Jean-Pierre Changeux, Arthur Christopoulos  Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Voltage-Gated Ion Channel: Activation States Li + Ca 2+,Cl -,K +, Na + -Channels In the closed resting state, the cell membrane is polarized, the extracellular.
Advertisements

Receptors and transduction mechanisms - I The Neuron by Levitan & Kaczmarek – Chapter 11.
Corrie J.B. daCosta, John E. Baenziger  Structure 
Transmembrane and GPCR Mohammed Mohammed Khan PhD Scholar- Department of Biochemistry King Abdul-Aziz University.
Bridging the gap: bitopic ligands of G-protein-coupled receptors
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Ligand-Specific Interactions Modulate Kinetic, Energetic, and Mechanical Properties of the Human β2 Adrenergic Receptor  Michael Zocher, Juan J. Fung,
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Antonio del Sol, Chung-Jung Tsai, Buyong Ma, Ruth Nussinov  Structure 
The Expanding Social Network of Ionotropic Glutamate Receptors: TARPs and Other Transmembrane Auxiliary Subunits  Alexander C. Jackson, Roger A. Nicoll 
TARPs and the AMPA Receptor Trafficking Paradox
Structural Insights into RNA-Dependent Ring Closure and ATPase Activation by the Rho Termination Factor  Emmanuel Skordalakes, James M. Berger  Cell 
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Supriyo Bhattacharya, Nagarajan Vaidehi  Biophysical Journal 
Frank J. Smith, Victor P.T. Pau, Gino Cingolani, Brad S. Rothberg 
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2018)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (October 2006)
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Allostery in Disease and in Drug Discovery
Mechanism of the αβ Conformational Change in F1-ATPase after ATP Hydrolysis: Free- Energy Simulations  Yuko Ito, Mitsunori Ikeguchi  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Crystal Structures of a Ligand-free MthK Gating Ring: Insights into the Ligand Gating Mechanism of K+ Channels  Sheng Ye, Yang Li, Liping Chen, Youxing.
Ákos Nemecz, Marie S. Prevost, Anaïs Menny, Pierre-Jean Corringer 
Structural Basis for the Inhibition of Caspase-3 by XIAP
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Constraining Ligand-Binding Site Stoichiometry Suggests that a Cyclic Nucleotide– Gated Channel Is Composed of Two Functional Dimers  David T. Liu, Gareth.
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Fluorescence Mapping of Mitochondrial TIM23 Complex Reveals a Water-Facing, Substrate-Interacting Helix Surface  Nathan N. Alder, Robert E. Jensen, Arthur.
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
A Gating Mechanism of the Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor
Homology Model of the GABAA Receptor Examined Using Brownian Dynamics
AMPA Receptor Activation
Plasticity of Burst Firing Induced by Synergistic Activation of Metabotropic Glutamate and Acetylcholine Receptors  Shannon J. Moore, Donald C. Cooper,
Voltage-gated ion channels
Modeling Ca2+ Feedback on a Single Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptor and Its Modulation by Ca2+ Buffers  Jianwei Shuai, John E. Pearson, Ian Parker 
Volume 76, Issue 3, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 9-22 (April 2011)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2018)
AMPA Receptor Activation
Velocity-Dependent Mechanical Unfolding of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Governed by a Dynamic Interaction Network  Christian Kappel, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical.
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Signaling from the Living Plasma Membrane
Reduced Curvature of Ligand-Binding Domain Free-Energy Surface Underlies Partial Agonism at NMDA Receptors  Jian Dai, Huan-Xiang Zhou  Structure  Volume.
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Ákos Nemecz, Marie S. Prevost, Anaïs Menny, Pierre-Jean Corringer 
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
Distinct Functional and Pharmacological Properties of Triheteromeric GluN1/GluN2A/GluN2B NMDA Receptors  Kasper B. Hansen, Kevin K. Ogden, Hongjie Yuan,
Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages (October 2006)
Crystal Structures of Human GlyRα3 Bound to Ivermectin
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Ingo H. Greger, Jake F. Watson, Stuart G. Cull-Candy  Neuron 
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2005)
Glutamatergic Signaling in the Central Nervous System: Ionotropic and Metabotropic Receptors in Concert  Andreas Reiner, Joshua Levitz  Neuron  Volume.
