TOF Fiducial Cut on 325 +/- 25 MeV/c (++ Field)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Search for the Flavor-Changing Neutral-Current Decay,   → p     HyangKyu Park University of Michigan, Ann Arbor for the HyperCP collaboration.
Advertisements

Some answers to the questions/comments at the Heavy/Light presentation of March 17, Outline : 1) Addition of the id quadrant cut (slides 2-3); 2)
TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. September 22, 2004.
1 KEK Beam Test Analysis Hideyuki Sakamoto 15 th MICE Collaboration Meeting 10 st June,2006.
1 May 27, 2005 Comparison tower A data and Montecarlo OVERVIEW Comparison of MC (EM- v 4r060302p18 ) and tower A data using the “baseline” run (Run )
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Case Monte Carlo Simulations 4/17/2008. Toolbox MCNP5 – the grunt work Polimi – low energy stuff Matlab – post processing.
Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University NA48/2 Semileptonics Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February.
GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell Indiana University Detector Review, October 2004.
Status of TPC experiment ---- Online & Offline M. Niiyama H. Fujimura D.S. Ahn W.C. Chang.
 Production at forward Rapidity in d+Au Collisions at 200 GeV The STAR Forward TPCs Lambda Reconstruction Lambda Spectra & Yields Centrality Dependence.
HADES coll. meeting, Oct. 31, 2007 Charged pion production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV results of data analysis from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 Jehad Mousa.
E. De LuciaNeutral and Charged Kaon Meeting – 7 May 2007 Updates on BR(K +  π + π 0 ) E. De Lucia.
October 14, 2004 Single Spin Asymmetries 1 Single Spin Asymmetries for charged pions. Overview  One physics slide  What is measured, kinematic variables.
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
Optimization of  exclusion cut for the  + and  (1520) analysis Takashi Nakano Based on Draft version of Technical Note 42.
Geant4 for GLAST BFEM -Comparison with Distributions in BFEM Data – T. Mizuno, H. Mizushima, S. Ogata, Y. Fukazawa (Hiroshima/SLAC) M. Roterman, P. Valtersson.
Measurement of photons via conversion pairs with PHENIX at RHIC - Torsten Dahms - Stony Brook University HotQuarks 2006 – May 18, 2006.
1 Nuclear modification and elliptic flow measurements for  mesons at  s NN = 200 GeV d+Au and Au+Au collisions by PHENIX Dipali Pal for the PHENIX collaboration.
Jyly 8, 2009, 3rd open meeting of Belle II collaboration, KEK1 Charles University Prague Zdeněk Doležal for the DEPFET beam test group 3rd Open Meeting.
JPS/DNPY. Akiba Single Electron Spectra from Au+Au collisions at RHIC Y. Akiba (KEK) for PHENIX Collaboration.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
1 Comments on HW1 reports A short self assesment My observations and general comments Your questions About the Oral presentation Specific comments in the.
Estimate of META efficiency in NOV02 Aim: check of META efficiency implemented in digitizers in order to get proper efficiency correction of yields Needed:
1 Light Yield results from the KEK tracker test using G4MICE M. Ellis Tracker Phone Meeting 25 th January 2006.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
QM2004 Version1 Measurements of the  ->     with PHENIX in Au+Au Collisions at 200 GeV at RHIC PPG016 Figures with Final Approval Charles F. Maguire.
Comparison of MC and data Abelardo Moralejo Padova.
Hadron production in C+C at 2 A GeV measured by the HADES spectrometer Nov02 gen3 analysis and results for spline tracks (shown in Dubna) changes - removing.
Jet Production in Au+Au Collisions at STAR Alexander Schmah for the STAR Collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Hard Probes 2015 in Montreal/Canada.
TOF detector in PHENIX experiment PHENIX time-of-flight counter The PHENIX time-of-flight (TOF) counter serves as a particle identification device for.
2 pion photoproduction from G11A E. Golovach MSU Analysis Status for.
Brunel University London Field-off LiH Energy Loss Rhys Gardener CM45 – July 28th.
Susanna Costanza - Pavia Group PANDA C.M., Stockholm – June 14, 2010
T. Ariga AEC-LHEP, University of Bern
Parameterization of EMC response for
Kaon and Phi production in p-C and p-W reactions A
Charles F. Maguire Vanderbilt University
Checks of TOF Fiducial Cuts
fKK analysis in Run3 d+Au collisions: Update
Numeracy Problem of the Fortnight 3
NA61 and NA49 Collaboration Meeting May 14-19, 2012, Budapest
First look at data/MC comparison for period 8 reference runs
Search For Pentaquark Q+ At HERMES
Check of Lambda Simulations in TOF-West
STAT 1301 Chapter 5(a) The Normal Curve
EMCal Recalibration Check
Run4 fK+K- analysis update
Run4 f K+K- analysis: analysis train
EMCal Recalibration Check
PIXEL patch efficiency
EMCal Run4 Recalibration Check Looking at K mass centroid and width
Λ 1520 Invariant Mass Analisys
Run3 f analysis: Proposal for PPG formation
Study of e+e- pp process using initial state radiation with BaBar
Problems with the Run4 Preliminary Phi->KK Analysis
f  K+K- analysis in Run4 Au-Au collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV
Run4 Fiducial Match between Real and MC
fK+K- analysis in Run3: Scopes of the paper
fK+K- yield analysis update
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
Low mass dimuon acceptance
CR Photon Working Group
Comparing Data and MC CITADL Variables on Ks and KK
Feb. 25,2009 Jongseok Lee (Sungkyunkwan University)
In what direction will the force act in this system?
Status of the cross section analysis in e! e
Presentation transcript:

TOF Fiducial Cut on 325 +/- 25 MeV/c (++ Field) Real Data Simulation South Positive North Positive South Positive North Positive South Negative North Negative South Negative North Negative Unnecessary cutting of positive particles below 1620 (both North and South) ? November 22, 2005 TOF Fiducial Cut Check

TOF Fiducial Cut on 325 +/- 25 MeV/c (++ Field) Sim (red line) vs Real (black points) After Cuts Sim (red line) vs Real (black points) Before Cuts South Positive North Positive South Positive North Positive South Negative North Negative South Negative North Negative Positive particle shape is not much improved using fiducial cuts Negative particle shapes were acceptable before cuts, little change after November 22, 2005 TOF Fiducial Cut Check

Explanation and Summary Slide 1 Explanation Left side is for real data and right side is for simulation: 325 +/- 25 MeV/c Real data are for all good quality tracks into TOF, first half of ++ field runs Simulation data used pions, same temperature spectrum as in real data Black line histogram is before cuts, red histogram (mostly on top of black) is for the after cuts using fiducial cut file from Dipali and Debsankar Black filled histogram is for the particles eliminated by the cuts Slide 1 Conclusion Unnecessary cutting of positive particle yield below 162 (see also slide 2) Slide 2 Explanation Same input as slide 1 but simulation and real results are overlaid Normalization is based on the total entries ratio (only shapes are relevant) Left side is before the fiducial cuts, right side is after the fiducial cuts Slide 2 Conclusions Also shows unnecessary cutting for positive particles below 1620 Negative particle shapes are in generally good agreement (only one big hole) Positive particle shapes above 1800 reasonably agreement between MC and Real Positive particle shapes below 1800 not as well reproduced, especially South side November 22, 2005 TOF Fiducial Cut Check

TOF Fiducial Cut on 975 +/- 25 MeV/c (++ Field) Simulation Real Data South Positive North Positive South Positive North Positive South Negative North Negative South Negative North Negative November 22, 2005 TOF Fiducial Cut Check

TOF Fiducial Cut on 975 +/- 25 MeV/c (++ Field) Sim (red line) vs Real (black points) Before Cuts Sim (red line) vs Real (black points) After Cuts South Positive North Positive South Positive North Positive North Negative North Negative South Negative South Negative November 22, 2005 TOF Fiducial Cut Check