No effect of Nitrogen? Something wrong? Not exceeded sites?

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

R E 1 Cross-scale Assessment of Biodiversity ; Opportunities and Limitations of the GLOBIO3 model and the Natural Capital Index (NCI) framework International.

Advertisements

Biodiversity and Climate Change in relation to the Natura 2000 Network Mike Harley and Nikki Hodgson (AEA) Chantal van Ham (IUCN) Jeff Price (UNEP-WCMC)

24 th CCE workshop& 30 th TF M&M, Rome, 7-10 April Call for Data results Jaap Slootweg & Max Posch.

Using iSIKHNAS for Budget Advocacy 2.2 Using iSIKHNAS data to estimate and compare performance indicators.

Europe Overseas Roundtable on Biodiversity and Climate Change 25th of September 2014, Brussels eea.europa.eu EEA activities on the EU Overseas Frank Wugt.

Biodiversity Adaption in Plymouth Kathryn Deeney Plymouth City Council.

User Interface. Cross Compliance Assessment Tool Quantitative impacts of all SMRs and GAECs will be computed using existing models; from the results,

Sakai Fall 2008 Sakai Student Survey Based on 100 responses.

Timed. Transects Statistics indicate that overall species Richness varies only as a function of method and that there is no difference between sites.

1 Biodiversity: A priority issue for business ?. 2 Outline  What is biodiversity and what is the problem?  Why is it an issue for businesses?  What.

Air Quality Performance Alan Collings Developing UK indicators for the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity : climate change adaptation.

Butterfly Monitoring: experiences with citizen scientists

Modelling biodiversity indicators using the CCE background database CCE workshop Rome 2014 Gert Jan Reinds, Luc Bonten, Janet Mol, Wieger Wamelink, Max.

Anna Donald Marine Planning and Strategy Marine Scotland

Valuation of damage to ecosystems due to air pollution Preliminary findings ECLAIRE-project Rome, 7-10 April 2014 Rob Maas, TFIAM.

Modelling N driven biodiversity changes in Austrian forest and grassland habitats Thomas Dirnböck & Ika Djukic 1.

Measuring Diversity.

THE BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR EUROPE Reporting – Data and indicators -Assessments BISE-CHM and Data centre Rania Spyropoulou, EEA.

Biodiversity metrics – a way forward Ed Rowe. Let’s GROW Goal Reality Options Way forward.

BEtter management and implementation of NATURa 2000 sites Zsuzsa Fidlòczky Nimfea Environment and Nature Conservation Association (LP) Hungary Brussels,

Measures of Central Tendency And Spread Understand the terms mean, median, mode, range, standard deviation.

Arjen van Hinsberg, Janet Mol Dynamic modelling of impacts in Natura 2000 habitats the Dutch response to the call for data.

Why Use Online Portfolios? (geared for administrators and parents)

Waterbody Classification Project A project of the Lakes and Watershed Commission, Dane County Department of Planning and Development, and the Dane County.

A world where biodiversity counts Matt Walpole UNEP-WCMC Cambridge, UK.

Charles Darwin’s Theory of Natural Selection and its significance as a mechanism of Evolution.

P. JägersbergProgress Report ELPEN. European Livestock Policy Evaluation Network Reporting back... IFCN Dairy Report 2001: 20 countries –Europe: D, F,

7.5 On the Origin of Species Pages Charles Darwin On the origin of Species published in 1859.

Preliminary ECLAIRE findings Budapest, 2 October 2014 Rob Maas, RIVM.

Challenges in conservation Alan Law, Director for Biodiversity Delivery, Natural England.

Table 3. Merits and Demerits of Selected Water Quality Indices Shweta Tyagi et al. Water Quality Assessment in Terms of Water Quality Index. American Journal.

Biodiversity Hotspots Biodiversity hotspots are undergoing habitat destruction or loss in some way or another. Biodiversity hotspots also are areas where.

EMODnet Biology Kick-off Meeting – VLIZ, Oostende September 2013 EMODnet Biology Work Package 2 Mark Costello & Dan Lear

Break-out group discussion

Biodiversity and agriculture

Essential Biodiversity Variables: towards an agreement on a common approach for biodiversity Rob Jongman, Wageningen UR Henrique Pereira, University of.

Streamlining European Biodiversity Indicators 2010 – update May 2007

Butterflies and nitrogen: The Netherlands experience

Natura 2000: key facts and figures

Guidance on Natura 2000 and Forests – Scoping Document

Coherent geographic scales and aggregation rules in assessment and monitoring of Good Environmental Status Theo Prins, Myra van der Meulen, Arjen Boon.

Guidance on Natura 2000 and Forests – Scoping Document

Results of Questionnaire 24 Nov 2011

Two major points discussed

BIODIVERISTY PP

The IUCN Green List Sustainability Standard

WP 1 - Review of the Art.17 reporting format & guidelines

Use of Article 17 report in Flanders

Challenge – Condition accounts

Public access to Natura 2000 geo-database

Training session A common biodiversity index, without excluding country specific indices Presentations by: Ed Row summarized, contextualized and wrapped.

16 april 2009 Draft OSPAR’s MSFD Advice Manual on Biodiversity approaches to determining GES, setting of environmental targets and selecting indicators.

Expert Group on Reporting under the Nature Directives 22/03/2012

Reporting Synergies: MSFD & BHD Miraine Rizzo, Matthew Grima Connell & Luke Tabone Biodiversity & Water Unit Environment & Resources Authority - Malta.

DEVELOPMENT OF A GENETIC INDICATOR OF BIODIVERSITY FOR FARM ANIMALS

Assessment of Conservation Status for Large Carnivores

IBI’s: How It’s Done.

Expert group on management of Natura 2000

Species Diversity.

PROVISIONS UNDER THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE RELEVANT TO NEEI

Advanced Ecology Option C.

Ecosystems Part 2.

Measuring progress under Target 1

Guidance on Non-energy extractive industries & Natura 2000

The State of Nature in the EU

EU biodiversity strategy to Target 1

River Basin Report Card

More on Maxent Env. Variable importance:

Indicators reviewed for the SEBI2010

Presentation transcript:

No effect of Nitrogen? Something wrong? Not exceeded sites? Non-sensitive habitats Metrics?

Species number doesn’t tell the story Rob Maas: easy Site Level Species number doesn’t tell the story Rob Maas: easy UK: species no. didn’t relate to good habitat quality DK: increase in negatively effected heathland CBD: not a selected policy indicator for biodiversity Shannon, Simpson Several: complicated Respond different to biodiversity loss CBD: not a selected policy indicator Other options: Selection of species DK, CH, .. : oligotrophic species UK, NL: positive indicators for habitat quality Regional level: 251 habitat types in Europe Jane: number of effected habitat types DK: number of protected areas Arjen van Hinsberg 08-04-2013

Biodiversity endpoint based on policy targets High quality (favourable status) Low quality Characteristic species ≠ positive species List of target (typical) species or List characteristic species List of species at high Habitat quality - List of competing species Arjen van Hinsberg 08-04-2013

Calculating Endpoint PROPS for 80% species Chance of occurrence Maximum chance Suitability = Overall Suitability for high quality = Averaged over species Suitability/ maximum suitability (maximum in history/future)