Calibrated Measurement of Gating-Charge Arginine Displacement in the KvAP Voltage- Dependent K+ Channel  Vanessa Ruta, Jiayun Chen, Roderick MacKinnon 
Structural Basis of Inward Rectification
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages e5 (February 2017)
Matthew T. Eddy, Tatiana Didenko, Raymond C. Stevens, Kurt Wüthrich 
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Allosteric Modulation as a Unifying Mechanism for Receptor Function and Regulation  Jean-Pierre Changeux, Arthur Christopoulos  Cell  Volume 166, Issue 5, Pages 1084-1102 (August 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.015 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 All Receptor Superfamilies Possess Spatially Distinct, but Conformationally Linked, Binding Sites (A) Left: original models proposed for the feedback inhibition of L-Threonine deaminase by L-Isoleucine, including one of direct “steric” inhibition (model 1) or indirect “allosteric” inhibition (model 2) from Changeux (1961). Right: schematic summarizing the key conformationally linked sites common to all receptor superfamilies, namely the “orthosteric site,” which recognizes the endogenous agonist or physical activator, the “biologically active site,” which propagates the initial stimulus imparted by the orthosteric ligand and one (or more) topographically distinct “allosteric sites” that modulate the interactive properties of the orthosteric and/or active sites via discrete conformational changes. (B) Schematic representations of the original Monod-Wyman-Changeux concerted model of allostery in terms of a minimum of two discrete, pre-existing states in equilibrium, “relaxed” (R) and “tense” (T), that can be differentially selected by various ligands. The three classes of molecules in the original conceptual model (top) were “activator” (A), “substrate” (S), and “inhibitor” (I) (from Changeux, 1964). The cubic model underneath re-casts the MWC model in terms of thermodynamic equilibrium linkages comprising unconditional isomerization (L) or dissociation constants (KA, KS), and cooperativity factors (α, β, γ, δ), which yield conditional dissociation constants and are direct thermodynamic measures of the allosteric linkage governing the different transitions (Christopoulos and Kenakin, 2002; Edelstein and Changeux, 2010). The graph on the bottom represents the MWC conformational selection model in terms of energy landscapes, both for a monomeric protein or a dimeric protein. Subscript numbers correspond to the number of ligand molecules bound. Arrows in gray indicate a hypothetical pathway for a Koshland-Nemethy-Filmer (KNF) induced fit model, including an intermediate (I) state for the dimer. Adapted with permission from Changeux and Edelstein (2011). Cell 2016 166, 1084-1102DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.015) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Schematic Representation of the Major Receptor Superfamilies Panels on the left show the proposed quaternary arrangement of the different receptors, whereas the panels on the right highlight the key secondary features of the regions delineated by the dashed squares. (A) LGICs, which are composed of multiple subunits containing hydrophilic N-terminal regions and multiple hydrophobic M1–M4 TMD; the pore-forming M2 region is highlighted in red, and approximate location of the ECD and ICD is also indicated. (B) VGICs, which are comprised of a large, principal, α subunit and accessory β subunits. The α subunit is comprised of four domains, each consisting of six linked transmembrane segments (1–6), with the first four forming the voltage sensor, whereas segments 5 and 6 and the associated “P loop” contribute to the pore. (C) GPCRs, whose minimal functional unit is comprised of an extracellular N-terminal region, seven transmembrane-spanning domains (1–7) linked by three extracellular (e1–e3) and three intracellular (i1–i3) loops, and an intracellular C-terminal domain. Also shown in red is a heterotrimeric G protein. (D) RTKs have a highly modular structure comprised of subunits containing a large ECD, a TMD linked to a JMD, and the catalytically active intracellular TKD (red). (E) NHRs also exhibit a modular structure containing an N-terminal activator function 1 (AF1) ligand independent-transactivation domain, a DBD, a variable hinge region and a C-terminal domain that contains both the LBD and the ligand-dependent transactivation domain (AF2), which co-binds co-regulators. In all instances (A–E), representative orthosteric binding domains are denoted in yellow. Cell 2016 166, 1084-1102DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.015) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Structural and Dynamic Insights into the Allosteric Transition of LGICs and GPCRs (A) Superimposed crystal structures of the pentameric bacterial GLIC in closed (red, pH7, PDB 4NPQ) and open (green, pH4, PDB 4NPP) states. Left: side view, from the plane of the membrane, of the complete superimposed crystal structures. Right: upper view of the TMDs as they transition between states; reproduced with permission from Sauguet et al. (2014). (B) The proposed “bloom” and “twist” model for successive steps of the allosteric transition mediating gating of pLGICs, viewed from the top of the receptor; reproduced with permission from Cecchini and Changeux (2015). (C) Superimposed crystal structures of the active (green; PDB: 4MQS) and inactive (red, PDB: 3UON) M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR), highlighting the key movement underlying the allosteric transition, namely a rigid body movement of TM6 that closes the extracellular vestibule, contracts the orthosteric pocket, and opens the intracellular domains for interaction with G protein. (D) Fluorescence intensity histograms of a collection of β2 adrenergic receptor (β2 AR) molecules determined at the single-molecule level in the absence (top) or presence of a high efficacy agonist (middle) or antagonist (bottom). The dotted lines and percentages show Gaussian fits indicating transitions between two states (active, green; inactive, red), whereas the composite fit is shown by the bold red line. Adapted with permission from Lamichhane et al. (2015). Cell 2016 166, 1084-1102DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.015) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Representative Crystal Structures of Allosteric Modulatory Sites and Their Ligands Shown are the homopentameric Caenorhabditis elegans glutamate-gated chloride channel (GluCl) (PDB: 3RHW), where the allosteric modulator, ivermectin, sits within the transmembrane regions of the channel; the human M2 mAChR (PDB: 4MQT), where the allosteric modulator, LY2119620, sits within the extracellular vestibular entrance to the receptor, above the orthosteric agonist, iperoxo; the rat NMDA R (PDB: 4PE5), where the allosteric modulator, ifenprodil, is located at interfaces between amino terminal domain subunits, whereas the orthosteric co-agonists, L-glutamate and glycine, sit within the ligand binding domain. Cell 2016 166, 1084-1102DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.015) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 A Multiplicity of Allosteric Modulatory Sites across All Receptor Superfamilies Shown schematically are different regions that have been proposed to interact with allosteric modulator ligands for LGICs, VGICs, GPCRs, RTKs, and NHRs, including representative examples for each of the sites (where validated; otherwise, they are referred to as “putative” allosteric sites). Note, for ion channels, black circles denote sites of interaction for molecules that directly interact with the endogenous agonist site(s) or sterically hinder the channel. For GPCRs, the nature/location of the orthosteric site vary with the class of GPCR (A, B, C, or F). ATD, amino terminal domain; RE, response element. All other abbreviations as defined in the legend for Figure 2. Cell 2016 166, 1084-1102DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.015) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions