Olivier Napoly, coordinator CEA/Irfu

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ESS SPOKE LINAC (WP4) Sebastien BOUSSON Guillaume OLRY ESS/SPL Meeting - Lund – 2010/07/01.
Advertisements

H. Danared | Sw/Fr Coordination Committee | Page 1 Swedish/French Coordination Committee Håkan Danared Saclay, 13 January 2015.
Test Stands Roger Ruber Uppsala University ESS TAC4 16 Feb
ATTRACT – From Open Science to Open Innovation Information Sharing Meeting Brussels, June 19, 2014 Markus Nordberg (CERN) Development and Innovation Unit.
1 Albrecht Wagner DESY and the ILC DESY today DESY strategy and funding DESY and the ILC Funding from the European Union KEK/DESY Collaboration.
1 The Design & Value Costs SRF Technology The XFEL as a Prototype Japan as a Host International Linear Collider Status Mike Harrison.
D.Proch, DESY; GDE meeting Vancouver 06 Technical systems: Cavity Report Overview on costing activities for ILC –European costing method Overview industrial.
1 ASTRONET Coordinating strategic planning for European Astronomy.
ERA-NET Supporting Cooperation for research infrastructures in all S&T fields 7 th FP Call Capacity Work Program: Infrastructures Deadline May 2 nd 2007.
Revised SPL-study work-plan W. Weingarten 3 May 20101SPL Cavity WG Meeting.
Mid Term Review Meeting, 26 September 2012N. SURNAME1 * The research project has been supported by a Marie Curie Early Initial Training Network Fellowship.
EuCARD-2 is co-funded by the partners and the European Commission under Capacities 7th Framework Programme, Grant Agreement An Introduction to EuCARD-2.
Accelerator/ Medium Beta Cavities Paolo Michelato INFN Milano - LASA April 21, 2015.
ESS Linac WP8 Radio Frequency Systems and Test Facilities ESS/SPL Collaboration Meeting Lund, 29 June 2010 Roger Ruber (Uppsala University) for the ESS.
RF programme Review for the ESGARD Roadmap to EUCARD2 Peter McIntosh (STFC) Stephane Chel (CEA) Wolf-Dietrich Moeller (DESY)
H. Danared | TB12, 5 Mar 2015 | Page 1 Håkan Danared Mats Lindroos Lund, 5 March 2015 Status of In-Kind Contributions to Accelerator.
General Introduction Markus Nordberg (CERN DG-DI-DI) 1
Astroparticle Physics European Consortium What can large Astroparticle Physics projects like LAGUNA-LBNO expect from the new APPEC, the Astroparticle Physics.
1 Comments concerning DESY and TESLA Albrecht Wagner Comments for the 5th meeting of the ITRP at Caltech 28 June 2004 DESY and the LC What could DESY contribute.
US Accelerator Industry- Small Business Perspective April 30,2013 US-Japan Advance Science and Technology Symposium Science Projects Homeland Security.
A Proposal for FJPPL (TYL) Development of Frequency Tuners Optimization and Cryomodule Integration for 1.3 GHz SRF Cavities G. Devanz, F. Nunio, O. Napoly.
BrightnESS is funded by the European Union's Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020, under grant agreement Building a Research.
SRF Collaboration Shekhar Mishra Fermilab. Overview Charge: Does the laboratory make effective use of collaboration and existing SRF capabilities at other.
H. Danared | Collaboration Board | Page 1 Status of In-Kind Contributions Håkan Danared Legnaro, 1 December 2014.
WP leaders meeting R. Aleksan October 5 th, 2009 TIARA 1.Objectives 2.General Context 3.Building TIARA 4.Conclusion.
H. Danared | Collaboration Board, March 2014 | Page 1 Status of In-Kind Contributions to Accelerator Håkan Danared Kastrup, 14 April 2014.
ESS SC cavities development G. Devanz TTC meeting, march 1st 2011, Milano.
Fermilab-India Agreements and Collaboration Shekhar Mishra Project-X, International Collaboration Coodinator Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia,
ESS Cryomodule Status Meeting – Introduction | | Christine Darve Introduction to Cryomodules for the ESS 2013 January, 9 th Christine Darve.
Accelerating development of high- performance detector and imaging technologies for science and markets Pablo Tello (CERN)
WP2.3 Accelerator and SC magnet TI sustainability
AMICI WP1 – Management, coordination and dissemination
AMICI WP5.2: Harmonization - Material and Component Reference
CompactLight H2020 Design Study Proposal
AMICI WP2.2: Global landscape (CEA, CERN, INFN, CNRS).
Horizon 2020 – R&D Opportunities
WP5 Elliptical cavities
WP5.1 Professional training and apprenticeship (CEA, DESY, INFN)
Uppsala Commitment to ESS and FREIA Planning
Coordinated Accelerator R&D in Europe
Role of FoE in LEAPS / PSSP
Evolving an ILC focused SCRF Facility from the XFEL Infrastructure
WG-1 Session Cavity Performance Cryomodule Performance
Accelerator Research and Innovation for European Science and Society
David Alesini, INFN-LNF, Frascati, Italy (Convener)
P.Fabbricatore (WP5 Coordinator)
Hosting Orsay Walid KAABI
WP 4 CERN Nov 2, 2009.
‘Accelerator and Magnet Infrastructure for Cooperation and Innovation’
Antonella Fresa Technical Coordinator
WP4.1: Industry Survey – Accelerator Technologies
Olivier Napoly CEA/Irfu
ESS – RF checks up to cavity operation readiness in tunnel
ESS RF Development at Uppsala University
recent activities our company Jean Claude Le Scornet - Tomas JUNQUERA
CEPC RF Power Sources System
4th BrightnESS Best Practice Workshop VAT exposure related to ESS Installations in Sweden Carlo J. Bocchetta.
AMICI Work Package 3 „Cooperation“
P.Fabbricatore (WP5 Coordinator)
AMICI WP1 – Management, coordination and dissemination
Christa Hooijer – director institute organisation NWO-I
First Annual Meeting 21 February 2018 Uppsala University, Sweden
ASTRONET Coordinating strategic planning for European Astronomy
AMICI WP1 – Management, coordination and dissemination
Work Package 3 „Cooperation“
Elettra – Sincrotrone Trieste S.C.p.A.
RF introduction Anders Sunesson RF group leader
AMICI WP5 INDUSTRIALIZATION
On the significant role played by the
Experience of the implementation of FP6; preparations towards FP7
Presentation transcript:

