A Somitic Compartment of Tendon Progenitors

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Paraxial and Intermediate mesoderm
Advertisements

Juan José Sanz-Ezquerro, Cheryll Tickle  Current Biology 
Paraxial mesoderm and somitogenesis
Single-cell internalization during zebrafish gastrulation
Clarissa A. Henry, Sharon L. Amacher  Developmental Cell 
Federica Bertocchini, Claudio D. Stern  Developmental Cell 
Dynamic Expression of Erbb Pathway Members during Early Mammary Gland Morphogenesis  Olivia Wansbury, Heena Panchal, Michelle James, Suzanne Parry, Alan.
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (June 2013)
VEGF Gene Delivery to Muscle
Katherine Joubin, Claudio D Stern  Cell 
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages (August 1998)
Iain Patten, Marysia Placzek  Current Biology 
Gabrielle Kardon, Brian D Harfe, Clifford J Tabin  Developmental Cell 
Distinct Origins of Adult and Embryonic Blood in Xenopus
Smoothened Mutants Reveal Redundant Roles for Shh and Ihh Signaling Including Regulation of L/R Asymmetry by the Mouse Node  Xiaoyan M. Zhang, Miguel.
The Neural Plate Specifies Somite Size in the Xenopus laevis Gastrula
IFT88 Plays a Cilia- and PCP-Independent Role in Controlling Oriented Cell Divisions during Vertebrate Embryonic Development  Antonia Borovina, Brian.
Volume 89, Issue 1, Pages 5-8 (April 1997)
Jan Schlueter, Takashi Mikawa  Cell Reports 
A Hedgehog-Insensitive Form of Patched Provides Evidence for Direct Long-Range Morphogen Activity of Sonic Hedgehog in the Neural Tube  James Briscoe,
Reprogramming Hox Expression in the Vertebrate Hindbrain: Influence of Paraxial Mesoderm and Rhombomere Transposition  Nobue Itasaki, James Sharpe, Alastair.
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages (August 1998)
Matthew P. Harris, Sean M. Hasso, Mark W.J. Ferguson, John F. Fallon 
Robert G. Kelly, Nigel A. Brown, Margaret E. Buckingham 
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Somite Development: Constructing the Vertebrate Body
Sara C. Ahlgren, Marianne Bronner-Fraser  Current Biology 
Canonical Wnt Signaling Dynamically Controls Multiple Stem Cell Fate Decisions during Vertebrate Body Formation  Benjamin L. Martin, David Kimelman  Developmental.
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages (August 1998)
A Crucial Interaction between Embryonic Red Blood Cell Progenitors and Paraxial Mesoderm Revealed in spadetail Embryos  Laurel A. Rohde, Andrew C. Oates,
Helge Amthor, Bodo Christ, Miguel Weil, Ketan Patel  Current Biology 
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (October 2006)
Neuropeptides: Developmental Signals in Placode Progenitor Formation
BMP4 Plays a Key Role in Left–Right Patterning in Chick Embryos by Maintaining Sonic Hedgehog Asymmetry  Anne-Hélène Monsoro-Burq, Nicole M. Le Douarin 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 1-7 (January 2013)
Tbx5 and Tbx4 Are Not Sufficient to Determine Limb-Specific Morphologies but Have Common Roles in Initiating Limb Outgrowth  Carolina Minguillon, Jo Del.
Sonic hedgehog and vascular endothelial growth factor Act Upstream of the Notch Pathway during Arterial Endothelial Differentiation  Nathan D. Lawson,
The BMP Signaling Gradient Patterns Dorsoventral Tissues in a Temporally Progressive Manner along the Anteroposterior Axis  Jennifer A. Tucker, Keith.
C.-M.Amy Chen, Norbert Kraut, Mark Groudine, Harold Weintraub  Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 106, Issue 2, Pages (July 2001)
Zebrafish pea3 and erm are general targets of FGF8 signaling
Bmp2 Signaling Regulates the Hepatic versus Pancreatic Fate Decision
Specification of Motor Neuron Identity by the MNR2 Homeodomain Protein
Local Extrinsic Signals Determine Muscle and Endothelial Cell Fate and Patterning in the Vertebrate Limb  Gabrielle Kardon, Jacquie Kloetzli Campbell,
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages (August 1998)
Won-Suk Chung, Didier Y.R. Stainier  Developmental Cell 
Distinct mechanisms regulate slow-muscle development
The Chick Transcriptional Repressor Nkx3
Volume 89, Issue 1, Pages (April 1997)
Åsa Apelqvist, Ulf Ahlgren, Helena Edlund  Current Biology 
FGF Signaling Controls Somite Boundary Position and Regulates Segmentation Clock Control of Spatiotemporal Hox Gene Activation  Julien Dubrulle, Michael.
Volume 90, Issue 2, Pages (July 1997)
Autonomous Modes of Behavior in Primordial Germ Cell Migration
Cell Movement Patterns during Gastrulation in the Chick Are Controlled by Positive and Negative Chemotaxis Mediated by FGF4 and FGF8  Xuesong Yang, Dirk.
Pharyngeal arch patterning in the absence of neural crest
Single-cell internalization during zebrafish gastrulation
Antagonistic Signaling by Caronte, a Novel Cerberus-Related Gene, Establishes Left– Right Asymmetric Gene Expression  Yuji Yokouchi, Kyle J Vogan, Richard.
The bHLH Transcription Factor Olig2 Promotes Oligodendrocyte Differentiation in Collaboration with Nkx2.2  Qiao Zhou, Gloria Choi, David J. Anderson 
Nigel P Pringle, Sarah Guthrie, Andrew Lumsden, William D Richardson 
Volume 89, Issue 1, Pages (April 1997)
The Anterior-Posterior Axis Emerges Respecting the Morphology of the Mouse Embryo that Changes and Aligns with the Uterus before Gastrulation  Daniel.
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (August 1996)
Wnt-14 Plays a Pivotal Role in Inducing Synovial Joint Formation in the Developing Appendicular Skeleton  Christine Hartmann, Clifford J Tabin  Cell 
Morphogenetic Movements Underlying Eye Field Formation Require Interactions between the FGF and ephrinB1 Signaling Pathways  Kathryn B. Moore, Kathleen.
Reprogramming Hox Expression in the Vertebrate Hindbrain: Influence of Paraxial Mesoderm and Rhombomere Transposition  Nobue Itasaki, James Sharpe, Alastair.
The bHLH Transcription Factor Olig2 Promotes Oligodendrocyte Differentiation in Collaboration with Nkx2.2  Qiao Zhou, Gloria Choi, David J. Anderson 
Volume 84, Issue 3, Pages (February 1996)
Presentation transcript:

A Somitic Compartment of Tendon Progenitors Ava E Brent, Ronen Schweitzer, Clifford J Tabin  Cell  Volume 113, Issue 2, Pages 235-248 (April 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00268-X

Figure 1 Expression of Scx in Mature Axial and Ventrolateral Body Wall Tendons (A) Whole-mount in situ detection of Scx in 10 day chick embryo, dorsal view. Frontal (B and C) and transverse (D–G) sections through day 10 chick embryo. Tendons detected with a Scx probe (purple), muscle with myosin heavy chain antibody (brown), and cartilage with a collagen II antibody (pink). Tendons connecting epaxial muscles and vertebrae (B and F), intercostal muscles and ribs (C and D), and rhomboid muscles and scapula (D) are shown. (E) Higher magnification of (D), showing tendonous connection of intercostal muscles to ribs. (G) Tendons connecting pectoral muscles to sternum. R, rib; S, scapula, St, sternum; V, vertebra. Cell 2003 113, 235-248DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00268-X)

Figure 2 The Tendons Associated with the Axial Skeleton Are Derived from the Somites Transverse sections through day 9 chick-quail chimeras in which chick psm corresponding to brachial or thoracic somites was replaced by stage-matched quail psm. (A, D, and G) Scx in situ hybridization. (B, E, and H) Detection of quail cells with QCPN antibody. (C, F, and I) Merged images, overlap in yellow. Tendons associated with epaxial muscle and vertebrae (A–C), intercostal muscle and vertebral ribs (D–F), and pectoral muscle and sternum (G–I). EM, epaxial muscle; IM, intercostal muscle; NT, neural tube; PM, pectoral muscle; R, rib; St, sternum; V, vertebra. Cell 2003 113, 235-248DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00268-X)

