ' -> 3p0 mcfedit should distinguish final states from decay paths Handle ALIASC and ALIASCB more generally Write memo and/or WWW documentation These changes should be released before tuning Are there any other tests to perform or major missing pieces? Any Objections? (hint: say “no”) 12/31/2018