Olivier Napoly, coordinator CEA/Irfu Overview of the AMICI Strategy for Consolidating the Exploitation of the European Technology Infrastructure Olivier Napoly, coordinator CEA/Irfu

From Science to Innovation: Technology The scientific quest for fundamental discoveries is a progress force for our societies. Through Technology, it carries an indirect societal influence via Innovation. “Large-scale science projects address fundamental questions at the forefront of science and technology. These projects require large and sustained infrastructures and a good collaboration on long time scales. In turn, such projects provide unique equipment, challenging request for high technology and innovation, stimulating ideas that attract good people, and offer the occasion to bring people closer together.” Rolf Heuer, The Role of Big Laboratories, Phys. Scr. T158 (2013) 21/02/2018, Uppsala 1st Annual Meeting

European Technology Infrastructure The Technology Infrastructure is the basement of any future large- scale accelerator and SC magnet projects, spanning activities from Design to Construction and Operation R&D Prototyping Assembly Verification Installation Support It spans the whole TRL spectrum, from R&D to fabrication, with an emphasis on the Preparation and Construction phases, corresponding to Prototyping (3-5) and Industrial Production (>5) of components. 21/02/2018, Uppsala 1st Annual Meeting

ESS LINAC Work Matrix France Italy Poland Spain Sweden UK CERN DESY Germany France Italy Poland Spain Sweden UK CERN DESY CEA CNRS Elettra INFN IFJ-PAN ESS-Bilbao ESS Uppsala STFC R&D Phase Linac Components RF systems LLRF Cryomodules SRF cavities Powers Couplers Frequency Tuners Cold vacuum Module Assembly Test Infrastructures RF cavities/ couplers RF cryomodules