Figure 3 Scx Marks a Population of Tendon Progenitors in the Developing Somites Scx expression by whole-mount (A, B, E, F, I, J, and K) and section (C, D, G, H, and L) in situ hybridization. (A) Scx first detected faintly at somite stage XVI of a stage 18 (30 somite) embryo. (B) At higher magnification. Arrows denote anterior and posterior somitic borders. (C and D) Transverse sections at levels indicated in (A). (E) Stage 22 embryo. (F) Stage 24 embryo. (G) Transverse section through thoracic somite of a stage 22 embryo, at level indicated in (E). (H) Transverse section through thoracic somite of a stage 24 embryo, at level indicated in (F). (I, J, and K) Stage 26 embryo. (L) Transverse section through thoracic somite of a stage 26 embryo, at level indicated in (I). Cell 2003 113, 235-248DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00268-X)

Figure 4 Tendon Progenitors Are Closely Associated with Both Myotome and Sclerotome during Somite Development and Are Derived from the Sclerotome (A–D) Double whole-mount in situ hybridization for comparison of Scx (purple) with MyoD (brown). Thoracic (A) and cervical (B) somites of a stage 20 embryo. (C) Stage 23 embryo. (D) Stage 25 embryo. (E) Simultaneous detection of Scx (red) and laminin (green) on a transverse section through a stage 20 embryo. (F) Simultaneous detection of Scx (purple) and Pax1 (pink) on a transverse section through thoracic somite of a stage 20 embryo. (G) Frontal section through thoracic somites of a stage 20 embryo, with myosin heavy chain (brown) expression marking the myotome and Pax1 (pink) expression the sclerotome. Whole-mount in situ hybridization for Scx expression in E10.5 (H) and E11.0 (I) mouse embryos. (J) Triple section in situ hybridization for MyoD (brown), Pax1 (pink), and Scx (purple) on a frontal section through the somites of an E10.5 embryo. Chick-quail chimeras showing transplantation of two consecutive sclerotomes (K–N) or dermomyotomes (O–R). Frontal sections were processed for section in situ hybridization for Scx. Probes were detected with fast red, which yields both visible (pink) (K and O) and fluorescent (red) (L and P) signals. Quail cells were detected by QCPN (green) (M and Q). (N and R) depict merged images from (L and M) and (P and Q), respectively. Overlap appears yellow. Pink arrow (N) indicates overlap of Scx and QCPN from two adjacent grafted sclerotomes, while blue arrow marks tendon progenitors derived from grafted quail and adjacent host chick sclerotome. Dm, dermotome; My, myotome; Sc, sclerotome. Cell 2003 113, 235-248DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00268-X)

Figure 5 Expression of FGF8 and FREK Suggests the Presence of an Anterior-Posterior Directed Signaling Pathway in the Myotome (A) Whole-mount in situ hybridization for Scx following removal of dermomyotome. (B) Detection of MyoD (brown) in same embryo shown in (A). (C) Double whole-mount in situ hybridization in a stage 20 embryo for comparison of Scx (purple) and FGF8 (brown) expression. (D) Whole-mount in situ hybridization for FREK. Adjacent transverse sections hybridized with probes for Scx (E), FGF8 (F), and FREK (G). Arrows (E–G) indicate DML and VLL of dermomyotome. (H) Frontal section through a stage 20 embryo showing expression of Scx (purple), FGF8 (brown), and FREK (pink). Cell 2003 113, 235-248DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00268-X)

Figure 6 Myotomal FGF Signaling Is Both Necessary and Sufficient to Induce Somitic Scx Expression (A–C) Whole-mount in situ hybridization for Scx following implantation of control (A) or FGF8-soaked beads after 4 (B) or 12 (A and C) hours of incubation. (D) Transverse section through embryo in (C): arrow indicates ventromedial-most sclerotome cells, asterisk indicates bead. (E) Whole-mount in situ hybridization for Scx following overexpression, in psm, of RCAS-FGF8. Section in situ hybridization for Scx (F) and FREK (G) on adjacent frontal sections following RCAS-FGF8 infection. Inset (G) shows viral detection using 3C2 antibody (red arrow indicates myotome infection). (H) Schematic depicting normal and truncated FREK. (I) Whole-mount in situ hybridization for Scx following overexpression, in psm, of RCAS-dnFREK. Ig-2 and Ig-3, immunoglobulin-like domains 2 and 3; TM, transmembrane domain; TKI and TKII, tyrosine kinase domains 1 and 2. Cell 2003 113, 235-248DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00268-X)

Figure 7 Overexpression of Shh and Pax1 Blocks Induction of Scx in the Sclerotome Whole-mount in situ hybridization for (A) Scx, (B) FGF8, (C) FREK, and (D) Pax1 following RCAS-Shh infection. (E) Whole-mount in situ hybridization for Scx following RCAS-Pax1 infection in psm. (F) Whole-mount in situ hybridization for Pax1 following RCAS-FGF8 infection. Section in situ hybridization for Scx (G) and Pax1 (H) on adjacent transverse sections following implantation of FGF8-soaked bead (asterisk in G and H) for 12 hr. Section in situ hybridization for Scx (I) and Pax1 (J) on adjacent frontal sections through an embryo, following RCAS-dnFREK infection in the psm (compare boxed regions, I and J). Inset (J) shows viral infection detected with 3C2. (K) Schematic depicting full-length Pax1, Pax1-VP16, and Pax1-EnR fusion constructs. Whole-mount in situ hybridization for Scx following viral misexpression with RCAS-Pax1-VP16 (L) or RCAS-Pax1-EnR (M). (M) Top inset shows viral infection detected with 3C2 in same embryo. Bottom inset shows whole-mount alcian blue staining of a day 10 embryo infected with RCAS-Pax1-EnR. Arrow indicates thinned neural arches and missing ribs. PD, paired domain; OP, octapeptide domain; VP16, VP16 activation domain; EnR, engrailed repressor domain. Cell 2003 113, 235-248DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00268-X)

Figure 8 Model for Syndetome Formation (A) Series of transverse sections depicting somite development from epithelial (left) to fully compartmentalized somite (right). In response to signals from surrounding tissues, the newly formed epithelial somite (red, left) is divided into an epithelial dorsal dermomyotome (red) and a mesenchymal ventral sclerotome (blue). Slightly later, the dermomyotome is subdivided into the myotome (yellow) and overlying dermotome (red), which remains dorsal. Finally, in response to myotomal signals, the sclerotome is subdivided into the ventral sclerotome (blue, right), and dorsal syndetome (purple). Neural tube and notochord indicated in black. (B) Overview of signals involved in induction of Scx expression in the syndetome. During early somite development (left), Shh, secreted from the notochord and floorplate (green), induces both Pax1 in the ventral somite and the FGF/FREK signaling pathway of the myotome. During subsequent somite development (right), myotomal FGFs (orange) signal to FREK-expressing cells (yellow), which in turn activate Scx (via factor X) within the abutting sclerotome, giving rise to the syndetome (purple). Sclerotomal Pax1 indirectly represses Scx (via factor Z), but this effect is counteracted by FGF8/FREK signaling (via factor Y). Arrows indicate anterior-posterior (A, P), dorsal-ventral (D, V), and medial-lateral (M, L) axes. Neural tube indicated in gray. (C) Schematic illustrating interactions between muscle (myotome) and cartilage (sclerotome) progenitors that function to place tendon progenitors (syndetome) at the junction of the other two. Six somites, three on either side of the neural tube (NT), and their derivatives, are depicted in frontal view. An inductive interaction between muscle (yellow) and cartilage (blue) progenitors (arrows, left) leads to establishment of a tendon progenitor population between them (purple, middle); thus, the tendon primordia are, from inception, in the same relative spatial setting later required for their mature role as connectors of muscle to cartilage, as shown here in the attachment of epaxial muscle to vertebrae (right). Cell 2003 113, 235-248DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00268-X)