H2020 Consortium: a Community 21/02/2018, Uppsala 1st Annual Meeting

ESS LINAC Work Matrix Germany France Italy Poland Spain Sweden UK DESY CEA CNRS Elettra INFN IFJ-PAN ESS-Bilbao ESS Uppsala STFC Linac Components RF systems LLRF Cryomodules SRF cavities Powers Couplers Frequency Tuners Cold vacuum Module Assembly Test Infrastructures RF cavities / couplers RF cryomodules

AMICI: Political Perspective Year 2: ‘Projection Phase’ goals Laying down an organization for the Technology Infrastructure Elaborating the Accelerator and SC Magnet Technological Roadmap Identifying the existing barriers and recommend actions to simplify and support the access of Industry to the Technology Infrastructure Articulating the needs for Co-Innovation technical platforms Last Semester: ‘Proposition / Persuasion Phase’ Gaining the support of the EC and Agencies to our findings and proposals Beyond 2019: ‘TI-AMO’ (or ‘AMICI-2’) Transversality of Accelerator and SC Magnet Technology through communities and applications is a key beneficial factor for success and progress. Option 1: The European TI is included in the ESFRI List Access to EC support programme for ‘preparation phase’ Access to EC support programme for ‘implementation phase’ Option 2: bid to the ‘Pilot Co-Innovation’ programme in 2020 ‘La porte étroite’ is quite crowded !

Questions to the Advisory Group WP2) Strategy: expectations on the content of the Accelerator and SC Magnet ‘Technological Roadmap’ WP3) Cooperation: expectations about the mode of association of Industry or Companies to a future Accelerator and SC Magnet ‘Technology Infrastructure’ WP4) Innovation: expectations about the ongoing market survey processes WP5) Industrialization: a. validity and scope of the Academia-Industry ‘subsidiarity’ principle (e.g. prototyping in Industry rather that at Institutes). b. Opportunities and incentives for co-innovation at the Technology Infrastructure platforms 21/02/2018, Uppsala 1st Annual Meeting

Budget breadown versus Component Breakdown WP2: Strategy Budget breadown versus Component Breakdown CEPC in China Total Cost ~ 5 B-Currency PIP-II in USA Total Cost ~ 720 M$ Major Systems Requirements:    Superconducting Cavities Types:   5    Superconducting Cavity Frequencies:  162.5, 325, 650 MHz    Superconducting Cavities:  116    Superconducting Cryomodules:  25    RF Amplifiers (CW):        162.5 MHz (3 kW): 8        325 MHz  (7-20 kW):  51        650 MHz (40-70 kW): 57    Superconducting Solenoids: 37    Normal Conducting Quadrupoles: 83    Normal Conducting Dipoles: 32    Correction Dipoles: 83    Magnet Power Supplies:         < 15 A:  150         < 500 A: 2 Which is the most useful presentation ? 21/02/2018, Uppsala 1st Annual Meeting

Co-Innovation @ Technology Infrastructure Technological facility @ CNRS Technological facility @ IFJ PAN Technological facility @ KIT Technological facility @ PSI Technological facility @ Industry n°1 Technological facility @ Industry n°2 Technical platform n°1 Technical platform n°2 WP3: Cooperation Co-Innovation @ Technology Infrastructure Scheme n°1: Industry in TI Scheme n°2: TI as a node The form of Industry-Academia partnership is under evaluation. Co-Innovation is favored by the adequacy of the TI platforms to high-TRL advanced components. 21/02/2018, Uppsala 1st Annual Meeting

2020: post-AMICI Horizon AMICI is only a first step towards a European Technology Infrastructure Organization AMICI partners are working on defining its statuses and functioning and networking rules. This European Technology Infrastructure Organization will not be restricted to the current AMICI partners. The case for European TI Organization will require the understanding and the support from the EC and from Industry 21/02/2018, Uppsala 1st Annual Meeting